| 研究生: |
周郁芝 Chou, Yu-Chih |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
公司總部位置與主動投資者對研發之關係 Firm Headquarters Location and Hedge Fund Activism on Firm Innovation |
| 指導教授: |
江明憲
Chiang, Min-Hsien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 國際企業研究所 Institute of International Business |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 23 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 主動投資者 、公司總部位置 、研發 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Location of Headquarters, Hedge Fund Activism, Innovation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:225 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在全球化的社會裡,研發成為公司獲得競爭優勢的以戰勝競爭者的重要因素之一,公司研發被那些因素影響一直是長期為人所研究的題目。機構投資者的投資在很多層面影響公司,特別是主動投資者會更涉入公司的決策與策略當中。因此,我建立雙重差分模型來分析主動投資者如何影響公司。此外,公司的總部位置若坐落在產業群聚與聚集經濟的區域,會有外溢效果。所以我建立了三重差分模型來探討公司總部位置與主動投資者之間如何影響公司研發與其二者之間如何影響與研發之間的係數。本文結果指出公司總部位置與公司研發並未有顯著正向關係。因此可能需要探討更全面的變因,加入更多變數,再度測試本文之假說。接續之研究會使用更多的樣本與加入更多細節。
In the globalization world, innovation is one of the most important factors to get the competitive advantages to win over other competitors. How corporate innovation been influenced by other factors is a long-time topic. Institutional investors are the factor that could make an impact on the company in many aspects. Especially, hedge fund activists who involve in the company strategies and decisions more. Therefore, we try to figure out how they influence the company by using the Difference-in-Difference model. Also, the location of company headquarters has been proven it can have some spillover effect when the company located in industry cluster or agglomeration economy. Thus, I come up with the model of Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference to know how location of the company headquarters and hedge fund activists influence each other. The results here prove that the location the location of the headquarters have no significant positive impact on innovation. Therefore, we may need to put more variables to test the hypothesis again. The remaining work will be carried out as a future work along with entire sample and for more details.
Bebchuk, Brav Jiang. (2015). The Long-Term Effect of Hedge Fund Activism. Columbia Law Review, 1085-1155.
Bena, Ferreira, Matos, Pires. (2017). Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. Journal of Financial Economics, 122-146.
Boyson, Mooradian. (2010). Corporate governance and hedge fund activism. Review of Derivatives Research, 169-204.
Brav, Jiang, Kim. (2008a). Hedge Fund Activism: A Review. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 185-246.
Brav, Jiang, Ma, Tian. (2018). How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 237-264.
Brav; Jiang, Ma, Tian. (2014). Shareholder Power and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from Hedge Fund Activism. SSRN Electronic Journal.
BravPartnoy, ThomasJiang,. (2008). Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance. The Journal of Finance, 1729-1775.
DanquahMichael, & Amankwah-AmoahJoseph. (2017). Assessing the relationships between human capital, innovation andtechnology adoption: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 24-33.
Delgado, Porter, Stern. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 1785–1799.
DelgadoMercedes, PorterE.Michael, & SternScott. (2014). Defining Clusters OF RELATED INDUSTRIES. Cambridges, MA: NATIONAL BUREAU of Economic Research.
Fernandes, Raposo, Ferreira. (2017). The Effects of Location on Firm Innovation Capacity. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 77–96.
Indiana University's Kelley School of Business. (n.d.). Innovation Index Methodology. STATSAMERICA: https://www.statsamerica.org/Default.aspx
JaffeB.Adam. (1986). Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R & D: Evidence from Firms' Patents,. The American Economic Review, 984-1001.
Jia, Jiang, Ma. (2015). The dynamic impact of industrial cluster life cycle. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 807–829.
Kochhar, Rahul, David, Parthiban. (1996). Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A Test of Cmpeting Hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 73-84.
MarshallAlfred. (1920). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
Porter. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review.
Porter. (n.d.). U.S. Cluster Mapping. U.S. Cluster Mapping: http://clustermapping.us/cluster
Rutten, Boekema. (2007). Regional Social Capital: Embeddedness, Innovation Networks and Regional Economic Development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1834–1846.
RuttenRoel, & BoekemaFrans. (2007). Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1834–1846.
Simcoe, Galasso. (2010). CEO Overconfidence and Innovation. Cambridges, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
TeixeiraA.C.Aurora, & FortunaNatercia. (2004). Human capital, innovation capability and economic growth in Portugal, 1960–2001. Portuguese Economic Journal, 205–225.
TianZheng. (2013). Measuring Agglomeration Using the Standardized Location Quotient with a Bootstrap Method. The Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 186-197.
Zhang, Oub, Tsui. (2017). CEO Humility, Narcissism and Firm Innovation: A Paradox Perspective on CEO Traits. The Leadership Quarterly.
Chiang, M-H, K. Karthee and Y.-C. Chou (2021) “The Impact of Firm Location on the relationship between Hedge Fund Activism and Innovations,” Working paper, Institute of International Business, National Cheng Kung University.