成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	鍾至怡 Chung, Chih-Yi
論文名稱：	共同居住空間之利害關係人社群建構流程探討：以南宅青年為例 Exploring the Community Building Process of Stakeholders in Co-Living Accommodation: Case Study of SoulifeHaxing
指導教授：	劉舜仁 Liou, Shuenn-Ren 楊佳翰 Yang, Chia-Han
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所 Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年：	2019
畢業學年度：	107
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	135
中文關鍵詞：	共享經濟、共同居住、社群建構過程、社區設計、社群互動
外文關鍵詞：	Sharing Economy, Co-living, Community Building Process, Community Design, Social Interaction
相關次數：	點閱：115 下載：30
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

二十一世紀以來高漲的房價、逐漸降低的結婚率，以及都市生活帶來的疏離感，都使得都市中的居住方式近年來的劇變，也造成年輕族群普遍「蝸居」的現象。

然而，共享經濟的發展，強調充份運用閒置資源，以及重新建立人際關係，這也為居住帶來不同的可能性，使得「共同居住」在近年來逐漸興起。「共同居住」的實踐使得居住者能共享住宅中的公共設備及空間，進而促進居住者間的社群互動，因此，社群建構的重要性，在此概念下更為顯著。

本研究對南宅青年進行個案研究，探討共同居住空間中的社群互動關係，以及該社群中利害關係人之社群建構過程，藉由參與式觀察以及深度訪談等方法收集質化資料。

研究發現，共同居住之社群建構可分為三階段，其中包含(1)社群計畫、(2)管理利害關係人，以及(3)利害關係人參與。進一步將資料進行論述分析後，可了解各個關鍵角色在室友活動中所彰顯之功能，以提供共同居住空間一套可參考的社群建構流程。

In a context of ever-increasing housing price, and the lower rate of marriage, as well as the sense of alienation result from urban lifestyle, the lifestyle of urban citizens, could no longer sustainable.
This article introduces the co-living movement under the sharing economy to make life more social and in an urban context, which is one of the answers to the problem listed above. Co-living communities are developed creatively mix private and common dwellings to recreate a sense of community while preserving a high degree of individual privacy. In that respect, the importance of community building should be emphasized.
This research is a case study of SoulifeHaxing, exploring the social interaction in the co-living community among youth in the urban area as well as providing a better understanding of the community building process through conducting participatory observation and in-depth interview to collecting qualitative data.
It is found in this research that the co-living community building process can be divided into three stages: (1) community planning, (2) stakeholder management, and (3) stakeholder engagement.
By further thematic analyzing, the researcher has a better understanding of the role among the stakeholders, for providing a framework of community building process for co-living accommodation to apply in the future.

Table of Content	1
Chapter 1	Introduction	6
1	Research Background	6
1.1	Changing lifestyles	7
1.2	Sharing Economy	10
1.3	Co-Living as the Solution	12
2	Research Motivation	13
3	Research Objectives and Questions	14
4	Research Target	15
5	Terminology	16
Chapter 2	Literature Review	17
1	Urban Design	17
1.1	Concept of DIY Urbanism	17
1.2	The Social Understanding of Urban Space	18
1.3	The Urban Space Framework	19
1.4	Community Design and Participatory Design	22
2	Co-Living	23
2.1	From Co-Housing to Co-Living	23
2.2	Current Development of Co-Living	24
2.3	The Goals of Co-Living	26
2.4	The Extensive Concept Under Sharing Economy — Co-working Spaces	28
3	Community Building	29
3.1	What is Community	29
3.2	The Concept of Community Building	30
3.3	Stakeholder Management and Engagement	32
4	Cases of Co-Living	35
4.1	Cases of Co-Living in Global	35
4.2	Cases of Co-Living in Taiwan	38
Chapter 3	Methodology	44
1	Research Framework	44
2	Research Method	45
2.1	Case Study	45
2.2	Participant Observation	47
2.3	In-depth Interview	48
3	Data Collection and Analysis	50
3.1	Primary Data	50
3.2	Secondary Data	53
3.3	Data Analysis	54
Chapter 4	Research Results	56
1	Case Study -- SoulifeHaxing	56
1.1	Case Introduction	56
1.2	A Prototype to Challenge Current Student Accommodations	59
1.3	SoulifeHaxing Becomes a Service Provider for Youth	61
1.4	The Current Community of SoulifeHaxing	62
1.5	The Activities in SoulifeHaxing	64
2	The Current Co-Living Community	67
2.1	The Onboarding Process in Co-Living Community	68
2.2	The Participation in Co-Living Community	69
2.3	Operate Alternatively Between Online and Offline	71
3	The Stakeholders of Co-Living Community	72
3.1	The Motivation and Expectation of Stakeholders	72
3.2	Diversity of Residents in Co-Living Community	77
3.3	The Key Stakeholder Profile in Co-Living Community	79
4	Facilitate the Co-Living Community Building	84
4.1	The Interaction Model in Co-Living Community	84
4.2	Make an Exception in Daily Life	86
4.3	Building Identity Through Project	87
Chapter 5	Discussion	89
1	Findings	89
1.1	The Transformation of Roles in Co-Living Community	89
1.2	Evolution of Co-Living Model	91
1.3	Achieve the Goal of Co-Living Community	93
2	Implication for Practice	96
3	Research Limitation	96
Chapter 6	Conclusion and Future Study	98
1	Conclusion	98
2	Suggestions for Future Study	99
References ….	101
Appendix I -- Field Notes	104
Appendix II – In-depth Interview	113
Appendix III— Secondary Data	119
                                    

山崎亮, & 莊雅琇. (2015). 社區設計: 重新思考" 社區" 定義, 不只設計空間, 更要設計" 人與人之間的連結": 臉譜出版, 城邦出版.
王俐雯. (2012). 成年前期男女孤獨感與幸福感之相關研究-以網路使用者為例. 臺北教育大學, Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2012年)
司馬蕾. (2012). Basic research on present status of China's residential facilities for the aged and thoughts of the elders: the overall image and internal diversities. 東京大学,
張淑琳. (2018). 從共享經濟模式探討共居之行為意圖--以玖樓共居公寓為例. 淡江大學, Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2018年)
潘信榮. (2017). 網絡崩世代居住空間的重構-以玖樓共生公寓為例. 臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學位論文(2017 年), 1-97.
蔡孟宏. (2016). 基進共享的台南老屋: 能盛興鐵工廠作為都市共享域的營造. 臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學位論文, 1-150.
蔡保田. (1987). 教育研究方法論. 中國教育學會. 師大書苑.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What's mine is yours: how collaborative consumption is changing the way we live (Vol. 5): Collins London.
Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management decision, 43(5), 649-660.
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
Butcher, T. (2013). Coworking: Locating community at work. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th annual australia new zealand academy of management (ANZAM) conference.
Cho, I. S., Trivic, Z., & Nasution, I. (2015). Towards an Integrated Urban Space Framework for Emerging Urban Conditions in a High-density Context. Journal of Urban Design, 20(2), 147-168. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1009009. doi:10.1080/13574809.2015.1009009
Colomb, C. (2015). ‘DIY urbanism’in Berlin: Dilemmas and conflicts in the mobilization of ‘temporary uses’ of urban space in local economic development. Paper presented ‘Transience and Permanence in Urban Development’University of Sheffield, 14-15.
Cox, W., Pavletich, H., & Hartwich, O. (2017). 13th annual demographia international housing affordability survey: 2017.
Dannenberg, A. L., Jackson, R. J., Frumkin, H., Schieber, R. A., Pratt, M., Kochtitzky, C., & Tilson, H. H. (2003). The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1500-1508.
Dearden, A., Light, A., Zamenopoulos, T., Graham, P., Plouviez, E., & Sousa, S. d. (2014). Scaling up co-design: research projects as design things. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2, Windhoek, Namibia.
Droste, C. (2015). German co-housing: an opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban research & practice, 8(1), 79-92.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for the case study: UNC Press Books.
Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International research on placemaking and urban sustainability, 7(4), 381-398.
Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2001). Conducting an in-depth interview: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and ….
Haq, R. U., Nadeem, S., Khan, Z. H., & Akbar, N. S. (2015). Thermal radiation and slip effects on MHD stagnation point flow of nanofluid over a stretching sheet. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 65, 17-23.
Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the “spatial fix”.
Horelli, L., & Vepsä, K. (1994). In search of supportive structures for everyday life. In Women and the environment (pp. 201-226): Springer.
Jefferson-Jones, J. (2014). Airbnb and the housing segment of the modern sharing economy: Are short-term rental restrictions an unconstitutional taking. Hastings Const. LQ, 42, 557.
Kong, L., Giang, E., Nieusma, T., Kadam, R. U., Cogburn, K. E., Hua, Y., . . . Ward, A. B. (2013). Hepatitis C virus E2 envelope glycoprotein core structure. Science, 342(6162), 1090-1094.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques: New Age International.
Krokfors, K. (2012). Co-housing in the making: Alexandrine Press.
Kwiatkowski, A., & Buczynski, B. (2011). Coworking: How freelancers escape the coffee shop office. Fort Collins.
Lietaert, M. (2010). Cohousing's relevance to degrowth theories. Journal of cleaner production, 18(6), 576-580.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Qualitative research. In: London: Sage.
Moriset, B. (2013). Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces.
Nathan, R. (2006). My freshman year: What a professor learned by becoming a student: Penguin.
Ostrom, E. E., Dietz, T. E., Dolšak, N. E., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S. E., & Weber, E. U. (2002). The drama of the commons: National Academy Press.
Peck, M. S. (1987). The Different Drum. The creation of true community-the first step to world peace. In: London, Sydney, Auckland, Johannesburg: Rider.
Pfortmüller, F., & Luchsinger, N. (2013). The Power of Trust: Learnings from Six Years of Building a Global Community of Young Leaders (Innovations Case Narrative: Sandbox). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3-4), 43-54.
Porter, J. (2008). Designing for the social web: New Riders Berkeley, CA.
Shinohara, 篠. S. (2016). 共享住宅_摆脱孤立的居住方式. 城市建筑, 4.
Tummers, L. (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how? Urban research & practice, 8(1), 64-78.
Vestbro, D. U. (2000). From collective housing to cohousing—a summary of research. Journal of architectural and planning research, 164-178.
Vestbro, D. U., & Horelli, L. (2012). Design for gender equality: The history of co-housing ideas and realities. Built Environment, 38(3), 315-335.
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Smith, A., Barry, T. L., Coe, A. L., Bown, P. R., . . . Gibbard, P. (2008). Are we now living in the Anthropocene? Gsa Today, 18(2), 4.

校內：立即公開
校外：立即公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文