鑒於國際間對於環境保護、減少碳排放量等意識提高，增加對綠色能源的接受與依賴，台灣是島嶼國家，在能源方面的產量需仰賴進口，因此過往透過使用石化燃料與核能進行發電，對環境產生龐大負擔，為減輕對於傳統燃料的依賴，開始了綠色能源的使用。台灣過去在綠色能源的使用在風力方面以陸上型風力發電機組為主，隨著國外陸續完成離岸風力發電的開發，台灣也開始將離岸風力發電技術引進，開始於苗栗竹南與彰化濱海一帶進行離岸風力發電場的開發設置工作。
離岸風力發電為透過設置於海面上的風力發電機組進行發電，其裝置尺寸、規模、發電效益皆大於陸上風力發電。亦因其規模大、又設置於海上，進而延伸如船舶航行、漁民權益、視覺景觀等議題。本文將透過文獻回顧、問卷調查、資料分析等研究方式，進行我國第一個離岸風場的研究。查國外資料，於離岸風場設置後發展觀光產業具有可行性，遂擬於我國苗栗竹南離岸風場進行相關研究。並設定三個問題面向如離岸風場發展觀光的支持度；離岸風電在設置上之視覺因素；以及設置離岸風場之政策溝通公民參與等，為本文於問卷調查中欲探究之項目。
本研究透過蒐集501份有效問卷進行分析，採用敘述性統計、卡方檢定、獨立樣本t檢定、因素分析等分析方法。得出四項結果：1.在視覺等可感受因素的存在並不影響離岸風電發展觀光。2.離岸風電政策之推動需要良好公眾參與。3.離岸風電發展觀光產業具可行性。4.發展離岸風電可以產生綠能效益。並於文末提出三項建議如加強公眾溝通效能、加速離岸風電政策推進、積極輔導風場所在產業發展觀光等，作為日後政策推動之參考，或未來研究可參酌之基礎。離岸風力發電在我國會逐漸成為能源轉型的主流，惟在武漢肺炎的影響下，國外技術人員的入境、國際原物料價格都將成為阻力。未來在疫情受到控制後，離岸風電產業會持續發展，根據研究結果，將離岸風電場周邊轉型發展觀光，對於當地經濟、環境品質是有所改善。而產業的轉型與發展觀光，更是被普遍填答者所接受，顯見離岸風場發展觀光產業有其可行性存在。

The offshore wind power becomes important in the world. The development of offshore wind power may affect coastal residents and coastal industry. Therefore, most of the research articles indicated the following findings: (1) the potential visual effects of the seascape; (2) the opportunity for industrial transformation from coastal industry to tourism; and (3) the public participation in policy.
In this study, questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the local resident’s opinions on these three aspects. The issues concerned by the public are explored based on these three aspects. The questionnaire was distributed in the Dragon Phoenix fishing port in Zhunan, Miaoli. There are lots of tourists attracted by the scenery of sunset and offshore wind farm in this fishing port. The questionnaire was distributed to these tourists and also distributed via the online internet. There are 501 effective questionnaires were obtained. The quantitative data was analyzed using the statistical methods including descriptive statistics, chi-square test, independent sample t test, and factor analysis. Results from statistical analysis indicated the four findings summarized as follows.
1. Tourism and the development of offshore wind power are not affected by visual and other perceptible factors.
2. Public participation are indispensable in promotion of offshore wind power policy
3. The development of offshore wind power benefit tourism industry.
4. Offshore wind power is beneficial in the development of green energy.
These results indicated that the development of tourism for offshore wind farms will improve the local economy and environmental quality.

中文文獻
1. 邱家琳(2021年8月27日)。難敵疫情！全球離岸風電建設進度嚴重落後。上報。取自：https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?SerialNo=122840
2. 吳鴻筠(2020年6月15日)。海洋風電-台灣首座離岸風力發電場。能源教育資源總中心。取自：https://learnenergy.tw/index.php?inter=knowledge&id=524
3. 林菁樺(2021年3月28日)。核四燃料棒全部運離台灣！今晨完成最後一批外運。自由時報。取自：https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3481460
4. 陳文姿(2019年11月18日)。【離岸風電知識+】台灣有哪些風場？環境資訊中心。取自：https://e-info.org.tw/node/220951
5. 海洋風力發電股份有限公司(2017)。海洋竹南離岸式風力發電計畫（第6次變更）環境影響差異分析報告。環境影響評估審查委員會317次會議。
6. 陳順宇（2005）。多變量分析（第四版）。台北：華泰。
7. 黃姵嫙（2018）。皮爾森積差相關分析（Pearson Correlation）－說明與SPSS操作。Quality & Quantity。取自：https://www.yongxi-stat.com/pearson-correlation/
8. Chuang, D. (2021年8月25日)。漁電紛爭不斷，離岸風電有沒有可能「走出」領海？科技新報。取自：https://technews.tw/2021/08/25/offshore-wind-territorial-water/
9. Chuang, D. (2021年8月28日)。疫情衝擊延後一年，109MW台電一期離岸風電
完成初始併聯。科技新報。取自：https://technews.tw/2021/08/28/ taipower-i-offshore
-wind/
英文文獻
1. Bidwell, D. (2017). Ocean Beliefs and Support for An Offshore Wind Energy Project. Ocean & Coastal Management, 146, 99-108.
2. Carr-Harris, A. & Lang, C. (2019). Sustainability and Tourism: the Effect of the United States’ First Offshore Wind Farm on the Vacation Rental Market. Resource and Energy Economics, 57, 51-67.
3. Churchill, G. A. Jr. (1995). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations (6th ed.). New York, NY: The Dryden Press.
4. Dwyer, J. & Bidwell, D. (2019). Chains of Trust: Energy Justice, Public Engagement, and the First Offshore Wind Farm in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 166-176.
5. Firestone, J., Bidwell, D., Gardner, M. & Knapp, L. (2018). Wind in the Sails or Choppy Seas?: People-Place Relations, Aesthetics and Public Support for the United States’ First Offshore Wind Project. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 232-243.
6. Firestone, J., Hirt,C., Bidwell, D., Gardner, M. & Dwyer, J. (2020). Faring Well in Offshore Wind Power Siting? Trust, Engagement and Process Fairness in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 62, 101393.
7. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
8. Haggett, C. (2011). Understanding Public Responses to Offshore Wind Power. Energy Policy, 39(2), 503-510.
9. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
10. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
11. Johansen, K. (2019). Local Support for Renewable Energy Technologies? Attitudes Towards Local Near-Shore Wind Farms Among Second Home Owners and Permanent Area Residents on the Danish Coast. Energy Policy, 132, 691-701.
12. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorical Simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36.
13. Klain, S. C., Satterfield, T., MacDonald, S., Battista, N. & Chan, K. M. A. (2017). Will Communities “Open-Up” to Offshore Wind? Lessons Learned From New England Islands in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 34, 13-26.
14. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15. Ólafsdóttir, R. & Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2019). Wind Farms in the Icelandic Highlands: Attitudes of Local Residents and Tourism Service Providers. Land Use Policy, 88, 104173.
16. Parsons, G., Firestone, J., Yan, L. & Toussaint, J. (2020). The Effect of Offshore Wind Power Projects on Recreational Beach Use on the East Coast of the United States: Evidence from Contingent-Behavior Data. Energy Policy, 144, 111659.
17. Patrick, D. W. & Wiersma, B. (2020). Understanding Community Acceptance of A Potential Offshore Wind Energy Project in Different Locations: An Island-Based Analysis of ‘Place-Technology Fit’. Energy Policy, 137, 111086.
18. Rudolph, D. (2014). The Resurgent Conflict Between Offshore Wind Farms and Tourism: Underlying Storylines. Scottish Geographical Journal, 130(3), 168-187.
19. Smythe, T., Bidwell, D., Moore, A., Smith, H. & McCann, J. (2020). Beyond the Beach: Tradeoffs in Tourism and Recreation at the First Offshore Wind Farm in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101726.
20. Teisl, M. F., Noblet, C. L., Corey, R. R. & Giudice, N. A. (2018). Seeing Clearly in A Virtual Reality: Tourist Reactions to An Offshore Wind Project. Energy Policy, 122, 601-611.
21. Upham, P. & Johansen, K. (2020). A Cognitive Mess: Mixed Feelings about Wind Farms on the Danish Coast and the Emotions of Energy Infrastructure Opposition. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101489.
22. Voltaire, L. & Koutchade, O. P. (2020). Public Acceptance of and Heterogeneity in Behavioral Beach Trip Responses to Offshore Wind Farm Development in Catalonia (Spain). Resource and Energy Economics, 60, 101152.
23. Westerberg, V., Jacobsen, J. B. & Lifran, R. (2013). The Case for Offshore Wind Farms, Artificial Reefs and Sustainable Tourism in the French Mediterranean. Tourism Management, 34, 172-183.
24. Westerberg, V., Jacobsen, J. B. & Lifran, R. (2015). Offshore Wind Farms in Southern Europe – Determining Tourist Preference and Social Acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 165-179.