從現在的產業資訊可以瞭解到：本土的製造業要能夠繼續在台灣這個土地上生存，必須從以往的勞力密集調整到以資本、知識密集為主，才能與當今的新興經濟體拉開彼此的競爭優勢，繼續在這一逐漸全球化的國際社會上，建立起自己的生存利基。而所謂的知識密集，其中心的概念就是創新。遂本研究將探索技術環境的變動性與公司競爭策略的定位和公司的技術創新績效間是否有些關係存在，透過對這些關係的瞭解，來看公司的創新績效是否存在著差異。
整個研究以傳統化工業與高科技業為調查對象，而獲得的數值資料先以因素和信度分析來找出獨立變數，再針對這些獨立變數以變異數分析、典型相關、集群與區別分析來分析其相關性，看看是否在變動性大的技術環境下，公司較偏向高競爭的思維模式，致使技術創新的重點偏向產品，進而得出較佳的產品創新績效；而在相對技術環境變異不大的情況下，是否公司的競爭策略偏向較不因應的低競爭模式，而使公司的技術創新著重在製程上，進而增加製程的績效。
而整個統計數據所呈現出來的結果證實，公司的管理者能針對自己產業的技術環境與競爭策略，將公司的創新重心著重在不同的技術創新上，而這些不同的創新也影響不同的創新績效。

From the industrial information, we can understand that the local manufacturers who want to subsist in Taiwan must adjust oneself from labor-intensive business to knowledge-intensive one. Just with that way, the companies can greatly transcend the competitors in the sunrise nations and keep establishing his own niche. The central concept of the so-called knowledge-intensive is innovation. So the thesis will research the existence of the relationship among the variation of technology environment, competitive strategy of the companies and the innovation performance. By understanding these relationships, we can predict that the companies will have different innovation performance under the different strategies and the different technology environment.
The whole research objects are the traditional chemical industry and the hi-tech industry. According to the data from the questionnaire, first, use the Factor Analysis and Reliability Analysis to find out the independent variables, then use these factors to examine the relationship by MANOVA, Canonical Correlation, Cluster Analysis. From this procedure, we try to see whether the highly variable environment make the competitive strategy become high. And then, it will lead the innovation strategy to slant to products. Further, the product performance will be good. On the other hand, when the technology environment is not variable, the competitive strategy of companies will slant to low competitive model. This will make companies emphasize the manufacture, and further, increase the manufacture performances.
The result from using the statistic analysis have already proved that the managers of companies stress different innovation strategies in light of the different competitive strategies and the different technology environments. And these influence the different performances.

一、 中文部份
1.大前研一，「策略家的智慧」，黃宏義譯，長河出版社，(1984)。
2.尹啟銘，「產品創新自由度、企業策略與技術政策之關係─台灣資訊電子業實證研究」，政大企研所未出版博士論文，(1989)。
3.吳家娜，「企業組織價值觀對製造策略競爭要項之影響研究」，成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文，(1998)。
4.呂鴻德，「技術策略、功能互動與產品創新績效關係之研究─資訊電子業成長階段之模式」，台大商研所未出版博士論文，(1992)。
5.李彥輝，「研發策略、製造策略之配合與新產品績效關係之研究」，中原大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，(1993)。
6.汪昭芬，「組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關聯性研究─科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實證」，成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文，(2000)。
7.翁明祥，「技術創新政策與事業經營策略的配合對技術創新績效之影響─台灣合成樹脂業實證研究」，政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文，(1989)。
8.張森林，「國際技術移轉績效影響因素探討－以電子業、化學業為例」，台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文，(1991)。
9.陳志遠，「製造策略、產品策略之配合與績效關係之研究─以台灣電子零組件業為例」，政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文，(1993)。
10.黃敏慧，「資訊服務業技術創新策略與績效關連性之研究」，政治大學資訊管理學系未出版碩士論文，(1999)。
11.經濟部投資業務處，「技術合作條例」，6月，(1988)。
12.蔡宗憲，「聯盟合作網路、知識流通、創新績效 之關連性研究--以我國電子廠商為例」，成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文，(2001)。
13.盧嘉振，「台灣小型製造業技術策略、創新績效與組織績效關係之研究─CEOs外部環境認知節制效果之驗證」，成功大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文，(2001)。

二. 英文部份
1. Abernathy, W.J. and Utterback, J.M., “Patterns of Industrial Innovation”, Management Innovation, pp97-108, (1982).
2. Ambrosio, E.M., ”Technological Management and Transfer of Technology”, Technology Management, Vol.10(7/8),pp.665-675, (1995).
3. Ansoff, H. Ingo and Steward, J.M., “Strategies for a Technology-Based Business”, Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec., pp.81-93, (1967).
4. Baker, N.R., Green, S.G. and Bean, A.S., “The Need for Strategic Balance in R&D Project Portfolios”, Research Management, Mar-Apr, P.38-43, (1986).
5. Baranson Jack, “Transfer of Technical Knowledge by International Corporations to Developing Economics”, American Economics Review, Vol.56, pp.311, (1996).
6. Barbosa, R.R., “Innovation in a Mature Industry”, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, (1985).
7. Barczak, G., “New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, pp.224-234, (1995).
8. Bitondo, D. and Frohman, A., “Linking Technological and Business Planning”, Research Management, pp.21, (1981).
9. Brown, R., “Managing the “S” Curves of Innovation”, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, pp.61-72, (1992).
10. Burgelman, R.L., Maidique, M.A. and Wheelwright, S.C., “Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation”, Irwin: Chicago, (1996).
11. Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M., “The Management of Innovation”, London, (1981).
12. Clarke, K., D. Ford and M. Saren, “Company Technology Strategy”, R&D Management, pp.215-229, (1989).
13. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E. J., “Success Factors in Product Innovation”, Research Technology Management, Vol.16, pp.215-223, (1987).
14. Cooper, R.G., “Industrial Firms’ New Product Strategies”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.13, pp.107-121, (1985).
15. Danila, N.,“Strategy Evaluation and Selection of R&D Projects,”R&D Management, Vol.19, pp.47-62, (1989).
16. Dess G.G and P.S Davis, “Porter’s (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.27, pp.467-488, (1984).
17. Dove and Rick. , “Design Principles for Agile Production”, (1995).
18. Drucker, P.F., “Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles”, N.Y.: Harper Business, (1986).
19. Duncan, Robert B., “Characteristics of Environmental Uncertainty”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, (1972).
20. ECD/EUROSTAT, “OSLO Manual”, (1997).
21. Frankle, E.G., “Management of Technology Change”, Kluwer Academic, (1990).
22. Glueck, Willian F., “Business Policy：Strategy Formation & Management Action”, 2nd ed., New York：McGraw- Hill, pp.119-147, (1976).
23. Henderson, R. and Clark, K., “Architectural Innovational: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, March, pp.9-30, (1990).
24. Herbert, T.T. and Deresky, H., “Generic Strategy Content”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.8, pp.135-147, (1987).
25. Hill, Charles. W.L. and Jones, G.R., “Strategic Management Theory: A Integrated Approach”, 4th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp.7, (1998).
26. Holt, K., “The Role of the User in Product Innovation,” Tech-innovation, Vol.12, pp.53-56, (1988).
27. Hussey, D.E., “The Innovation Challenge”, In John-Wiley & Sons Eds. , pp.216-218, (1997).
28. Karagozoglu, N. and Brown, W.B., “ Time-Based Management of The New Product Development Process”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.10, pp.204-215,(1993).
29. Leong, G.K., D.L. Snyder and P.T. Ward. ,“Research in the Process and Content of Manufacturing Strategy”, Omega. , Vol.18, pp.109-122, (1990).
30. Leroy, G.P., ”Transfer of Developing Economics within the Multinational Enterprise ”, (1978).
31. Maidique, A.M. and A.L. Frevola, “Technology Strategy”, In Burgelman and Maidique Eds. , Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., pp.273-342, (1988).
32. Modesto A. Maidique and Peter Patch, “Corporate strategy and Technology Policy”, In Tushman & Moore Eds. , Management of Innovation, Pitman Books Ltd., pp.283-285, (1982).
33. Mansfield, E., “International Technology Transfer: Forms”, Journal of American Economic Association, pp.68-69, (1975).
34. Marquish, D.G., “The Anatomy of Successful Innovation”, Winthrop Publisher, Cambridge, (1982).
35. Miles, R. E. and Snow, C.C., “Organizational Strategy, Structure a Process”, McGraw-Hills Press, (1978).
36. Miller, J. G., Meyer A. D. and Nakane J., “Benchmarking Global Manufacturing Understanding International Suppliers, Customers, and Competitors”, Irwin, (1992).
37. Moser, Martin R., “Achievement Recognition in a Research and Development Unit”, Engineering Management International, Amsterdam, Nov, Vol.3, pp.49-55, (1984).
38. OECD, “OSOL MANUAL: the measurement of scientific and technological activity”,(1997).
39. OECD, “Technology and Industry Performance”, (1996).
40. Pegels, C.C. and Thirumurthy, M.V., “The Impact of Technology Strategy on Firm Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.43, pp.246-249, (1996).
41. Philips, A., ”Patents, Potential Competition, and Technical Progress”, America Economic Review, Vol.2, pp.302-331, (1966).
42. Porter, M. E.,” Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors”, New York: Free Press, (1980).
43. Richardson, P.K. Taylor, A.J. and Gordon, J.R.M.“A Strategic Approach to Evaluating Manufacturing Performance”, Interface, Vol.15,pp.15-27, (1985).
44. Scherer, F. M., ”Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Intentions”, (1965).
45. Schroeder, R.G., Benson, P.G. and Saraph, J.V., “An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management”, Decision Science, Vol.20, pp. 810-829, (1989).
46. Skinner, C.S., “The Strategic Management of Technology”, In P.R. Kleindorter Eds. , The Management of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing, NY: Plenum Press, pp.300-315, (1985).
47. Souder, W.E. and Song, X.M., “Analyses of U.S. and Japanese Management Processes Associated with New Product Success and Failure in High and Low Familiarity Markets”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.15, pp.208-223, (1998).
48. Souder, W.E., “ Managing New Product Innovations”, Lexington Books, pp. 217-220, (1987).
49. Spital, F.C. and D.J. Bickford. ,“Successful Competitive and Technology Strategies in Dynamic and Stable Product Technology Environments”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. , Vol.9, pp.29-60, (1992).
50. Tavistock.Gupta, Anil K. and Vijay Govindarajan,“Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, (2000).
51. UNCATD. Technology form Develop to Developing Countries. (AT/B/AC), New York, UN, No, 5, (1981).
52. Vonderembse, M.A. and Tracey, M.,“The Impact of supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, summer, (1999).
53. Walker, O.C. and Ruekert, R.W., “Marketing’s Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.51, pp.15-33, (1987).
54. Wheelwright, Steven, C. “Reflecting Corporate Strategy in Manufacturing Decision”, Business Harisons, Feb. pp.57-66, (1978).
55. Wilson, R.E., “ The Effect of Technological Environment and Product Rivalry on R&D Effort and Licensing of Inventions”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.59, pp.171-178, (1977).
56. Zahra, S.A. and Covin, J.G., “Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, pp.451-478, (1993).
57. Zahra, S.A. and W.C. Bogner, “Technology Strategy and Software New Ventures’ Performance: Exploring the Moderating Effect of the Competitive Environment”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.15, pp.135-173, (2000).
58. Zahra, S.A., Sisodia, R.S. and Das, S.R., “Technological Choices within Competitive Strategy Types: A Conceptual Integration,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.9, pp.172-195, (1994).