| 研究生: |
黃紫瑞 Huang, Zi-Rui |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
破壞式創新中新興企業對於既有企業的模仿與差異化:以純網銀為例 The Imitation and Differentiation of New Entrants in a Disruptive Innovation: A Case Study of Taiwan Internet-Only Banks |
| 指導教授: |
許經明
Shiu, Jing-Ming |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 65 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 破壞式創新 、最適獨特性 、正當性 、層級分析法 、純網銀 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Internet-only Banks, Disruptive Innovation, Legitimacy, Optimal Distinctiveness, Analytic Hierarchy Process |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:32 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討台灣純網銀於破壞式創新的背景下,如何模仿既有企業(傳統銀行)來追求正當性的同時發展自身的差異化優勢。在高度監管與市場競爭並存的環境中,新興企業若想穩固立足,除了展現自身的創新力,更需要贏得社會與制度的認可。儘管純網銀常被視為打破傳統金融體系的代表,但實際運作上卻仍受限於現有規範與市場期待,因此,初期會採取「模仿」的策略,效仿傳統銀行在合規架構、風險控管與顧客服務等方面的做法,以降低外界疑慮,並累積信任與穩定性。
由於金融業制度高度成熟且對風險極度敏感,過度強調創新反而易忽視市場對穩定的需求,影響生存機會。透過模仿,新興企業能在爭取認可的同時,逐步發展自身的差異化優勢。本研究正是從此出發,探討純網銀如何在模仿與創新看似衝突的兩端之間,尋求一種兼容並蓄的平衡點,並以最適獨特性作為理論基礎,深入剖析其成功關鍵。為此,本研究運用層級分析法,建構由「實用正當性」、「認知正當性」與「道德正當性」三大目標構面組成之分析架構,並設計五項評估準則,分別為:無實體分行與低成本營運、高利率與手續費減免、數位轉型與去紙化、靈活授信與快速放貸、以及創新產品與服務設計。研究透過問卷蒐集台灣三家純網銀專家之評估意見,並進行成對比較與權重計算。
研究結果顯示,「創新產品與服務設計」為最關鍵之準則,其次為「靈活授信」與「數位轉型」;在目標構面中,「道德正當性」的重要性最高。這也進一步地證實,純網銀應以正當性為基礎,並以創新與顧客導向的服務模式做為競爭策略。
This study explores how Internet-only banks in Taiwan strategically balance legitimacy and differentiation in a highly regulated financial environment. The research integrates disruptive innovation and optimal distinctiveness perspectives to examine how emerging banks establish market acceptance while offering unique value. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to construct a three-level decision framework encompassing pragmatic, cognitive, and moral legitimacy dimensions, with five evaluation criteria including operating without physical branches, competitive pricing, digital transformation, flexible credit policies, and innovative service design. Expert responses from three Internet-only banks in Taiwan were analyzed to calculate weightings and determine strategic priorities. The results indicate that “Innovative Product and Service Design” was the most influential criterion, followed by flexible credit practices and digital transformation. Additionally, moral legitimacy emerged as the most critical legitimacy type, emphasizing the importance of ethical conduct and public trust. The findings suggest that Internet-only banks should treat legitimacy as a prerequisite and invest in differentiated, user-centered innovation to achieve long-term competitiveness. This study contributes to the understanding of digital banking strategy and offers insights for practitioners navigating institutional and market pressures.
吳萬益, & 林清河. (2001). 企業研究方法. 台北:華泰.
曾國雄, & 鄧振源. (1989). 層級分析法 (AHP) 的內涵特性與應用 (下). 中國統計學報.
Aladwani, A. M. (2001). Online banking: a field study of drivers, development challenges, and expectations. International Journal of Information Management, 21(3), 213-225.
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
Algarín, C. R., Llanos, A. P., & Castro, A. O. (2017). An analytic hierarchy process based approach for evaluating renewable energy sources. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 38-47.
Anindita, V. (2021). Disruptive Strategy in Disruption Era: Does Netflix Disrupt the Existing Market? International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 3(1), 30-39.
Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829–1853.
Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215-233.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management.
Barzilai, J., & Lootsma, F. (1997). Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 6(3), 155-165.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “ Coopetition” in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411-426.
Bouncken, R. B., & Fredrich, V. (2012). Coopetition: performance implications and management antecedents. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(05).
Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition: A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation in the marketplace. Currency/DoubleDay Business.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1331-1350.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). 17. Disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44-53.
Corbett, K. (2020). Understanding How Tesla Leverages Twitter To Communicate Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Toronto Metropolitan University.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), 169-187.
Dacin, M. T. (1997). Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46-81.
Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., & Roy, J. P. (2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 169-187.
Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039.
Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147-166.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Ballinger.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147-160.
Dougherty, D., & Heller, T. (1994). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200-218.
Durand, R., & Calori, R. (2006). Sameness, otherness? Enriching organizational change theories with philosophical considerations on the same and the other. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 93-114.
Durand, R., Rao, H., & Monin, P. (2007). Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 455-472.
Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel; 1860. Elements of Psychophysics, 280-286.
Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409.
Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397-405.
Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Orchestrating institutional processes for technology sponsorship: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214.
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Roberts, A., & Xu, L. (2020). Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 447-475.
Giacomini, D., Martini, M., Sancino, A., Zola, P., & Cavenago, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility actions and organizational legitimacy at the peak of COVID-19: a sentiment analysis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(6), 1043-1058.
Glasmeier, A. (1991). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20(5), 469-485.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663.
Guttentag, D. (2019). Progress on Airbnb: a literature review. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(4), 814-844.
Haans, R. F. (2019). What's the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management Journal, 40(1), 3-27.
Haghighi, M., Divandari, A., & Keimasi, M. (2010). The impact of 3D e-readiness on e-banking development in Iran: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4084-4093.
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345.
Islam, M. T., & Kokubu, K. (2018). Corporate social reporting and legitimacy in banking: a longitudinal study in the developing country. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 159-179.
Jonsson, A., & Foss, N. J. (2011). International expansion through flexible replication: Learning from the internationalization experience of IKEA. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 1079-1102.
Kantika, K., Kurniasari, F., & Mulyono, M. (2022). The factors affecting digital bank services adoption using trust as mediating variable. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(10), 690-704.
Kennedy, M. T. (2008). Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 270-295.
Kennedy, M. T., Lo, J., & Lounsbury, M. (2010). Category currency: The changing value of conformity as a function of ongoing meaning construction. In Categories in markets: Origins and evolution (pp. 369-397). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Ketchen Jr, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L. (2004). Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779-804.
Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., Richard, M.-O., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1755-1767.
Larson, A. (1991). Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 173-188.
Le, M. T. (2021). Examining factors that boost intention and loyalty to use Fintech post-COVID-19 lockdown as a new normal behavior. Heliyon, 7 (8). In.
Liu, F. H., Norden, L., & Spargoli, F. (2020). Does uniqueness in banking matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 120, 105941.
Lootsma, F. A. (1993). Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 2(2), 87-110.
Markman, G. D., & Waldron, T. L. (2014). Small entrants and large incumbents: A framework of micro entry. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 179-197.
McKnight, B., & Zietsma, C. (2018). Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 493-512.
Melnyk, V. (2024). Transforming the nature of trust between banks and young clients: from traditional to digital banking. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(4), 618-635.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Millar, C., Lockett, M., & Ladd, T. (2018). Disruption: Technology, innovation and society. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129(4), 254-260.
Miller, J. R. (1966). The assessment of worth: a systematic procedure and its experimental validation Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Nair, H. A., Sri Ramalu, S., & Kumar M, D. (2014). Impact of innovation capacity and anticipatory competence on organizational health: A resource based study of Nokia, Motorola and Blackberry. International Journal of Economic Research, 11(2), 395-415.
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439-471.
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479-499.
Nel, J., & Boshoff, C. (2021). “I just don't like digital-only banks, and you should not use them either”: Traditional-bank customers' opposition to using digital-only banks. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59.
Nitsure, R. R. (2003). E-banking: Challenges and Opportunities. Economic and Political weekly, 5377-5381.
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource‐based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697-713.
Payne, E. M., Peltier, J. W., & Barger, V. A. (2018). Mobile banking and AI-enabled mobile banking: The differential effects of technological and non-technological factors on digital natives’ perceptions and behavior. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(3), 328-346.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397-416.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy:Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, 276.
Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927-938.
Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy–when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307-324.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Sardana, V., & Singhania, S. (2018). Digital technology in the realm of banking: A review of literature. International Journal of Research in Finance and Management, 1(2), 28-32.
Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 347-369.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.
Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171-193.
Sterling, G. (2018). How should retailers respond to Amazon Go? 7 experts weigh in. Marketing Land.
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64(3), 153.
Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Organization-creating organizations. Society, 2(2), 34-35.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Taeuscher, K., & Rothe, H. (2020). Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers. Strategic Management Journal, 42(2), 435-461.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). Three psychophysical laws. Psychological Review, 34(6), 424.
Walker, A. (2014). Banking without banks: Exploring the disruptive effects of converging technologies that will shape the future of banking. Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, 7(1), 69-80.
Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2).
Yokoyama, M. (1921). The nature of the affective judgment in the method of paired comparisons. The American Journal of Psychology, 32(3), 357-369.
Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Zhou, X. (2020). Dare to be different? Conformity versus differentiation in corporate social activities of Chinese firms and market responses. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 717-742.
Zhao, E. Y. (2022). Optimal distinctiveness: A new approach to the competitive positioning of organizations and markets. Cambridge University Press.
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93-113.
Zhao, E. Y., & Glynn, M. A. (2022). Optimal distinctiveness: On being the same and different. Organization Theory, 3(1), 26317877221079340.
Zheng, Q., Luo, Y., & Maksimov, V. (2015). Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 389-403.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431.
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181-199.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443-464.