簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳宜勉
Wu, Yi-Mien
論文名稱: 避險基金的拉回狀態分析--以達爾文選擇之觀點
The Analysis of Hedge Fund Drawdown Status--From the Darwinian Selection
指導教授: 顏盟峯
Yen, Meng-Feng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 38
中文關鍵詞: 避險基金拉回狀態達爾文選擇七因子模型
外文關鍵詞: hedge fund, drawdown status, Darwinian selection process, seven-factor model
相關次數: 點閱:79下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要在探討避險基金的拉回狀態(drawdown status)和基金績效表現之間的關係。避險基金的拉回狀態一直是投資人關心的重要議題之一,本文以投資組合分類法(the portfolio sort approach)來預測避險基金的報酬,並運用廣為接受的( Fung and Hsieh (2004) 七因子模型)來衡量其相對績效表現。
    本文發現,投資人若利用達爾文選擇(Darwinian selection process)來操作,長時間下,有較大的拉回卻存活下來的基金,其將會有最突出的績效表現。

    In this paper we study the drawdown status of hedge funds as a hedge fund characteristic related to performance. The drawdown status of the hedge fund is one of investors’ major concerns.This thesis adopts the portfolio sort methodology to assess the predictability of hedge funds returns and then testing the subsequent performance of these portfolios, we use one of the most widely accepted models in the hedge funds literature, namely, the Fung and Hsieh(2004) seven-factor model to measure the performance.
    This study finds that the Darwinian selection process will generate best performance from the portfolio of hedge funds which have incurred the largest drawdown for a long period of time.

    目錄 1 表次 3 圖次 4 壹、緒論 5 一、研究背景與動機 5 二、研究目的與架構 7 貳、文獻回顧 11 一、避險基金績效探討 11 二、與經理人相關之績效探討 12 參、資料整理 14 一、資料描述 14 二、資料整理與修正 14 肆、研究方法 17 一、投資組合分類法(PORTFOLIO SORT METHODOLOGY) 17 二、七因子模型(SEVEN-FACTOR MODEL) 18 三、步驟 20 伍、實驗結果與分析 22 一、敘述統計 24 二、投資組合最低及最高拉回狀態之累積淨報酬 28 三、最低拉回狀態基金投資組合的風險調整績效表現 31 四、最高拉回狀態基金投資組合的風險調整績效表現 33 陸、結論與未來研究建議 35 一、結論 35 二、未來研究建議 36 參考文獻 37 英語部分 37 網站HTTP://WWW.HEDGEFUNDRESEARCH.COM 38

    Ackerman, C., R. McEnally, and D. Ravenscraft, (1999), The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return and incentives, Journal of Finance 54, 833–874.
    Agarwal, V. and Naik, N. Y. (2004). Risks and portfolio decisions involving hedge funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 17, 63-98.
    Agarwal, V. and N. Y. Naik, (1999), On Taking the Alternative Route:Risks, Rewards and Performance Persistence of Hedge Funds, Journal of Alternative Investments, Volume 2, Number 4,6-23,2000.
    Agarwal, V., N. D. Daniel, and N. Y. Naik, (2006), Flows, performance, and managerial incentives in the hedge fund industry, Working Paper, London Business School.
    Capocci, D., Corhay, A., and Hübner, G. (2005). Hedge fund performance and persistence in bull and bear markets. The European Journal of Finance, 11, 361–392.
    Edwards, F. R., and M. O. Caglayan, (2001), Hedge fund performance and manager skill, Journal of Futures Markets 21, 1003–1028.
    Fung, W. and Hsieh, D. (2004a). Extracting portable alphas from equity long/short hedge funds. Journal of Investment Management, 2, 1-19.
    Fung, W. and Hsieh, D. (2004b). Hedge fund benchmarks: A risk-based approach. Financial Analysts Journal, 60, 65-80.
    Getmansky, M., Lo, A.,and Makarov, I. (2004). An econometric model of serial correlation and illiquidity in hedge fund returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 529-609.
    Harri, A. and B. W. Brorsen, (2004), Performance Persistence and the Source of Returns for Hedge Funds, working Paper.
    Jagannathan, R., A., Malakhov, and D. Novikov, (2010), Do hot hands exist among hedge fund managers? an empirical evaluation, Journal of Finance 65, 217–255.
    Kosowski, R., Naik, N. Y., and Teo, M. (2007). Do hedge funds deliver alpha? A bayesian and bootstrap analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 229–264.
    Liang, B. (1999). On the performance of hedge funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 4, 72-85.
    Lo, A. (2001), Risk management for hedge funds: Introduction and overview, Fi- nancial Analysts Journal 57, 16–33.
    Sevinc C.and J. M. Marin, (2010), On the Economics of Hedge Fund Drawdown Status: Performance, Insurance Selling and Darwinian Selection.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2017-08-14公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE