簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張智凱
Zhang, Zhi-Kai
論文名稱: 美國公司治理與企業績效之探討
Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in the United States
指導教授: 王澤世
Wang, Tse-Shih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 23
中文關鍵詞: 公司治理企業績效董事會
外文關鍵詞: Corporate governance, Firm performance, Board of directors
相關次數: 點閱:76下載:23
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本篇研究欲探討公司治理與企業績效間之關係,以2013~2019 美國的601 間上市
    公司進行檢驗。本研究提供了一個較為全面關於董事會的公司治理架構,與以往大部
    分文獻對於美國只針對單一公司治理變數進行探討不同,並加入了過去較少研究的公
    司治理變數: 董事會薪酬,以增進本研究之完整性。另外,本研究使用市場價值衡量
    之公司績效,Tobin’s q,與會計價值衡量之ROE 與ROA 進行比較。研究結果顯示,
    董事會規模、董事會獨立性以及董事會薪酬對企業績效有負面影響 ; CEO 雙重職位、
    董事會性別多樣性則會為企業績效帶來正面影響,另外,僅有董事會獨立性及董事會
    性別多樣性在三個模型之下都呈現顯著。

    This study aims to investigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm
    performance, studying with 601 publicly traded companies in the United States from 2013 to
    2019. Unlike most of the previous literatures in the U.S. that focus on a single corporate
    governance aspect, this study provides a more comprehensive framework of corporate
    governance and add a corporate governance variable which has been less studied in the past:
    board compensation to increase the completeness of this thesis. In addition, this study uses
    Tobin's q, a market value measurement of firm performance to compare with ROE and ROA
    measured by accounting value. The result shows that board size, board independence, and
    board compensation have a negative impact on firm performance; CEO duality, gender
    diversity have a positive impact on firm performance, while only board independence and
    gender diversity are significant in all three models.

    摘要 I Abstract II Table of Contents III List of Tables IV 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review and Hypotheses 3 2.1 Board size and firm performance 3 2.2 Board independence and firm performance 4 2.3 CEO duality and firm performance 6 2.4 Gender diversity and firm performance 7 2.5 Board compensation and firm 8 3. Data and Methodology 9 3.1 Sample and data 9 3.2 Variables 9 3.2.1 Independent variables 10 3.2.2 Dependent variables 11 3.2.3 Control variables 12 3.3 Methodology 12 4. Result 13 4.1 Descriptive statistics 13 4.2 Corporate governance and firm performance 17 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 20 6. Reference 22

    Baker, G. P., Jensen, M. C., Murphy, K. J., 1988. Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, No. 3, 593–616.
    Barney, J. B., Clark, D. N., 2007. Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. OUP Oxford.
    Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., 2008. Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 3, 257-273.
    Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., 2007. Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 122, No. 4, 1341–1408.
    Baliga, B. R., Moyer, R. C., Rao, R. S., 1996. CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What's the Fuss? Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, 41-53.
    Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., Wald, J. K., 2006. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism?. Journal of corporate finance, Vol. 12, No. 3, 403-423.
    Campbell, K., Mínguez Vera, A., 2010. Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 14, No. 1, 37–59.
    Chung, K. H., Pruitt, S. W., 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's Q. Financial Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, 70-74.
    Fama, E. F., Jensen, M. C., 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 301-325.
    Fernandes, N., 2008. Board compensation and firm performance: The role of “independent” board members. Journal of multinational financial management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 30-44.
    Guest, P. M., 2009. The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 15, No. 4, 385–404.
    Hussein, K., Kiwia, B., 2009. Examining the Relationship between Female Board Members and Firm Performance- A Panel Study of US Firms. African Journal of Finance and Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, 121-130.
    Jermias, J., 2007. The effects of corporate governance on the relationship between innovative efforts and performance. European Accounting Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 827–854.
    Koji, K., Adhikary, B. K., Tram, L., 2020. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol. 13, No. 9, 215.
    Lipton, M., Lorsch, J. W., 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, Vol. 48, No. 1, 59-77.
    Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., Yang, T., 2015. Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 30, 223-244.
    Low, D. C., Roberts, H., Whiting, R. H., 2015. Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 35, 381–401.
    Marashdeh, Z. M. S., 2014. The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance in Jordan. (Doctor dissertation, University of Central Lancashire).
    Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., Remery, C., 2016. Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27, No. 15, 1777-1790.
    Mehran, H., 1995. Executive compensation, ownership, and firm performance, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 163-184.
    Pass C., 2004. Corporate Governance and the Role of Non-Executive Directors in Large UK Companies: An Empirical Study. Corporate Governance, Vol. 4, No. 2, 52-63.
    Rashid, A., 2018. “Board independence and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Future Business Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, 34-49.
    Rashid, K., Islam, S., 2010. Board size and firm performance: a comparative and comprehensive analysis by using organizational theories and correct proxies. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, Vol. 6, No. 2, 35-52.
    Rose, C., 2007. Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 404-413.
    Saha, R., Kabra, K. C., 2019. ‘Does corporate governance influence firm performance Evidence from India. Economics and Business Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, 70–89.
    Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., Batsakis, G., 2018. Corporate governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance. British Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, 171-190.
    Vo, D. H., Nguyen, T. M., 2014. The impact of corporate governance on firm performance: Empirical study in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 6, No. 6, 1-13.
    Vo, D., Phan, T., 2013. Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, 62-78.
    Yan, C. C., Hui, Y. Z., Xin, L., 2021. The relationship between board size and firm performance. E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 257, EDP Sciences, 02079.
    Yang, T., Zhao, S., 2014. CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 49, 534- 552.
    Yermack, D., 1996. Higher market valuation for firms with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 185-211.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE