簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 朱利葉
Sinabutar, Julio Jeremia
論文名稱: 結合深度學習道路語義分割與道路權狀向量資料之行人空間可行性評估
Pedestrian Space Feasibility Assessment by Integrating Deep Learning-Based Road Semantic Segmentation and Road Certificate Vector Data
指導教授: 饒見有
Rau, Jiann-Yeou
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 測量及空間資訊學系
Department of Geomatics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 緩衝區分析憑證資料語義分割人行道道路
外文關鍵詞: Buffer analysis, Certificate data, Semantic segmentation, Sidewalks, Roads
相關次數: 點閱:13下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人本都市環境需要具備以行人為本之公共空間與完善之步行設施。在印尼,此原則受到《Indonesian Traffic and Road Transportation Act Number 22, 2009》之支持,其規定所有供公眾通行之道路皆須設置行人設施。依據印尼公共工程與住宅部所頒布之《Technical Planning of Pedestrian Facilities No. 02/SE/M/2018》,人行道最小寬度須達 1.5 m。然而,都市道路普遍存在三種情況:具備足夠空間卻未設置人行道、已設置人行道但寬度不足 1.5 m,以及完全缺乏設置人行道之空間。現有研究多著重於人行道之偵測或其狀況評估,但鮮少探討在既有土地條件限制下,是否具備符合最低標準之足夠空間。
    為填補此研究缺口,本研究提出一套整合無人機影像道路語意分割、緩衝區分析,以及道路權狀向量資料之方法,其中向量資料係由印尼 Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency 提供。研究採用五種深度學習模型,包括 U-Net, FPN, DeepLabV3+, MA-Net 與 SegFormer,並以來自 Kendari City, Sleman Regency 與 Tainan City 之無人機影像進行訓練。測試則於 Pematang Siantar City 進行,使用空間解析度分別為 4.42、8.84、13.26 與 17.68 cm/pixel 之正射影像。
    透過五種深度學習模型與四種空間解析度之組合,共產生 20 組分割結果。單因子重複量數變異數分析顯示,六組空間解析度比較中有五組達顯著差異,而不同模型間之差異則未達顯著。Fleiss’ kappa 顯示各模型於所有空間解析度下皆達「幾乎完全一致」之結果。後續分析選擇由 SegFormer 於 13.26 cm/pixel 所產生之分割結果,因其在維持較高精度之同時,亦能完整保留道路連通性。
    緩衝區與疊圖分析共辨識出 18 個人行道寬度不足 1.5 m 之道路區段,其面積介於 1.001 至 62.834 m²。透過 Google Street View 進一步判釋發現,部分不足區段因鄰近空地或農地,仍可透過土地徵收改善;然而,另一些區段則鄰接永久性建築物,因此不易進行改善。本研究所提出之方法,可在無須大量實地調查之情況下,快速辨識人行空間不足之道路區段。

    A humane urban environment requires pedestrian-friendly public spaces and adequate pedestrian facilities. In Indonesia, this principle is supported by the Indonesian Traffic and Road Transportation Act Number 22, 2009, which mandates pedestrian facilities on all public roads. According to the Technical Planning of Pedestrian Facilities No. 02/SE/M/2018, by the Indonesian Ministry of Public Works and Housing, sidewalks must have a minimum width of 1.5 m. However, urban roads commonly exhibit three conditions: sufficient space without sidewalks, sidewalks narrower than 1.5 m, or no available sidewalk space. Existing studies generally detect sidewalks or evaluate their condition, but rarely assess whether sufficient space exists to meet minimum standards under current land constraints.
    To address this gap, this study proposes a framework integrating UAV-based road semantic segmentation, buffer analysis, and road certificate vector data obtained from the Indonesian Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. 5 deep learning models, i.e., U-Net, FPN, DeepLabV3+, MA-Net, and SegFormer, were trained using UAV imagery from Kendari City, Sleman Regency, and Tainan City. Testing was conducted in Pematang Siantar City using orthophotos with spatial resolutions of 4.42, 8.84, 13.26, and 17.68 cm/pixel.
    Combining 4 kinds of spatial resolution and 5 deep learning models, we have obtained 20 segmentation outputs. One-way repeated measures ANOVA showed significant differences in 5 of 6 comparisons between spatial resolutions, whereas differences between models were insignificant. Fleiss’ kappa indicated “almost perfect” agreement among models. The result selected for further analysis was generated by SegFormer at 13.26 cm/pixel because it preserved complete road connectivity while maintaining high accuracy.
    Buffer and overlay analysis identified 18 road segments with sidewalk widths below 1.5 m, ranging from 1.001 to 62.834 m². Interpretation using Google Street View showed that some segments could be improved through land acquisition, whereas others bordered permanent buildings and were impractical to fulfil. The proposed framework enables rapid identification of road segments lacking sufficient sidewalk space without extensive field investigation.

    摘要 iii Abstract iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v TABLE OF CONTENTS vi LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Sidewalk Width from Indonesian Ministry of Public Works and Housing (2018) 7 2.2 Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning Techniques 10 2.2.1 State-of-The-Art 10 2.2.2 Data Augmentation 16 2.2.3 Loss Functions 19 2.2.4 Optimization Algorithms or Optimizers 20 2.2.5 Learning Curves 21 2.2.6 Performance Metrics 22 2.3 Statistical Testing 23 2.3.1 Spatial Resolution and Model Comparisons 24 2.3.2 Level of Agreement of The Segmentation Results 27 2.4 Buffer Analysis 28 2.5 Road Certificate 31 2.6 Vector Simplification 33 CHAPTER 3 Methodology 35 3.1 Dataset Collection and Pre-processing 35 3.1.1 Dataset Collection 36 3.1.2 Dataset Pre-processing 39 3.2 Data Processing 44 3.3 Evaluation and Post-processing 46 3.3.1 Evaluation 46 3.3.2 Post-processing 48 CHAPTER 4 Results and Discussions 51 4.1 Evaluations on Segmentation Results 51 4.1.1 Training result 51 4.1.2 Testing result 51 4.1.3 One-way repeated measures ANOVA test 64 4.1.4 Fleiss' kappa measurements 73 4.2 Post-Processing 75 CHAPTER 5 Conclusions and Suggestions 88 5.1 Conclusions 88 5.2 Suggestions 90 REFERENCES 93

    Abdi, H. (2010). The Greenhouse-Geisser Correction. Encyclopedia of Research Design, 1–10.
    Abou-senna, H., Radwan, E., & Mohamed, A. (2022). Investigating the Correlation Between Sidewalks and Pedestrian Safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 166(December 2021), 106548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106548
    Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2001). Outlier Detection for High Dimensional Data. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/375663.375668
    Alzubaidi, M., Shah, U., Agus, M., & Househ, M. (2024). FetSAM: Advanced Segmentation Techniques for Fetal Head Biometrics in Ultrasound Imagery. IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 5(March 2024), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3382487
    Ardohain, C., & Fei, S. (2025). The Impacts of Training Data Spatial Resolution on Deep Learning in Remote Sensing. Science of Remote Sensing, 11(December 2024), 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100185
    Ayyala, D. N., Ghosh, S., & Linder, D. F. (2022). Covariance Matrix Testing in High Dimension Using Random Projections. Computational Statistics, 37(3), 1111–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01166-4
    Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended Effect Size Statistics for Repeated Measures Designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379–384.
    Barinov, R., Gai, V., Kuznetsov, G., & Golubenko, V. (2023). Automatic Evaluation of Neural Network Training Results. Computers, 12(16), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12020026
    Bichri, H., Chergui, A., & Hain, M. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Train / Test Split Ratio on the Performance of Pre-Trained Models with Custom Datasets. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 15(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150235
    Blanca, M. J., Arnau, J., García-Castro, F. J., Alarcón, R., & Bono, R. (2023). Repeated Measures ANOVA and Adjusted F -tests When Sphericity Is Violated: Which procedure is best? Frontiers in Psychology, 14(August 2023), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192453
    Boschetti, L., Flasse, S. P., & Brivio, P. A. (2004). Analysis of the Conflict Between Omission and Commission in Low Spatial Resolution Dichotomic Thematic Products: The Pareto Boundary. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91(February 2004), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.015
    Box, G. E. P. (1954a). Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, I. Effect of Inequality of Variance in the One-Way Classification. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(2), 290–302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2236731
    Box, G. E. P. (1954b). Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, II. Effects of Inequality of Variance and of Correlation Between Errors in the Two-Way Classification. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728717
    Brezina, T., Graser, A., & Leth, U. (2017). Geometric Methods for Estimating Representative Sidewalk Widths Applied to Vienna’s Streetscape Surfaces Database. Journal of Geographical Systems, 19(December 2016), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0245-2
    Brown, V. A. (2021). An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351
    Brunner, E., & Munzel, U. (2000). The Nonparametric Behrens‐Fisher Problem: Asymptotic Theory and a Small‐Sample. Biometrical Journal, 42(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(200001)42:1%3C17::AID-BIMJ17%3E3.0.CO;2-U
    Cao, M., Tran, Q., Nguyen, N., & Chang, K. (2020). Survey on Performance of Deep Learning Models for Detecting Road Damages Using Multiple Dashcam Image Resources. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 46(April 2020), 101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101182
    Chatfield, M., & Mander, A. (2009). The Skillings–Mack test (Friedman test when there are missing data). Stata J, 9(2), 299–305.
    Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2018). Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 801–818.
    Chen, Z., Deng, L., Luo, Y., Li, D., Gonçalves, W. N., Nurunnabi, A. A., Li, J., Wang, C., & Li, D. (2022). Road Extraction in Remote Sensing Data: A Survey. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 112(April 2022), 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102833
    Chomean, S., Khemtonglang, N., Mukda, E., & Kaset, C. (2025). AI-powered Body Fluid Cell Classification: Development and Validation Using Roboflow and YOLOv11n Framework. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 19(May 2025), 100243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100243
    Cira, C.-I., Kada, M., Manso-callejo, M.-Á., Alcarria, R., & Sanchez, B. B. (2022). Improving Road Surface Area Extraction via Semantic Segmentation with Conditional Generative Learning for Deep Inpainting Operations. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(January 2022), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010043
    Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
    Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
    Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical Nonparametric Statistics (B. W. II, M. O’Sullivan, & J. Perea (eds.); 3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
    Corazza, M. V., Mascio, P. Di, & Moretti, L. (2016). Managing Sidewalk Pavement Maintenance: A Case Study to Increase Pedestrian Safety. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 3(2016), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2016.04.001
    Demir, I., Koperski, K., Lindenbaum, D., Pang, G., Huang, J., Basu, S., Hughes, F., Tuia, D., & Raskar, R. (2018). DeepGlobe 2018: A Challenge to Parse the Earth through Satellite Images. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 172–181.
    Dhawan, A., Bodani, P., & Garg, V. (2019). Post Processing of Image Segmentation using Conditional Random Fields. 2019 6th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 729–734.
    Dina, A. S., Siddique, A. B., & Manivannan, D. (2023). A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things using Focal Loss Function. Internet of Things, 22(January), 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100699
    Dong, S., & Jiang, C. (2025). Data Thinning of Ship Engine Room Equipment Based on Improved Douglas-Peucker Algorithm. 2025 8th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTIS68762.2025.11214982
    Douglas, D. H., & Peucker, T. K. (1973). Algorithms for the Reduction of the Number of Points Required to Represent a Digitized Line or Its Caricature. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 10(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.3138/FM57-6770-U75U-7727
    Esri. (2024). How Buffer (Analysis) works. ArcGIS Pro Documentation. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/analysis/how-buffer-analysis-works.htm
    Fan, T., Wang, G., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2020). MA-Net: A Multi-Scale Attention Network for Liver and Tumor Segmentation. IEEE Access, 8, 179656–179665. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025372
    Fan, Y., Ding, X., Wu, J., Ge, J., & Li, Y. (2021). High Spatial-resolution Classification of Urban Surfaces using A Deep Learning Method. Building and Environment, 200(March 2021), 107949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107949
    Fatima, N. (2020). Enhancing Performance of a Deep Neural Network: A Comparative Analysis of Optimization Algorithms. ADCAIJ Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 9(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.14201/ADCAIJ2020927990
    Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.
    Friedman, M. (1937). The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522
    Fu, L., Chen, Y., Ji, W., & Yang, F. (2024). Biomedical Signal Processing and Control SSTrans-Net : Smart Swin Transformer Network for medical image segmentation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 91(February 2024), 106071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106071
    Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An Extension of Box’s Results on the Use of the F Distribution in Multivariate Analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(3), 885–891. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2237272
    GISCARTA. (2025). Buffer Analysis. GISCARTA. https://giscarta.com/gis-glossary/buffer-analysis
    Hernandez, H. (2021). Testing for Normality: What is the Best Method? (Vol. 6). www.forschem.org
    Horváth, E., Pozna, C., & Unger, M. (2022). Real-Time LIDAR-Based Urban Road and Sidewalk Detection. Sensors, 22(December 2021), 1–17.
    Hosseini, M., Miranda, F., Lin, J., & Silva, C. T. (2022). CitySurfaces: City-scale Semantic Segmentation of Sidewalk Materials. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79(December 2021), 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103630
    Hosseini, M., Sevtsuk, A., Miranda, F., Cesar, R. M., & Silva, C. T. (2023). Mapping the Walk: A Scalable Computer Vision Approach for Generating Sidewalk Network Datasets from Aerial Imagery. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 101(April 2022), 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101950
    Hou, Q., & Ai, C. (2020). A Network-level Sidewalk Inventory Method using Mobile LiDAR and Deep Learning. Transportation Research Part C, 119(August 2020), 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102772
    Huang, H., Lan, Y., Yang, A., Zhang, Y., Wen, S., & Deng, J. (2020). Deep learning versus Object-based Image Analysis (OBIA) in Weed Mapping of UAV Imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(9), 3446–3479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1706112
    Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Randomized Block and Split-Plot Designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986001001069
    Iakubovskii, P. (2019). Segmentation Models Pytorch. GitHub Repository. https://github.com/qubvel/segmentation_models.pytorch
    Jayoma, J. M., Navales, G. P., Bustamante, F. A. M., & Tradio, L. R. (2023). Enhanced Ramer-Douglas-Peucker Algorithm for Efficient 2D Line Simplification. 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM60674.2023.10589058
    Jeong, H., Lee, Y., Lee, B., Jung, E., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2024). Applications of Geographically Weighted Machine Learning Models for Predicting Soil Heavy Metal Concentrations Across Mining Sites. Science of the Total Environment, 957(November 2024), 177667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177667
    Jiang, Y., Han, S., Li, D., Bai, Y., & Wang, M. (2022). Automatic Concrete Sidewalk Deficiency Detection and Mapping with Deep Learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 207(June 2022), 117980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117980
    John, S. (1972). The Distribution of a Statistic Used for Testing Sphericity of Normal Distributions. Biometrika, 59(1), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/59.1.169
    Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep Learning in Agriculture: A Survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147(July 2017), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016
    Kassambara, A. (2020a). Friedman Test in R. Datanovia. https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/friedman-test-in-r/
    Kassambara, A. (2020b). Repeated Measures ANOVA in R. Datanovia. https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/repeated-measures-anova-in-r/
    Kassambara, A. (2025). Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests (0.7.3). CRAN. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.rstatix
    Khosla, C., & Saini, B. S. (2020). Enhancing Performance of Deep Learning Models with Different Data Augmentation Techniques: A Survey. 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), 1–7.
    Kweon, B., Rosenblatt-Naderi, J., Ellis, C. D., Shin, W., & Danies, B. H. (2021). The Effects of Pedestrian Environments on Walking Behaviors and Perception of Pedestrian Safety. Sustainability, 13(July 2021), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/%0Asu13168728
    Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan [Traffic And Road Transportation], Pub. L. No. UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2009, 1 (2009). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38654/uu-no-22-tahun-2009
    Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310
    Lee, D. G., You, J. H., Park, S. G., Baeck, S. H., & Lee, H. J. (2019). Comparison Between Object-based Method and Deep Learning Method for Extracting Road Features Using Submeter-grade High-resolution Satellite Imagery. Sensors and Materials, 31(10), 3335–3353. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2019.2472
    Li, H., Rajbahadur, G. K., Lin, D., Bezemer, C.-P., & Jiang, Z. M. (2024). Keeping Deep Learning Models in Check: A History-Based Approach to Mitigate Overfitting. IEEE Access, 12(March), 70676–70689. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3402543
    Lin, T., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017). Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2117–2125.
    Liu, F., & Wang, L. (2022). UNet-based Model for Crack Detection Integrating Visual Explanations. Construction and Building Materials, 322(December 2021), 126265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126265
    Liu, Y., Bai, X., Wang, J., Li, G., Li, J., & Lv, Z. (2024). Image Semantic Segmentation Approach Based on DeepLabV3 Plus Network with an Attention Mechanism. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 127(September 2023), 107260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107260
    Lu, C., Wen, Y., Li, Y., Mao, Q., & Zhai, Y. (2024). Sea-land Segmentation Method Based on an Improved MA-Net for Gaofen-2 Images. Earth Science Informatics, 17(June 2024), 4115–4129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01391-7
    Lu, C., Xu, H., Zhang, X., & Liu, G. (2026). STNet: A Spatio-temporal Network for Binary Change Detection in High-resolution Remote Sensing Images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 234(February 2026), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.02.003
    Maharana, K., Mondal, S., & Nemade, B. (2022). A Review: Data Pre-processing and Data Augmentation Techniques. Global Transitions Proceedings, 3(April), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2022.04.020
    Mahboob, Z., Khan, M. A., Lodhi, E., Nawaz, T., & Khan, U. S. (2025). Using SegFormer for Effective Semantic Cell Segmentation for Fault Detection in Photovoltaic Arrays. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 15(April 2024), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2024.3450009
    Manai, E., Mejri, M., & Fattahi, J. (2024). Confusion Matrix Explainability to Improve Model Performance: Application to Network Intrusion Detection. 2024 10th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT62066.2024.10708595
    Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Ann. Math. Statist, 18(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
    Mauchly, J. W. (1940). Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal n-Variate Distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(2), 204–209. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2235878
    Mitchell-Olds, T., & Shaw, R. G. (1987). Regression Analysis of Natural Selection: Statistical Inference and Biological Interpretation. Evolution, 41(6), 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb02457.x
    Mobasheri, A., Huang, H., Degrossi, L. C., & Zipf, A. (2018). Enrichment of OpenStreetMap Data Completeness with Sidewalk Geometries Using Data Mining Techniques. Sensors, 18(October 2017), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020509
    Muhammad, L. N. (2023). Guidelines for Repeated Measures Statistical Analysis Approaches with Basic Science Research Considerations. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 133(11), 11–14. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1172/JCI171058
    Nagao, H. (1973). On Some Test Criteria for Covariance Matrix. The Annals of Statistics, 1(4), 700–709. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2958313
    Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized Eta and Omega Squared Statistics: Measures of Effect Size for Some Common Research Designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
    Osama, A., & Sayed, T. (2017). Evaluating the Impact of Connectivity, Continuity, and Topography of Sidewalk Network on Pedestrian Safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 107(July 2017), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.001
    Pallero, J. L. G. (2013). Robust Line Simplification on the Plane. Computers & Geosciences, 61(August 2013), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.08.011
    Pallero, J. L. G. (2015). Robust Line Simplification on the Surface of the Sphere. Computers & Geosciences, 83(July 2015), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.07.011
    Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah [Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration], Pub. L. No. PP No.24 Tahun 1997, 1 (1997). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/56273/pp-no-24-tahun-1997
    Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki [Technical Planning of Pedestrian Facilities], Pub. L. No. 02/SE/M/2018, 1 (2018). https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://binamarga.pu.go.id/uploads/files/783/pedoman-perencanaan-teknis-fasilitas-pejalan-kaki.pdf
    Pohlert, T. (2024). Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums Extended (1.9.12). CRAN. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.PMCMRplus
    Proulx, F. R., Zhang, Y., & Grembek, O. (2015). Database for Active Transportation Infrastructure and Volume. Transportation Research Record, 1(2527), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.3141/2527-11
    QGIS Development Team. (2026a). Raster Analysis (Sieve). QGIS Documentation. https://docs.qgis.org/3.44/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/gdal/rasteranalysis.html#gdalsieve
    QGIS Development Team. (2026b). Vector geometry (Buffer). QGIS Documentation. https://docs.qgis.org/3.44/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/qgis/vectorgeometry.html#qgisbuffer
    QGIS Development Team. (2026c). Vector geometry (Simplify). QGIS Documentation. https://docs.qgis.org/3.44/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/qgis/vectorgeometry.html#qgissimplifygeometries
    QGIS Development Team. (2026d). Vector overlay (Difference). QGIS Documentation. https://docs.qgis.org/3.44/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/qgis/vectoroverlay.html#qgisdifference
    Quistberg, D. A., Koepsell, T. D., Miranda, J. J., Boyle, L. N., Johnston, B. D., & Ebel, B. E. (2015). The Walking Environment in Lima, Peru and Pedestrian–Motor Vehicle Collisions: An Exploratory Analysis. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9588(December 2013), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.930830
    Richards, J. A. (2013). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis (5th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2
    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
    Royston, P. (1995). Remark AS R94: A Remark on Algorithm AS 181: The W-test for Normality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 44(4), 547–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986146
    Saltiel, T. M., Dennison, P. E., Campbell, M. J., Thompson, T. R., & Hambrecht, K. R. (2022). Tradeoffs between UAS Spatial Resolution and Accuracy for Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation Applied to Wetland Vegetation Species Mapping. Remote Sensing, 14(11), 2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112703
    Seksi Pengukuran Dasar BPN Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah (Basic Measurement Division of the National Land Agency of Central Sulawesi Province). (2011). Buku Pegangan Juru Ukur [Surveyor’s Handbook]. https://pengukurandasarbpnsulteng.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/buku-pegangan-juru-ukur/
    Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
    Sharen, H., Jawahar, M., Anbarasi, L. J., Ravi, V., Saleh, N., & Suliman, W. (2024). FDUM-Net : An Enhanced FPN and U-Net Architecture for Skin Lesion Segmentation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 91(December 2023), 106037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106037
    Sharma, S., & Panda, S. P. (2024). Performance Metrics Analysis for Deep Learning Models. 2024 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computation, Communication and Information Technology (ICAICCIT), 1(Dl), 970–976. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICCIT64383.2024.10912181
    Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019). A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning. Journal of Big Data, 6(April 2019), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0
    Skillings, J. H., & Mack, G. A. (1981). On the Use of a Friedman-Type Statistic in Balanced and Unbalanced Block Designs. Technometrics, 23(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1981.10486261
    Solís-martín, D., Galán-páez, J., & Borrego-Díaz, J. (2025). A Model for Learning-Curve Estimation in Efficient Neural Architecture Search and Its Application in Predictive Health Maintenance. Mathematics, 13(555), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13040555
    Stivaktakis, R., Tsagkatakis, G., & Tsakalides, P. (2019). Deep Learning for Multilabel Land Cover Scene Categorization Using Data Augmentation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16(7), 1031–1035. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2893306
    Sugiura, N. (1972). Locally Best Invariant Test for Sphericity and the Limiting Distributions. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 43(4), 1312–1316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2239959
    Sun, R. (2020). Optimization for Deep Learning: An Overview. Journal of the Operations Research Society of China, 8(December 2019), 249–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-020-00309-6
    Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks. International Conference on Machine Learning, 6105–6114.
    Terven, J., Cordova-Esparza, D.-M., Romero-González, J.-A., Ramírez-Pedraza, A., & Chávez-Urbiola, E. A. (2025). A Comprehensive Survey of Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(195), 1–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11198-7
    Thode, H. C. (2002). Testing for normality. CRC press.
    Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria [Law Number 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles], Pub. L. No. UUPA No. 5 Tahun 1960, 1 (1960). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/51310/uu-no-5-tahun-1960
    United Nations. (2015a). Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/sustainable-cities-and-communities
    United Nations. (2015b). United Nations Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention Is All You Need. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), 1–11.
    Viering, T., & Loog, M. (2023). The Shape of Learning Curves: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(6), 7799–7819. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3220744
    Visvalingam, M., & Whyatt, J. D. (1993). Line Generalisation by Repeated Elimination of Points. The Cartographic Journal, 30(1), 46–51.
    Wang, R., Cai, M., Xia, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Remote Sensing Image Road Segmentation Method Integrating CNN-Transformer and UNet. IEEE Access, 11(November), 144446–144455. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3344797
    Welch, B. L. (1974). The Generalization of “student’s” Problem When Several Different Population Variances Are Involved. Biometrika, 34(1–2), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28
    Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968
    Wu, H., Yao, L., Xu, Z., Li, Y., Ao, X., Chen, Q., Li, Z., & Meng, B. (2019). Road Pothole Extraction and Safety Evaluation by Integration of Point Cloud and Images Derived from Mobile Mapping Sensors. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 42(May 2019), 100936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100936
    Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J. M., & Luo, P. (2021). SegFormer : Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1–14.
    Xie, T., Wang, C., Li, X.-M., Li, H., Fan, G., Mouche, A., & Chapron, B. (2026). Iceberg Detection from Global Open Ocean Sentinel-1 Wave Mode SAR Data with YOLO Deep Learning. Remote Sensing of Environment, 337(February 2026), 115344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115344
    Zhang, J., Li, Y., Yang, X., Jiang, R., & Zhang, L. (2025). RSAM-Seg: A SAM-Based Model with Prior Knowledge Integration for Remote Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation. Remote Sensing, 17(4), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040590
    Zhang, J., Qin, Q., Ye, Q., & Ruan, T. (2023). ST-Unet: Swin Transformer boosted U-Net with Cross-Layer Feature Enhancement for medical image segmentation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 153(December 2022), 106516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106516
    Zhang, L., Li, H., Shen, P., Zhu, G., Song, J., Shah, S. A. A., Bennamoun, M., & Zhang, L. (2018). Improving Semantic Image Segmentation With a Probabilistic Superpixel-Based Dense Conditional Random Field. IEEE Access, 6(March 2018), 15297–15310. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2814568
    Zhao, L., & Shi, G. (2018). A Method for Simplifying Ship Trajectory Based on the Improved Douglas – Peucker Algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 166(August 2018), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.005
    Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (1993). Relative Power of the Wilcoxon Test, the Friedman Test, and Repeated-Measures ANOVA on Ranks. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1993.9943832
    Zuo, S., Xiao, Y., Chang, X., & Wang, X. (2022). Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction: A Survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, 253(July 2022), 109552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109552

    QR CODE