| 研究生: |
楊欣宜 Yang, Hsin-Yi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
公司策略與公司治理結構關聯性之研究 The Relationship Between Business Strategy And Corporate Governance |
| 指導教授: |
楊朝旭
Young, Chaur-Shiuh |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 59 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 公司策略 、公司治理 、經營績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | business strategy, corporate governance, corporate performance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:93 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
不同公司策略型態其公司治理系統之設計應有所不同。本研究探討公司策略與公司治理之間關聯性,並進一步研究不同策略型態其最適公司治理結構之組成,若偏離該最適公司治理結構,是否對公司未來績效有負面影響。研究樣本為台灣2011至2015 上市櫃公司,透過Miles and Snow (1978) 之企業策略之分類,將樣本公司分為探勘者企業與防禦者企業。本研究得到以下結論: (1) 探勘者企業在外部董事比例、董事兼任經理人比例、經理人持股、大股東持股、外資持股上顯著高於防禦者企業。防禦者企業在董監事持股、盈餘股份偏離比、盈餘分配、採用交叉持股、金字塔結構顯著高於探勘者企業。(2) 在設計最適公司治理結構上,探勘者企業之最適公司治理設計為董事會規模大、董事兼任經理人比例高、法人持股低、盈餘股份偏離比低、不採用金字塔結構之五項變數設計,當探勘者企業公司治理設計偏離最適公司治理特性設計時,與公司績效為顯著負向影響。
This study examines the relationship between business strategy and corporate governance, and we assume that different types of business strategies will have different corporate governance designs. Also, different strategies have their own top performing corporate governance profile, and we called that the ideal profile. If a company’s corporate governance design deviated from the ideal profile, then the company’s performance has a negative effect. Data was collected from 2011 to 2015 listed companies from the stock exchange market and the over-the-counter market in Taiwan. This study uses Miles and Snow’s (1978) the prospector and defender strategies. Our results shows that: (1) Prospectors are significantly higher than defenders in outside directors, director-managers, large shareholder holdings, managerial holdings, and foreign institutional stockholdings. Defenders are significantly higher than prospectors in director and supervisor stockholdings, deviation ratios in surplus stocks, earning distribution, intersect holdings, and pyramid structures. (2) In designing the optimal corporate governance structure, the ideal profile of corporate governance design for prospectors contains five major variables: large board size, higher percentage of director-manager, low institutional shareholdings, low deviation from surplus shares, and no pyramid structure. When a prospector’s corporate governance design deviates from the optimal corporate governance design, it is significantly negatively related to corporate performance.
王文英、李佳玲,2008,策略、智慧資本觀點下之價值鏈活動與財務績效關連性:台灣資訊電子業之實證研究,會計評論,(47),89-121。
王育偉、鄭揚耀,2013,公司治理、資本支出決策與公司價值,管理與系統,20(4),665-695。
廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華,2006,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響,東吳經濟商學學報,(54),117-160。
李坤璋、陳勝源、王海華,2014,公司治理評量有效性之研究,科際整合管理研討會,31-45。
李馨蘋、陳治豪、程心瑤,2015,公司策略與公司績效之研究-公司治理之調節效果,中華管理評論國際學報,18(1),1-24。
林美鳳、梁嘉紋、金成隆,2010,公司股權結構與外資持股關係之研究,中山管理評論,18(1),101-142。
林郁翎、黃建華,2009,考慮公司治理之企業財務危機預警模型,東吳經濟商學學報,(64),23-55。
洪榮華、陳香如、林慧珍,2007,公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及公司績效之影響-研發密集產業之實證,中山管理評論,15(1),37-60。
高惠松、鄭品卉,2012,集團企業特性、公司治理與社會責任績效,中華管理評論國際學報,15(3),1-28。
高蘭芬、陳振遠、李焮慈,2006,資訊透明度及席次控制權與現金流量權偏離對公司績效之影響-以台灣電子業為例,台灣管理學刊,6(2),81-104。
陳瑞斌、許崇源,2007,公司治理結構與資訊揭露之關聯性研究,交大管理學報,27(2),55-109。
陳美華、洪世炳,2005,公司治理、股權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究,企業管理學報,65,129-153。
黃旭輝、黃一祥、張志向,2011,重大資本支出後的經營績效:成長機會與公司治理的角色,臺大管理論叢,22(1), 297-325。
楊朝旭、吳幸蓁,2009,資產減損之決定因素與盈餘資訊性後果:論公司治理之角色,會計評論,48,67-114。
闕廷諭、許峰睿、陳育成,2014,公司經營績效之探討:考慮公司治理與股權結構的影響,商學學報,22,67-86。
Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting review, 443-465.
Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 780-817.
Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of corporate finance, 14(3), 257-273.
Boyd, B. K., & Salamin, A. (2001). Strategic reward systems: A contingency model of pay system design. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), 777-792.
Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 479-491.
Chen, Y., & Jermias, J. (2014). Business strategy, executive compensation and firm performance. Accounting & Finance, 54(1), 113-134.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: a multiple measures‐based study. Strategic management journal, 11(5), 365-383.
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management journal, 37(6), 1603-
1617.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management journal, 42(6), 674-686.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64.
Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative science quarterly, 514-539.
Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of financial economics, 65(3), 365-395.
Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy, 88(2), 288-307.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 499-533.
Gerdin, J., & Greve, J. (2004). Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research—a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3-4), 303-326.
Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Academy of Management journal, 26(1), 5-26.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial management, 101-112.
Higgins, D., Omer, T. C., & Phillips, J. D. (2015). The influence of a firm's business strategy on its tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 674-702.
Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. Journal of accounting and economics, 32(1-3), 349-410.
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Rajan, M. V. (1997). The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. Accounting Review, 231-255.
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
King, R., & Clarkson, P. (2015). Management control system design, ownership, and performance in professional service organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 45, 24-39.
La Porta, R., & Lopez-de-Silanes, F. (1999). The benefits of privatization: Evidence from Mexico. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1193-1242.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 38(2), 163-184.
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 3(3), 546-562.
Miles, R. E., and C. C. Snow. (2003). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
Mousa, G. A., Desoky, A. M., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2012). The association between internal governance mechanisms and corporate value: evidence from BAHRAIN. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(1), 67-92.
Navissi, F., Sridharan, V. G., Khedmati, M., Lim, E. K., & Evdokimov, E. (2016). Business Strategy, Over-(Under-) Investment, and Managerial Compensation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(2), 63-86.
Patton, A., & Baker, J. C. (1987). Why wont directors rock the boat. Harvard Business Review, 65(6), 10.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York, 300, 28.
Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of financial economics, 20, 237-265.
Rajagopalan, N. (1997). Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: Evidence from electric utility firms. Strategic Management Journal, 761-785.
Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 26(2), 175-191.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Shortell, S. M., & Zajac, E. J. (1990). Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of management Journal, 33(4), 817-832.
Thomas, A. S., & Ramaswamy, K. (1996). Matching managers to strategy: further tests of the Miles and Snow typology. British Journal of Management, 7(3), 247-261.
Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of management review, 14(3), 423-444.
Wiersema, F., & Treacy, M. (1995). The Discipline of Market Leaders.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211.