簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李惠櫻
Lee, Hui-Ying
論文名稱: 企業策略、企業資源規劃導入、知識管理能力對企業績效關聯性之研究─以資訊電子業為例
The Business Strategy, Enterprise Resource Planning, Knowledge Capability, and Performance -Electronics and Information Industry as Samples
指導教授: 蔡明田
Tsai, Ming-Tien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 120
中文關鍵詞: 企業績效知識管理能力企業資源規劃導入企業策略
外文關鍵詞: Performance, Knowledge Management, Enterprise Resources Planning, Strategy
相關次數: 點閱:74下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   隨著資訊科技的快速進步、全球化、及顧客需求的日益多樣化,產業競爭環境越來越激烈。而企業資源規劃系統(ERP)就是可以讓企業資源作最佳化配置的資訊管理系統,透過此一系統將可使企業的資訊流緊密的整合,以改善企業在作業流程及生產力的績效,進而提升競爭優勢。另以知識管理來創造競爭優勢,成為企業經理人與管理學界在探討組織效能上的重要議題。文獻上出現不同的觀點來探討知識管理的內涵,如從流程、系統、資源等觀點,但仍缺乏一完整的架構來闡述知識管理。而對組織效能的影響,也需要進一步的實證。本研究從能力觀點,從文獻中提出一完整性的知識管理架構,並實證與企業績效的關係。本研究之研究主要目的為:探討台灣資訊電子業企業策略、知識管理能力、企業資源規劃導入與企業績效之關聯性、及企業策略透過ERP導入和知識管理能力之中介效果對企業績效的影響。

      本研究將以Miles & Snow(1978)所提之企業策略理論、Bingi, Sharma & Godla(1999)所提之ERP導入動機、Andrew, Malhotra & Segars(2001)所提之知識管理能力理論及Kaplan & Norton(1992)所提之以平衡計分卡衡量企業績效理論為基礎,透過文獻回顧,確認研究變數與研究架構,並分析相關變數間的關係提出研究假設,以問卷調查方式共發出問卷470 份,(回收有效問卷300份,回收率63.83%),再將回收之有效問卷進行因素分析、變異數分析、線性結構關係模式及迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析驗證。

      經實證研究後,本研究得到的結果如下:
    一、企業策略分別對導入ERP動機、知識管理能力和企業績效皆有顯著正向影響。
    二、導入ERP動機對企業績效有顯著正向影響。
    三、知識管理能力對企業績效有顯著正向影響。
    四、企業策略透過導入ERP動機的中介作用對企業績效有顯著正向影響。
    五、企業策略透過知識管理能力的中介作用對企業績效有顯著正向影響。
    六、不同企業特性在企業策略、知識管理能力、導入ERP動機及企業績效上有顯著差異。

      本研究建議,企業應致力發展企業策略的能力,並且試著將知識管理和企業資源規劃做最佳的配置,這將帶給企業有效且最佳的績效。

      Due to the rapid advancement of information technology, globalizations, and diversification of customers needs, enterprises are facing severe competition ever. Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) is an information management system that can help enterprises allocate their resources best. With this system, the information flow will be integrated to improve the performances of operational process and productivity of enterprises and eventually enhance the competitiveness advantages.

      Recently, Knowledge Management (KM) is the important issue to research competitive advantage and organizational effectiveness for management practices and academic researches. In the literatures, there are different perspectives to discuss about KM such as Process, System and Resource viewpoint, but it still lacks of an integrate model to explain the organizational effectiveness. This study proposes an integrated research model from the literatures based on capability perspective and makes empirical analysis on the relationships between KM and business effectiveness. By using the case study method to investigate the electronics and information industries, this study attempts to analyze the relativity among business strategies, KM capability, ERP, and business performance. Through the KM and ERP intermediary effect, strategy will influence performance.

      Based on the theory of business strategy by Miles & Snow(1978), the theory of ERP by Bingi, Sharma & Godla(1999), the theory of KM capability by Andrew, Malhotra & Segars(2001), and the Balanced Scorecard(BSC)theory of business performance by Kaplan & Norton(1992), this study build up its research framework, obtained variables, and then proposed the hypotheses. Four hundred and seventy questionnaire samples were issued (with three hundred usable copies returned, and a 63.83% returning rate). Statistical methods such as factor analysis, ANOVA, linear structure relation mode analyze, and regression analysis, were conducted.

      The results of this study suggested the following:
    1.Strategy has positive influence of ERP, KM, and enterprises performance.
    2.ERP has positive influence of enterprises performance.
    3.KM has positive influence of enterprises performance.
    4.Through the ERP intermediary effect, strategy has positive influence of enterprises performance.
    5.Through the KM intermediary effect, strategy has positive influence of enterprises performance.
    6.The characteristics of organizations show distinguishing differences among their strategic capability, ERP, KM, and enterprises performance.

      The findings of this study suggests that companies should develop their abilities in strategy, and try to make the best match between ERP and KM which will bring effective performances.

    目 錄 I 表目錄 III 圖目錄 V 第一章 緒論 1  第一節 研究背景 1  第二節 研究動機 4  第三節 研究範圍及對象 6  第四節 研究目的 7  第五節 研究流程及論文結構 8 第二章 文獻探討 10  第一節 策略與策略管理的意涵 10  第二節 企業資源規劃系統 17  第三節 知識與知識管理的意涵 26  第四節 企業績效 34  第五節 各構面間相關研究 38 第三章 研究方法 44  第一節 研究架構 44  第二節 研究假設 45  第三節 操作性定義及問卷設計 46  第四節 抽樣設計與問卷回收 50  第五節 資料分析方法 51  第六節 研究限制 54 第四章 研究結果分析 55  第一節 敘述性統計分析 55  第二節 因素分析與信效度分析 61  第三節 迴歸分析 75  第四節 整體理論架構模式之關係分析 85  第五節 不同企業特性在各構面之差異性分析 93 第五章 結論與建議 100  第一節 研究結論 100  第二節 研究意涵 105  第三節 未來研究方向與建議 107 參考文獻 108 附錄:研究問卷 117 表目錄  表1-1. 研究範圍界定 6  表2-1. 策略之定義 11  表2-2. 策略之類型 14  表2-3. 經營策略型態差異之彙總 40  表2-4. ERP之定義彙總表 18  表2-5. ERP系統演進史 21  表2-6. ERP導入動機之目標層次 24  表2-7. 知識管理基礎建設之要素 32  表3-1. 本研究變數操作性定義 47  表3-2. 問卷發放與回收份數統計 50  表4-1. 樣本基本資料 56  表4-2. 企業策略構面題項之平均值與標準差 57  表4-3. 導入ERP動機構面題項之平均值與標準差 58  表4-4. 知識管理能力構面題項之平均值與標準差 59  表4-5. 企業績效構面題項之平均值與標準差 60  表4-6. KMO與BARTLETT’S TEST 61  表4-7. 企業策略之因素分析及信度檢定表 64  表4-8. 導入ERP動機之因素分析及信度檢定表 66  表4-9. 知識管理能力之因素分析及信度檢定表 67  表4-10. 企業績效之因素分析及信度檢定表 69  表4-11. 企業策略之驗證性因素分析結果 71  表4-12. 導入ERP動機之驗證性因素分析結果 72  表4-13. 知識管理能力之驗證性因素分析結果 72  表4-14. 企業績效之驗證性因素分析結果 73  表4-15. 企業策略對導入ERP動機之複迴歸分析 76  表4-16. 企業策略對企業績效之複迴歸分析 77  表4-17. 企業策略對知識管理能力之複迴歸分析 79  表4-18. 導入ERP動機對企業績效之複迴歸分析 80  表4-19. 知識管理能力對導入ERP動機之複迴歸分析 81  表4-20. 知識管理能力對企業績效之複迴歸分析 82  表4-21. 本研究LISREL模式架構之變數 86  表4-22. LISREL配適指標之判斷準則 86  表4-23. LISREL模式分析結果  88  表4-24. 不同產業類別在各構面之變異數分析 93  表4-25. 不同員工人數在各構面之變異數分析 95  表4-26. 企業ERP導入時間長短在各構面之變異數分析 96  表4-27. 企業成立歷史長短在各構面之變異數分析 97  表4-28. 企業資本額不同在各構面之變異數分析 99  表5-1. 研究假設實證結果彙總 103 圖目錄  圖1-1. 研究流程圖 9  圖2-1. 導入ERP動機構面圖 24  圖2-2. ARTHUR ANDERSON 知識管理架構 27  圖2-3. 知識管理能力與組織效能關係架構 30  圖3-1. 本研究架構 44  圖4-1. 修正後研究架構 74  圖4-2. 原始之因果模式 85  圖4-3. 本研究之LISREL驗證結果 90

    中文文獻
    1. 日本SAP 公司…等(1997),謝明弘譯,「SAP 革命-21 世紀的世界經營標竿」,茂迪國際出版公司,台北,(2000)。
    2. 王立善(1999),「在全球運籌環境下,台灣資訊電子廠商購買ERP 電腦軟體系統之決策研究」,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    3. 王耀國(2004),「知識管理能力與組織效能之研究-以資訊服務業為例」,私立銘傳大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
    4. 司徒達賢(1994)。台灣中小企業發展之經營策略。台北:中小企業發展學術研討會。
    5. 司徒達賢(1995),「策略管理」,台北:遠流出版公司。
    6. 司徒達賢(2001),「策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法」,智勝文化。
    7. 朱文洋(2000),中小型醫院經營策略與營運績效之探討-以平衡計分卡觀點分析,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    8. 朱道凱譯(1999),Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton 著,「平衡計分卡」,臉譜文化。
    9. 吳安妮(1999),「績效評估觀念交友上運用」,會計研究月刊,第164期,頁118-20。
    10. 吳思華(2000),「智慧資本衡量因素之研究─以我國軟體業為例」,台北:國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
    11. 吳思華(2000),「策略九說」,臉譜出版。
    12. 吳毓琳(2001),「知識管理在國民中學學校行政應用之研究」,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    13. 吳萬益、林清河(2001),「企業研究方法」,台北:華泰。
    14. 林吉輝(2002),「從ERP 導入案例中探討影響導入成效之系統、組織、及流程因素」,國立中央大學資訊管理所碩士論文。
    15. 林珮琪(1997),「高科技產業研究發展績效衡量之研究-平衡計分卡觀點」,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    16. 夏珮玲(2001),「企業資源規劃系統對企業經濟立論之影響」,國立中央大學,碩士論文。
    17. 張英慧(1999),「事業策略、績效評估及其成效之探討-以平衡計分卡觀點分析」,私立淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。
    18. 張寶升(2000),「企業經營策略、企業資源規劃與組織績效之實證研究」,雲林科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    19. 梁志偉(2001),「台灣地區企業導入企業資源規劃系統的績效評估-以平衡計分卡為分析方法」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    20. 莊立民(2002),「組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為例」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    21. 陳嵩(1998),「製造部門策略角色定位及其對經營績效影響之研究---資訊硬體產業之實證」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    22. 辜輝趁(2000),「企業電子化知識管理策略研究」,台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
    23. 黃宏義譯(1984),大前研一,「策略家的智慧」,長河出版社。
    24. 葉淑燕(2001),「績效指標認知差異與組織績效之關聯性」,國防大學國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    25. 廖志德(1998),「導入ERP-實踐世界級的管理」,能力雜誌,第514 期,pp.20-25。
    26. 劉京偉譯(2001),勤業管理顧問公司,「知識管理的第一本書—運用知識管理提升企業核心能力」,新商業週刊叢書。
    27. 劉常勇(1999),「對於知識管理的基本認識」,http://www.cme.org.tw/know/paper/paper7.html。
    28. 劉鳳如(1999),「企業導入企業資源規劃(ERP)套裝軟體的策略性目標與重要關鍵」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    29. 鄭安裕(2002),「知識管理能力與知識效能之關係研究」,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    30. 蕭健宇(2000),「企業導入ERP 系統對組織循環的影響-以導入ERP 的本土廠商為例」,私立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    31. 藍立恬(2003),「知識管理能力、創新能力與組織績效關係之研究」,私立輔仁大學織品服裝學系碩士論文。
    32. 譚大純、汪昭芳(2001),「知識管理之策略觀點:文獻回顧、分類與命題」,科技管理學刊,6 卷1 期,頁35-54,。
    33. 譚伯群,林清河,施坤壽,張音(2000),「網際網路應用(價值鏈觀點)與經營策略及資訊化成熟度之關係—台灣製造業實證研究」,管理評論,第19 卷,第1 期,頁151-182。

    英文文獻
    1. Aaker, David A. (1998), “Strategic Market Management, 5th ed. ”, New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    2. Almedia, P. (1996), “Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals. Patentciation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp.137-154.
    3. American Productivity & Quality Center, (1998), What is Knowledge management, http://www.apqc.org/
    4. Andrew H. G., Arvind M. and Albert H. Segars, (2001), “Knowledge Management:An Organizational Capabilities Perspective”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol.18.1, pp.185-214.
    5. Appleyard,M.M.(1996), “How does knowledge flow?Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp.137-154.
    6. Arthur Anderson and The American Productivity and Quality Center, (1996), “The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version”, (Winter).
    7. Badaracco, J. L. and R. R. Ellswort. (1989), “Leadership and the quest for integrity”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    8. Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1998), “On the Evaluation of Structure Equation Models ”, Journal of Academic of Markering Science, 16(1), pp.14-21.
    9. Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1998), “On the Evaluation of Structure Equation Models ”, Journal of Academic of Markering Science, 16(1), pp.74-94.
    10. Beijerse,R.P., ( 2000), “Knowledge Management in Small and Medium-Sized Companies:Knowledge Management for Entrepreneurs Filing Cabinet.”, MCB University Press:Journal of Knowledge Management,4(2).
    11. Bentler, P. M. (1990), “Comparative fit indexes in structural models”, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), pp. 238-246.
    12. Bingi, P., Sharma, K.M., & Godla, K.J. (1999), “Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation,” Information Management System, (Summer), pp.7-14.
    13. Burn, Tom. Stalker, (1980), “Organic Structure and Innovation in Small Work Groups”, Human Relations, pp.369-382.
    14. Butler, J. (1999),“Risk Management Skills Needed in A Packageed Software Environment”, Information Systems Management, pp.15-20.
    15. Bylinsky, G. (1999), “The Challengers Move in on ERP”, Fortune, (Nov), pp.306.
    16. Chandler, A. (1962). “Strategy and Structre”, New York:Doubleday.
    17. Chow, C. W., Haddad, K. M. and Williamson J. E. (1997), “Applying the balance scorecard to small companies, ” Management Accounting, (August), pp.21-27.
    18. Clarke, T., (2001), “The Knowledge Economy”, Education & Training, 43(4/5), pp.189-196.
    19. Conant, J.S., Mokwo, M.P.,& Varadaraian, P.R. (1990), “Strategic Types Distinctive Marketing Competencies and Organizational Performance:a Multiple Measure-base Study ”, Strategic Management Journal,11(5),pp.356-383.
    20. Cook, P., (1999), “I Heard It Through The Grapevine:Making Knowledge Management Work by Learning to Share Knowledge, Skills and Experience”, Industrial and Commercial Training, 31(3), pp.101-105.
    21. Davenport T. H., Klahr P. (1998), “Managing customer support knowledge”, California Management Review, Vol.40.3, pp.195-208.
    22. Davenport T. H., Short J. E. (1998), “The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign ”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31(4), pp.11-27.
    23. Davenport T.H., De Long, D., and Beers. M. (1998), “Successful knowledge management project ”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.39, pp.43-57.
    24. Davenport, T. H., and Laurence Prusak, (1998), “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    25. Davenport, T.H. (1998), “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System”, Harvard Business Review, pp.121-131.
    26. Drucker, P. (1955), “The Practice of Management. ”, New York:Harper & Row.
    27. Eccles, R.G. and N. Nohria, (1992), “Beyond the hype—Rediscovering the essence of management”, Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
    28. Epstein, M. J., and J. F. Manzoni. (1997). “Translating strategy into action”, Management Accounting (August), pp.28-36.
    29. Glueck, W.F. (1976), “Business Policy:Strategy Formulation and Management Action, 2nd ed. ”, New York, McGraw-Hill.
    30. Grant, Robert M., (1996), “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, Winter Special Issue, pp.109-122.
    31. Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y.B. and Malak, N. (2002a), “Core Competence for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Structured Methodology for Identifying Core Competence”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), pp. 28-35.
    32. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995), “Multivariate data analysis, 4th ed ”, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    33. Hammer, M., (2002),“Process Management and The Future of Six Sigma”, Sloan Management Review, (Winter).
    34. Hart, B. H., (1967), “Strategy”, New York. : Praeger.
    35. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, G.R. (2004), “Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, 6th ed. ”, Houghton Mifflin Company.
    36. Holland, Chris, Geoff Lockett; and Ian Blackman, (1992), “Planning for Electronic Data Interchange” Strategic Management Journal, Vol 13, (Oct), pp.539-562.
    37. Holland, Christopher P. and Light, Ben, (1999),“A Critical Success Factors Model For ERP Implementation”, IEEE Software, vol.16, Iss.3, (May-June), pp.30-36.
    38. Holsapple, C. and Joshi, K. (1997), “Knowledge Management: A Three-Fold Framework”, Kentucky Initiative for Knowledge Management Paper, No. 140, (July).
    39. Hronce, S. M. (1997), “Vital Signs: Using Quality, Time, and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company’s Future ”, New York, NY: Arthur Andersen & Co.
    40. Internet.com, (2003), http://webopedia.internet.com/TERM/E/ERP.html.
    41. Johnson, H.T. and R. S. Kaplan, (1987), “Relevance Lost”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    42. Kaiser, H. F. & Rice, J. (1974), “Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychology Measurement ”, pp.111-117.
    43. Kaiser, H. F. (1966). “The Varimax Criterion for Analysis Rotation in Factor Analysis”, Psychometrika, pp.189.
    44. Kaplan, R. S. and D. Norton, (1992), “The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, vol., no.1, pp.71-79.
    45. Kaplan, R. S. and D. Norton, (1996),“Link the balanced scorecard to strategy”, California Management, vol., no., pp.53-79.
    46. Kaplan, Robert S. & Norton, David P. (1996), “The Balanced Scorecard:Translating Strategy into Action”, Harvard Business School Press.
    47. Karimi, Jahangir, Yash P Gupta, and Toni M.Somers, (1996), “The Congruence between a Firm’s Competitive Strategy and Information Technology Leader’s Rank and Role”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 13, No.1, pp.63-88.
    48. Laurie, J., (1997),“Harnessing the power of intellectual capital”, Training & Development.
    49. Lawrence S Gould, (1999),“Reinventing ERP After Y2K”, Automotive Manufacturing & Production, pp.68-70.
    50. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), “Wellsprings of Knowledge”, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
    51. Lingle J. H., and W. Schiemann, (1996), “From balanced scorecard to strategic gauge:Is measurement worth it? ”, Management Review Mar., pp56-61.
    52. Martensson, M. (2000), “A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3): 204-216.
    53. McNichols, T.J. (1977), “Executive Policy and Planning, 1st ed”, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    54. Minahan, Tim, (1998), “Enterprise resource planning: Strategies not included”, Purchaseing, pp112-127.
    55. Mintzberg, H., (1990), “The design school:Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management ”, Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp.171-196.
    56. Nadler, D.A. and Tushman, M.L., (1999), “The Organization of the Future: Strategic Imperatives and Core Competencies for the 21st century”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 27(4), pp. 96-107.
    57. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), “The Knowledge Creating Company ”, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
    58. Nunnally, J. C. (1978), “Psychometric Theory, 2th ed. ”, N. Y: Graw-Hill.
    59. O'Dell, C. (1998), “If Only We Knew What We Know”, New York:The Free Press.
    60. Oliver, R.W., (1999), “ERP is Dead!! Long Live ERP”, Management Review, (Nov), pp.12-13.
    61. Peter Clarke and Fred Tyler, (1997), “Implementing a Balanced Scorecard: An Irish example”, pp.151-153.
    62. Porter, M. E. (1980), “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors ”, New York:The Free Press.
    63. Poter, M. E. (1985), “ Competitive Advantage”, New York:The Free Press.
    64. Prasad, Bingi, Maneesh K.Sharma, and Jayanth K.Godla, (1999) “Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation ”, Information Systems Management, Vol. 19, pp.7-15.
    65. Quintas, P. (1997), “Knowledge Management:A Strategic Agenda”, 30(3). (Summer).
    66. Robbins, S. P. (1990), “Organization Theory, Structure, Design and Applications. 3th ed. ”, New York:Prentice Hall Inc.
    67. SAP, http://www.sap.com
    68. Sarvary M., (1999), “Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry”, California Management Review, Vol41.2, pp. 95-107.
    69. Scheer, August Wilhelm and Habermann, Frank, (2000),“Making ERP A Success”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 4, (April), pp. 57-61
    70. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995), “Market orientation and the learning organization”, Journal of Business Research, 59(July), pp. 63-74.
    71. Smith, K.G., J.P.Guthrie & M.Chen, (1986),“Miles and Snow’s Typology of Strategy, Organizational Size and Organizational Performance”, Academy of Management Proceedings, pp.45-49.
    72. Snow, Charles C. & Hrebiniak, Lawrence G. (1980), “Strategy Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance ”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp.317-336.
    73. Stephen J., Mraz, (2000), “Keeping up with ERP”, MachineDesign, p.56-60.
    74. Tatikonda, L.U. and Tatikonda, R.J. (1996), “Measuring and Reporting the Cost of Quality”, Production & Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 1-7.
    75. Tavakolian, Hamid, (1989), “Linking the Information Technology Structure With Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey”, MIS Quarterly, pp.309-317.
    76. Teece, D.J. (2000), “Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context”, Long Range Planning, 33, pp. 35-54.
    77. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
    78. Ultterback, J. M. and W.J. Abernathy, (1975), “A dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation”, Omega, Vol.3, No.6, pp.639-656.
    79. Walker, O.C.Jr. & Ruekert, R.W. (1987), “Marketing's Role in The Implementation of Business Strategies:A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework”, Journal of Marketing, Vol 51,pp.25.
    80. Wiig, K.M. (1994), “Knowledge management: The central management focus for intelligent-acting organizations”, Vol.2.
    81. Zack, E. (1999), “Managing Codified Knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, 40(4), pp.45-58.
    82. Zack, M.H. (1999) “Knowledge and Strategy”, Boston, MA:Butterworth-Heinemann.
    83. Zack, M.H. (1999), “Developing A Knowledge Strategy”, California Management Review, 41(3), pp.125-145.

    下載圖示 校內:2006-07-27公開
    校外:2006-07-27公開
    QR CODE