簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡宗嶧
Tsai, Tsung-Yi
論文名稱: 臺灣東部海域固定式中層人工浮魚礁管理之研究
Management of Anchored Subsurface Fish Aggregation Devices (FADs) in the Water of the Eastern Taiwan
指導教授: 張懿
Chang, Yi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 海洋科技與事務研究所
Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 人工浮魚礁固定式中層人工浮魚礁漁業管理漁獲資料分析
外文關鍵詞: fish aggregation devices (FADs), anchored subsurface fish aggregation devices (FADs), management, Taiwan.
相關次數: 點閱:219下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人工浮魚礁是一種被置放於水下的人造漂浮物,在世界各地的海洋裡,人工浮魚礁被用來吸引魚群並達到增加漁獲量之目的。但是人工浮魚礁造成鮪魚產生滯留時間延長、影響洄游行為等改變,再加上過度的捕撈,可能形成生態陷阱導致過漁而減少加入量,進而影響海洋生態,所以漁業相關權責單位必須對於人工浮魚礁的利用進行適當的評估與管理。
    在臺灣東部沿岸,行政院農業委員會水產試驗所設置了八個人工浮魚礁,離臺灣本島約20~30公里遠,浮體漂浮於水深20~60公尺之處,是為中層人工浮魚礁。本研究利用臺東區漁會與水產試驗所取得的漁獲資料分析主要魚種、體長頻度分布、單位努力漁獲量(Catch Per Unit Effort)等,針對人工浮魚礁離岸遠近、人工浮魚礁區與非人工浮魚礁區之漁獲種類進行比較,以利用適當的方法對於東部人工浮魚礁之漁業資源概況進行評估。研究結果表明人工浮魚礁區的主要漁獲種類是黃鰭鮪、正鰹、鬼頭刀。黃鰭鮪體長頻度以介於41~50公分之小型魚居多,而2~5月與10~12會出現80公分以上之中大型魚;另外,7~9月則因天候或漁獲較少的影響,漁船出海作業天數較少。漁獲統計資料的結果發現臺灣東部漁業資源正慢慢下降,而透過產官學綜合談會之舉辦,並參考國內外文獻與管理辦法,訂出7~9月為禁漁期、限制最小鉤寬2.2公分、制定40公分最小合法漁獲體長等管理措施,並希望整合整個臺灣東部之人工浮魚礁之使用情況,以期達到漁業資源的永續利用。

    The use of fish aggregation devices (FADs) has increased catch sizes and convenience for fishermen; however, these devices may have a harmful impact on tuna stocks. Such structures are deployed throughout the oceans worldwide to concentrate fish and, thus, facilitate catching them. In addition, FADs may change the migration behavior of fish. Therefore, the use of FADs may influence the population of exploited fish species, leading to concerns of overfishing and decreases in recruitment in capture fisheries.
    Eight FADs are moored semipermanently on the continental shelf off the coast of eastern Taiwan. These FADs are under the sea surface at a depth of 20–60 m and located less than 30 km from the shore. Fishing data from the Fisheries Research Institute, Council Of Agriculture, Taiwan and Taitung Fishermen’s Association were analyzed to identify the various species caught, the frequency distribution of fork lengths, and catch per unit of effort (CPUE) in waters around FADs.
    The data revealed that fishing conditions differ between two substudy areas. The dominant species in Area A (near land) were yellowfin tuna, skipjack, and dolphinfish; however, the dominant species in Area B (farther from land) were yellowfin tuna, which represented more than 80% of the catch. The frequency distribution of fork lengths indicated that fish mainly ranged in size from 41 to 50 cm in Area A, but the size of the fish was often greater than 70 cm in Area B. Moreover, the CPUE has decreased in the past decade. In addition, conflict between fishing boats using different fishing gear has increased the need for enhanced management requirements for FADs. Appropriate management strategies for FADs and fish resources, namely limitation of fishing efforts and autonomous management by fishermen organizations, are recommended.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 誌 謝 ix 論文目錄 x 表目錄 xiii 圖目錄 xiv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 2 1.2 研究目的 7 1.3研究區域 8 1.4 研究架構 9 第二章 文獻分析 11 2.1人工浮魚礁介紹 11 2.1.1人工浮魚礁的發展 11 2.1.2 人工浮魚礁的種類 12 2.2人工浮魚礁與自由素群的選擇 15 2.3 人工浮魚礁的效用 15 2.3.1聚魚特性 15 2.3.2魚群滯留時間 16 2.3.3魚種及魚體大小差異 17 2.4 探討魚群靠近人工浮魚礁的原因 19 2.4.1吸引還是聚集? 19 2.4.2 浮魚礁吸引魚類假說 19 2.5滯留魚群特性 24 2.5.1攝食是否為主要目的: 24 2.5.2尺寸大小 25 2.5.3行為改變: 26 2.6 國內、外人工浮魚礁相關管理辦法 30 第三章 材料方法 33 3.1 研究區域之選定 33 3.2資料蒐集與分析 33 第四章 結果與討論 35 4.1主要漁獲種類 35 4.2 黃鰭鮪體長頻度分布 38 4.3 單位努力漁獲量(CPUE)之變動 48 第五章 討論 50 5.1人工浮魚礁對魚群的影響 50 5.2臺灣東部漁業資源現況討論 50 5.3管理之異同 50 5.4捕魚資格的限制 51 5.5現行管理辦法之討論 51 第六章 管理政策建議 53 6.1 管理政策建議 53 6.1.1禁漁期: 53 6.1.2魚鉤大小之限制 53 6.1.3最小合法長度 53 6.1.4管理適用範圍 53 6.1.5漁獲量之限制 54 6.2產銷班自律性式管理 54 6.3 未來展望 56 英文參考文獻 58 中文參考文獻 67

    Atapattu, A.R. (1991) The experience of fish aggregating devices for fisheries resource enhancement and management in Sri Lanka. RAPA Report 11:16-40.
    Anderson, J., and Gates, P.D. (1996) South Pacific Commission fish aggregating device (FAD) manual. Volume 1 planning FAD programs. South Pacific Commission
    Anonymous. (2011) Report of the 2011 ISSF Stock Assessment Workshop. Rome, Italy, March 14–17, 2011. ISSF Technical Report 2011-02, 18 pp.
    Brock, R.E. (1985) Preliminary study of the feeding habits of pelagic fish around Hawaiian fish aggregation devices or can fish aggregation devices enhance local fisheries productivity? Bull. Mar. Sci. 37(1), 40–49.
    Buckley, T.W. and Miller, B.S. (1994) Feeding habits of yellowfin tuna associated with fish aggregation devices in American Samoa. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55, 445–459.
    Block, B.A., Keen, J.E., Castillo, B., Dewar, H., Freund, E.V., Marcinek, D.J., Brill, R.W.and Farwell, C. (1997) Environmental preferences of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) at the northern extent of its range. Mar Biol 130, p 119~132
    Brill RW, Block BA, Boggs CH, Bigelow KA, Freund EV, Marcinek DJ (1999) Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes. Mar Biol 133:395–408
    Bromhead, D., Foster, J., Attard, R., Findlay, J. and Kalish, J. (2003) A review of the impacts of fish aggregating devices (FADs) on tuna fisheries. Final report to the Fisheries Resources Research Fund. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia. 122 p.
    Battin, J. (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conservation Biology 18, 1482–1491.
    Cayré, P. (1990) Dispositifs de concentration de poissons et pêche artisanale. In: Le Gall J.-Y., Reviers X. and Roger C. (eds.), Actes de la conférence thonière régionale.
    Commission De L’Océan Indien, Colloques et Séminaires, Orstom Editions, p 54–64
    Castro, J.J., Santiago, J.A. and Santana-Ortega, A.T. (2002) A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: an alternative to the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fisheries 11(3), 255–277.
    Coan, A.L. and Crone, P.R. (2003) Fishery-related attributes associated with FAD and log fishing practices conducted by the US purse seine fleet in the central-western Pacific Ocean, 1997–2002. In: 16th Standing Committee on Tuna and Billfish, Fishing Technology Working group, July 9–16, 2002, Mooloolaba, Australia, 13 pp.
    Wei-Chuan Chiang, Michael K. Musyl, Chi-Lu Sun, Shu-Ying Chen , Wen-Yie Chen, Don-Chung Liu, Wei-Cheng Su, Su-Zan Yeh, Shin-Chin Fu, Tzu-Lun Huang (2011) Vertical and horizontal movements of sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) near Taiwan determined using pop-up satellite tags. Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 397 (2011) 129–135
    Dwernychuk, L.W. and Boag, D.A. (1972) Ducks nesting in association with gulls -an ecological trap? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 50, 559–563.
    Dagorn, L., Stretta, J.M., and Petit, M. (1995) Tropical tuna associated with floating objects: A simulation study of the meeting point hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:984-993.
    de San, M., and Pages, A. (1998) FADs: The western Indian Ocean experience. SPC fish aggregating device information bulletin 3:24-29.
    Dagorn, L. and Fre´on, P. (1999) Tropical tuna associated with floating objects: a simulation study of the meeting point hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56, 984–993.
    Dagorn L, Josse E, Bach P (2000) Individual differences in horizontal movements of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in nearshore areas in French Polynesia, determined using ultrasonic telemetry. Aquat Living Resour 13:193–202
    Desurmont, A., and Chapman, L. (2001) The use of anchored FADs in the area served by the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC): Regional synthesis. Proceedings: Tuna fishing and fish aggregating devices, Martinique.
    Dempster, T., Kingsford, M.J., (2003) Homing of pelagic fish to fish aggregation devices(FADs): the role of sensory cues. Marine Ecology Progress Series 258, 213–222.
    Dempster, T (2004) Biology of fish associated with moored fish aggregation devices (FADs): implications for the development of aFAD fishery in New South Wales, Australia. Fisheries Research 68 (2004) 189–201
    Dagorn L, Kim N. Holland, David G. Itano (2007) Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye(T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar Biol (2007) 151:595–606 DOI 10.1007/s00227-006-0511-1
    Dagorn, L., Holland, K.H. and Filmalter, J. (2010) Are drifting FADs essential for testing the ecological trap hypothesis? Fisheries Research 106, 60–63.
    Dagorn L, Kim N. Holland, Victor Restrepo, Gala Moreno (2011) Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? DOI:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00478.x
    Friedlander, A., J. Beets and W. Tobias, (1994) Effects of fish aggregating device design and location on fishing success in th U.S. Virgin Islands. Bull. Mar. Sci., 55(2-3):592-601
    Fréon, P., and Dagorn, L. (2000) Review of fish associative behavior: Toward a generalization of the meeting point hypothesis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10:183–207.
    Fonteneau, A., Pallares, P. and Pianet, R. (2000) A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs. Actes Colloques-IFREMER 28,pp. 15–35.
    Fauvel, T., Bez, N., Walker, E. et al. (2009) Comparative study of the distribution of natural versus artificial drifting Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) in the Western Indian Ocean. Indian Ocean Tuna Commission document, IOTC-2009-WPTT-19, 17 pp.
    Fonteneau, A. and Ariz, J. (2011) Tunas yield per recruit and MSY of longline fisheries, case of yellowfin stock in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Scientific Advisory Committee, May 2011, 8 pp.
    Gooding, R.M. and Magnusson, J.J. (1967) Ecological significance of a drifting object to pelagic fishes. Pac. Sci. 21, 486–497.
    Gaertner, D., Dewals, P. and Marsac, F. (1999) Relations biome´triques utilisables dans les e´tudes sur l’achappement des juve´niles de thonide´s tropicaux dans les sennes. ICCAT Collective Volume Scientific Papers 49, 323–332.
    Girard, C., Benhamout, S, Dagorn, L. (2004) FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2004, 67, 319e326
    doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.007
    Graham, B.S., Grubbs, D., Holland, K. and Popp, B.N. (2006) A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of junvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawii, Marine Biology 150, p 647-658.
    Graham B.S, Grubbs D, Holland K, Popp BN (2007) A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of juvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawaii. Mar Biol 150:647–658
    Guillotreau, P, Salladarré, F, Dewals, P, Dagorn L (2011) Fishing tuna around Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) vs free swimming schools: Skipper decision and other determining factors. Fisheries Research 109 (2011) 234–242
    Ghazali, S.M., Montgomery, J.C., Jeffs, A.G., Ibrahim, Z., Radford, C.A. (2013) The diel variation and spatial extent of the underwater sound arounda fish aggregation device (FAD). Fisheries Research, Volume 148, November 2013, Pages 9–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.07.015
    Hunter, J.R. and Mitchell, C.T. (1967) Association of fishes with flotsam in the offshore waters of Central America. Fishery Bulletin US 66, 13–29.
    Hunter, J.R. and Mitchell, C.T. (1968) Field experiments on the attraction of pelagic fish to floating objects. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer. 31(3), 427–434.
    Holland K, Brill R, Chang R. Horizontal and vertical movements of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices. Fishery Bulletin, 1990, 88: 493-507
    Hall, M. (1992) The association of tuna with floating objects and dolphins in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. VII. Some hypotheses on the mechanisms governing the associations of tunas with floating objects and dolphins. In: International Workshop on Fishing for Tunas Associated with Floating Objects (11–14 February 1992. La Jolla, California), 6 pp.
    Higashi, G. (1994) Ten years of fish aggregating device (FAD) design development in Hawaii. Bulletin of Marine Science 55:651-666.
    Hampton, J. (2000) Natural mortality rates in tropical tunas: size does matter. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57, 1002–1010
    Holland, K., Jaffe, A., Cortez, W. (2000)The fish aggregating device (FAD) system of Hawaii. In: Le Gall, J.Y., Cayre, P. and Taquet, M. (eds) Peche thonier et dispositifs de concentration de poisons. Plouzane: Edition Ifremer. Pp 55-77
    Harley, S.J. and Suter, J.M. (2007) The potential use of time-area closures to reduce catches of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean. Fishery Bulletin 105, 49–61.
    Hallier, J.P. and Gaertner, D. (2008) Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 353, 255–264.
    Harley, S.J., Williams, P., and Hampton, J. (2010) Characterization of `purse seine fishing activities during the 2009 FAD closures. Sixth regular session of the WCPFC Scientific Committee, Aug. 10-19, 2010, Nuku’alofa, Tonga. WCPFC-SC6-2010/FT-WP-03.
    Ibrahim, S., Kawamura, G., Ambak, M.A., (1990) Effective range of traditionalMalaysian FAD as determined by fish-releasing method. Fisheries Research 9,299–306
    Itano DG, Holland KN (2000) Movement and vulnerability of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in relation to FADs and natural aggregation points. Aquat Living Resour 13:213–223
    Itano, D. (2007) An examination of FAD-related gear and fishing strategies useful for data collection and FAD-based management. WCPFC Scientific Committee, third regular session, Aug. 13-24, 2007, Honolulu.
    ISSF, (2013) ISSF Tuna Stock Status Update, 2013(2): Status of the world fisheries for tuna. ISSF Technical Report 2013-04A. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA.
    Josse, E., Bach, P. and Dagorn, L. (1998) Simultaneous observations of tuna movements and their prey by sonic tracking and acoustic surveys. Hydrobiologia 371/372, p 61~69
    Jaquemet, S., Potier, M. and Me´nard, F. (2011) Do drifting and anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) similarly influence tuna feeding habits? A case study from the western Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research 107, 283–290.
    Kleiber, P. and Hampton, J. (1994) Modeling effects of FADs and islands on movement of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis): estimating parameters from tagging data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51, 2642–2653.
    Kitamado, T. and C. Katoaoka, (1996) A study for the realization of sustainable fisheries. A case of Payang fishery in the southern coast of west Jawa, Indonesia. Bull. Fac. Fish. Nagasaki Univ., 77:117-126
    Klimley AP, Holloway CF (1999) School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar Biol 133:307–317
    Kakuma, S. (2000) Synthesis on moored FADs in the North west Pacific region, p. 63-77. In: Le Gall, J.Y., and Taquet, M. (eds.) Peche thoniere et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. Ed. Ifremer, Actes colloquy 28
    Maldeniya, R. (1996) Food consumption of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, in Sri
    Lankan Waters, Environmental Biology of Fishes 47, p 101-107
    Marsac F, Cayre´ P (1998) Telemetry applied to behaviour of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) movements in a network of fish aggregating devices. Hydrobiologia 371–372:155–171
    Me´nard, F, Fonteneau, A, Gaertner, D, Nordstrom, V, Stequert, B, Marchal, E (2000) Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem. ICES J Mar Sci 57:525–530
    Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A. and Menard, F. (2000) Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap? In: Le Gall J.-Y., Cayré P. and Taquet M. (eds.), Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons, Ed. Ifremer, Actes Colloq. 28, p 537–552
    Morales-Nin, B., Cannizzaro, L., Massuti, E., Potoschi, A., and Andaloro, F. (2000) An overview of the FADs fishery in the Mediterranean Sea, p. 184-207. In: Le Gall, J.Y., Cayre, P., and Taquet, M. (eds.) Peche thoniere et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. Ed. Ifremer, Actes colloquy 28.
    Moreno, G., Dagorn, L. , Sancho, G., and Itano, D. 2007. Fish behavior from fishers’ knowledge: The case study of tropical tuna around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences64:1517-1528.
    Ohta, I., Kakuma, S. and Kanashiro, K. (2001) Aggregating behavior of yellowfin and
    bigeye tuna tagged with coded ultrasonic transmitters around FADs in Okinawa, Japan. In: Sibert JR, Nielsen JL (eds) Electronic tagging and tracking in marine fisheries. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p 131~145
    Ohta I, Kakuma S (2005) Periodic behavior and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations. Mar Biol 146:581–594
    Özgül, A and Angel, D (2013) Wild fish aggregations around fish farms in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea: implications for fisheries management and conservation. Aquacult Environ Interact Vol. 4: 135–145, 2013 doi: 10.3354/aei00076
    Pollard and Matthews, (1985) Experience in the Construction and Siting of Artificial Reefs and Fish Aggregation Devices in Australian Waters, with Notes on and a Bibliography of Australian Studies. Bulletin of Marine Science, Volume 37, Number 1, July 1985, pp. 299-304(6)
    Rountree, R.A. (1990) Community structure of fishes attracted to shallow water fish aggregation devices off South Carolina, USA. Env. Biol. Fish. 29, 241–262.
    Robertson, B.A. and Hutto, R.L. (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87, 1075–1085.
    Robert, M., Dagorn, L. and Deneubourg, J.L. (2010) Comparing condition factors of skipjack tuna associated with natural floating objects and those from free swimming schools in the Mozambique Channel. Indian Ocean Tuna Commission document, IOTC-2010-WPTT-24, 14 pp.
    Robert, M, Dagorn,L, Louis, J, Deneubourg, Itano, D, Holland, K (2012) Size-dependent behavior of tuna in an array of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar Biol (2012) 159:907–914 DOI 10.1007/s00227-011-1868-3
    Suyehiro, Y. (1952) Textbook of Ichthyology [in Japanese]. Iwanami Shoten, Tokoyo
    Schaefer, K.M. and Fuller, D.W. (2002) Movements, behaviour, and habitat selection of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the eastern equatorial Pacific, ascertained through archival tags. Fish. Bull. 100, 765–788.
    Schaefer, K.M. and Fuller, D.W. (2005) Behavior of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) tunas within aggregations associated with floating objects in the equatorial eastern Pacific,Marine Biology 146, p781~792
    Schaefer KM, Fuller DW (2010) Vertical movements, behavior, and habitat of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean, ascertained from archival tag data. Mar Biol 157:2625–2642
    Stehfest, K.M. and Dagorn, L. (2010) Differences in large scale movement between free swimming and fish aggregating device (FAD) caught tuna. Indian Ocean Tuna Commission document, IOTC-2010-WPTT-06, 24 pp.
    Sun, C.H., Maunder, M.N., Aires-da-Silva, A. and Bayliff, W.H. (2010) Increasing the Economic Value of the Eastern Pacific ocean Tropical Tuna Fishery: Tradeoffs Between Longline and Purse Seine Fishing, International Workshop on Global Tuna Demand, Fisheries Dynamics and Fisheries Management in the Eastern Pacific ocean, La Jolla, California, USA, May 13–14, 2010.
    Taquet, M., Reynal, L. and Laurans, M. (2000) Do FADs influence the geographical distribution of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus)? In: Le Gall, J.-Y., Cayre, P. and Taquet, M. (eds.), Peˆche Thoniere et Dispositifs de Concentration de Poisons. Ed. Ifremer, Actes Colloq. 28, 528–536.
    Uda, M (1933) Types of skipjack schools and their fishing qualities. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 2(3):107–111
    WATERS, J.R. (1911) Restricted Access vs. Open Access Methods of Management: Toward More Effective Regulation of Fishing Effort. Marine Fisheries Review 53(3),1991
    Wilkins and Goodwin, (1989) Progress report on the evaluation of fish aggregating devices for rhe eastern Caribbean. In: Watigh. G.T. and M.H. Goodwin ( ed~)P. roceedings of rhe thirty ninth annual Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Insrirure, Hamilton. Bermuda. Nov. 1986. vol. 39: 405-407.
    水產試驗所92 至94 年度年報。
    井上實,(1978) 魚及行動と漁法,恆星社厚生閣出版,東京,PP.211。
    井上實,(1987) 魚及行動と漁法,恆星社厚生閣出版,東京,PP.198。
    王世斌,(2005) 臺灣沿近海延繩釣漁業. In:臺灣農家要覽,增修訂三版 (五)、壹海洋漁業篇,三沿近海漁業,(二)延繩釣漁業,p.45~50。
    王磊,(2007) 人工魚礁的優化設計和礁區佈局的初步研究,中國海洋大學漁業資源研究所學位論文。
    江偉全、陳文義,(2011) 臺灣東部漁業資源與保育現況,水產試驗所東部海洋生物研究中心。
    邵廣昭,(1979)「化滄海為良田的人工魚礁」科學月刊(114) 。
    邵廣昭,(2004) 臺灣人工魚礁的理論與功能,中央研究院生物多樣性研究中心。
    宋薰華 (1980) 黃鰭鮪產卵生態之初步調查。臺灣水產學會刊,7(1):32-42頁。
    沈世傑,(1993)臺灣魚類誌,國立臺灣大學動物學系,PP. 960。
    吳龍靜、陳淑珍、謝勝雄、陳秋月、吳春基、陳守仁、曾莉芸、蘇偉成、林俊辰,(2003) 中層人工浮魚礁漁場造成之研究,水試專訊,1: 2-7。
    吳龍靜和蘇偉成,(2004) 臺灣人工浮魚礁設礁技術的演進,海洋高雄期刊,第8期,p.18~23 。
    吳龍靜、翁進興、彭昌洋、吳春基、林俊辰,(2005) 人工浮魚礁現況及展望座談紀要,水產試驗所沿近海資源研究中心 。
    吳龍靜和翁進興,(2006) 臺灣西南部及東部海域之中層人工浮魚礁聚魚效益比較。水產試驗所沿近海資源研究中心,水試專訊,16: 19-23 。
    呂學榮,(2007) 人工集魚器具及黃鰭鮪與大目鮪之聲探紀錄特性分析及混或減緩措施研究(第一年)。行政院農業委員會漁業署96年度科技計畫研究報告。
    李彥宏、邱允志、陳紫,(2013) 黃鰭鮪的種魚培育及產卵繁殖,水試專訓,第42期,p.4~6。
    林俊辰,(1994) 人工浮魚礁的設計技術及設置要領,中國水產,第496期,P.25-50。
    林俊辰,(1995) 中層人工浮魚礁設置技術之探討,中國水產,第509期,P.13-36。
    林俊辰,(2007) 中層人工浮魚礁投放,大仁科技大學教師研究計畫成果報告。
    洪銘昆,(2008) 臺灣西南海域中層人工浮魚礁區黃鰭鮪洄游行為之研究,國立中山大學海洋事務研究所碩士論文。
    陳守仁,(1989) 人工浮魚礁聚魚效果之研究,臺灣省水產學會會刊,16(1):29-46。
    陳守仁.黃建智.陳羿惠.吳龍靜,(2010),流動的水晶—臺灣櫻花蝦,科學發展 2010年8月,452期,p.32~39。
    翁進興和吳龍靜,(2007) 綠島海域之中層人工浮魚礁效益調查,水產試驗所沿近海資源中心,水試專訊,18: 10-11。
    越智洋介,(1997) 南海諸島邊水域こおけそ中層人工浮魚礁及適正利用技術,東北大學博士論文,PP.105。
    蘇偉成,(1992) 日本的人工浮魚礁概況,臺灣省水產試驗所潮訊,第48期,P.3-5。
    蘇偉成,(1992) 人工浮魚礁在南中國海所展現的神奇功效,臺灣省水產試驗所高雄分所遠洋漁業推廣資料彙集 (Ⅳ),P.34-37。
    蘇偉成(1994).中國南海浮魚礁投放試驗初選成果評估。海洋牧場經營管理經驗交流座談會專刊。高雄縣政府、臺灣漁業技術顧問社刊行。p.14~16。
    蘇偉成和林俊辰,(1996) 人工浮魚礁之漁業效益,海洋牧場研討會系列(一)論文摘要,國立中山大學海洋科學研究中心印行,P.155-170。
    蘇茂森,(2008),從鮪魚漁撈到人工養殖,科學人 4月號/2008 第74期,p.70。

    下載圖示 校內:2019-09-11公開
    校外:2019-09-11公開
    QR CODE