在電影【明天過後The Day After Tomorrow】的劇情中，地球遭受極端氣候的反撲，自然界生物面臨著排山倒海而來的海嘯與冷冽的低溫，當時任何生物都無法倖免於難，包括自詡為萬物之靈的人類。為了保護我們唯一的地球與萬物的生長，永續發展已成為當今企業面臨的重要挑戰。紡織業是一個重要的產業，然而其生產過程可能對環境和社會產生負面影響。其生產過程中會消耗大量能源和水資源，並排放大量廢水、廢氣和廢棄物。同時，紡織品生產過程中也可能會使用有害化學物質，對人體健康產生潛在風險。因此，紡織業需要關注永續發展，以減少對環境的負面影響，保護生態環境和生物多樣性。本研究旨在探討紡織業的永續發展解決方案。本研究回顧了過去相關研究文獻，了解目前紡織業界對於永續發展的作法與對未來的規劃，並使用訪談法探討台灣紡織產業應如何落實永續經營之概念。
本研究發現了以下的四點重要結果:一、永續發展是紡織業經營的關鍵議題；二、台灣紡織業為強化永續經營，必須在對於原材料的選擇及回收模式於事前的規劃給予極高比重的關注；三、持續改善生產流程與投資節能減廢，有助於台灣紡織業強化永續發展；四、台灣紡織業應設立專責單位負責永續發展工作的推動與監督，更有效率的支持永續發展。根據以上的研究結論與發現，期望能對於台灣紡織業在現今全球化的競爭中爭取到部分的優勢，也讓台灣的好山好水繼續長存。
越來越多的消費者關注企業的社會責任和環境表現，這也促使紡織企業更加關注永續發展。本研究之成果可協助紡織業廠商實施永續發展，滿足消費者的期望，並提高品牌忠誠度和市場佔有率。

Extreme weather strikes back at Earth in [The Day After Tomorrow], causing widespread destruction across the planet and killing off all forms of life in the process. Even humans, the species that likes to think of itself as the best, will have a hard time. Sustainable development has become an important challenge for companies to meet in order to preserve our planet and allow all forms of life to flourish. In light of the known environmental and social costs of textile production, this research investigates potential sustainable development strategies to mitigate these effects. The textile industry is a major economic driver, but its production methods may have unintended consequences for people and the natural world. Large amounts of energy and water are used in these processes, and correspondingly large amounts of wastewater, air pollutants, and waste are released into the environment. The use of potentially hazardous chemicals in the textile manufacturing process also poses risks to human health. Therefore, in order to lessen its negative impact on the environment, protect ecological systems, and maintain biodiversity, the textile industry must prioritize sustainable development. The purpose of this research is to investigate options for sustainable development in the textile sector. It examines relevant previous research literature to comprehend the textile industry's present practices and future plans for sustainable development. In addition, interviews are used to explore how sustainable management can be applied in Taiwan's textile sector. There were several major takeaways from this research. First, the textile industry faces serious challenges related to sustainable development. Second, two of the most important things the textile industry in Taiwan can do to improve its sustainable management are (1) prioritize the selection of raw materials and (2) plan ahead for recycling models. Third, investments in energy efficiency and waste reduction, as well as the ongoing improvement of production processes, are crucial methods for achieving sustainable development. Finally, the textile industry in Taiwan could provide more effective support if it established specialized units tasked with promoting and monitoring sustainable development. The results and findings of this study provide hope that Taiwan's textile industry can thrive in the face of globalized competition and protect the island nation's pristine natural resources. Businesses in the textile industry are prioritizing sustainable development in response to rising consumer interest in corporate social responsibility and environmental performance. Sustainable development, satisfying customer needs, and expanding customer loyalty and market share are all objectives that can benefit from the findings of this study for businesses in the textile industry.

一、 英文參考文獻：
Archie B. Carrol (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,Academy of Management Review VOL. 4, NO. 4
Ben Purvis & Yong Mao & Darren Robinson (2019). Three pillars of sustainability:
in search of conceptual origins ,Springer Japan Volume 14,P681-695
Bhattacharya, C., Sen, S. and Korschun, D. (2008). “Using Corporate Social Responsibility To Win the War for Talent”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 37-44.
Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease and C. W. Smith. (1988). "Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments", Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 267-292
Brummer, J. (1991). Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. New York: Greenwood Press.
Catarina Costa & Nuno G. Azoia & Carla Silva & Eduardo F. Marques (2020). Textile Industry in a Changing World: Challenges of Sustainable Development
Chen, L. & F. Caro & C. J. Corbett & and X. Ding. (2019). "Estimating the environmental and economic impacts of widespread adoption of potential technology solutions to reduce water use and pollution: Application to China's textile industry"
Cobbing, M. & Vicaire, Y. (2016). Timeout for fast fashion.
Costanza R & Daly Let al. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ecol Econ. 130:350-355.
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Sage Publications Ltd.
E. Merrick Dodd (1932). 'For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?' Harvard Law Review 45, pp.1145-63
Ferrell, O.C. & Maignan, I. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23 (3), pp. 283-297
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
Friedman, A. (1964). Partial Differential Equation of Parabolic Type. Prentice Hall, Eagliweed Cliffs.
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, 122-126.
James A. Brickley & Ronald C. Lease & Clifford W. Smith Jr. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments, Journal of Financial Economics Volume 20, January–March 1988, Pages 267-291
Jens M. Olesen et al. (2010). Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate, Advances in Ecological Research Volume 42, 2010, Pages 71-138
Kant, R. (2012). "Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard". Natural Science 4,no. 1 (January): 22-26.
Karthik, T. & D. Gopalakrishnan (2014). "Environmental analysis of textile value chain: An overview". In Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing, edited by S. S. Muthu, 153-88. Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer.
Kavita K. (2015). Target will end school charity program, shift giving focus to wellness,Star tribune Business, September 14th
Liu Mei-Ying & Ting P. (2014). "Chu Huan A Study of the Relationship Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance P17-30 The 17th Conference on Interdisciplinary and Multifunctional Business Management
Liu, Yang, et al. (2021). "Neutralizing activity of BNT162b2-elicited serum." New England Journal of Medicine 384.15 (2021): 1466-1468.
Loetscher, S., M. Starmanns, and L. Petrie. (2017). Changing fashion: The clothing and textile industry at the brink of radical transformation. Environmental rating and innovation report 2017. WWF Switzerland.
Måns Nilsson & Dave Griggs & Martin Visbeck (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals
Mark R. Foreh & Sonya Grier (2003). When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism Journal of Consumer Psychology Volume 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 349-356
Michael E. Porter & Mark R. Kramer (2011). Creating Shared Value How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth
Nayak, R. K.& R. Padhye (2015). "The care of apparel products". In Textiles and fashion: Materials, design and technology, edited by R. Sinclair, 799-822. Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles.
Nayak R. & T. Panwar, & L. V. T. Nguyen. (2020). "Sustainability in fashion and textiles:A survey from developing country". In Sustainable technologies for fashion and textiles,edited by R. Nayak, 3-30. Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles.
P. F. Drucker (1955). The Practice of Management, Butterworth Heinemann,1955-399
Robert Gunness (1986). Social Responsibility: The Art of the Possible, Business And Society Review12:1974-75
Ruth Alsop (2005). Power, Rights, and Poverty: Concepts and Connections, Poverty Reduction Group, PREM, World Bank, and Andrew Norton, Policy Unit, UK Department for International Development
Sachs JD. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals.Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2206-11.
Saxena, S. & A. S. M. Raja & A. Arputharaj. (2017). "Challenges in sustainable wet processing of textiles". In Textiles and clothing sustainability, edited by S. S. Muthu, 43-79. Textile Science and Clothing Technology.
Tranfield, D. & Denyer, D. & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence: Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222.
William B. Werther Jr.& David Chandler (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance, Business Horizons Volume 48, Issue 4, July–August 2005, Pages 317-324
Yeosun Yoon & Zeynep Gürhan-Canli & Norbert Schwarz (2006). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations, Journal of Consumer Psychology Volume 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 377-390

二、中文參考文獻：
何莉芸 & 李佳玲 (2017) 企業永續發展與社會責任報告之趨勢與實務 中華會計學刊 第12卷特刊，359-366 頁
李永展 (2007). 都市型永續社區之準則：國土永續發展之新趨勢，應用倫理研究通訊第41期2007年2月頁48-57
李永展 (2012). 永續國土.區域治理.社區營造：理論與實踐。臺北：詹氏書局
李建瑩 & 林麗嬌 & 侯國隆 (2010). 企業社會責任與財務績效關聯性研究-以本國金融業為例，國立勤益科技大學
杜瑞澤 & 陳振甫 (1998). 綠色生命週期設計產品回收再生特性之永續性評估模式研究，中華民國設計學報，第3卷第1期，pp.23-41。
林立生 (2010) 國土管理制度之比較研究:以荷蘭、日本為借鏡 【教育行政與管理】學術研討會論文集
陳家榮 & 陳永坤 (2009). 台灣永續發展評量模型之建立與應用研究(3/3)，行政院國科會96年度專題研究計畫
陽光行動 (2021). 企業永續經營關鍵題：如何打造友善職場、凝聚同仁共識？，社企流編輯室
齊力 & 林本炫.(2005). 質性研究方法與資料分析.嘉義縣：南華大學教社所.
劉阿榮 & 石慧瑩 (1999). 永續發展的五個正義向度. 國立中央大學哲學研究所應用倫理研究中心,199904.P37-42
蕭瑞麟 (2006). 不用數字的研究-鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究.台北:培生出版社
簡又新 (2019). 躍升中的臺灣企業永續發展。東吳經濟商學學報，頁1-14。