本研究釐清了在ICT商業生態系中企業合作專業分工所形成的原因，以及進一步解釋台灣代工廠商如何與歐美品牌廠商共同創造更高的分工表現。本研究的分析對象是伺服器商業生態系，Intel是主要的技術平台樣(technological platform, Gawer, 2014)業者。而伺服器品牌廠商與伺服器代工廠商都需要依賴於Intel所提供的技術資料，才能有效地進行伺服器產品開發。我們認為技術平台本身的技術變化會影響伺服器品牌廠商與伺服器代工廠商之間的企業合作專業分工。當技術平台的技術變化屬於增強型的時候，伺服器品牌廠商與伺服器代工廠商分別從技術平台業者獲取各自的專業知識來加強與補足自己的專業性資產，藉此追求伺服器產品開發的表現。另外一方面，當技術平台的技術變化屬於破壞型的時候，伺服器品牌廠商與伺服器代工廠商分別從技術平台業者獲取各自與對方的專業知識來加強與補足自己的專業性資產，藉此追求伺服器產品開發的表現。本研究的結果意味著，模組化、標準化等或許只是在ICT商業生態系中企業合作專業分工關係的形成原因之一而已。企業能否從技術平台業者吸收技術變化類型相關的知識，將有助於企業達成更佳的產品開發表現。

This study clarifies the reasons behind the interfirm division of labor in the ICT business ecosystem, and further explains how Taiwanese ODM collaborates with foreign brand company to create higher performance of interfirm division of labor. The analysis of this research is the server business ecosystem, in which Intel is the platform leader. Server brand company and Server ODM need to rely on the technical information provided by Intel in order to effectively carry out server product developments. We believe that the technological changes in the technological platform itself will affect the interfirm division of labor between server brand company and server ODM. When the technical changes of the CPU belong to the reinforced type, the server brand company and the server ODM obtain their respective knowledge from Intel in order to strengthen and supplement their specialized assets, thereby pursuing the performance of server product developments. Moreover, when the technical changes of CPU belong to the overturned type, the server brand company and the server ODM obtain each other’s knowledge and their own knowledge respectively from Intel to strengthen and supplement their specialized assets, thereby pursuing the performance of server product developments. The results of this study also depict that modularization, standardization, etc. may be just one of the factors to determine the relationship of interfirm division of labor in the ICT business ecosystem. The knowledge assimilation based on the types of technical changes from platform leader, which will help companies to achieve higher performance of new product developments.

Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of innovation in technology. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in
new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Ahuja, G. (2000). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities
in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3),
317-343.
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Alcacer, J., & Oxley, J. (2014). Learning by supplying. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 204-223.
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
Alchian, A. R. M. E. N., & Demsetz, H. (1996). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, 193-216.
Alexander, C. (1964). Alexander, Christopher, Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
Argyres, N. S. (1995). Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 28(3), 337-358.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(1), 91-114.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research policy, 23(5), 523-532.
Asanuma, B. (1988). Japanese manufacturer-supplier relationships in international perspective: the automobile case.
Baldwin, C. Y. (2015). Bottlenecks, modules and dynamic architectural capabilities. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, (15-028).
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Platforms, markets and innovation, 32.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Basole, R. C. (2009). Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology, 24(2), 144-159.
Basole, R. C. (2009). Structural analysis and visualization of ecosystems: a study of mobile device platforms. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 292.
Berger, S., & Lester, R. K. (2005). Globalization and the Future of the Taiwan Miracle. Global Taiwan: Building Competitive Strengths in a New International Economy, ME Sharpe, Armonk, 3-32.
Boudreau, K., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: regulation of an ecosystem by a private actor. Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Platforms, markets and innovation, 1, 163-191.
Boudreau, K., & Lakhani, K. (2009). How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69.
Bresnahan, T. F., & Greenstein, S. (1999). Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(1), 1-40.
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83-108.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?. Administrative science quarterly, 46(4), 597-621.
Burgelman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative science quarterly, 47(2), 325-357.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2011). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, Forthcoming.
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research policy, 24(2), 233-257.
Clark, K. B. (1985). The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research policy, 14(5), 235-251.
Clark, K. B., Fujimoto, T., & Cook, A. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry.
Colfer, L. J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2016). The mirroring hypothesis: theory, evidence, and exceptions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(5), 709-738.
Constant, E. W. (1980). The origins of the turbojet revolution.
Cusumano, M. A., & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3), 51.
Dore, R. (1983). Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism. The British Journal of Sociology, 34(4), 459-482.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162.
Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 271-291.
Dyer, J. H. (1996). Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organization science, 7(6), 649-666.
Dyer, J. H., & Ouchi, W. G. (1993). Japanese-style partnerships: giving companies a competitive edge. MIT Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 51.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
Eppinger, S. D., & Ulrich, K. T. (1995). Product design and development.
Evans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale J. on Reg., 20, 325.
Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O'keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management science, 30(6), 682-695.
Gawer, A. (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation: An introduction.
Gawer, A. (2009). Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services. Platforms, markets and innovation, 45, 57.
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research policy, 43(7), 1239-1249.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: how Intel. Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417-433.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104.
Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173-192.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery ofgrounded theory: Strategiesfor qualitative research. Chicago: Aldire.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, 101, 158.
Goetz, C. J., & Scott, R. E. (1981). Principles of relational contracts. Va. L. Rev., 67, 1089.
Henderson, R., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly.
Hoetker, G. (2006). Do modular products lead to modular organizations?. Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), 501-518.
Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of power: electrification in Western society, 1880-1930.
Iansiti, M. (1998). Technology integration.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Keystones and dominators: Framing operating and technology strategy in a business ecosystem. Harvard Business School, Boston, 24-25.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-81.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability.
Imai, K., & Shiu, J. M. (2011). Value chain creation and reorganization: the growth path of China’s mobile phone handset industry. The Dynamics of Local Learning in Global Value Chains, 43-67.
Kang, J. S., Li, M., Wu, H., Nguyen, H., & Hu, Y. (2018). Experimental observation of high thermal conductivity in boron arsenide. Science, 361(6402), 575-578.
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017). Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organization Science, 28(3), 531-551.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822-841.
Kindleberger, C. P. (1983). Standards as public, collective and private goods. Kyklos, 36(3), 377-396.
Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. The Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297-326.
Knight, K. E. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 478-496.
Kude, T., & Dibbern, J. (2009). Tight versus loose organizational coupling within inter-firm networks in the enterprise software industry-the perspective of complementors. AMCIS 2009 proceedings, 666.
Langlois, R. N., & Robertson, P. L. (1992). Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research policy, 21(4), 297-313.
Langlois, R., Yu, F. L. T., & Robertson, P. (2002). Alternative theories of the firm.
Langlois, R. N. (2003). The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and corporate change, 12(2), 351-385.
Langlois, R. N. (2004). Competition through institutional form: the case of cluster tool standards.
Marples, D. L. (1961). The decisions of engineering design. IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (2), 55-71.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1986). Porter's (1980) generic strategies and performance: an empirical examination with American data: part I: testing Porter. Organization studies, 7(1), 37-55.
Monteverde, K. (1995). Applying resource-based strategic analysis: Making the model more accessible to practitioners.
Monteverde, K. (1995). Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Science, 41(10), 1624-1638.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Moore, J. F. (2016). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems.
Nalebuff, B. J., Brandenburger, A., & Maulana, A. (1996). Co-opetition.
Ogawa, S. (1998). Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 777-790.
Ogawa, S., & Pongtanalert, K. (2011). Visualizing invisible innovation continent: Evidence from global consumer innovation surveys.
Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management science, 51(10), 1494-1504.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economyand how to make them work for you.
Prencipe, A. (2003). Corporate strategy and systems integration capabilities: managing networks in complex systems industries. The business of systems integration, 114-132.
Prencipe, A., Davies, A., & Hobday, M. (Eds.). (2003). The business of systems integration.
Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.
Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.
Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology.
Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125-43.
Sako, M. (1991). The role of trust in Japanese buyer-supplier relationships. Ricerche economiche, 45(2-3), 449-474.
Sako, M. (1992). Price, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan.
Umena, Y., Kawakami, K., Shen, J. R., & Kamiya, N. (2011). Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature, 473(7345), 55.
Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 312-334.
Schilling, M. A., & Steensma, H. K. (2001). The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1149-1168.
Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., & Svahn, F. (2010). Transforming Ecosystem Relationships in Digital Innovation. In ICIS (Vol. 138).
Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., & Svahn, F. (2013). Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 183-197.
Shintaku, J., Ogawa, K., & Yoshimoto, T. (2006). Hikari-disuku Sangyo no Kyoso to Kokusai-teki Kyogyo Moderu: Suriawase Yoso no Kapuseru-ka ni yoru Mojurah-ka no Shinten.[The Competition and Architecture Based Alliance in Optical Disk Industry: Process of Modularization by Encapsulation of Integral Based Technology]. Inobeshon to Kyoso-yui.
Shintaku, J., Ogawa, K., & Yoshimoto, T. (2006). Architecture-based approaches to international standardization and evolution of business models. IEC Century Challenge, 2006, 19-35.
Snow, C., Miles, R. E., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1992). Managing 21st Century Network Organizations in Organizational Dynamics–New York American Management Association.
Strahilevitz, L. J., West, S. R., Bernstein, D. E., Berger, M. A., Twerski, A. D., Kaersvang, D. L., & White, J. R. (1835). Information asymmetries and the rights to exclude. Michigan Law Review, 104.
Stigler, G. J. (1951). The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185-193.
Tatsumoto, H., Ogawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2009). Platforms and the international division of labor: A case study on Intel labor: The case of automotive product. Platform, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Tatsumoto, H., Ogawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2009). Platforms and the international division of labor: A case study on Intel’s platform business in the PC industry (pp. 345-369). Platform, Markets and Innovation. London, UK: Edward Elgar.
Thomke, S., & Fujimoto, T. (1999, August). Front-loading problem-solving: implications for development performance and capability. In PICMET'99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No. 99CH36310) (pp. 234-240). IEEE.
Tiwana, A. (2015). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266-281.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information systems research, 21(4), 675-687.
Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & present, (38), 56-97.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative science quarterly, 439-465.
Tushman, M. L. (1992). Organizational determinants of technological change: toward a sociology of technological evolution. Research in organizational behavior, 14, 311-347.
Tushman, M. L., & Murmann, J. P. (1998, August). Dominant Designs, Technology Cycles, and Organization Outcomes. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1998, No. 1, pp. A1-A33). Academy of Management.
Victor, B., & Blackburn, R. S. (1987). Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 486-498.
Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443-454.
West, J. (2003). How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research policy, 32(7), 1259-1285.
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.
Yin Robert, K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. sage publications.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods.
丸川知雄, 安本雅典, 今井健一, & 許経明. (2006). 日中携帯電話端末産業の比較. 赤門マネジメント・レビュー, 5(8), 541-572.
立本博文, 許経明, & 安本雅典. (2008). 知識と企業の境界の調整とモジュラリティの構築--パソコン産業における技術プラットフォーム開発の事例 (特集 市場と組織のインターフェイス). 組織科学, 42(2), 19-32.
伊藤秀史. (2005). 企業とガバナンス. リーディングス日本の企業システム 第 Ⅱ 期, 2.
朱安群（2003）。自有品牌廠商與專業代工廠商在供應商評估選擇考量因素之比較。國立高雄第一科技大學運輸倉儲營運所碩士論文，高雄市。
吳柄勳（2011）。代工廠商轉型品牌廠商之研究:動態能力觀點。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文，花蓮縣。
李家君（2012）。智慧型手機代工廠商轉型為品牌廠商前後策略行銷分析：以A公司為例。國立政治大學商管專業學院碩士學位學程(AMBA)碩士論文，台北市。
林芯玫（2003）。我國筆記型電腦代工廠商競爭優勢之探討。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文，台北市。
陈杰. (2018). 英特尔嵌入式平台硬件设计流程指导. 电子技术与软件工程, (2), 198-199.
洪清德（2004）。使命感，客戶網路和供應商網路：影響我國電子資訊產業代工和自創品牌策略抉擇因素的探討。管理學報，21(4)，451-476。
高敏舜（2017）。代工廠商與品牌廠商之長期績效探討。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，台北市。
許經明. (2010). 中国携帯電話産業における垂直非統合の形成・発展要因の考察. イノベーション・マネジメント, 7, 51-71.
楊達凱. (2016). 從 OEM/ODM 轉型成 OBM 組織結構之兩難. 多國籍企業管理評論, 10(1), 25-43.