| 研究生: |
吳幸英 Wu, Hsing-Ying |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
肉毒桿菌注射於痙攣型腦性麻痺兒童之步態分析 Gait Analysis in Spastic Cerebral Palsy with Injected Botulinum Toxin Type A |
| 指導教授: |
蘇芳慶
Su, Fong-Chin |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 醫學工程研究所 Institute of Biomedical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2002 |
| 畢業學年度: | 90 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 68 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 腦性麻痺 、肉毒桿菌 、步態分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Botulinum Toxin, cerebral palsy, gait analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:92 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
痙攣型腦性麻痺兒童的步態異常一直是臨床評估與治療的重點。近年來,許多研究報告提出,注射A型肉毒桿菌可有效減低腦性麻痺兒童痙攣情形,並增進其功能。然而,這些研究大多數是使用臨床評估方式,缺乏客觀性、科學化的評估研究,且目前並無注射前後足底壓力變化的文獻。
本研究目的是針對痙攣型腦性麻痺兒童下肢痙攣部位注射兩次肉毒桿菌,注射位置依痙攣程度選擇腓腸肌或股後肌,利用步態分析量化探討重複兩次注射前後之步態變化。本研究使用動態分析系統及鞋墊式足底壓力量測系統,收集包括時間-空間參數、關節角度與足底接觸面積和壓力的資料進行分析。
受測者共有八位,六位為雙邊痙攣型,二位為右側痙攣型。結果發現,受測者注射之後在步行平均速度、步頻、步伐長增加,尤其是第二次注射後達顯著差異。踝關節剛著地時過度蹠側彎曲明顯減少,而站立期最大彎曲角度有顯著增加,表示腓腸肌過度強勢情形減少。膝關節站立期過度伸直情形改善,然而擺盪期最大彎曲角度減少,可能是注射後肌力減少或股四頭肌相對強勢所造成,並使膝關節活動度減少。從足底壓力量測發現,注射後蹠骨區與趾區過大的壓力減少,而足跟區之接觸面積、最大壓力和壓力-時間積分皆增加。
多數步態參數在注射後兩個月有較大的進步,四個月出現回復現象但仍比未注射前改善,表示肉毒桿菌作用可能持續四個月,或者在作用期間結合復健計畫所得的進步。另外,第二次注射後步態參數比第一次注射較接近正常兒童,代表重複注射肉毒桿菌較只接受一次注射的效果為佳。
Gait abnormalities of spastic cerebral palsy (CP) children have been the focus of evaluation and treatment. Recently, a number of studies have demonstrated that injections of botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) are effective in reducing spasticity and improving function in CP. However, most of researches used clinical evaluation form.
The purpose of the study is to quantify the influences of receiving two BTX-A injections on gastrocnemius or hamstring of spastic CP children. We employed the three-dimensional motion analysis systems and the Pedar pressure system to acquire the information of temporal-spatial parameters, joint angles and plantar pressure of the lower extremity during ambulation.
Eight spastic CP children were investigated in this research. The results showed significant increase in velocity and step length after second injection. Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact and in stance improved significantly. Knee excessive extension in stance also improved, but knee flexion in swing and range of motion decreased. Contact area, peak pressure and pressure-time integral of hindfoot increased after injections.
The benefit reached to the peak in the second month after injections. At the fourth month, certain benefit still maintained in gait were due to the rehabilitation performed during the period with BTX-A benefit. The residual effects after second injection were more than those after first injection. This showed the tendency that repeated injections have more benefit than a single injection.
參考文獻
1. Abu-Faraj ZO, Harris GF, et al. Surgical rehabilitation of the planovalgus foot in cerebral palsy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001;9(2): 202-14.
2. Aoki KR, Guyer B. Botulinum toxin type A and other botulinum toxin serotypes: a comparative review of biochemical and pharmacological actions. Eur J Neurol. 2001;8(5):21-9.
3. Barnett S, Cunningham JL, et al. A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clin Biomech. 2000;15(10): 781-5.
4. Bon Ventre PE, Kempe LL. Physiology of toxin production by Clostridium botulinum types A and B. J Bacteriol. 1960;79:24-32.
5. Boyd RN, Pliatsios V, et al. Biomechanical transformation of the gastroc-soleus muscle with botulinum toxin A in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(1):32-41.
6. Calder n Gonz lez R, Calder n Sep lveda RF. Clinical reatment (non surgical) of spasticity in cerebral palsy. Rev Neurol. 2002;34: 1-6.
7. Carmick J. Comments on a recent study of therapeutic electrical stimulation in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44: 212.
8. Cavanagh PR. The arch index: a useful measurement from footprints. Journal of Biomechanics. 1987;5:547-551.
9. Corry IS, Cosgrove AP, et al. Botulinum toxin A in hamstring spasticity. Gait Posture. 1999;10:206-10.
10. Cosgrove AP, Graham HK. Botulinum toxin A prevents the development of contractures in the hereditary spastic mouse. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:379-85.
11. Dietz V. Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:33-69.
12. Eng GD. Rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy or mening omyelocele. Curr Opi Neurol Neurosurg. 1990;3:733-7.
13. Femery V, Moretto P, et al. Spasticity and dynamic plantar pressure distribution measurements in hemiplegic spastic children. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2001;44(1):26-34.
14. Gage JR. Gait Analysis in Cerebral Palsy. Mac Keith Press. Oxford. 1991.
15. Garcia Ruiz, PJ, Pascual Pascual I, et al. Progressive response to botulinum A toxin in cerebral palsy. Eur J Neurol. 2000;7(2):191-3.
16. Goldstein EM. Spasticity management: an overview. J Child Neurol. 2001;16:16-23.
17. Graham HK, KR Aoki, Autti-Ramo I, et al. Recommendations for the use of botulinum toxin type A in the management of cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2000;11:67-79.
18. McPoil T, Cornwall M. A comparison of two in-shoe plantar pressure measurement systems. The Lower Extremity. 1995;2(2):95-103.
19. Mendez-Eastman SK. BOTOX: a review. Plast Surg Nurs. 2000;20; 60-5;quiz 66-7.
20. Metaxiotis D, Siebel A, Doederlein L. Repeated botulinum toxin A injections in the treatment of spastic equinus foot. Clin Orthop. 2002;177-85.
21. Morris C. A review of the efficacy of lower-limb orthoses used for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44: 205-11.
22. Morton DJ. Structural factors in static disorders of the foot. Am J Surg. 1930;9:315-26.
23. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy. In: Schoenberg BS, ed. Advances in Neurology, Vol 19. New York: Raven Press, 1978.
24. Peacock WJ, Staudt LA. Spasticity in cerebral palsy and the selective posterior rhizotomy procedure. J Child Neurol. 1990;5:179-185.
25. Peacock WJ, Staudt LA. Functional outcomes following selectie posterior rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg. 1991;74(3):380-5.
26. Pharoah PO, Cooke T, Rosenbloom I, Cooke RW. Trends in birth prevalence of cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child. 1987;62:379-84.
27. Rose J. Gamble JG. Gait Analysis : Clinical application human walking. Published by Williams and Wilkins. Chapter 7. 1994.
28. Sanchez-Carpintero R, Narbona J. Botulinum toxin in spastic infantile cerebral palsy: results in 27 cases during one year. Rev Neurol. 1997;25(140):531-5.
29. Simpson LL. The origin, structure, and phannacological activity of botulinum toxin. Pharmacol Rev. 1981;33:155-88.
30. Su Fong-Chin, Guo Lan-Yuen, Lin Chii-Jeng, et al. Gait characteristics at five gait events in spastic diplegia of cerebral palsy. Biomedical Engineering. 2000;12(4):173-84.
31. Sutherland DH, David JR. Common gait abnormalities of the knee in cerebral palsy. CORR. 1993;288:139-147.
32. Sutherland DH, KR Kaufman, et al. Double-blind study of botulinum A toxin injections into the gastrocnemius muscle in patients with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 1999;10(1):1-9.
33. Ward AB. A summary of spasticity management - a treatment algorithm. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(1):48-52.
34. Wilson JM. Cerebral palsy. In: Campbell SK, ed. Pediatric Neurological Physical Therapy. 2nd ed., New York: Churchill Livingston, 1991:301-60.
35. Wissel J, Heinen F, et al. Botulinum toxin A in the management
of spastic gait disorders in children and young adults with cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind study of "high-dose" versus "low-dose" treatment. Neuropediatrics. 1999;30(3):120-4.
36. 成戎珠、賴儀娟。痙攣型腦性麻痺兒接受選擇性背根神經切除術之療效及其對物理治療之啟示。物理治療。2001;26(3):159-67。
37. 李志韋。穿鞋行走時足部之生物力學探討。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所。碩士論文。1999。
38. 洪千雅。以生物力學分析探討良好支撐運動鞋對內八兒童的潛在益處。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所。碩士論文。2001。
39. 陳貽明。動靜態腳底壓力之臨床分析與應用。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所。碩士論文。1991。
40 詹益坤、李淑貞、楊世偉等。正常青年人之足底壓力分析。中華物理治療雜誌。1997;22:81-90。
41. 潘世明。使用數位影像處理技術推算足底靜態壓力之分佈。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所。碩士論文。1989。
42. 劉心儀。腦性麻痺孩童穿著足矯具之生物力學評估。國立陽明大學醫學工程研究所。碩士論文。1998。
43. 蕭秀姍。踝關節固定病人術後行走之步態分析。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所。碩士論文。2000。