簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林敏鈴
Lin, Min-Ling
論文名稱: 金融資產公允價值層級資訊與審計公費關聯性之研究-以台灣銀行業為例
The Relationship between Fair Value Hierarchy of Financial Assets and Audit fees: Evidence from the Banking Industry in Taiwan
指導教授: 楊朝旭
Young, Chaur-Shiuh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班
Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 33
中文關鍵詞: 公允價值資訊審計公費銀行業
外文關鍵詞: Fair value information, audit fees, banking
相關次數: 點閱:93下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著全球資訊及科技發展資本市場無國界,各國紛紛採用國際財務報導準則(IFRS)編製財務報表,公允價值衡量的複雜度影響財務報表品質,會計師具外部監督功能,能降低管理者與投資人間因資訊不對稱與道德危機存在代理問題,本研究以台灣銀行業之公允價值金融資產為研究標的,探討公允價值資訊是否對審計公費產生影響,實證結果發現銀行持有較多公允價值金融資產時,會計師收取較低審計公費,進一步檢測各層級資訊對審計公費的影響,發現第1層級資訊相較於第2、3層級資訊對審計公費影響更具顯著差異。由於台灣銀行業多數委託四大會計師事務所進行審計,事務所在查核中累積經驗、提升查核效率且規模經濟效應節省查核成本,台灣銀行業多數選擇有活絡市場或市場中有相似資產觀察值之金融資產進行投資,會計師在查核程序及風險能有效確實掌握而降低審計公費。

    Countries all over the world have adopted IFRS to prepare financial statements, and the complexity of fair value measurement affects the qualities of financial statements. Accountants who have the function of external supervision can reduce the asymmetry and moral crisis which exist in agent problems. The research target of this study is Taiwan's banking fair value financial assets, and can explore whether the fair value information has any impact on audit public fees. The results found that when banks hold more fair value financial assets, accountants would charge lower audit public fees. Because most of the banks entrust the four major accounting firms to conduct audits, the firms can accumulate experiences in the audit and improve the efficiency of inspection. Economies of scale effect can save the cost of verification, and the bank investment target of the multi-choice has observable value input value of financial assets. Accountants can reduce audit public fees in the verification procedures and risks effectively.

    第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 IFRS公允價值相關文獻 4 第二節 審計公費相關文獻 7 第三節 假說發展 9 第三章 研究設計與方法 12 第一節 統計分析方法 12 第二節 資料來源與樣本選取 12 第三節 實證模型 13 第四節 變數衡量 14 第四章 實證結果分析 17 第一節 敘述統計分析 17 第二節 相關係數分析與共線性檢定 19 第三節 迴歸分析 21 第四節 額外分析 25 第五章 結論與建議 27 第一節 結論 27 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 28 參考文獻 29

    中文文獻
    1.王書鶴(2003),「非審計公費對審計品質之影響-從盈餘管理的角度探討」,中國文化大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    2.邱敬衡(2012),「公允價值、產業專精與審計公費之探討-以我國銀行業為例」, 銘傳大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    3.林舒婷(2019),「審計公費與未來企業風險變動之關聯」, 國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    4.胡靜妮(2002),「非審計服務與會計師獨立性關係之實證研究」, 國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
    5.陳玉芳(2010),「國際財務報導準則之價值攸關性研究」, 國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    6.翁宏達(2013),「公允價值三級資料與資訊不對稱之關聯性」, 國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
    7.楊馥亘(2017),「公允價值、會計資訊品質、信用風險與外資持股比率之關聯性研究」, 國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    8.謝依純(2013),「審計品質對金融商品公平價值攸關性之影響」, 中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    9.鍾宛儒(2017),「公允價值評價與債權結構之關聯性 -以美國銀行聯貸為例」, 國立東華大學會計與財務碩士學位學程碩士論文。

    英文文獻
    1. Ahmed, A.S., M. Neel, & D. Wang (2013), “Does Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Improve Accounting Quality? Preliminary Evidence” Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4) pp.1344~1372.
    2. Apandi, R. N. N. (2016), “Pengaruh Penerapan Fair Value Non Current Asset dan Manajemen Pajak atas Asset Perusahaan terhadap Fee Audit.” Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 4(3) pp1229~1242.
    3. Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R. & Shackelford, D. A. (2001), “Auditor's perceived business risk and audit fees: analysis and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1) pp35~43.
    4. Bratten, B., Gaynor, L., McDaniel, L., Montague, N., & G. Sierra. (2013), “The audit of fair value and other estimates: The effects of underlying environmental, task, and auditor-specific factors.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 pp7-44.
    5. Callao, S., & J.I. Jarne (2010), “Have IFRS Affected Earnings Management in the European Union?” Accounting in Europe, 7(2) pp159~189.
    6. Caramanis, C., & C. Cennox (2008), “Audit effort and earnings management.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1) pp116~138.
    7. Chan, K. H., Lin, K. Z., Mo, P. L., (2006), “A political-economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches.” Review of Accounting studies, 11 pp.21~48.
    8. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981), “Auditor size and audit quality.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3) pp183~199.
    9. DeFond, M. L., J. R. Francis, & T. J. Wong. (2000), “Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(1) pp49~66.
    10. Eccher, A., k. Ramesh, & S. R. Thiagarajan. (1996), “Fair value disclosures by bank holding companies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 pp79~117.
    11.Ettredge, M. L., Xu, Y., & Yi, H. S. (2014), “Fair value measurements and audit fees: Evidence from the banking industry.” Auditing, 33(3) pp33~58.
    12.Fields, L. P., D. R. Fraser, & M. S. Wikins. (2004), “An investigation of the pricing of the pricing of and it services for financial institutions.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(1) pp53~77.
    13.Firth, M. (1985), “An analysis of audit fees and their determinants in New Zealand. Auditing” A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4(2) pp23~37.
    14.Francis, J. R. (2004), “What do we know about audit quality?” The British Accounting Review, 36 (4) pp345~368.
    15.Francis, J. R., & M. D. Yu. (2009), “Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality.” The Accounting Review, 84(5) pp1521~1552.
    16.Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002), “The Relation between Auditor’s Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings Quality. ” Research Papers, 77 pp71~105.
    17.Goh , B.W, D. Li, J. Ng , K. O. Yong(2015), “Market pricing of banks’ fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 since the 2008 financial crisis” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(2) pp129~145
    18.Goncharov, Igor & Riedl, Edward J. & Sellhorn, Thorsten (2014), “Fair value and audit fees.” Review of Accounting Studies, 19 (1) pp210~241.
    19.Gul, F. A., & J. Tsui. (1997), “A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: Evidence from audit pricing.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (2) pp219~237.
    20.Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, & N. Wong. (2006), “Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. ” Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1) pp141~191.
    21.Khan, U. (2009), “Does Fair Value Accounting Contribute to Systemic Risk in the Banking Industry?” Working pater. Michael G. Foster School.
    22.Kolev, K. (2009), “ Do investors perceive marking-to model as marking-to myth? Early evidence from FAS 157 disclosure” SSRN Working Paper Series, No.1336368.
    23.Liang, L., & Riedl, E. J. (2011), “The effect of fair value versus historical cost reporting model on analyst forecast accuracy.” Working paper, Syracuse University and Boston University.
    24.Mayhew, B. W., & Wilkins, M. S. (2003), “Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22 (2) pp33~52.
    25.Miah, M. S. (2019), “Fair value, management discretion, and audit fees: An empirical analysis” The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, pp82~91.
    26.Nelson, K. (1996), “Fair value accounting for commercia banks : An empirical analysis of SFAS NO.107.” The Accounting Revies, 71 pp161~182.
    27.Reynolds, J., & Francis, J. (2000), “Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3) pp375~400.
    28.Riedl, E. J., & Serafeim, G. (2011), “Information risk and fair values: An examination of equity betas.” Journal of Accounting Research, 49 pp1083~1122.
    29.Ryan, S. G. (2007), “Financial Instrument & Institutions-Accounting and Disclosure Rule.” Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    30.Sangchan, P., Habib, A., Jiang, H., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2020), “Fair value exposure, changes in fair value and audit fees: Evidence from the Australian real estate industry.” Australian Accounting Review.
    31.Simunic, D. A. (1980), “The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1) pp161-190.
    32.Sirois, L. P., & D. A. Simunic. (2011), “Auditor Size and Audit Quality Revisited: The Importance of Audit Technology.” Working paper.
    33.Sloan, R. G. (1999), “Evaluating the reliability of current value estimates.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1-3) pp193-200.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2025-07-01公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE