| 研究生: |
黃稚婷 Huang, Chih-Ting |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
電子紙模組廠商之產業競爭力分析 Analysis of the Competitiveness of Electronic Paper Industry |
| 指導教授: |
林清河
Lin, Chin-Ho |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Industrial and Information Management (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 89 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電子紙 、五力分析 、價值鏈 、資源基礎理論 、質性研究 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | E-paper model, five forces analysis, value chain, resource-based view, qualitative research |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:83 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年物聯網(Internet of Things, IoT)智慧技術應用蓬勃發展,促進傳統商業模式革新,成了智慧城市發展之新動能推手。其價值必須以軟體與硬體整合為基礎,在不同智慧應用情境下建置數以萬計之低耗電智慧終端裝置,這些裝置大多數需要顯示器,或某些感測元件做為人機之溝通介面。而電子紙顯示器之超低功耗,僅在於更換顯示畫面時才需耗電,成為最適用於物聯網之智慧應用。其產值為頗有潛力之產業,但就電子產業之經營特性,企業勢將面臨競爭壓力,因此任何業者宜盡速探究其競爭問題,並適當地調整其策略,以取得其優勢競爭地位。
本研究將以個案為例,利用五力分析進行電子紙模組產業之潛在進入者的威脅、替代品的威脅、供應商的議價能力、購買者的議價能力與現有提供同樣產品的廠商間之競爭程度現況分析、運用價值鏈的活動類別及資源基礎理論來確認核心競爭力來源,企業可依此制定組織資源之應用策略,藉以建構價值鏈的關鍵環節上之重要的核心競爭力。本文依此探討個案公司未來之願景與任務之可行性,進而提出電子紙顯示器產業發展策略之建議。
A case study was conducted for implementing Michael Porter’s five forces model. The competition analysis based on the resource-based theory was implemented to identify core competencies for each value-chain activity in the electronic paper model industry. The feasibility of the future visions and missions of the case company was examined and then the future strategy was formulated. The results showed five primary profit-making activities, with core resources extracted based on their value-creating activities. Furthermore, for the product strategy, six primary profit factors were brand, customization capacity, advanced protective material use, accelerated development, automated production line, and high capital flexibility. The study proposed a valuable strategy for the case firm to manage aggressive competition in future.
中文部分
王石番(1991)。傳播內容分析法:理論與實證。台北:幼獅文化事業公司。
吳紹群(2002)。內容分析法與圖書館學研究。台北:圖書與資訊學刊。
周海濤, 李永賢, & 張蘅(2009)。個案研究-設計與方法(原作者:Robert K. Yin)臺北市:五南。
潘淑滿. (2003). 質性研究: 理論與應用: 臺北市: 心理出版社.
英文部分
Allred, C. R., Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., & Magnan, G. M. (2011). A dynamic
collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 129-161.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of
management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the
firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based
theory: revitalization or decline. Journal of management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. S. (2012). Strategic management and corporate competitive
advantage: concepts.
Ben Salah, H. (2015). Creswell, JW (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design.
Choosing among five approaches (3e éd.). London: sage. Approches inductives.
Chen, J., & Liu, C. T. (2013). Technology advances in flexible displays and
substrates. IEEE Access, 1, 150-158.
Churchill, S. D., Lowery, J. E., McNally, O., & Rao, A. (1998). The question of reliability
in interpretive psychological research. In Phenomenological inquiry in psychology (pp. 63-85). Springer, Boston.
Cousin, G. (2005). Case study research. Journal of geography in higher education, 29(3),
421-427.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and
evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
Davidson, M. R., Samspon, M. C., & Davidson, N. S. (2017). Identifying prodromal
symptomology in women who experienced postpartum psychosis: a grounded research study. Int J Pregn & Chi Birth, 2(6), 159-165.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of
management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Ganotakis, P., & Love, J. H. (2012). The innovation value chain in new technology‐
based firms: Evidence from the UK. Journal of product innovation management, 29(5), 839-860.
Gertner, M. I. (2013). The value chain and value creation. Advances in
management, 6(10).
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study.
Academy of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University Sweden, 1-15.
Gökkaya, Ö., & Özbağ, G. K. (2015). Linking core competence, innovation and firm
performance. Journal of Business research turk, 7(1), 90-102.
Guo, J., & Bouwman, H. (2016). An analytical framework for an m-payment ecosystem: a
merchants׳ perspective. Telecommunications Policy, 40(2-3), 147-167.
García-Ochoa Mayor, M., & Bajo Davó, N. (2016). Competitive advantages of the mobile
phone operators in the Asia Pacific region: analysis from the strategic groups
approach. Technology analysis & strategic management, 28(5), 541-554.
Henzen, A., & van de Kamer, J. (2006). The present and future of electronic paper.
Journal of the society for information display, 14(5), 437-442.
Hsiao, R. L., Tsai, D. H., & Lee, C. F. (2012). Collaborative knowing: the adaptive nature
of cross‐boundary spanning. Journal of management studies, 49(3), 463-491.
Hsieh, C. H., Lin, C. H., & Huang, J. L. (2017). Foresight for e-paper development
in Taiwan. Foresight, 19(1), 65-80.
Huang, Y. F., Wang, C. N., Dang, H. S., & Lai, S. T. (2015). Predicting the trend of
Taiwan's electronic paper industry by an effective combined grey model.
Sustainability, 7(8), 10664-10683.
Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical
review of qualitative case study reports. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 9(1), 23606.
Hollweck, T. (2015). Case study research design and methods (5th ed), Robert K.
Yin. The canadian journal of program evaluation, 30(1), 108.
Indiatsy, C. M., Mwangi, M. S., Mandere, E. N., Bichanga, J. M., & George, G. E.
(2014). The application of Porter’s five forces model on organization performance: A case of cooperative bank of Kenya Ltd. European journal of business and management, 6(16), 75-85.
Immergut, M., & Kaufman, P. (2014). A sociology of no‐self: applying buddhist social
theory to symbolic interaction. Symbolic interaction, 37(2), 264-282.
Jacobsen, I. D. (2002). Vad, hur och varför? – Om metodval i företagsekonomi och andra
samhällsvetenskapliga ämnen. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Johannsdottir, L., & McInerney, C. (2018). Developing and using a five C framework for
implementing environmental sustainability strategies: a case study of nordic insurers. Journal of cleaner production, 183, 1252-1264.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities,
and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage
publications.
Knott, P. J. (2015). Does VRIO help managers evaluate a firm’s resources? Management
decision, 53(8), 1806-1822.
Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five
approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.
Lichterman, P. (2017). Interpretive reflexivity in ethnography. Ethnography, 18(1), 35-45.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource‐based view within the
conversation of strategic management. Strategic management journal, 13(5), 363-380.
Maresova, P., & Kuca, K. (2014). Porters five forces on medical device industry in
europe. Military medical science letters, 83(4), 134-144.
Njiraini, N. (2016). Critical thinking as a core competence for the future. AED–adult
education and development editorial mint tea in the garden, 83, 94-99.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and
competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior
performance. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive
advantage.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Competitive
intelligence review, 1(1), 14-14.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based
view. Strategic management journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S. (2014). The historical research method and
information systems research. Journal of the association for information systems, 15(9), 536.
Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews:
An ongoing and continuous journey. The qualitative report, 16(2), 563-566
Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and
sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 15(1), 88-102.
Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., & Christensen, H. K. (2001). The resource-based view
and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of management, 27(6), 777-802.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration
to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of management, 37(5), 1390-1412.
Srivastava, P., & Frankwick, G. L. (2011). Environment, management attitude, and
organizational learning in alliances. Management decision, 49(1), 156-166.
Toparlar, Y., Blocken, B., Vos, P. V., Van Heijst, G. J. F., Janssen, W. D., van Hooff, T., ... &
Timmermans, H. J. P. (2015). CFD simulation and validation of urban microclimate: A case study for Bergpolder Zuid, Rotterdam. Building and environment, 83, 79-90.
Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of
definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative inquiry, 17(6), 511-521.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management
journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.
Ziebertz, C. M., Beckers, D. G., Van Hooff, M. L., Kompier, M. A., & Geurts, S. A.
(2017). The effect on sleep of being on‐call: an experimental field study. Journal of sleep research, 26(6), 809-815.
Zhao, Z. Y., Zuo, J., Wu, P. H., Yan, H., & Zillante, G. (2016). Competitiveness assessment
of the biomass power generation industry in China: a five forces model study. Renewable Energy, 89, 144-153.
網站資料
Global E-Paper Display Market -Global Industry Analysis and Forecast (2017-2024) _ by
Product, Applications, and Geography. Retrieved Oct, 14, 2018 from https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-e-paper-display-market/8353/
Riley, J. (2012). Porter’s Five Forces Model: analysing industry structure. Retrieved
Oct, 14, 2018 from http://www.tutor2u.net/business/strategy/porter_five_forces.htm.
楊伶雯(2018年8月13日)。元太ESL奪全球65%市占率 彩色電子紙年底量產
攻商用廣告看板。鉅亨網。2018年10月7日,取自https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4182004
不再只為閱讀而生,「電子紙」轉戰物聯網、零售業創新機! 2017/7/24【合作媒
體】36kr Kindle、新零售、物聯網、電子紙。2018年10月18日,取自
https://www.inside.com.tw/2017/07/24/kindle-iot
校內:2024-08-01公開