利用油壓制動器與反力牆配合實驗元件之擬動態實驗，通常為替代振動台實驗之經濟且可行的方法，然而對於摩擦型且與速度相依隔震元件之隔震效能測試，例如多項式變曲率滑動支承(PSIVC)，尚有許多瓶頸需要克服。針對裝設於建築樓板上之PSIVC設備隔震系統，本文提出取代完整振動台試驗之混合實驗架構，將PSIVC設備隔震系統直接架設於振動台上，藉由量測隔震層總橫力回饋至建築整體數值模型，並命令振動台模擬裝置樓板之絕對位移反應，藉由其即時互制之作用，以探討取代完整振動台試驗之可行性與正確性。另外，為取得更多驗證資料，本文亦利用元件測試資料，以進行PSIVC數值模型重要參數之識別，並進行數值模擬。根據本文混合實驗架構，其實驗結果與數值模擬及完整振動台實驗結果相當接近，因此可以證明本混合實驗架構於結構實驗領域具有發展性，並且可以取代隔震元件複雜數學模型的建立與識別。

The pseudo-dynamic testing of isolation devices that interacts with hydraulic actuator and reaction wall is usually a cost-effective alternative to the shaking table test. However, there are a few bottlenecks need to be overcame especially for the velocity-dependent or highly-nonlinear friction device, such as the polynomial sliding isolator with variable curvature (PSIVC). A hybrid testing framework is proposed in this study as an alternative of shaking table test to investigate the isolation performance of an equipment isolation system equipped with PSIVC. The PSIVC equipment isolation system is installed directly on the shaking table which simulates the absolute displacement of the equipped floor of building by interacting with the measured total shear force between the isolation layers. In order to get more comparison cases, some important parameters of the numerical model of PSIVC are identified through the component test. The simulation results and shaking table test measurements are compared with the proposed hybrid test. From the good agreements on the responses and hysteresis loops, the feasibility of the proposed hybrid testing framework is ensured.

[1] Lu, L. Y., T. Y. Lee, S. W. Yeh (2011) “Theory and experimental study for sliding isolators with variable curvature.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 14, 1609-1627.。
[2] 盧煉元、林沛暘、林子剛、葉士瑋、莊翔圩、何銘川(2011) 先進減震高架地板於設備防震之應用研究，99年度國科會專題研究計畫成果報告書，計畫編號 NSC 99-2625-M-327-002。
[3] 江子政，”複擺隔震器於防震工程之應用”，逢甲大學土木及水利工程研究所，博士論文，(2004)
[4] Zayas, V.A., Low, S. S. and Mahin, S. A.,”The FPS earthquake resisting system.”Experimental Report No.UCB/EERC 87/01, EERC, University of California, BerkEley, California.(1987).
[5] Zayas, V.A., Low, S. S. and Mahin, S. A.,”A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolator.”Experimental Spectra; 6:317-33.(1990).
[6] 王彥伯，”建築結構之隔震設計-摩擦單擺支承FPS篇”，台灣省土木技師公會6/18中南區結構審查講習會，(2005)。
[7] Hakuno, M., Shidawara, M. and Hara, T., “Dynamic destructive test of a cantileverbeam controlled by an analog-computer” Transactions Japa Society of Engineers, 1-9(1969).
[8] Takanashi, K. et al., “Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer actuator online system” Transactions Architectural Instruction Japan, 229,77-83 (1975).
[9] Wang, Y.P., Lee C.L., Yo, T.H., “Modified state space procedures for pseudodynamic testing” Earthquake Engineering ans Structure Dynamics, 30,59-80(2001).
[10] 羅仕杰，”記憶體共享光纖網路設備於即時擬動態實驗之初步研究”，國立暨南國際大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2005)。
[11] 林憲良，”降伏型非線性構件之慢速擬動態實驗與數值模擬”，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2007)。
[12] 張家瑋，”不同加載速率對擬動態實驗誤差的影響”，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2008)。
[13] 顏呈璁，”多重取樣量測對擬動態實驗誤差之影響”，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2009)。
[14] 吳依寰，”摩擦型阻尼器之擬動態實驗與震動台驗證”，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2011)。
[15] 簡旭甫，”不同加載速率下摩擦單擺支承之消能行為測試，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2012)。
[16] Lu, L.Y., T. Y. Lee, S. Y. Juang, S. W. Yeh (2013) “Polynomial friction pendulum isolators (PFPIs) for building floor isolation: an experimental and theoretical study.” Engineering Structures, in press, DOI:10.1016/ j.engstruct.2013.06.016, accepted in June of 2013.
[17] Constantinou Mokha “Teflon Bearing in Base Isolator.” MODELING,(1990).