| 研究生: |
楊堡傑 Yang, Bao-Jie |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
同中求異、異中求同:台灣螺絲扣件產業 Seeking differentiation from conformity, seeking conformity from differentiation: Taiwan fastener industry |
| 指導教授: |
許經明
Shiu, Jing-Ming |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Business Administration (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 43 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 制度化理論 、模仿同形 、認知觀點 、互補性邏輯 、台灣螺絲扣件產業 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | institutional theory, mimetic isomorphism, cognitive perspective, complementarity logic, Taiwan screw fastener industry |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:250 下載:23 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究基於制度化理論(institutional theory)的模仿同形(mimetic isomorphism)來討論企業如何追求競爭優勢。制度化理論指出,企業在環境不確定性(uncertainty)之下會模仿其它成功性企業的做法,藉此獲得正當性(legitimacy)之下的資源來增加企業生存的機率。制度化理論認為企業彼此之間互相模仿策略行為,將會讓企業之間產生同質化(homogeneity),而這也是企業經營者在面臨一致性的壓力之下所形成的認知觀點(cognitive perspective)。不過,另外一方面,企業的商業活動是要來獲取競爭優勢,所以企業經營者在面臨差異性的壓力之下,亦會構築具有異質性(heterogeneity)企業資源的認知觀點。本研究透過台灣螺絲扣件產業中企業間模仿同形的個案研究,進一步發現企業經營者對於一致性與差異性亦是具有互補性邏輯(complementary logic)的認知觀點,而這樣的認知觀點可能會在做中學(learning by doing)或者經驗積累(experience accumulation)中逐漸形成。過去研究認為制度化理論必須加上資源基礎理論(resource-based view)才能有效說明企業競爭優勢,而本研究則是補足這些研究中關於企業經營者的認知觀點之討論。我們提出企業經營者擁有一致性與差異性的互補性邏輯之認知觀點,將有助於進一步瞭解制度化資本的重組與調整如何影響構築出異質性的資源資本(同中求異),以及不同的資源資本又是如何形成新慣例等制度化資本(異中求同)。本研究建議台灣政府今後在制定產業政策的時候,可以思考如何創造出讓中小型企業學習的策略群組(strategic groups),藉此來引導出同中求異、異中求同的模仿同形機制來促使提升產業競爭力。
This study is based on the institutional theory of mimetic isomorphism to discuss how firms pursue competitive advantage. According to institutional theory, firms imitate the practices of other successful firms in an environmental uncertainty to acquire resources under legitimacy and increase their chances of survival. Institutional theory suggests that firms imitate each other's strategic behaviors, which will lead to homogeneity among firms, and this is also the cognitive perspective formed by firms’ managers under the pressure of the conformity. On the other hand, firms’ business activities are to obtain competitive advantage, so managers under the pressure of the differentiation will generate a cognitive perspective with heterogeneity of firms’ resources. Through the case study of mimetic isomorphism in Taiwan screw fastener industry, this study finds that managers have a complementary logic cognitive perspective of conformity and differentiation, and such a cognitive perspective may be gradually formed through learning by doing or experience accumulation. This study complements the discussion of managers’ cognitive perspectives in past studies that suggest that institutional theory must be coupled with resource-based view to explain firms’ competitive advantage. We propose a complementary logic of conformity and differentiation among firms’ managers, which will help to further understand how the recombination and adjustment of institutionalized capital influence the creation of heterogeneous resource capital and how different resource capital forms institutionalized capital, such as new routines. This study suggests that Taiwan government’s policy can consider how to create strategic groups for small and medium-sized firms to learn, to induce a mimetic isomorphism of “seeking differentiation from conformity” and “seeking conformity from differentiation” in pursuit of industrial competitiveness.
呂銀坤. (2012). 台灣螺絲產業為因應中國的低價競爭的策略研究. 國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程在職專班碩士論文.
Alcacer, J., & Oxley, J. (2014). Learning by supplying. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 204-223.
Amburgey, T. L., & Miner, A. S. (1992). Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 335-348.
Andersen, T. J. (2004). Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1271-1299.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656-665.
Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 175-190.
Barney, J. B., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally‐based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 5-9.
Barreto, I., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy‐based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1559-1581.
Baum, J., & Singh, J. (1994). Organizational niche overlap and the dynamics of organizational failure. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 346-380.
Beamish, P. (1988). Multinational joint ventures in developing countries. London: Routledge.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of economic perspectives, 12(3), 151-170.
Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. Devolving control. Management science, 56(10), 1849-1872.
Boudreau, K. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427.
Buchko, A. (2011). Institutionalization, coercive isomorphism, and the homogeneity of strategy. Advances in Business Research, 2(1), 27-45.
Burke, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (1999). Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Academy of Management Perspectives, 13(4), 91-99.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management science, 32(5), 539-553.
Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1995). Organizations in industry: Strategy, structure and selection. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chen, M.-J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453-482.
Cool, K. O., & Schendel, D. (1987). Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the us pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Management Science, 33(9), 1102-1124.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
D’Aveni, W. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33-54.
Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’sa question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147-166.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147-160.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dutton, J. E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan, V. K. (1983). Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 4(4), 307-323.
Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 76-90.
Eggers, J., & Kaplan, S. (2009). Cognition and renewal: Comparing ceo and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science, 20(2), 461–477.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.
Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., & Schendel, D. (1996). Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 219-235.
Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (1995). Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 461-476.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fligstein, N. (1991). The structural transformation of american industry: An institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fransella, F., & D., B. (1977). A manualfor repertory grid technique. New York: Academic Press.
Gary, M., & Wood, R. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogenity. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 569-594.
Gavetti, G. (2012). Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267-285.
Glaser, B., G, & Strauss, A., L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser Barney, G., & Strauss Anselm, L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, Adline de Gruyter.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
Greve, H. R. (1996). Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 29-60.
Greve, H. R. (1998). Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 967-988.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
Hadida, A. L., & Paris, T. (2014). Managerial cognition and the value chain in the digital music industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 84-97.
Hagiu, A., & Halaburda, H. (2010). Responding to the wii? HBS Case 709-448, Harvard Business School, Boston.
Haleblian, J., Kim, J.-Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2006). The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: Evidence from the us commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 357-370.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. H. (1977). The population ecology of public organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, competition and legitimation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 564-592.
Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472-500.
Haunschild, P. R., & Sullivan, B. N. (2002). Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines' learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 609-643.
Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593-627.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilites and the microfundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 831-850.
Huff, A. S. (1982). Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 119-131.
Huff, A. S. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. Chichester: Wiley.
Kaplan, S., Murray, F., & Henderson, R. (2003). Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 203–233.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
Khan, S. N. (2014). Qualitative research method: Grounded theory. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 224-233.
Knickerbocker, F. T. (1973). Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lant, T. K., & Baum, J. A. C. (1995). Cognitive sources of socially constructed competitive groups: Examples from the manhattan hotel industry. In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (Eds.), The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. (pp. 15–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Levinthal, D. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management science, 43(7), 934–950.
Levinthal, D., & Posen, H. E. (2007). Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 586-620.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1998). Organizational learning. In W. R. Scott (Ed.), Annual review of sociology (pp. 319-340.). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366-385.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
Mason, R., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley.
McGee, J., & Thomas, H. (1986). Strategic groups: Theory, research and taxonomy. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 141-160.
Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64-79.
Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. External knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49(4), 497-513.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA.: Havard University Press.
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource‐based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697-713.
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562-578.
Porac, J., Rosa, J. A., Spanjol, J., & Saxon, M. S. (2001). America’s family vehicle: Path creation in the us minivan market. R. Garud, p. Karnoe, eds. Path dependence and creation. In: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 224-240.
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397-416.
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2011). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of scottish knitwear manufacturers revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 646-664.
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., Paton, D., & Kanfer, A. (1995). Rivalry and the industry model of scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 203-227.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy:Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95-117.
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
Powell, W. W. (1991). Exanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485-501.
Reger, R. K., & Huff, A. S. (1993). Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 103-123.
Rokeach, M. (1970). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.
Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000). Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of ncr in the electronic era. Strategic Management Journal, 21(11), 1083-1103.
Sabel, C. F. (1993). Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9), 1133-1170.
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1375-1394.
Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
Spender, J. C. (1989). Industry recipes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Taylor, A., & Helfat, C. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20(4), 718–739.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Thomas, H., & Venkatraman, N. (1988). Research on strategic groups: Progress and prognosis. Journal of Management Studies, 25(6), 537-555.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary—digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. (2010). Research commentary—platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675-687.
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1147-1161.
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195-1215.
Westphal, J. D., Boivie, S., & Ming Chng, D. H. (2006). The strategic impetus for social network ties: Reconstituting broken ceo friendship ties. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), 425-445.
Yang, M., & Hyland, M. (2012). Re‐examining mimetic isomorphism: Similarity in mergers and acquisitions in the financial service industry. Management Decision, 50(6), 1076-1095.
Yin, R., K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods.
Yin Robert, K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. sage publications.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443-464.
Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.