| 研究生: |
杜立琪 TU, Li-Chi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
美國三個月公債殖利率與十年期公債殖利率資訊之領先落後關係的探討 The investigation on the informationlead-lag relationship between the US three-month Treasury bill rate and the ten-year Treasury note yield |
| 指導教授: |
王澤世
Wang, Tse-Shih |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 38 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 三個月公債殖利率 、十年期公債殖利率 、單根檢定 、向量自我迴歸模型 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Three-month Treasury yield, 10-year Treasury yield, Unit Root Test, Vector Autoregression model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:4 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文資料來自於美聯儲經濟數據庫(FRED),並使用時間序列計量方法,例如單根檢定、向量自我回歸模型、Granger因果關係檢定及衝擊函數與預測誤差變異數分解等,來探討1. 探討美國長短天期債券是否存在領先或落後的關係。2.探討美國長短天期債券殖利率之間是否存在正向或負向關係。
向量自我迴歸模型之實證結果顯示美國三個月公債殖利率與美國十年期公債殖利率都受到美國三個月公債殖利率落後4期與5期的影響,具有顯著正相關。
Granger因果檢定下,美國十年期公債殖利率的變動不會「Granger影響」美國三個月公債殖利率,美國三個月公債殖利率會「Granger 影響」美國十年期公債殖利率,所以兩變數間不具有相互回饋關係。
美國三個月期公債殖利率對於自身衝擊會產生正向反應,尤其以第一期與第六期衝擊反應最大,之後驟減再緩慢上升。美國三個月公債殖利率對於美國十年期公債殖利率的衝擊自第一期到第五期皆有正向反應,預測誤差變異數分解也跟衝擊反應圖有相呼應的結果。
This article uses data from the Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED) and employs time series econometric methods, such as the single root test, vector autoregression model, Granger causality test, and shock function and prediction error variance decomposition, to explore: 1. Whether a leading or lagging relationship exists between US long-term and short-term bond yields. 2. Whether a positive or negative relationship exists between US long-term and short-term bond yields.
Empirical results show that both the yield on the three-month U.S. Treasury note and the yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury note are significantly positively correlated due to the lag of the three-month U.S. Treasury note yield by four and five periods.
Under the Granger causality test, changes in the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note do not have a Granger effect on the yield on the 3-month U.S. Treasury note, but the yield on the 3-month U.S. Treasury note does have a Granger effect on the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note. Therefore, there is no feedback relationship between the two variables.
The yield on the three-month U.S. Treasury note exhibits a positive response to shocks to itself, with the largest responses observed in the first and sixth periods, followed by a sharp decrease and then a slow rise. The yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury note shows a positive response to shocks from the first to the fifth period, and the decomposition of the variance in the prediction error also corresponds to the results of the shock response diagram.
中文參考文獻
1.陳旭昇(2013)時間序列分析:總體經濟與財務金融之應用,臺灣東華書局
2.蕭宇翔,謬維正(2021)以高頻物價數據進行通膨預測,經濟論文叢刊49(3).371-414.
3.陳香君(2010)美國公債、投資級債券與高收益債券殖利率關係的研究(Analysis of the Relationship between U.S. Treasury Bonds and High Yield Bond Yield)
4.蕭惟中(2020)就業市場指標與公債殖利率之關聯性探討(The Research on Relationships Between Indicatiors of Labor Markets and Yields of Us Treasury)
5.延任(2022)美國公債殖利率與市場指數關聯性實證研究(An Empirical Study of Relationship between US Treasury Yield and Market indices)
英文參考文獻
1.Andersen,T.G.,Bollerslev,T.,F.X.,and Vega(2007).”Real-time price Discovery in global stock,bond and foreign exchange markets.”Journal of international Economics,73(2),251-277.
2.Branson,w.(1977).”Asset Markets and Relative Prices in Exchang Rate detrmination.”,1IES Seminar. In:Paper.
3.Breitung,J.,and Roling,c.(2015)”Forecasting inflation rates using daily data: A nonparametric MIDAS approach. Journal of Forecasting,”34(7), 588-603.
4.Chow,E.H.,Lee,W.Y.,and Solt,M.E.(1997)”The exchang-rate rick exposure of asset returns.”Journal of Business,105-123.
5.Cologni,A.,and Manera,M.(2008).”Oil prices,inflation and interest rates in a structural
cointegrated VAR model for the G-7 countries.”Energy Economics,30(3),856-888.
6.Estrella,A.,and Hardouvelis,G.A.(1991).”The term structure as a predictor of real economic activity.”The journal of Finance,46(2),555-576.
7.Fisher,I.(1896)”Appreciation and interest:A study of the influence of monetary appreciation and depreciation on the rate of interest with applications to the bimetallic controversy and the theory of interest”,Amrican economic association.
8.Haubrich,J.G.(2006).”Does the yield curve signal recession?”Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,15.
9.Jammazi,R.,Ferrer,R.,Jareno,F.,and Hammoudeh,S.M.(2017)”Main driving factors of the interest rate-stock market Granger causality.” Internation Review of Financial Analysis,52,260-280.
10.Knotek,E.S.,and Zaman,S.(2017)”Nowcasting US headline and core inflation.”Journal of Money,Credit and Banking,49(5)931-968.
11.Modugno,M.(2013).”Now-casting inflation using high frequency data.” International Journal of Forecasting,29(4),664-675.
12.Said,S.E and Dickey,d.A.(1984),”Testing for unit root in autoregresswive –moving aerage models of unknown order”,Biometrika.71(3),599-607.
13.Sarkar,S.,and Ariff,M.(2002).”The effect of interest rate volatility on treasury yields.”Applied Financial Economics,12(9),667-672.
14.Sharpe,W.F.(1964).”Capital asset proces:A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk.”The journal of Finance,19(3),425-442.
15.Sims,c.a.(1980).”Macroeconomics and reality.”Econometrica journal of the Econometric Society,1-48.