簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賴鵬仁
Lai, Peng-Jen
論文名稱: 品質績效衡量系統建構之研究--以某專業TFT-LCD面板製造商為例
Research on Quality Performance Measurement System Constructed - A Case Study in a Professional TFT-LCD Panel Makers
指導教授: 林清河
Lin, Chin-Ho
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系碩士在職專班
Department of Industrial and Information Management (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 65
中文關鍵詞: 品質管理品質機能展開法平衡計分卡層級分析法績效衡量
外文關鍵詞: quality management (QM), quality function development (QFD), balanced scorecard (BSC), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), performance measurement
相關次數: 點閱:187下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 品質管理(Quality Management),一般而言是指為了保障及改善產品品質使其達到一定的水準,所進行的各種相關的管理活動。而現代講求的品質管理不僅僅包括在製品在生產現場所進行的各種品質方面的檢查工作,還包括了在非生產性的部門為了要提高其業務執行的品質而進行的整體性品質管理
    。品質管理現在已經被定義成為一種致力在所有組織中實現持續改善的功
    能並實現公司水準的管理理念。
    另外,管理大師彼德•杜拉克(Peter Drucker)曾經說過很少有其他要素如組織的績效衡量指標這麼重要,許多的企業都需要且渴望對現行組織的績效能夠進行客觀且有效的衡量。而平衡計分卡正是一套細心挑選的策略衡量工具
    ,是組織主管對其員工及其他的利害關係者,傳達投資的成果並驅動績
    效,來達成最終的任務及策略目標。
    本研究對象為某TFT-LCD Display製造商之後段模組生產工廠,先利用其製程PFMEA管控表由製程品質管控小組針對製造階段重要改善項目進行QFD品質機能之展開,接下來進行其績效衡量系統之建構,先列出平衡計分卡各構面的相關衡量指標,藉由專家訪談調查了解經營管理階層最重視的關鍵指標,並由製程品質管控小組討論定義出重要品質管控項目和關鍵績效指標間的關連性,最後再利用問卷調查及AHP層級分析法找出各構面及各栺標之重要性權重,以利針對該個案公司提出管理建議。本研究希望藉由平衡計分卡的導入並使用層級分析法分析後可提供給個案公司檢視在品質要項和績效衡量指標間之關係,了解其重要性之結果並提供修正策略的方向。

    The research reviewed relevant literature both in Taiwan and abroad and used a LCD factory of a domestic TFT-LCD panel manufacturing company as a case study. The investigation aims to identify key items in the quality management and control system of LCM manufacturing define performance measurement indicators, as well as determine correlation among items and indicators and their priorities, so as to make performance measurement more complete and practical.
    The framework of the research will first established the quality house of developing quality function to the case company. Then list relevant measurement indicators for each dimension of the balanced score card and then find the key indicators valued by management level mostly, as well as define the key quality management and control items in PFMEA. Finally, it utilizes the AHP analytic hierarchy process to find relevance and priority of each dimension and indicator, and analyzes the differences in research results between the supervisor and staff teams, so as to propose management suggestions for the case company.

    摘要..................................................I EXTENDED ABSTRACT....................................II 致謝.................................................VII 目錄................................................VIII 表目錄.................................................X 圖目錄................................................XI 第一章 緒論.............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機................................1 第二節 研究目的......................................2 第三節 研究範圍與對象.................................2 第四節 研究流程.......................................3 第二章 文獻探討...........................................5 第一節 品質機能展開法(QFD).............................5 第二節 平衡計分卡(BSC)................................9 第三節 層級分析法(AHP) ...............................16 第四節 小結..........................................20 第三章 研究方法..........................................21 第一節 研究架構......................................21 第二節 建立品質機能展開...............................24 第三節 平衡計分卡之導入及衡量指標......................28 第四節 層級分析法的步驟...............................30 第五節 小結..........................................33 第四章 研究資料分析.......................................34 第一節 績效衡量指標...................................34 第二節 FMEA重要製程管控項目............................36 第三節 品質屋建立.....................................38 第四節 問卷發放及資料分析..............................41 第五章 結論與建議.........................................47 第一節 結論..........................................47 第二節 確認結論適用性..................................50 第二節 給個案公司的建議................................51 第三節 未來研究之建議..................................53 參考文獻..................................................55 附錄一...................................................61

    一、英文文獻
    Akshay, K. & Ashraf W. L. (2004). Applying Quality Function
    Deployment for the Design of a Next-Generation
    Manufacturing Simulation Game. Int. J. Engng
    Ed, Vol. 20, No. 5, 787-800
    Alexandre, P. & João, M. C. (2008). The Impact of Quality
    Management on Profitability: An Empirical Study. The
    Flagship Research Journal of International Conference of
    the Production and Operations Management Society, Vol. 1,
    No. 1, 66-77
    Ali, B.J. (2013). The Effect of Quality Management
    Practices on Organizational Performance in Jordan: An
    Empirical Study. International Journal of Financial
    Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 93-109
    Ali, N., Habibollah, J., Sadra, R. & Ali, A.T. (2011). The
    Effect of Quality Management and Participative Decision-
    Making on Individual Performance. 2011 International
    Conference on Information Communication and
    Management, IPCSIT, Vol.16, 83-87
    Arawati, A., Mhd, S. A., & Jaafar, M. (2009). An Empirical
    Investigation on the Impact of Quality Management on
    Productivity and profitability: Associations and
    Mediating Effect. Contemporary Management Research, Vol.
    5, No. 1, 77-92
    Asma, M. A. B. (2006). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A
    Methodology for Win-Win Management. JKAU: Econ. & Adm.,
    Vol. 20, No. 1, 3-16
    Azeem, A., Magnus, G. & Aamir, S. (2010). Limitations of
    the Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique with Respect to
    Geographically Distributed Stakeholders. World Academy of
    Science, Engineering and Technology, 45 2010, 111-116
    Didik, W., Moses, L. S. & Patdono, S. (2012). Impact of
    Quality Management Practices on Bu Performance: A
    Research Model Development. International Conference on
    IML 2012, 289-294
    Eshan, S. J. (2012). A Case Study on Quality Function
    Deployment (QFD). IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
    Engineering, Vol. 3, Issue 6, 27-35
    Fred, A.F. (2012). Impact of Quality Management Practices
    on the Performance and Growth of Small and Medium Sized
    Enterprises (Smes) in Chana. International Journal of
    Business and Social Science, Vol. 3, No. 13, 1-13
    Gholamreza, J., Ali, N. A. & Abdolazim, M. (2010). A
    quality function deployment approach to HR strategy
    formation and prioritization: Meeting client satisfaction
    in service organizations. Africa Journal of Business
    Management , Vol. 4, No. 16, 3513-3521
    Jan, L. R. (2006). An Integrated Balanced Scorecard
    Strategic Planning Model for Nonprofit Organizations.
    Journal of Practical Consulting, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 25-
    35
    John, D. K. & Dan, S. (2007). Use Analytic Hierarchy
    Process For Project Selection. Six Sigma Forum Magazine ,
    August 2007, 22-29
    Khaled, M. H., Abd Elbaset, A. H. & Mostafa, M. K. (2010).
    The Multiplicative Analytic Hierarchy Process (MIAHP) as
    a Quality Criterion Determining the Technological Value
    of the Egyptian Cotton Varieties. American Journal of
    Plant Sciences, 2010, No. 1, 106-112
    Khomba, J. K., Vermaak, F.N.S. & Gouws, D.G. (2011).
    Redesigning an innovation section of the Balanced
    Scorecard model: An African perspective. Southern
    African Business Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1-20
    Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B. & Ka Kwai G. P.
    (2009). An evidential reasoning based approach for
    quality function deployment under uncertainty. Expert
    Systems with Applications, 2009, No 36,5684–5694
    Mahaptra, S.S. (2013). Design of Office Chair: A Quality
    Function Deployment Approach. Advanced Materials
    Manufacturing & Characterization, Vol 3, Issue 1, 131-136
    Margarita, I. (2008). The Balanced Scorecard Method : From
    Theory to Practice. Intelektine Ekonomika Intellectual
    Economics, 2008, No. 1, 18–28
    Maria, N.P-A., Rui, S., & Javier, L.M. (2009). Quality
    management practices as a forerunner of absorptive
    capacity. An empirical study. Investment Management
    and Financial Innovations, Vol 6, Issue 3, 264-272
    Matthew, J. L. & Robert, L. N. (2007). The analytic
    hierarchy process in medical and health care decision
    making: A literature review. European Journal of
    Operational Research, 2008, No 189, 194–207
    Max, H., Paul, J.S., Arron, S. F. & Richard, A. R.J.
    (2012). The balanced scorecard: Sustainable performance
    assessment for forensic laboratories. Science and
    Justice, 2012, No 52, 209–216
    Michael, M., John, G. W. & Michael, J. F. (2008).
    Implementing A Balanced
    Scorecard In A Not-For-Profit Organization. Journal of
    Business & Economics Research , 2008, Vol. 6, No. 9, 67-80
    Petr, S. & Andrea, C. (2011). Balanced Scorecard and
    Compensation. International Conference on Business and
    Economics Research IPEDR , 2011, Vol.16, 42-46
    Pregiwati, P., Kazem, A. & Luong, L. (2013). Integrating
    Environmental Requirements into Quality Function
    Deployment for Designing Eco-Friendly Product.
    International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and
    Manufacturing, Vol. 1, No. 1, 80-84
    Robert S. Kaplan. (2010). Conceptual Foundations of the
    Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School, Harvard
    University Samir, G. & Subrata, M. (2006). Measurement of
    Corporate Performance Through Balanced Scorecard : An
    Overview. Vidyasagar University Journal of Commerce, Vol.
    11, 60-70
    Sonam, K., & Jitendra, S. (2013). From Conception to
    Creation -Quality Function Deployment in Health Sector.
    Mathematics and Computers in Contemporary Science, 84-89
    Tanmoy, C., Tamal, G., & Pranab, K. D. (2011). Application
    of Analytic Hierarchy Process And Heuristic Algorithm In
    Solving Vendor Selection On Problem. Business
    Intelligence Journal , 2011, Vol.4, No.1, 167-177
    Thomas, L. S. (2008). Decision making with the analytic
    hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No.
    1, 83-98
    Vidosav, D.M. & Valentina, D.M. (2012). Researches Of The
    Impact Quality Management Principles On Integrated
    Management System Practices In Serbia. ACTA Technical
    Corviniensis – Bulletin of Engineering, 2012, January-
    March,143-149
    Xiaosong, Z. & Petri, P. (2007). Improving Mobile Services
    Design : A QFD Approach. Computing and Informatics, 2007,
    Vol. 26, 369–381

    二、中文文獻
    水野滋、赤尾洋二. (2005).品質機能展開法—如何有效掌握顧客需求. 先鋒
    企管,桃園縣
    李焙偉、時台華、賴美嬌. (2011). 醫院導入平衡計分卡影響因素之探討., Journal of Commercial Modernization,Vo1.6, No.2, (2011), 213-228
    吳淑鶯、鄒欣宜. (2008). 應用平衡計分卡觀點建立網路行銷績效評估指標
    與關係模式-以旅行社為例. Commerce & Management Quarterly, Vol. 9,
    No.4, 443- 464
    林士彥、鄭健雄. (2009). 以平衡計分卡觀點探討休閒渡假旅館績效指標-應
    用模糊層級分析法. 品質學報,Vol. 16, No. 6 (2009), 441-458
    林文燦、戴玉娟、林峻正、詹勳峰. (2004). 將品質機能展開導入人事管理診
    斷之探討. Journal of Management & Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3, July 2004, 387-
    408
    保羅 尼文, (2009). 平衡計分卡最佳實務—按部就班,成功導入. 商周出版,
    台北市
    陳文亮、褚翊岑、蔡雅玲、張旭銘. (2011). 以品質機能展開建構組合式情境
    家具需求與產品設計. Journal of Professional Mechanical Engineers,
    2011,Vol. 4, No.1, 4-9
    陳文亮、李佳頤. (2010). 應用品質機能展開法於鎖匙設計之研究. 工業設
    計122, 第三十八卷 第一期,69-74
    陳世宗. (2005). 層次分析法在企業價值評估之運用與實證探討. 國立空中大學
    管理與資訊學系管理與資訊學報,民94,10 期,87-113
    陳國嘉、王裕文、方顯光. (2011). 平衡計分卡之規劃與設計一以台北捷運公
    司為例. 全球管理與經濟,第七卷第二期, 56-72
    黃士滔、粘銘訓、張又升、游輝懋、羅際筠. (2009). 品質機能展開與灰關聯
    分析之應用-以嬌生ACUVUE®隱形眼鏡為例. 工程科技與教育期刊,
    第六卷 第四期, 359-373
    黃永東、鄭景安、包珀誌. (2007). 整合QFD和TRIZ在綠色創新産品設計之探
    討. 品質月刊, 2007年第三期, 23-26
    劉順仁. (2004). 論平衡計分卡的最新發展及其在公共部門的應用. 國家政策
    季刊, 第三期 第二卷, 79-106
    劉說芳、李雁隆、高鳳如. (2012). 基於QFD與FMEA 的TFT-LCD工業包裝設
    計研究. 設計學報,第17卷第4 期,63-77
    蔡宗佑、林谷鴻. (2006). 應用平衡計分卡探討高科技光電產業的營運績效及達成組織目標的效能評估-以個案公司(背光模組廠)為例. 工程科技與
    教育學刊, 第三卷 第二期, 210-226

    無法下載圖示 校內:2017-09-03公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE