| 研究生: |
王偉國 Wang, Weu-Kuo |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
消費者使用科技創新產品之因素探討
-以平板電腦為例 Consumer products using the factors of technological innovation - The Tablet PC Case |
| 指導教授: |
蔡明田
Tsai, Ming-Tien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Business Administration (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 92 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 延伸科技接受模式 、平板電腦 、認知有用性 、認知易用性 、形象 、便利條件 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Extended technology acceptance model, Tablet PC, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, image, facilitating conditions |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:140 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
平板電腦的產業在2010年Apple發表iPAD後正式拉開序幕,一時間百家爭鳴,各種不同功能的產品伴隨著不同型態的作業系統紛紛出爐,而消費者面對如此多樣化的產品究竟會如何選擇?而其中有那些因素會成為考量的重點?
本研究的目的針對消費者的部份,就使用者的觀點切入,以科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Model,TAM)及延伸科技接受模式(TAM2)部分構面做為理論基礎,透過問卷調查方式作為資料蒐集的工具,企圖了解消費者在使用如平板電腦此類創新科技產品時,影響其使用與否的因素為何?共收回259份有效問卷,再利用SPSS對平板電腦使用意圖之因素進行實證研究。
研究的結果發現:
1.「形象」及「認知易用性」對平板電腦的「認知有用性」有顯著的正向影響。
2.「認知有用性」對平板電腦的「使用態度」有顯著的正向影響。
3.「便利條件」對平板電腦的「使用態度」及「使用意圖」有顯著的正向影響。
4.「認知易用性」對於平板電腦的「使用態度」無顯著相關。
5.「認知有用性」對平板電腦的「使用意圖」無顯著相關。
ablet PC industry, Apple released in 2010, was officially kicked off iPAD, contending for a time, a variety of products with different functions in different types of operating systems have released, and consumers faced with such a variety of products to choose what will ? What are the factors which will become the focus of consideration?
The purpose of this study for the part of consumers to the viewpoint of the user, technology acceptance model (Technology Acceptance Model, TAM) and the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2) dimension as part of the theoretical basis, through the questionnaire as data collection tool, an attempt to understand the consumers in the use of innovative technology such as Tablet PC product, the factors that affect its use or why? 259 valid questionnaires were resumed, and then use the Tablet PC using SPSS intention of an empirical study of factors .
Results of this study:
1. "Image"and"Perceived ease of used " of the Tablet PC's "Perceived usefulness " have a significant positive effect.
2. "Perceived usefulness " of the Tablet PC "Attitude toward using " have a significant positive effect.
3."Facilitiating condition "on the Tablet PC "Attitude toward using " and "Intention of using " have a significant positive effect.
4. "Perceived ease of used " for the Tablet PC "Attitude toward using " no significant correlation.
5. "Percived usefulness " of the Tablet PC "Intention of using" no significant correlation.
壹、中文文獻
1. 余泰魁、吳桂森、李能慧(2005), ”我國技職體系學生MP3使用行為模式之研究”,資訊管理學報, 第12卷第3期, 頁189-122
2. 余泰魁、楊淑斐(2005), “線上學系系統使用易項之模式建構與比較分析研究”, 台灣管理月刊,第5卷第2期, 頁311-337
3. 吳雅馨、朱素玥、方文昌(2005), “網路購物信任與科技接受模式之實證研究”, 資訊管理學報, 第15卷第1期, 頁 123-152
4. 李婉怡、趙珮如(2004), “醫療產業員工對電子病歷之科技接受模式探討—以中南部地區為例”, 醫務管理期刊, 第5卷第2期, 頁 243-269
5. 周家慧、張善斌、范垂仁,顧為元(2004), “綜合所得稅網路結算申請系統的接受度研究”, 電子商務研究, 第2卷第4期, 頁 259-380
6. 林文寶、楊淑斐(2005), “影響線上學習市場使用意向模式建構之研究—模糊類神經網路方法之應用”, 中山管理評論, 第13卷第2期, 頁 721-745
7. 林震岩,”多變量分析 : SPSS的操作與應用”, 2007, 致聖文化事業有限公司, 頁 197
8. 邱皓政, “量化研究法(二)統計原理與分析技術”, 2005, 雙葉書廊有限公司, 頁 15-23
9. 吳明隆, “結構方程式模型AMOS的操作與應用”, 2009, 五南圖書出版公司, 頁349-351
10. 廖莉秀, “套裝軟體更新與使用者接受度—CAI之應用”,2001, 中原大學
貳、英文文獻
1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. & Todd, P.A. (1992)“Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology : a replication”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16 No.2,pp.227-47
2. Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1997) “The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies”, Decision Science, Vol.28 No. 3, pp.557-82
3. Burt, R. S., Interpretational on founding of Unobserved Variables in Structural Equation Models, Sociological Methods & Research. 5(August, 1976), 3-52.
4. Chang, M.K. & Cheung, W., (2001) “Determinants of the intention to use internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study”, Information & Management 39, 2001, pp. 1-14
5. Chau, P.Y.K. (1996)“An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol.12 No.2, pp.185-204
6. Chau, P.Y.K., & Hu, P.J.H., (2001)”Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 32 No.4, pp 185-204
7. Chen, L.D., Mark L.G. & Daniel L.S., (2004) “Consumer acceptance of virtual stores: a theoretical model and critical success factors for vitual stores”, ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(2), 8-31
8. Cho, V. & Cheung, I. (2003) “A study of on-line legal service adoption in Hong Kong”, in The 9th Conference of Academy Of Business & Administrative Science, Vancourver, Canada, 24-26
9. Cho, V., (2006) “A study of the roles of trust and risk in information-oriented online legal service using an integrated model”, Information & Management, 43(2006), pp. 502-520
10. Davis,F.D.,(1989)”Preceived Usefulness,Preceived Ease of use,and User Acceptance of Information Technology”,MIS Quarterly,Vol.13
11. Daughtery M. & Funke B.L., (1998) “University faculty and student perceptions of web-base instruction”, Journal of Distance Education 13, 21-39
12. Dishaw, M.T. & Strong, D.M., (1999)“ Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with task-technology fir constructs”, Information Management 36, pp. 9-21
13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) “ Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variable and measurement error “. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39-50
14. Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, (1989) “User Acceptance of Computer Technologu: A comparison of Two Teeoretical Models”, Management Science, Vol. 35 NO.8 August
15. Gefan,D. (2000) “E-Commerce: The role of Familiarity and Trust”, Omega :The International Journal of Management Science, 28(6), pp. 725-737
16. Groves M.M. & Zemel P.C., (2000) “Instructional technology adoption in high education : an action research case study”, International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 57-65
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981)“Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39-50.
18. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
19. Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006) “Multivariate data analysis (6th ed)”. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Holloway, Robert E. (1997) “Perceptions of an Innovation”. Syracuse University Project Advance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Syacuse University.
21. Horton, R.P., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E. & Clegg, C.w. (2001)“Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model”, Journal of information Systems, Vol.16 No.2 pp. 237-49
22. HU, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.L. & TAM, K.Y. (1999) “Examining the technology acceptance model of telemedicine”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 16 No.2, pp.91-112
23. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. & Davis, G.B. (1995) “ Testing the Determinates of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model”, Journal of Management Information System, 11(4), pp. 87-114
24. Jiang, J.J., Hsu, M.K., Klein, G. & Lin, B. (2000) “E-Commerce user behavior model: an empirical study”, Human System Management, Vol. 19 No. 4,pp.265-76
25. .Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. & Chervany, N.L. (1999)“ Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparsion of Pre-Adoption and Post Adoption Belifes”, MIS Quarterly, 23(2), pp. 182-213
26. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling : A researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc
27. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
28. Lai, V.S. & Li, H. (2004) “Technology Acceptance Model for Internet Banking: an invariance analysis”, Information & Management, 42(1), 373-386
29. Luarn, P. & Lin, H.H. (2004) “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking”, Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873-891
30. Mathieson, K.(1991) “Predicting user intentions comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior”, Information System Research,Vol. 2 no. 3, pp173-91
31. Moore & Benbasat, “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Preceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation”, Information System Research 2:3
32. Moon, J.W. & Kim, Y.G. (2001) “Extending the TAM for a World Wide Web context”, Information & Management, 38(4), pp. 217-230
33. Ngai E.W.T., Poon J.K.L., & Chan Y.H.C. (2007) “Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM”, Computer & Education 48, 250-267
34. Pavlou, P.A. (2003) “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(2), pp. 101-134
35. Pedersen P.E., (2005)“Adoption of mobile Internet service : An exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters”, Journal of Organization Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 203-222
36. Rogers, Everett M., Diffusion of Innovations, (Third Ed), The Free Press, New York. 1982
37. Stuart J. Barnes & Sid L. Huff., (2003)“Rising Sun : iMode and the Wireless Internet”, Communication of the ACM, November 2003, Vol. 46 , No. 11
38. Tan, M. & Teo, T.S.H. (2000) “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking”, Journal of Association for Information System, 1(5), 1-41
39. Taylor, S. & Todd, P.A. (1995) “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”, Information System Research, Vol. 6 No.2
40. Terry, D.J.(1993), Self-efficacy expectancies and theory of reasoned actor, in Terry, D.C. Gallois, C. & McCamish, M. (Eds), “The theory of Reasoned Action its Application to AIDS-preventing Behaviour", Pergamon, Oxford
41. Thompson, R.L., Higgins C.A. & Howwll, J.M. (1994) “Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: testing a conceptual model”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 1 No.1
42. Tornatzky, Louis G. & Katherine J. Klein, (1982) “Innovation Characteristics and Innocation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Finding”, IEEE Transcations on Engineering Management. EM-29, 1(February 1982), 28-45
43. Triandis, H. (1980), Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior, Nebraska Symposium Motivation, 1979; Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values, University of Nebrasks Press, Lincoin, NB. Pp.195-259
44. Venkatesh, V. (2000) “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information System Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp.342-65
45. Venkatesh & Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.189
46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003) “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View”, MIS Quarterly(27:3), 2003, pp. 425-47
47. . Vijayasarathy, L.R. (2004) “Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model”, Information & Management,41(6), 747-762
參、 網站資料
1. www.ithome.com.tw
2. it.dxrc.cn
3. www.eprice.com
4. www.cbinews.com
5. mag.edn.com
6. www.it.com.cn
7. weihsinchiu.pixnet.net
8. info.ch.gongchang.com
9. www.wiki.com
10. http://stock.nlog.cc