簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 趙湘珽
Chao, Hsiang-Ting
論文名稱: 集團企業控制型態轉換與公司價值及財務績效之關聯性探討:以台灣上市櫃集團企業為例
The Relation between Control Type Conversion of Business Groups and Firm Value and Financial Performance: Evidence from Taiwan Listed Business Groups
指導教授: 黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 39
中文關鍵詞: 集團企業控制型態公司價值財務績效
外文關鍵詞: Business Groups, Control Types, Firm Value, Financial Performance
相關次數: 點閱:117下載:55
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探討集團企業控制型態轉變與公司價值及財務績效之關聯性。研究對象以台灣上市櫃非金融業之集團企業為對象,研究期間為2002年至2019年,研究樣本共計27,552筆觀察值。實證結果發現,集團企業控制型態轉變與公司價值有顯著正向關聯性;而集團企業控制型態轉變與短期財務績效有顯著負向關聯性。研究目的希望能提供企業做為是否需推動集團企業控制型態轉變的相關證據,以及做為企業永續經營之參考。
    本論文的主要貢獻為:過去對於所有權型態的研究,大多皆是強調經理人持股比率如何影響公司績效,較少探討集團企業控制型態轉變對公司價值與財務績效的影響。因此,探討不同型態的轉變是否影響公司價值及財務績效,實具有實務與學術的參考價值。此研究具有的管理意涵為:企業可以將集團企業控制型態轉變列為重要的治理評估參考,以達到永續經營。
    關鍵字:集團企業、控制型態、公司價值、財務績效。

    This study mainly discusses the relation between business groups and firm value and financial performance. Using 27,552 observations from Taiwan Economic Journal during the years from 2002 to 2019, the empirical results show that the change of control types of business groups has a significant positive correlation with firm value.
    However, the change of control types of business groups has a significant negative correlation with short-term financial performance. This study provides evidence for the enterprises to promote the change of control types of business groups and to provide references for the sustainable operation of enterprises. In the past, the research on ownership patterns mostly emphasizes how the ratio of managers' shareholding affects the performance of the company, but less discusses the influence of the change of control types of group enterprises on the firm value
    and financial performance. Therefore, it is of practical and academic reference value to explore whether different types of changes affect the firm value and financial performance. The management implication of this study is that the enterprise can make the change of control types as an important reference for governance evaluation, so as to achieve sustainable operation.
    Key words: Business Groups, Control Types, Firm Value, Financial Performance.

    第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討與研究問題 3 第三章 研究設計與模型建立 7 第四章 實證結果 16 第五章 額外分析 20 第六章 結論 33 參考文獻 35 附錄 39

    Kuo, T. and C. Y. Wang. 公司治理如何影響家族企業之績效?長期縱貫分析How Does Corporate Governance Affect the Performance of Family Businesses? A Long-Term Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Accounting Review, (64), 61-111, 2017.
    王元章。內部人持股、風險、股利、負債、投資與公司價值,證券市場發展,第十三卷第三期,29-69,2001。
    李卉馨、詹淑婷、蘇怡方、鍾喜梅。專業經理人職位的代理意涵: 台灣電子業家族企業之實證分析,臺大管理論叢,第25卷第1期,259-285,2014。
    李冠皓、黃培琳。公司治理模組解釋(四)集團控制型態-以上市櫃公司為例,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第83期,93-101,2010。
    周行一、陳錦村、陳坤宏。家族持股、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究,中國財務學刊,第4卷第1期,115-139,1996。
    林宛瑩、許崇源。台灣集團企業之控股型態及公司治理衡量指標之研究與建議,交大管理學報,第28卷第1期,269-312,2008。
    林俊傑、劉梧柏、黃華瑋。公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討: 以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例,PhD Thesis. National Cheng Kung University Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA),2017。
    林寶人。台灣上市櫃家族企業與公司績效,會計學報,第3卷第1期,53-82,2010。
    施俊儀。家族持股、公司控制型態與經營績效-台灣地區上市公司監督機制之研究,1997。
    洪榮華、陳香如、柯璟瑩。從代理理論角度探討董事會特性、股權結構與負債之關聯性,管理與系統,第12卷第4期,33-53,2005。
    曾秀玲。家族企業內部稽核獨立性與組織績效關聯性之研究,2012。
    黃旭輝。經理人異動與股東財富效果,管理評論,第25卷第1期,23-45,2006。
    溫育芳。國內上市公司最適資本結構之實證研究,企銀季刊,第二十八卷第二期,51-69,2005。
    葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩。公司治理與評等系統,初版,商智文化事業股份有限公司,臺北,2002。
    葉銀華。家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證卷市場之比較,管理評論,第18卷第2期,57-90,1999。
    盧志偉。家族企業接班佈局之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所學位論文,1-90,2010。
    戴皖珍。女性管理者對公司績效之影響-以臺灣上市櫃公司為例,臺灣師範大學高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)學位論文,1-75,2019。
    蘇靜怡。台灣家族型態之中小企業接班問題的探討,2005。
    Agrawal, A. and C. R. Knoeber. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 31(3), 377-397, 1996.
    Anderson, R. C. and D. M. Reeb. Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328, 2003.
    Andres, C. Large shareholders and firm performance—An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of corporate finance, 14(4), 431-445, 2008.
    Bennedsen, M., K. M. Nielsen, F. Pérez-González, and D. Wolfenzon. Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647-691, 2007.
    Benston, G. J. The Market for Public Accounting Services: Demand, Supply and Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4(1), 33-79, 1985.
    Berle, A. and G. Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property Macmillan. New York, 2(3), 45-53, 1932.
    Bertrand, M., S. Johnson, K. Samphantharak, and A. Schoar. Mixing family with business: A study of Thai business groups and the families behind them. Journal of financial Economics, 88(3), 466-498, 2008.
    Bosworth, D. and M. Rogers. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record, 77(239), 323-337, 2001.
    Campbell, K. and A. Mínguez-Vera. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83(3), 435-451, 2008.
    Choi, J. J., S. W. Park, and S. S. Yoo. The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 941-962, 2007.
    Chung, I. Y., K. J. Koford, and I. Lee. Stock market views of corporate multinationalism: Some evidence from announcements of international joint ventures. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 33(3), 275-293, 1993.
    Cronqvist, H. and M. Nilsson. Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 695-719, 2003.
    DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo and R. M. Stulz. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial economics, 81(2), 227-254, 2006.
    Duchin, R., J. G. Matsusaka, and O. Ozbas. When Are Outside Directors Effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195-214, 2010.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. Profitability, investment and average returns. Journal of financial economics, 82(3), 491-518, 2006.
    Farber, D. B. Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter? The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539-561, 2005.
    Farooque, O. A., T. van Zijl, K. Dunstan, and A. W. Karim. Ownership structure and corporate performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 14(2), 127-149, 2007.
    Fisher, F. M. and J. J. McGowan. On the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profits. The American Economic Review, 73(1), 82-97, 1983.
    Gomez-Mejia, L. R., M. Nunez-Nickel, and I. Gutierrez. The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 81-95, 2001.
    Gompers, P. A. and A. Metrick. Institutional investors and equity prices. The quarterly journal of Economics, 116(1), 229-259, 2001.
    Hall, B. H. Investment and research and development at the firm level: does the source of financing matter? NBER working paper, 1992.
    Healy, P. M. and K. G. Palepu. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440, 2001.
    Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50, 1983.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360, 1976.
    Khurana, I. K. and K. Raman. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non‐Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo‐American countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473-495, 2004.
    Lee, I. and S. B. Wyatt. The effects of international joint ventures on shareholder wealth. Financial Review, 25(4), 641-649, 1990.
    Leland, H. E. and D. H. Pyle. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. The journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387, 1977.
    Luan, C.-J., Y.-Y. Chen, H.-Y. Huang, and K.-S. Wang. CEO succession decision in family businesses–A corporate governance perspective. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(2), 130-136, 2018.
    McConnell, J. J. and C. J. Muscarella. Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm. Journal of financial economics, 14(3), 399-422, 1985.
    McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of financial economics, 27(2), 595-612, 1990.
    Miller, J.S., R. M., Wiseman, and L. R., Gomez-Mejia. The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 745-756, 2002.
    Morck, R. K., D. A. Stangeland, and B. Yeung. 11. Inherited Wealth, Corporate Control, and Economic Growth The Canadian Disease? University of Chicago Press, 2007.
    Morck, R., M. Nakamura, and A. Shivdasani. Banks, ownership structure, and firm value in Japan. The Journal of Business, 73(4), 539-567, 2000.
    Mullins, W. and A. Schoar. How do CEOs see their roles? Management philosophies and styles in family and non-family firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), 24-43, 2016.
    Pérez-González, F. Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559-1588, 2006.
    Smith, B. F. and B. Amoako-Adu. Management succession and financial performance of family controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(4), 341-368, 1999.
    Sraer, D. and D. Thesmar. Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the european economic Association, 5(4), 709-751, 2007.
    Villalonga, B. and R. Amit. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417, 2006.
    Yeh, Y.-H. Corporate governance and family succession: New evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 100967, 2019.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE