簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃琪涵
Huang, Qi-Han
論文名稱: 慈濟基金會賑災策略之研究 以滿納海國際學校為例
Research on Tzu-Chi Foundation Disaster Relief Strategy -The case of Menahil International School
指導教授: 楊永年
Yang, Yung-Nane
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 自然災害減災及管理國際碩士學位學程
International Master Program on Natural Hazards Mitigation and Management
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 170
中文關鍵詞: 慈濟基金會人道救援策略滿納海國際學校資訊資源動員組織間合作敘利亞難民兒童
外文關鍵詞: Tzu Chi Foundation, Humanitarian relief strategy, Menahil International School, Information, Resource Mobilization, Inter-organizational Collaboration, Syrian refugee children
相關次數: 點閱:9下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以土耳其滿納海國際學校為個案,探討慈濟基金會人道救援策略的有效性,並特別關注敘利亞難民兒童的長期教育需求。研究依據楊永年(2010)的災害管理架構,從資訊、資源動員及組織間合作三個面向,透過需求滿足與運作效率兩項標準進行分析。研究採質性個案研究法,結合關鍵參與者的深度訪談與多元二手資料,包括慈濟出版品、土耳其政府文件、國際組織報告、學生個案及教育成果資料。
    研究結果顯示,輟學、童工與家庭經濟困難是彼此交織的教育障礙。Ali Kord Arabo 的案例顯示,免費教育、教材與依需求提供的經濟協助,降低了就學直接成本及離開童工後所帶來的部分家庭經濟壓力,使其得以由2015年的部分就學逐步轉為2017年的全日制就學,並於後續進入高等教育。此外,Ali 在2023年土耳其-敘利亞地震後投入人道救援,其行為亦提供了親社會行為、感恩、回饋與社會責任等正向發展的可觀察證據。其他滿納海畢業生在進入高等教育後亦投入地震救援,呈現出相似的行為模式。
    跨案例比較進一步顯示,學生的需求會隨不同發展階段而改變。Mohammed Hak 因家庭經濟壓力再次中斷學業,後在獲得針對性的經濟協助後重返校園;Abdulrahman Hritani 的發展則顯示,學生需求可由基本教育逐步延伸至高等教育、專業技能及志願服務。至2024年底,滿納海共有531名高中畢業生,其中377名進入高等教育。綜合而言,可觀察的教育成果已不僅限於返校,也延伸至持續就學、升學、技能發展與親社會參與。
    在效率性方面,已辨識的需求能在一定程度上轉化為教育決策與實際行動;資源動員展現出一定程度的即時性、適切性與永續性;組織間合作則提供互補性的行政、教育及專業資源。然而,受限於現有資料,本研究無法精確衡量資訊轉化速度、協調成本及各參與者的相對貢獻。
    整體而言,慈濟的教育援助回應了教育可及性與持續就學方面的若干重要障礙,並在三個研究面向中展現一定程度的運作效率。縱向與跨案例證據亦呈現出一種反覆出現的發展模式:部分受助者由接受教育援助,逐步發展至進入高等教育、培養專業能力,並進一步參與志願服務與社會回饋。然而,現有證據仍不足以證明慈濟的介入本身直接造成學業成績或行為發展的提升,也無法推論所有學生皆有相同結果,或已達成更廣泛的社會融入與經濟自立。

    This study examines the effectiveness of the Tzu Chi Foundation’s humanitarian relief strategy through the case of Menahil International School in Turkey, focusing on the long-term educational needs of Syrian refugee children. Based on Yang’s (2010) disaster management framework, the study evaluates three dimensions—information, resource mobilization, and inter-organizational collaboration—through two criteria: needs fulfillment and operational efficiency. A qualitative case study approach was adopted, combining an in-depth interview with multiple secondary sources, including Tzu Chi publications, Turkish government documents, international organization reports, student cases, and educational outcome data. The findings show that school dropout, child labor, and household economic hardship were interconnected barriers to education. Ali Kord Arabo’s case demonstrates how free education, teaching materials, and needs-based financial support reduced both schooling costs and part of the economic pressure associated with leaving child labor, enabling him to progress from part-time schooling in 2015 to full-time attendance in 2017 and subsequently to higher education. His later participation in humanitarian relief after the 2023 Türkiye–Syria earthquake also provides observable evidence of prosocial behavior, gratitude, reciprocity, and social responsibility. Similar patterns were identified among other Menahil graduates who participated in earthquake relief after progressing to higher education. Cross-case comparisons further show that students’ needs changed across different stages of development. Mohammed Hak returned to school after receiving targeted financial assistance when household economic pressure had forced him to work, while Abdulrahman Hritani’s trajectory illustrates the extension of educational needs toward higher education, professional skills, and volunteer participation. At the school level, 531 students had graduated from high school by the end of 2024, of whom 377 had progressed to higher education. Together, these findings indicate that observable outcomes extended beyond school re-entry to educational continuity, further education, skill development, and prosocial participation. In terms of efficiency, identified needs were translated into educational decisions and actions; resource mobilization demonstrated a certain degree of timeliness, appropriateness, and sustainability; and inter-organizational collaboration provided complementary administrative, educational, and professional resources. However, limitations in available data prevent precise measurement of information-processing speed, coordination costs, and the relative contribution of individual actors. Overall, Tzu Chi’s educational assistance addressed several major barriers to educational access and continuity and demonstrated a certain degree of operational efficiency. Longitudinal and cross-case evidence also reveals a recurring pattern in which some former beneficiaries progressed from receiving assistance to pursuing higher education, developing professional capacities, and contributing to society. Nevertheless, the available evidence does not establish that Tzu Chi’s intervention alone caused improvements in academic achievement or behavioral development, nor does it demonstrate uniform outcomes, broader social integration, or economic self-reliance.

    1 摘要 i 2 ABSTRACT iii 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS viii 5 LIST OF FIGURES xi 6 LIST OF TABLES xii 1 CHAPTER ONE 1 1.1 Research Motivation 3 1.2 Research Purpose 7 1.3 Definition of the terms 9 1.3.1 Tzu-Chi Foundation 9 1.3.2 Disaster Relief Strategy 11 1.3.3 Menahil International School 12 1.3.4 Refugee Education 13 1.4 Research Framework 15 1.4.1 Information 16 1.4.2 Resource Mobilization 19 1.4.3 Inter-organizational Collaboration 21 1.5 Background of the case 23 1.5.1 The Turkish Education System 24 1.5.2 Refugee Education in Turkey 26 1.5.3 Establishment and Development of Menahil International School 32 1.5.4 Curriculum, Textbooks, and Academic Recognition 37 2 CHAPTER TWO 40 2.1Information 40 2.1.1 Needs 42 2.1.2 Efficiency 48 2.2Resource Mobilization 54 2.2.1Needs 55 2.2.2 Efficiency 63 2.3Inter-organizational collaboration 66 2.3.1 Needs 68 2.3.2 Efficiency 72 3 CHAPTER THREE 79 3.1 Research Methods 79 3.2 Interviewees 80 3.3 Research Question Design 82 3.4 Research Limitations 86 4 CHAPTER FOUR 91 4.1 Information 91 4.1.1 Needs 91 4.1.2 Efficiency 99 4.2 Resource Mobilization 101 4.2.1 Needs 101 4.2.2 Efficiency 114 4.3 Inter-organizational Collaboration 126 4.3.1 Needs 126 4.3.2 Efficiency 130 5 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 139 5.1 Conclusions 139 5.2 Suggestions 146 5.3 Future Research Directions 149 6 REFERENCES 151

    (OCHA), U. N. O. f. t. C. o. H. A. (2022). Humanitarian Needs Overview Guidance (Humanitarian Programme Cycle 2023, Issue. U. N. O. f. t. C. o. H. A. (OCHA). file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/2.1_hpc_2023-hno_guidance.pdf
    Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.
    Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2022). Community Level Social Capital and Resilience1. In Routledge handbook of environmental hazards and society (pp. 201-213). Routledge.
    American instructional resources surveys. (2022). RAND Corporation. https://www. rand. org/pubs.
    Atesok, Z. O., Komsuoglu, A., & Ozer, Y. Y. (2019). An evaluation of refugees’ access to higher education: Case of Turkey and Istanbul University. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 119-136.
    Betancourt, T. S., & Khan, K. T. (2008). The mental health of children affected by armed conflict: Protective processes and pathways to resilience. International review of psychiatry, 20(3), 317-328.
    Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2014). At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Routledge.
    Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross‐Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public administration review, 66, 44-55.
    Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public administration review, 75(5), 647-663.
    Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative science quarterly, 604-632.
    Cerna, L. (2019). Refugee education: Integration models and practices in OECD countries.
    Charles, M. T., & Kim, J. C. K. (1988). Crisis management: A casebook. CC Thomas.
    Charmaz, K. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative health research, 14(7), 976-993.
    Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current directions in psychological science, 8(5), 156-159.
    Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public administration review, 67, 189-197.
    Coppola, D. (2015). Introduction to International Disaster Management. Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2012). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. In Hazards vulnerability and environmental justice (pp. 115-132). Routledge.
    Daddoust, L., Asgary, A., McBey, K. J., Elliott, S., & Normand, A. (2021). Spontaneous volunteer coordination during disasters and emergencies: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65, 102546.
    Declaration, I. (2016). Framework for action. Towards inclusive and equitable quality.
    Dryden-Peterson, S. (2016). Refugee education: The crossroads of globalization. Educational researcher, 45(9), 473-482.
    Dryden-Peterson, S., Adelman, E., Bellino, M. J., & Chopra, V. (2019). The purposes of refugee education: Policy and practice of including refugees in national education systems. Sociology of Education, 92(4), 346-366.
    El Khaled, Z., & Mcheick, H. (2019a). Case studies of communications systems during harsh environments: A review of approaches, weaknesses, and limitations to improve quality of service. International journal of distributed sensor networks, 15(2), 1550147719829960.
    El Khaled, Z., & Mcheick, H. (2019b). Challenges and requirements for communication technologies in connected zones. Procedia Computer Science, 155, 27-34.
    Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 36(3), 389-415.
    Güvendi, M. F., & Alpaydın, Y. (2022). Suriyeli mültecilerin yükseköğretimden istihdama geçiş deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 55(55), 365-388.
    Hazer, L., & Gredebäck, G. (2023). The effects of war, displacement, and trauma on child development. Humanities and social sciences communications, 10(1), 1-19.
    Kapucu, N. (2007). Non‐profit response to catastrophic disasters. Disaster prevention and management: An international journal, 16(4), 551-561.
    Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., & Collins, M. L. (2010). Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: Toward a network-centered approach. Administration & Society, 42(2), 222-247.
    Liu, C., & Shi, Q. (2023). Inter-organizational partnering strategies in disaster response: a complex network perspective. Systems, 11(8), 420.
    Liu, Y., Cao, L., Yang, D., & Anderson, B. C. (2022). How social capital influences community resilience management development. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 642-651.
    Menashy, F., & Zakharia, Z. (2017). Investing in the crisis: Private participation in the education of Syrian refugees. Education International, 1-40.
    Mendenhall, M., Russell, S. G., & Bruckner, E. (2017). Urban refugee education: Strengthening policies and practices for access, quality, and inclusion.
    Moshtari, M., & Gonçalves, P. (2017). Factors influencing interorganizational collaboration within a disaster relief context. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(4), 1673-1694.
    Muhammed T, S., & Mathew, S. K. (2022). The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media. International journal of data science and analytics, 13(4), 271-285.
    Na, J.-i., Okada, N., & Fang, L. (2009). Collaborative action development for community disaster reduction by utilizing the Yonmenkaigi system method. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,
    Ngamassi, L., Maitland, C., & Tapia, A. H. (2014). Humanitarian interorganizational information exchange network: how do clique structures impact network effectiveness? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1483-1508.
    Nolte, I. M. (2018). Interorganizational collaborations for humanitarian aid: An analysis of partnership, community, and single organization outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(3), 596-619.
    Palik, J., & Østby, G. (2023). Interventions to improve refugee children’s access to education and quality learning: A scoping review of existing impact evaluations. International Review of Education, 69(1), 227-247.
    Park, E.-S., & Yoon, D. (2022). The value of NGOs in disaster management and governance in South Korea and Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 69, 102739.
    Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252.
    Sato, H., Sudo, N., Hwang, T., Liu, J., & Yang, S.-C. (2026). Disaster relief strategies of the Buddhist Tzu Chi Charity Foundation: A case study of the 2024 Hualien Earthquake in Taiwan. Progress in Disaster Science, 100517.
    Souad, M., Tahraoui, R., & Tahraoui, G. (2022). Issues in education for Syrian elementary refugee learners in Turkey: a systematic review. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 10(1), 179-203.
    Tasli‐Karabulut, V., & Sancak, M. (2024). Vocational education and training: A pathway for refugees' integration in the labour market? Lessons from Syrian refugees in Tarsus, Turkey. Industrial Relations Journal, 55(6), 401-424.
    UNESCO. (2019). Global Education Monitoring Report, 2019:Migration, displacement & education: building bridges, not walls. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54676/DSNY6741
    UNHCR. (2019). Global Framework for Refugee Education. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/5dd50ce47.pdf
    UNHCR. (2025). Needs Assessment for Refugee Emergencies (NARE). U. N. H. C. f. R. (UNHCR). file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Needs%20assessment%20for%20refugee%20emergencies%20NARE.pdf
    Vesco, P., Baliki, G., Brück, T., Döring, S., Eriksson, A., Fjelde, H., Guha-Sapir, D., Hall, J., Knutsen, C. H., & Leis, M. R. (2025). The impacts of armed conflict on human development: A review of the literature. World Development, 187, 106806.
    Viravaidya, M., & Hayssen, J. (2001). Strategies to strengthen NGO capacity in resource mobilization through business activities. PDA and UNAIDS Joint Publication UNAIDS Best Practice Collection.
    Yang, X., Yao, Y., Tian, K., Jiang, W., Xing, Q., Yang, J., & Liu, C. (2023). Disaster response strategies of governments and social organizations: From the perspective of infrastructure damage and asymmetric resource dependence. Heliyon, 9(10).
    Yang, Y.-N. (2020). Disaster Management System.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE