台灣因其特殊地理區位處於颱風盛行之亞熱帶氣候與太平洋板塊及菲律賓海板塊交界地震事件頻繁，故針對自然災害的災害減少策略格外重要，因此台灣共同響應聯合國及國際組織所制訂之目標，國內積極推動相關減災策略，其中韌性在空間規劃方面如國土計畫內將因應氣候變遷極端氣候，營造永續韌性城鄉視為發展目標，同時台灣防災體系除都市防災計畫外另一具有直接相關性計畫為地區防救災計畫，目前地區韌性評估的相關研究尚不成熟，現有的評估流程不足以全面反映地方韌性水準，導致政策推動缺乏具體依據。
而目前相關韌性研究多聚焦於單一時間點之評估，針對韌性之動態屬性研究仍佔少數，故本研究透過2013年至2023年資料於環境、社會、經濟、基礎設施、災害影響等五大面向，初步建置地區災害韌性評估指標，結合過程與結果導向研究方法，於過程導向運用主成分分析將指標資料進行降維，並找出最能夠解釋資料的方向，而後透過熵值權重法利用熵值在資訊理論代表的不確定性，計算各評估指標能傳遞決策資訊能力，求算評估指標間之相對權重，並使用整合 GIS 與空間統計之空間自相關分析，於結果導向運用社區韌性測量模型，以理想中系統功能與實際功能之間差距進而量化適應性韌性，探討各地區不同年度之災害韌性空間及時間差異，檢視其空間分布型態與空間自相關特性，分析結果亦可了解研究地區內各空間單元之韌性分布差異及各地區內韌性時間變化差異，針對空間單元不同特性給予後續韌性調適策略，依此建議後續相關韌性政策推動之依據，根據本研究成果，西南方向市中心周邊邊陲地區在地區條件上有逐漸下降的趨勢，經適應性韌性評估後也發現以長期趨勢來看韌性為下降之趨勢，表明該地區在面對災害的適應能力是不足以恢復到較好的狀態，表明儘管在地區條件上相對較好但在經災害影響後將使該地區逐漸喪失韌性，本研究嘗試以更完整角度將韌性兩者特性結合整體評估高雄地區災害韌性，並作為相關單位作為政策上之依據，此評估架構亦可作為相關防救災計畫評估韌性之流程參考。

Taiwan's geographic location makes it highly vulnerable to natural disasters such as typhoons and earthquakes. In response, Taiwan promotes disaster risk reduction strategies aligned with international goals, emphasizing resilience in national spatial planning. However, current regional resilience assessments remain underdeveloped, often focusing on single time points and lacking dynamic perspectives.
This study establishes a regional disaster resilience assessment framework for Kaohsiung from 2013 to 2023 across five dimensions: environment, society, economy, infrastructure, and disaster impact. It integrates a process-oriented approach using Principal Component Analysis and the Entropy Weight Method to identify key indicators and their relative importance, and an outcome-oriented approach applying GIS-based spatial autocorrelation and a community resilience measurement model to quantify adaptive resilience.
Results show significant spatial and temporal variations in resilience, with southwestern peripheral areas exhibiting a long-term decline. This indicates insufficient adaptive capacity despite favorable conditions. The proposed framework offers a more comprehensive evaluation method and provides a policy reference for future resilience planning.

1. Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707-2716. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
2. Berkes, J., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems Building Resilience For Complexity And Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020
3. Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O’Rourke, T., Reinhorn, A., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W., & Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra - EARTHQ SPECTRA, 19. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
4. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
5. Carpenter, S. R., Westley, F., & Turner, M. G. (2005). Surrogates for Resilience of Social–Ecological Systems. Ecosystems, 8(8), 941-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
6. Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2014). The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 29, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
7. Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2016). Urban–Rural Differences in Disaster Resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(6), 1236-1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
8. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
9. Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647-656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019
10. Flanagan, B. E., Hallisey, E. J., Adams, E., & Lavery, A. (2018). Measuring Community Vulnerability to Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index. J Environ Health, 80(10), 34-36.
11. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
12. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. s., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Ambio, 31, 437-440. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437
13. Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
14. Geary, R. C. (1954). The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, 5(3), 115-146. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986645
15. Graveline, M.-H., & Germain, D. (2022). Disaster Risk Resilience: Conceptual Evolution, Key Issues, and Opportunities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 13(3), 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00419-0
16. Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=DHcjtSM5TogC
17. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096802
18. Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience. The National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/4919
19. Hung, H.-C., Yang, C.-Y., Chien, C.-Y., & Liu, Y.-C. (2016). Building resilience: Mainstreaming community participation into integrated assessment of resilience to climatic hazards in metropolitan land use management. Land Use Policy, 50, 48-58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
20. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.
21. Mayunga, J., & Peacock, W. (2010). The Development of a community disaster resilience framework and intex. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23402.75201
22. McEntire, D. (2005). Why Vulnerability Matters: Exploring the Merit of an Inclusive Disaster Reduction Concept. Disaster Prevention and Management, 14, 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560510595209
23. Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332142
24. Pintilescu, C., & Viorică, D. (2019). Current Methodological Approaches in Economic Resilience Analysis. Empirical Findings in the EaP Countries. In G. Rouet & G. C. Pascariu (Eds.), Resilience and the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood Countries: From Theoretical Concepts to a Normative Agenda (pp. 321-348). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25606-7_11
25. Quinlan, A. E., Berbés‐Blázquez, M., Haider, L. J., Peterson, G. D., & Allen, C. (2015). Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(3), 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12550
26. Roy, D. C., & Blaschke, T. (2015). Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 6(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.816785
27. Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E. H., Rietkerk, M., & Sugihara, G. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature, 461(7260), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08227
28. Sharifi, A. (2016). A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators, 69, 629-647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
29. Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282-292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
30. Stone-Jovicich, S. (2015). Probing the interfaces between the social sciences and social-ecological resilience insights from integrative and hybrid perspectives in the social sciences. Ecology and Society, 20(2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26270217
31. Tian, C. S., Fang, Y. P., Yang, L. E., & Zhang, C. J. (2019). Spatial-temporal analysis of community resilience to multi-hazards in the Anning River basin, Southwest China [Article]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, 9, Article 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101144
32. Walker, B., Holling, C. s., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2003). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecol. Soc., 9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
33. Wiréhn, L., Opach, T., & Neset, T.-S. (2016). Assessing agricultural vulnerability to climate change in the Nordic countries – an interactive geovisualization approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1143351
34. Yoon, D. K., Kang, J. E., & Brody, S. D. (2016). A measurement of community disaster resilience in Korea. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(3), 436-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1016142
35. Zhou, H., Wang, J. a., Wan, J., & Jia, H. (2010). Resilience to natural hazards: A geographic perspective. Natural Hazards, 53, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
36. Zhou, Y., Su, Q. H., Li, Y. L., & Li, X. W. (2022). Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Multi-Hazard Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Areas of Southwest China: A Case Study in Aba [Article]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 21, Article 12018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912018
1. 王憶滋. (2016). 從時空特性探討島嶼回復力之研究－以澎湖縣為例 國立成功大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v9ea9a
2. 白仁德, & 林建元. (2009). 各層級國土空間規劃與管理之脆弱度與回復力之評估研究---以縣市空間為對象(II). http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69082
3. 白昕恩. (2020). 氣候變遷下都市與鄉村韌性比較之研究-以嘉義縣為例 國立成功大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p8ad72
4. 宋郁玲, 林貝珊, & 涂建翊. (2018). 以社會脆弱性與韌性建構脆弱性單元的可能性分析臺灣中部地區強降雨災害為例 [Constructing the Spatial Units of Vulnerability and Social Resilience by the Analysis of Social-spatial Differences A Case Study of Rainfall Disaster in Central Taiwan]. 地理學報(89), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.201806_(89).0001
5. 林文苑. (2019). 鄉鎮市區層級災害耐韌力指標關聯性與權重之DANP分析以及空間聚集性分析之應用 [Relationship and Weights of Township Level Disaster Resilience Indicators and the Application of Spatial Clustering Analysis]. 臺灣土地研究, 22(1), 59-103. https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.201905_22(1).0003
6. 林震岩. (2018). 多變量分析：SPSS的操作與應用. 智勝文化.
7. 洪鴻智, 徐牧謙, & 洪至萱. (2021). 都會颱洪災害韌性變遷及其與脆弱度、調適力之連結 [Changes in Metropolitan Typhoon-Flood Hazard Resilience and Its Links with Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity]. 地理學報(99), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.202108_(99).0003
8. 張學聖, & 劉佩佳. (2015). 考量空間關聯之地區洪災脆弱性研究以雲林縣易淹水地區為例 [Local Vulnerability under the Effect of Spatial Association A Case Study in Flood-prone Areas of Yunlin]. 地理學報(79), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.2015.79.01
9. 廖桂賢. (2020). 新北市政府水利局年報 (承洪韌性是什麼?跟防洪有什麼關係?, Issue. 新北市政府.
10. 廖興中, 張鎧如, & 李天申. (2020). 新北市里層級之水災暨坡地災害脆弱性分析：全盤型脆弱性管理架構的初步應用 [Comprehensive Vulnerability Management Framework of Village Vulnerability Assessment to Floods and Landslides in New Taipei City: A Preliminary Empirical Study]. 行政暨政策學報(71), 89-137. https://doi.org/10.29865/pap.202012_(71).0003