簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔣楚翹
Tseung, Cho-Kiu
論文名稱: 探討香港黃色經濟之社群發展歷程:以政治消費主義之社會價值共創為視角
Exploring the Community Building Process of Yellow Economy in Hong Kong: A Perspective from Social Value Co-Creation of Political Consumerism
指導教授: 楊佳翰
Yang, Chia-Han
仲曉玲
Chung, Hsiao-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所
Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 151
中文關鍵詞: 政治消費社會價值共同創造社群建置黃色經濟香港
外文關鍵詞: Political Consumerism, Social Value Co-Creation, Community Building, Yellow Economy, Hong Kong
ORCID: 0009-0006-4170-5295
相關次數: 點閱:109下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在2019年,香港人發起了「反送中」運動,示威和遊行遍布香港各地。在示威的背後,香港人不僅用示威表達立場,還運用自己的消費力量,抵制親中國與親政府的商店(即藍店),同時支持與「反送中」運動和香港民主相關的商店(即黃店)。這些政治消費者因共享的價值觀而形成社群,在這個群體中分享資訊並發起消費行動。儘管政治消費日益普遍,卻仍缺乏涉及政治消費者、消費過程中各利益相關者以及擴展社群的研究。

    本研究旨在透過文獻探討法和歷史研究,深入探究香港政治消費模式(即黃色經濟)的發展過程以及涉及的各方利益相關者。同時,利用文獻探討法和綜合個案研究方法,了解黃色經濟社群的發展過程,以及其中社會價值的共創過程。最後,本研究通過專家訪談提出了一個政治消費社群建設架構,供後續相關研究學者參考。

    研究的主要發現是,黃色經濟是隨著社會運動而興起的,並在2019年至2022年間形成了黃色經濟的社群。通過綜合個案研究,發現社群在成長過程中受到不同的影響因素影響,因此出現不穩定的成長路線。通過訪問黃色經濟社群的利益相關者,我們了解到整個發展過程分為四個階段,在不同階層中,社群抱有不同的共享價值。此外,社交媒體在共享價值中扮演了重要角色。本研究的價值在於提供清晰的黃色經濟社群發展過程,並根據研究結果提出政治消費社群的發展指引供參考。

    關鍵字:政治消費、社會價值共同創造、社群建置、黃色經濟、香港

    In 2019, Hong Kong witnessed the rise of the anti-ELAB movement (also known as the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement), which sparked numerous demonstrations and protests. During this period, Hong Kong citizens used their purchasing power as a form of "protest" by boycotting pro-China and pro-government stores, known as "Blue shops," and supporting stores aligned with the anti-ELAB movement and Hong Kong's democracy, known as "Yellow shops." Despite the increasing prevalence of political consumption, there is a lack of research exploring the process between political customers, various stakeholders involved in the consumption process, and the extended community of political consumers.

    This research conducted an extensive literature review and historical research to understand the development process of Hong Kong's political consumption pattern, known as the Yellow Economy. Simultaneously, it utilized literature research and integrated case study methods to comprehend the community-building process within the Yellow Economy and the co-creation of social value within the community. Finally, expert interviews were organized to propose a framework for the political consumption community-building process, which can serve future researchers in related fields.

    The main findings of the research revealed that the Yellow Economy emerged in conjunction with social movements and evolved into a community between 2019 and 2022. Through comprehensive case studies, it was observed that the community faced various influential factors during its growth, resulting in an unstable developmental trajectory. Stakeholders within the Yellow Economy were interviewed to understand its four-stage developmental process, wherein different layers of the community held distinct shared values. Furthermore, social media played a crucial role in shaping the shared values within the community. The research value of this thesis lies in providing a clear understanding of the developmental process of the Yellow Economy community and proposing a development guideline for political consumerism communities.

    Keywords: Political Consumerism, Social Value Co-Creation, Community Building, Yellow Economy, Hong Kong

    Table of Content 摘要 i ABSTRACT ii 誌謝 iii List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Research Background 1 The Overall Trend of Political Consumption 1 The Consumption Pattern of Hong Kong People Before 2019 2 The New Form of Political Consumption in Hong Kong 3 Research Motivation 7 Individual Motivation 7 Academic Motivation 10 Research Objectives and Research Questions 11 Key Terminology 12 Chapter 2 Literature Review 13 Political Consumerism: The Value-driven Consumption Pattern 13 Political Consumerism: Consumption Power as a Way of Political Participation 15 Political Consumerism: The Interpretation from Involved Stakeholder 17 Social Value Co-creation: The Process of Creating Additional Value 21 Framework of Value Co-creation 23 Community Building: The Shared Value Community 26 Components of Community Building 27 The Process of Community Building 29 The Formation of Shared Value Community 34 The Driving Force of Political Consumerism in Hong Kong:The Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement 37 The Evolution of Social Movement:The Political Consumerism in Hong Kong 38 Summary of Literature Review 41 Chapter 3 Research Design 42 Research Framework 42 Research Method 44 Literature Review 44 Historical research of Yellow Economy community 45 Expert Interview 47 Case Study Method (Mixed method) 49 Questionnaire 50 In-depth Interview 51 Content Analysis 53 Selection Criteria 54 Data Analysis 55 Section 1: The Development Timeline of the Yellow Economy and its Community 55 Involved Stakeholders, Motivation, and Influencing Power of the Yellow Economy and its community 55 The Yellow Economy and its Community: From 0 to 1 71 Section 2: Role of Social Media in the Community Building Process: A Case Study of Punish Mee (懲罰Mee) 72 Background of Punish Mee and its Users 73 The Role of Social Media: From Edge to Center 84 The Shared Values of the Yellow Economy Community: Social, Economic, and Personal…. 89 The Value Co-Creation in the Yellow Economy community: From Yellow Shop to Social Media 97 Summary about Collected Data 109 Discussion and Conclusion 111 Section 1: Research Finding and Discussion 111 The Building Process of Yellow Economy Community: From a Crowd to a Few 111 The Shared Values: Turning Points of the Building Process of the Yellow Economy Community 117 Guidelines of Social Value-driven Consumption Community: A Lesson from Yellow Economy 123 Conclusion 129 Section 2: Research Limitation, Future Study, and Implication 130 Research Limitation 130 Future Study 131 Theory and Practical Implications 131 References 133 Appendix 145

    Journal Reference
    1. Adrian F. Payne, Kaj Storbacka, & Pennie Frow. Managing the Co-Creation of Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96. 2007
    2. Agrawal, Amit K., et al. “Co-creation of Social Value through Integration of Stakeholders.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 189, pp. 442-448, 2015
    3. Ahmed H. Tolba, & Maha Mourad. Individual and cultural factors affecting diffusion of innovation. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies. . (n.d.)
    4. Alexander, J. C. Toward a theory of cultural trauma. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, 1-30. doi:10.1525/california/9780520235946.003.0001, 2004
    5. Andrew, N., Tolson, D., & Ferguson, D. Building on Wenger: Communities of practice in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 28(2), 246-252. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2007.05.002 ,2008.
    6. Anna Haines. Asset-based community development, 2009.
    7. Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. Interviewing experts. Springer., 2009
    8. Boström M, Føllesdal A, Klintmann M, Micheletti M, & Sørensen MP. Political consumerism: Its motivations, power, and conditions in the nordic countries and elsewhere. TemaNord. doi:10.6027/tn2005-517., 2005
    9. Brown, R. E. The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Online Learning, 5(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v5H2.1876., 2019
    10. Cannas, Rita, et al. “Fostering corporate sustainability in tourism management through social values within collective value co-creation processes.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 139-155., 2018
    11. Cassandra Johnson-Gaither, J. M. Bowker The social construction of african- American environmental values. Values in Sustainable Development, 173-182. doi:10.4324/9780203080177-27. 2013
    12. Castelló, E., & Mihelj, S. Selling and consuming the nation: Understanding consumer nationalism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(4), 558-576. doi:10.1177/1469540517690570., 2017
    13. Charles Follet, & Irina Eva Ianko., Understanding social value creation: A process study of Romanian beggars and Swedish volunteers, 2015
    14. Cheng, E., & Yuen, S. Total mobilisation from below: Abeyance networks, threats and emotions in Hong Kong’s freedom summer. doi:10.33774/apsa-2020-05j34, 2020
    15. Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66-88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x, 2009
    16. Chris White, Social Value 2032 Creating A Social Value Economy, 2023
    17. David L. Morgan. Focus Group. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129-152. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129, 1996
    18. De Souza Briggs, X. Doing democracy up-close: Culture, power, and communication in community building. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(1), 1-13. doi:10.1177/0739456x9801800101, 1998
    19. De Zúñiga, H. G., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society, 16(3), 488-506. doi:10.1177/1461444813487960, 2013
    20. Delli Paoli, A., & D’Auria, V. Digital Ethnography: A Systematic Literature Review. Italian Sociological Review, 11(4), 243-267. doi:10.13136/isr.v11L1S.434, 2021
    21. Duxbury, N., & Jeannotte, M. S. Introduction: Culture and sustainable communities. Culture and Local Governance, 1-10. doi:10.18192/clg-cgl.v3H1.181, 2011
    22. Elena, T., Katifori, A., Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., & Halatsis, C.. Historical research in archives: User methodology and supporting tools. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11(1), 25-36. doi:10.1007/s00799-010-0062-4, 2010
    23. Etienne Wenger. Communities of Practice:Learning as a Social System. In Systems Thinker, 1998.
    24. Etienne Wenger. community of practice:a brief introduction, n.d..
    25. Endres, Kyle, and Costas Panagopoulos. “Boycotts, buycotts, and political consumerism in America.” Research & Politics, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 205316801773863, 2017
    26. Farmer, J., Carlisle, K., Dickson-Swift, V., Teasdale, S., Kenny, A., Taylor, J., … Gussy, M. Applying social innovation theory to examine how community Co-designed health services develop: Using a case study approach and mixed methods. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0, 2018
    27. Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E.. Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139-160. doi:10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799, 2016
    28. Farrington-Darby, T., & Wilson, J. R. Understanding social interactions in complex work: A video ethnography. Cognition, Technology & Work, 11(1), 1-15. doi:10.1007/s10111-008-0118-z, 2008
    29. Farry, Oliver. “Restaurants scrub off protest walls: All signs of the city’s recent protest past are being removed in Hong Kong’s restaurants, shops and even libraries following the new security law.” Index on Censorship, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 24-26, 2020
    30. Filho, W. L., Levesque, V., Sivapalan, S., Salvia, A. L., Fritzen, B., Deckert, R., & Kozlova, V. Social values and sustainable development: community experiences, n.d.
    31. George A. Akerlof, & Rachel E. Kranton. Economics and Identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715-753, 2000
    32. Goundar, Sam. Research Methodology and Research Method, 2012.
    33. Gruber, S. Designing online curriculum: Program revisions and knowledge exchange. Open Praxis, 10(4), 423. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.869, 2018
    34. Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16. doi:10.1080/09523980802588626, 2009
    35. Hannes Rask. What does political consumerism mean for marketers? doi:10.6027/9789289336789-19-en, 2005
    36. Hoadley, C. What is a Community of Practice and How Can We Support It?, 2014.
    37. Holzer B. Private choice and public influence: Political consumers behind the mirror of the market. doi:10.6027/9789289336789-9-en, 2005
    38. Holzer, B. Political consumerism between individual choice and collective action: Social movements, role mobilization and signalling. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 405-415. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00538.x, 2006
    39. Iskanius, P., & Pohjola, I. Leveraging communities of practice in university-industry collaboration: A case study on Arctic research. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 10(2/3), 283. doi:10.1504/ijbir.2016.074830, 2016
    40. Jin-Ding Lin, Chia-Feng Yen, & Mei-Hua Chen.. 質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析. Journal of Disability Research, 3(2), 122-136. doi:10.30072/JDR.200506.0005, 2005
    41. John W. (Jack) Vincent II. Community development practice, 2009
    42. Johnson, S., Rice, R., & Chuckry, J. Wise Indigenous community development principles and practices. Community Practice and Social Development in Social Work, 81-106. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6969-8_4, 2020
    43. Joseph Schumpeter. On the Concept of Social Value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23(2), 213-232, 1909
    44. Joseph McNeely. Community Building. Journal Of Community Psychology, 27(6), 741-750, 1999
    45. Karen L. Then, James A. Rankin, & Elena Ali. Focus Group Research: What Is It and How Can It Be Used? Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 24(1), 16-22, 2014.
    46. Klintman, M. Ambiguous framings of political consumerism: Means or end, product or process orientation? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 427-438. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00540.x, 2006
    47. Kofman, E., Lee, M., & Tse, T. China and the internationalisation of the sociology of contemporary work and employment. Work, Employment and Society, 095001702110594. doi:10.1177/09500170211059420, 2021
    48. Kranton, R. E. Identity economics: Where do social distinctions and norms come from? American Economic Review, 106(5), 405-409. doi:10.1257/aer.p20161038, 2016
    49. Kristin Strømsnes. Political consumption in Norway: Who, why – and does it have any effect? doi:10.6027/9789289336789-8-en, 2005
    50. Ku, A. S., Wang, H., & Choi, J. Cultural sociology in East Asia: Three trajectories in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 10(3), 516-534. doi:10.1057/s41290-021-00127-0, 2021
    51. Lazarus, S., Seedat, M., & Naidoo, T. Community building: Challenges of constructing community. APA handbook of community psychology: Methods for community research and action for diverse groups and issues, 215-234. doi:10.1037/14954-013, 2017
    52. Lee, F. L. The perceptual bases of collective efficacy and protest participation: The case of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 392-411. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq023, 2010
    53. Lee, F. L. Internet alternative media, movement experience, and radicalism: The case of post-umbrella movement Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 17(2), 219-233. doi:10.1080/14742837.2017.1404448, 2017
    54. Lee, F. L., Chen, H., & Chan, M. Social media use and university students’ participation in a large-scale protest campaign: The case of Hong Kong’s umbrella movement. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 457-469. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.005. 2017
    55. Lee, F. L. Changing political economy of the Hong Kong media. China Perspectives, 2018(3), 9-18. doi:10.4000/chinaperspectives.8009. 2018
    56. Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 4(1). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-11. 2009
    57. Li, Y., & Whitworth, K. Redefining consumer nationalism: The ambiguities of shopping yellow during the 2019 Hong Kong Anti-ELAB movement. Journal of Consumer Culture, 146954052211273. doi:10.1177/14695405221127346. 2022
    58. Mads P. Sørensen. Liberal democratic society and political consumerism – a problematic combination. doi:10.6027/9789289336789-3-en. 2004
    59. McDonald, Sally, et al. “Urban Regeneration For Sustainable Communities: A Case Study.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49-59, 2009
    60. Mette Tobiasen.Political consumerism in Denmark.doi:10.6027/9789289336789-6-en. 2005
    61. Mia, Md. T., et al. “The Role Of Community Participation And Community-Based Planning In Sustainable Community Development.” Asian People Journal (APJ), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31-41, 2022
    62. Micheletti, M., & Stolle, D. Fashioning social justice through political consumerism, capitalism, and the internet1. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 749-769. doi:10.1080/09502380802246009. 2008
    63. Moss, M. L., & Grunkemeyer, W. T. Building shared visions for sustainable communities. Community Development, 41(2), 240-254. doi:10.1080/15575330903477309. 2010
    64. Olivier Serrat. Building Communities of Practice. Knowledge Solution, 4. . 2008
    65. Tomlins, R. Social Value Today:Current public and private thinking on Social Value. 2015
    66. Tse, T., Leung, V., Cheng, K., & Chan, J. A clown, a political Messiah or a punching bag? Rethinking the performative identity construction of celebrity through social media. Global Media and China, 3(3), 141-157. doi:10.1177/2059436418805540. 2018
    67. Tse, T. Work faster, harder, cheaper? Global, local and sectoral Co-configurations of job insecurities among Hong Kong creative workers. Critical Sociology, 48(7-8), 1141-1167. doi:10.1177/08969205221087345. 2022
    68. Tse, T., & Gheorghiu, I. The good life as accountable: Moralities of dress consumption in China and Romania. Journal of Consumer Culture, 146954052211419. doi:10.1177/14695405221141951. 2022
    69. Tse, T., & Li, X. Recoupling corporate culture with new political discourse in China’s platform economy: The case of Alibaba. Work, Employment and Society, 095001702210831. doi:10.1177/09500170221083106. 2022
    70. Tse, T., & Shum, H. H. Platforms, politics and precarity: Hong Kong television workers amid the new techno-nationalist media agenda. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 136754942211055. doi:10.1177/13675494221105534. 2022
    71. Paul W. Mattessich. Social capital and community building. 2009.
    72. Phillips, R., & Pittman, R. H. An introduction to community development. Routledge. 2014
    73. Pink, S. In and out of the Academy video ethnography of the home. Visual Anthropology Review, 20(1), 82-88. doi:10.1525/var.2004.20.1.82. 2004
    74. Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes LaBond, C. Empathetic technologies: Digital materiality and video ethnography. Visual Studies, 32(4), 371-381. doi:10.1080/1472586x.2017.1396192. 2017
    75. Poon, H., & Tse, T. Enacting cross-platform (buy/boy)cotts: Yellow economic circle and the new citizen-consumer politics in Hong Kong. New Media & Society, 146144482210973. doi:10.1177/14614448221097305. 2022
    76. Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. The historical research method and information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(9), 536-576. doi:10.17705/1jais.00373. 2014
    77. Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. doi:10.1002/dir.20015. 2004
    78. Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. Co‐creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4-9. doi:10.1108/10878570410699249. 2004
    79. Rakesh Ranjan, K., and S. Read. “The Six Faces of Value Co-creation: A Field Guide for Executives.” 2017.
    80. Ratten, Vanessa. “Coronavirus (covid-19) and social value co-creation.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 42, no. 3/4, pp. 222-231, 2020
    81. Rhonda Phillips, & Robert H. Pittman. A framework for community and economic development. 2009.
    82. Ronald J. Hustedde. Seven theories for seven community developers. 2009.
    83. Roseland, Mark. “Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives.” Progress in Planning, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 73-132, 2000
    84. Sayer, A. Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61(1), 79-103. doi:10.1080/19187033.2000.11675254. 2000
    85. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N., … McLeod, D. M. Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 676-703. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x. 2007
    86. Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Kim, E., Sun Young Lee, Gotlieb, M. R., Ho, S. S., & Breivik, H. Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive “Lifestyle politics”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 217-235. doi:10.1177/0002716206298714. 2007
    87. Sigala, Marianna. “A market approach to social value co-creation: Findings and implications from “Mageires” the social restaurant.” Marketing Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27-45, 2018
    88. Stigzelius, I. Representing the political consumer: Liquid agencies in the production of consumer voice. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(5), 475-502. doi:10.1080/10253866.2018.1462175. 2018
    89. Stuart MacDonald, & Nicola Headlam. Research Methods Handbook Introductory guide to research methods for social research. n.d..
    90. Thomas Clay Arnold. Rethinking Moral Economy. The American Political Science Review, 95(1), 85-95. 2001.
    91. Tung, H. H., Lin, M., & Lin, Y. Anti-ELAB movement, national security law, and heterogeneous institutional trust in Hong Kong. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 22(4), 287-311. doi:10.1017/s1468109921000293. 2021
    92. Valdis Krebs, & June Holley. Building Sustainable Communities through Network Building. 2002
    93. Wallis, A. Social capital and community building: Part two. National Civic Review, 87(4), 317-336. doi:10.1002/ncr.87404. 1998
    94. Watson, K. J., Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Whitley, T. Capturing the social value of buildings: The promise of social return on investment (SROI). Building and Environment, 103, 289-301. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.007. 2016
    95. William James Booth. On the Idea of the Moral Economy. The American Political Science Review, 88(3), 653-667. 1994
    96. Wing Kei, K. Back to a New Normal: “Yellow Businesses” as a Means of Resistance. Hong Kong Anthropologist, 11. 2021
    97. Wong, M. Y., Kwong, Y., & Chan, E. K. Political consumerism in Hong Kong: China’s economic intervention, identity politics, or political participation? China Perspectives, (2021/3), 61-71. doi:10.4000/chinaperspectives.12330. 2021
    98. Yin, R. K. Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE. 2003.
    99. Yuk Wah Chan, & Kendra W. Y. Ng. Boundaries, Pandemic, and Transborder Relations: Hong Kong’s Food Localism and Colored Consumption. 《亞太研究論壇》, 68. 2020

    Book Reference
    1. Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J., & Sztompka, P. Cultural trauma and collective identity. University of California Press. 2004.
    2. Allen, M. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications. 2017.
    3. Anna Davies, & Julie Simon. How to grow social innovation: A review and critique of scaling and diffusion for understanding the growth of social innovation. Paper presented at 5th International Social Innovation Research Conference, Oxford. 2013
    4. Carugati, F., & Levi, M. A moral political economy: Present, past, and future. Cambridge University Press. .2021
    5. G. Thomas Kingsley, Joseph B. McNeely, & James O. Gibson. COMMUNITY BUILDING COMING OF AGE. 1997.
    6. Michelle Dunscombe, & Dee Brooks. Participatory Community Building Guidebook Building Community Capacity. 2020.
    7. Peck, M. S. The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace. Touchstone, 1998.
    8. Walliman, N. Research methods: The basics. Routledge.2010.

    Website Reference
    1. Daniels, T. (2018, September 3). Colin Kaepernick named face of Nike's 30th anniversary of 'Just do it' campaign. Retrieved from https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2793994-colin-kaepernick-named-face-of-nikes-30th-anniversary-of-just-do-it-campaign
    2. Enago Academy. (2020, November 27). 論文結果與討論:作伙或分家?. Retrieved from https://www.enago.tw/academy/how-to-separate-results-and-discussion/
    3. Eventsinfocus. (n.d.). 香港反送中運動大事記. Retrieved from https://eventsinfocus.org/issues/3255
    4. Hong Kong Free Press. (2021, June 16). Almost 2 million attended anti-extradition law demo, say organisers, as protesters bed in around gov’t HQ. Retrieved from https://hongkongfp.com/2019/06/17/almost-2-million-attended-anti-extradition-law-demo-say-organisers-protesters-bed-around-govt-hq/
    5. IDEA PRO. (2022, April 8). 创新的第一个里程碑:访谈结果分析及洞察. Retrieved from https://www.woshipm.com/user-research/5385747.html
    6. Lin, C. (2019, July 16). 【反送中懶人包】 5分鐘了解反送中(逃犯條例)是什麼?. Retrieved from https://medium.com/%E8%83%8C%E5%9C%B0%E8%A3%A1%E7%9A%84%E8%BA%AB%E5%88%86%E5%85%B6%E5%AF%A6%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%BD%8D%E5%B9%B3%E9%9D%A2%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88%E5%B8%AB/%E5%8F%8D%E9%80%81%E4%B8%AD%E6%87%B6%E4%BA%BA%E5%8C%85-5%E5%88%86%E9%90%98%E4%BA%86%E8%A7%A3%E5%8F%8D%E9%80%81%E4%B8%AD-%E9%80%83%E7%8A%AF%E6%A2%9D%E4%BE%8B-%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC-7c07a2d18250
    7. Ming Pao. (2021, August 13). 一年近9萬港人移出 總人口跌1.2% 學者料持續 - 20210813 - 港聞. Retrieved from https://m.mingpao.com/pns/%E6%B8%AF%E8%81%9E/article/20210813/s00002/1628793114836/%E4%B8%80%E5%B9%B4%E8%BF%919%E8%90%AC%E6%B8%AF%E4%BA%BA%E7%A7%BB%E5%87%BA-%E7%B8%BD%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3%E8%B7%8C1-2-%E5%AD%B8%E8%80%85%E6%96%99%E6%8C%81%E7%BA%8C
    8. Mirror Media. (2019, June 17). 【香港這次為什麼不一樣(上)】為何雨傘運動失敗落幕 「反送中」卻讓港府讓步?. Retrieved from https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E9%80%99%E6%AC%A1%E7%82%BA%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%E4%B8%8D-%E6%A8%A3-%E4%B8%8A-%E7%82%BA%E4%BD%95%E9%9B%A8%E5%82%98%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E5%A4%B1%E6%95%97%E8%90%BD%E5%B9%95-%E5%8F%8D%E9%80%81%E4%B8%AD-221712331.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHcH80KZGIY8ehppbQPNZmLfiM2qRGrokoCOhsBbLOXhT6B5NyMxGkXb2VpQRPg8ynTlo9OANPPr_KbSLtzrdTdrtNff-Wi4OejVq2wQCfyjTLTFV6f3z8OAgxZ7nypYCUOMfmsnKaO-P9ft_Z6GbwNC6szu8l79rj5ogBa8_duI
    9. Rfa. (2023, July 14). 【反送中4周年】「黃色經濟圈」已劃句號?. Retrieved from https://www.rfa.org/cantonese/features/hottopic/feature-yellow-07142023080607.html
    10. Rovell, D. (2018, September 3). Kaepernick face of Nike's 30th 'Just do it' ad. Retrieved from https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/24568359/colin-kaepernick-face-nike-just-do-30th-anniversary-campaign
    11. Weber Shandwick. (2018, January 30). Battle of the wallets: The changing landscape of consumer activism. Retrieved from https://webershandwick.com/news/battle-of-the-wallets-the-changing-landscape-of-consumer-activism
    12. 質化研究數據分析. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.coms.hkbu.edu.hk/ies_support/files/media_and_cultural_studies/MCS_qualitative.pdf
    13. 萬文隆. (2004). 深度訪談在質性研究中的應用. Retrieved from https://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:8080/server/api/core/bitstreams/13d7b9b7-a2d3-458f-bcae-f7e0de995324/content
    14. 创新的第一个里程碑:访谈结果分析及洞察. (2023, March 10). Retrieved from https://www.woshipm.com/user-research/5385747.html
    15. 【擬訂903中學生大罷課】 沒有大台 只有學生!形式自己決定!... - 學生動源 Studentlocalism. (2019, August 9). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/studentlocalism/posts/2880312332043832/
    16. 自由時報電子報. (2019, October 6). 香港人反抗》「警察社會」來了!12大專學生會:誓死抗爭. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/2938543
    17. 97年出生......中晒~ - 自由講場 - Baby kingdom - 親子王國 香港 討論區. (2020, February 17). Retrieved from https://www.baby-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=23072295
    18. 林祖偉. (2019, December 17). 香港抗議:政治立場主導,消費分黃藍. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business-50755863

    無法下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2026-06-12公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE