| 研究生: |
邱明誠 Chiu, Ming-Cheng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
線上社群的創造力:知識協作對發想品質之影響 The Creativity of Online Communities: The Effects of Knowledge Collaboration on Idea Quality |
| 指導教授: |
許經明
Shiu, Jing-Ming |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 65 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 線上創新社群 、發想品質 、知識協作 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Online innovation community, Knowledge collaboration, Idea quality |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:92 下載:16 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
現今,隨著資訊、通訊科技的發展,企業與用戶之間的互動變得更加容易。因 此,許多企業紛紛建立了線上用戶創新社群(Online User Innovation Community), 讓用戶去為企業現有的產品及服務提供建議,甚至是參與到新產品及新服務開發的 流程中。雖然過去許多線上社群之相關研究都有探討用戶知識協作的動機是如何促 使他們進行知識協作,然而關於知識分享或知識協作本身對於發想品質(Idea Quality)的影響之探討反而比較少。因此,本篇研究目的是試著從用戶角度進一步 去探討不同的知識協作方式對於發想品質的影響。
本研究採用實驗分析法去模擬線上社群的用戶進行知識協作的情境去進行實驗 分析。實驗的對象為國立成功大學企業管理學系某門課程的 40 位碩士班的同學在觀 察時間 10 週內在線上課程的通訊群組中進行「組內」和「組間」知識協作並由 6 位 專業人士去對每組在 10 週內於線上提交的想法進行評分。研究結果顯示,兩個研究 假設皆成立,表明組內知識協作及組間知識協作分別與發想品質之間皆呈現顯著倒 U 關係。因此,建議企業在利用這些線上用戶社群時可以留意組內知識協作與組間 知識協作之間的平衡。
Nowadays, many companies have established Online User Innovation Communities (OUIC) to engage users to provide suggestions, and even to participate in the new product and service development. Although past researches on online communities have discussed how the motivation of users motivates them to collaborate, however, the effects of knowledge sharing or knowledge collaboration on Idea Quality are rarely researched. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to further discuss the effects of different knowledge collaboration approaches on Idea Quality.
An experiment was conducted to simulate the knowledge collaboration situation in an online community. The experiment was conducted with 40 students from a master's course in the Department of Business Administration at National Cheng Kung University during an observation period of 10 weeks. The results showed that significant inverted-U relationships between intra-group and inter-group knowledge collaboration and idea quality, respectively. Therefore, it is recommended that companies should consider the balance between intra-group and inter-group knowledge collaboration when leveraging these online user communities.
Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., & Paolillo, J. (1996). A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques. Information & Management, 30(2), 91-99.
Allen, T. J. (1984). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the r&d organization. MIT Press Books, 1.
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative science quarterly, 634-665.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Open source software user communities: A study of participation in linux user groups. Management science, 52(7), 1099-1115.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Prentice-Hall.
Baumer, E. P., Sueyoshi, M., & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Bloggers and readers blogging together: Collaborative co-creation of political blogs. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 20(1), 1-36.
Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced" sense" of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database: the database for advances in information systems, 35(1), 64-79.
Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., . . . Haefliger, S. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and innovation, 24(1), 8-40.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40-57.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. In Structural holes: Harvard university press.
Burt, R. S. (2007). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital: OUP Oxford.
Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
Couger, J. D. (1996). Creativity & innovation in information systems organizations: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperPerennial, New York, 39.
Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization science, 23(4), 988-1007.
Dean, D. L., Hender, J., Rodgers, T., & Santanen, E. (2006). Identifying good ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646-699.
Di Gangi, P. M., Wasko, M. M., & Hooker, R. E. (2010). Getting customers'ideas to work for you: Learning from dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4).
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(3), 497.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization science, 3(2), 179-202.
Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization science, 22(5), 1224-1239.
Faraj, S., & Johnson, S. L. (2011). Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organization Science, 22(6), 1464-1480.
Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239.
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
Hara, N., Shachaf, P., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Cross‐cultural analysis of the wikipedia community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2097-2108.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative science quarterly, 716-749.
Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributors to the linux kernel. Research policy, 32(7), 1159-1177.
Hippel, E. v., & Krogh, G. v. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209-223.
Im, S., & Workman Jr, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of marketing, 68(2), 114-132.
Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course: Bearly.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2010). Research commentary—vigilant interaction in knowledge collaboration: Challenges of online user participation under ambivalence. Information systems research, 21(4), 773-784.
Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1), 45-63.
Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization science, 21(5), 1016-1033.
Jeppesen, L. B., & Laursen, K. (2009). The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Research policy, 38(10), 1582-1589.
Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of management review, 22(4), 911-945.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
Kollock, P. (1999). The economies ol online cooperation. Communities in cyberspace, 220.
Koput, K. W. (1997). A chaotic model of innovative search: Some answers, many questions. Organization science, 8(5), 528-542.
Kosonen, M., Gan, C., Vanhala, M., & Blomqvist, K. (2019). User motivation and knowledge sharing in idea crowdsourcing. In Managing innovation: Understanding and motivating crowds (pp. 47-69): World Scientific.
Kramer, M. W., Kuo, C. L., & Dailey, J. C. (1997). The impact of brainstorming techniques on subsequent group processes: Beyond generating ideas. Small group research, 28(2), 218-242.
Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., & Archer, T. (2004). Harnessing the creative potential among users*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(1), 4-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00050.x
Kurtzberg, T. R. (2005). Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 51-65.
Lakhani, K. R., & Hippel, E. v. (2004). How open source software works:“Free” user-to-user assistance. In Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen communities (pp. 303-339): Springer.
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003). Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Open Source Software Projects (September 2003).
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. The journal of industrial economics, 50(2), 197-234.
Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., . . . Rashid, A. M. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 10(4), 00-00.
Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information systems research, 18(1), 42-67.
Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. External knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management science, 49(4), 497-513.
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of management review, 21(2), 402-433.
Moreau, C. P., & Dahl, D. W. (2005). Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers' creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 13-22. doi:10.1086/429597
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.
Murray, F., & O'Mahony, S. (2007). Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organization Science, 18(6), 1006-1021.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different roles, different strokes: Organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organization Science, 21(2), 554-572.
O'mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of management Journal, 50(5), 1079-1106.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 18(S1), 187-206.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination.
Pallant, J. (2020). Spss survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using ibm spss: Routledge.
Parent, M., Gallupe, R. B., Salisbury, W. D., & Handelman, J. M. (2000). Knowledge creation in focus groups: Can group technologies help? Information & management, 38(1), 47-58.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
Pelz, D. C. (1956). Some social factors related to performance in a research organization. Administrative science quarterly, 310-325.
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245-256.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (Vol. 892): Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Ransbotham, S., & Kane, G. C. (2011). Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in wikipedia. MIS quarterly, 613-627.
Ransbotham, S., Kane, G. C., & Lurie, N. H. (2012). Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Science, 31(3), 387-405.
Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization studies, 28(3), 377-408.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community, revised edition: Homesteading on the electronic frontier: MIT press.
Riedl, C., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2010). Rating scales for collective intelligence in innovation communities: Why quick and easy decision making does not get it right. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems.
Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic management journal, 25(6), 541-562.
Shalley, C. E., & Perry‐Smith, J. E. (2008). The emergence of team creative cognition: The role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 23-41.
Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, communications, and the public interest, 72, 37.
Sørensen, F., Mattsson, J., & Sundbo, J. (2010). Experimental methods in innovation research. Research policy, 39(3), 313-322.
Sproull, L., & Arriaga, M. (2007). Online communities. In Handbook of computer networks (pp. 898-914).
Stewart, K. J., & Gosain, S. (2006). The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS quarterly, 291-314.
Tang, C., & Ye, L. (2015). Diversified knowledge, r&d team centrality and radical creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 123-135.
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything: Penguin.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of management journal, 24(2), 289-305.
Valacich, J. S., Wheeler, B. C., Mennecke, B. E., & Wachter, R. (1995). The effects of numerical and logical group size on computer-mediated idea generation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 318-329.
Velasquez, A., Wash, R., Lampe, C., & Bjornrud, T. (2014). Latent users in an online user-generated content community. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23(1), 21-50.
Von Hippel, E. (2006). Democratizing innovation: the MIT Press.
Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California management review, 40(3), 133-153.
Von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The journal of strategic information systems, 21(2), 154-164.
Von Krogh, G., & Von Hippel, E. (2006). The promise of research on open source software. Management science, 52(7), 975-983.
Wagner, D., Vollmar, G., & Wagner, H.-T. (2014). The impact of information technology on knowledge creation: An affordance approach to social media. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
Wang, C.-C., & Lai, C.-Y. (2006). Knowledge contribution in the online virtual community: Capability and motivation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management.
Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
Ward, T. B., & Kolomyts, Y. (2010). Cognition and creativity. The Cambridge handbook of creativity, 93-112.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The journal of strategic information systems, 9(2-3), 155-173.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should i share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
Wasko, M. M., Teigland, R., & Faraj, S. (2009). The provision of online public goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice. Decision support systems, 47(3), 254-265.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321.