簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡采吟
Tsai, Tsai-Yin
論文名稱: 貸款越多銀行承受風險越高?以美國銀行為例
More loans more risk-taking? The case of the U.S. banks.
指導教授: 王澤世
Wang, Tse-Shih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 50
中文關鍵詞: 不良債權風險性資產道德風險總體因子衝擊反應分析因果關係檢驗
外文關鍵詞: non-performing loans, risk weighted assets, moral hazard, macroeconomic determinants, impulse response analysis, Granger causality test
相關次數: 點閱:134下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本篇研究以1984第一季至2015年第三季,美國所有參加聯邦存款保險公司 (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,FDIC) 的商業銀行之時間序列資料為樣本,並採用複迴歸模型以最小平方法 (ordinary least squares,OLS) 及時間序列模型進行分析,探討總體經濟波動對於美國銀行業不良債權比率之影響效果,更進一步探討總體景氣於繁榮與衰退間是否對於銀行不良債權比率有一致的影響效果。此外,亦探討在景氣衰退期間的不良債權是否會間接影響銀行之資產品質,並檢驗美國銀行是否會產生道德風險的行為。
    本研究結果顯示,不良債權的確會隨著景氣循環波動,在景氣衰退時往往會伴隨著較高比率的不良債權。透過時間序列模型,可以證實不良債權顯著正相關影響風險性資產比率,意謂間接影響到銀行的資產品質。此外,我們可以發現不良債權對於資產性風險、資產性風險對於貸款、貸款對於不良債權有顯著的因果關係。此現象說明當銀行風險提高時,經理人有更大的誘因放貸更多的貸款,符合道德風險假說。

    The paper uses the commercial banks in the U.S. that joined the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as the samples during the 1984Q1-2015Q3. The structure of the thesis involves the use of time series data, and a multiple regression is built to assess a time series model and analyze whether macroeconomic conditions can contribute significantly to the level of non-performing loans to total loans in the U.S. banking system. Further, we want to explore whether the non-performing loans fluctuate in accordance with the macroeconomic condition along with in boom or in recession. Finally, we examine whether the non-performing loans have an indirect influence on banks’ asset quality and to check whether lending decisions of U.S. banks exhibit moral hazard.
    Our results show that the non-performing loans actually fluctuate associated with business cycle. When the economy is in bust, the ratio of the non-performing loans raises up. Through the time series model, it can be proved that there are significantly positive correlation between non-performing loans and the ratio of risk weighted assets. It represents the non-performing loans affect the asset quality indirectly. Moreover, we can find the non-performing loans versus risk weighted assets, risk weighted assets versus banks’ loans and the banks’ loans versus non-performing loans have significant Granger-cause relations. The phenomenon explains that a bank’ managers have an incentive to lend more loans when the bank’s risk enhances. The result of the thesis is consistent with the moral hazard hypothesis.

    Abstract II 摘要 III 誌謝 IV Contents V List of Tables VII List of Figures VIII Chapter I Introduction 1 Chapter II Literature Review 4 2.1 The Relationship between Loan Loss Reserve and Loan Loss Provision 4 2.2 The Influence of Factor on Non-performing Loans 6 2.3 The Relationship between Non-performing Loans and Risk Determinant 8 Chapter III Data and Methodology 11 3.1 Data Collection and Description 11 3.2 Cross Correlogram 17 3.3 Multiple Regression Analysis 20 3.3.1 Ordinary least squares (OLS) 20 3.4 Time Series Analysis 23 3.4.1 Unit root test 23 3.4.2 Vector Autoregression Model 25 3.4.3 Impulse Response Function 26 3.4.4 Granger Causality test 26 Chapter IV Empirical Results 28 4.1 Multiple Regression Analysis 28 4.2 Time Series Analysis 29 4.2.1 Unit root test 29 4.2.2 Vector Autoregression Model 30 4.2.3 Impulse Response Function 30 4.2.4 Granger Causality test 36 Chapter V Conclusions 37 References 39

    Ahmed, A.S., Takeda, C. & Thomas, S., (1999). Bank loan loss provisions: a reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects. Journal of accounting and economics, 28, 1-25
    Arpa, M., Giulini, I., Ittner, A., & Pauer, F. (2001). The influence of macroeconomic developments on Austrian banks: implications for banking supervision. bis Papers, 1, (Bank of International Settlements, Working Paper Series) 91-116.
    Avery, R.B., & A.N. Berger (1991b). Risk-based capital and deposit insurance reform. Journal of Banking and Finance, 15 (September): 847-874
    Balla, E. & McKenna, A., (2009). Dynamic provisioning: a countercyclical tool for loan loss reserves. Economic quarterly, 95, 383-418
    Beatty, A., Chamberlain, S., Magliolo, J., (1995). Managing financial reports of commercial banks: the influence of taxes, regulatory capital and earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 27, 157-178.
    Beatty, A. & Liao, S., (2010). Do delays in expected loss recognition affect bank’s willingness to lend? Journal of accounting and economics, 52, 1-20
    Berge, T. O., & Boye, K. G. (2007). An analysis of banks' problem loans.Norges Bank. Economic Bulletin, 78(2), 65.
    Bikker, J. A., & Metzemakers, P. A. (2005). Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 15(2), 141-157.
    Borio, C., Furfine, C., & Lowe, P. (2001). Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: issues and policy options. BIS papers, 1, 1-57.
    Bradley, M.G., C.A. Wambeke, & D.A. Whidbee, (1991). Risk weights, risk-based capital and deposit insurance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 15 (August): 875-893
    Caprio, Gerard, & Daniela Klingebiel. "Episodes of systemic and borderline banking crises." Managing the real and fiscal effects of banking crises, World Bank Discussion Paper 428 (2002): 31-49.
    Caporale, G. M., Di Colli, S., & Lopez, J. S. (2014). Bank lending procyclicality and credit quality during financial crises. Economic Modelling, 43, 142-157
    Carey M (1998). Credit risk in private debt portfolios. Journal of Finance 53, 1363–1387
    Carey M (2002). A guide to choosing absolute bank capital requirements. Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 929–951
    Clair, Robert T. (1992). “Loan Growth and Loan Quality: Some Preliminary Evidence from Texas Banks.” Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review, 3rd quarter 1992, 9-22.
    Collins, J. H., Shackelford, D. A., & Wahlen, J. M. (1995). Bank differences in the coordination of regulatory capital, earnings, and taxes. Journal of accounting research, 263-291.
    Cordell, L. R., & King, K. K. (1995). A market evaluation of the risk-based capital standards for the US financial system. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19(3), 531-562.
    Cottarelli, Carlo, Giovanni Dell’Ariccia, & Ivanna Vladkova-Hollar. (2005). “Early birds, late risers, and sleeping beauties: Bank credit growth to the private sector in Central and Eastern Europe and in the Balkans.” Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 83-104.
    Das, M. S., & Sy, M. A. N. (2012). How risky are banks' risk weighted assets? Evidence from the financial crisis (No. 12-36). International Monetary Fund.
    Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427-431.
    Enders, W. (2008). Applied econometric time series. John Wiley & Sons.
    Fofack, Hippolyte. (2005). Nonperforming loans in Sub-Saharan Africa: causal analysis and macroeconomic implications. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (3769).
    Foos, D., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010). Loan growth and riskiness of banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(12), 2929-2940
    Furfine, C., Groeneveld, H., Hancock, D., Jackson, P., Jones, D., Perraudin, W. & Yoneyama, M. (1999). Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: The Impact of the Basle Accord. Working Paper 1, Bank for International Settlements, Basle, Switzerland.
    Gambera, M., (2000). Simple forecasts of bank loan quality in the business cycle. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
    Hasan, I. & Wall, J.D., (2004). Determonants of the loan loss allowance: some cross_country comparisons. The financial review, 39, 129-152
    Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data (No. 54). Cambridge university press.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., & Yang, D. H. (2005). Determinants of signaling by banks through loan loss provisions. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 312-320.
    Kraft, E., Jankov, L., (2005). Does speed kill? Lending booms and their consequences in Croatia. Journal of Banking & Finance 29, 105–121.
    Laeven, L. & Majnoni, G., (2003). Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: too much, too late? Journal of financial intermediation, 12, 178-197
    Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1012-1027.
    Quagliariello, M. (2009). Macroeconomic uncertainty and banks’ lending decisions: The case of Italy. Applied Economics, 41(3), 323-336.
    Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). From financial crash to debt crisis (No. w15795). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Rinaldi, L., & Sanchis-Arellano, A. (2006). Household debt sustainability: what explains household non-performing loans? An empirical analysis.
    Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1-48.
    Sinkey, Joseph F., & Mary Brady Greenawalt. (1991). “Loan-Loss Experience and RiskTaking Behavior at Large Commercial Banks.” Journal of Financial Services Research 5, 43-59
    Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2001). Vector autoregressions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 101-115.
    Susan E. Moyer, (1990). Capital adequacy ratio regulations and accounting choices in commercial banks. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 13, Issue 2, July 1990, pp 123–154
    Wang, A. T., (2016). Bond yield spreads and the U.S. aggregate non-performing loans. Working paper, National Cheng Kung University.
    Zhang, D., Cai, J., Dickinson, D. G., & Kutan, A. M. (2016). Non-performing loans, moral hazard and regulation of the Chinese commercial banking system. Journal of Banking & Finance, 63, 48-60.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2021-07-01公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE