簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝佳宜
Hsieh, Chia-Yi
論文名稱: 生技保健食品以SOR模型探討知覺信息、購買動機、涉入程度與價值定位對消費者認知效用與購買意願關聯性和追溯性之研究
A Research on the Relationships and Traceability of Perceived Information, Purchase Motivation, Involvement, and Value Positioning on Consumer’s Cognitive Utility and Purchase Intention in Biotech Health Foods: An Application of the SOR Model
指導教授: 葉時碩
Yeh, Shih-Shuo
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 140
中文關鍵詞: 生技保健食品SOR模型知覺信息購買動機涉入程度價值定位認知效用購買意願追溯性理論
外文關鍵詞: Biotechnology and Health food, SOR Model, Perceptual information, Motivation, Involvement, Value position, Cognitive Utility, Purchasing Intention, Traceability theory
相關次數: 點閱:5下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著醫療技術的進步、預防醫學的興起,現代人追求壽命的延長,更加重視養生及健康意識提升、慢性疾病增加、COVIE-19疫情等傳染病的爆發,以及少子化使人口結構逐漸走向中高齡化等因素,人們對健康保健食品的需求持續攀升,故而帶動產業利用生物技術投入具健康訴求的保健食品製造,使得該產業快速蓬勃發展。因此,本研究在購買生技保健食品的情境下建立以「刺激-個體-反應SOR橂型」框架探討有順序性、系統性的架構衍生出,如何透過各種構面直接刺激消費者,產生認知效用進而直接影響到購買意願,發生購買行為非線性式的多次決策過程。因為消費者購買行為是複雜且多變的,購買行為的產生受到其內在因素和外在因素的相互促進因果交互影響外,更具有反饋性或追溯性,此乃本研究為彌補之研究缺口。
    本研究以網路問卷進行資料蒐集,累計回收問卷數為300份「n1=300」,為使本研究問卷趨於有購買保健食品及食用的經驗,以達問卷調查之目的及實質價值,故扣除沒有買過保健食品的樣本共計15份無效問卷,總計有效樣本之統計資料數為285份「n2=285」,並以『SPSS及Smart PLS軟體』進行統計分析。研究結果顯示,以假設檢定分析及鏈式中介分析二者互相驗證分析結果相同且正確無誤,均具有非常顯著性。根據第四章資料分析結果得知,知覺信息、購買動機、涉入程度、價值定位「S刺激」以及認知效用「O個體」與購買意願「R反應」等構面除了互相影響且有顯著之正向關聯性外,更具有因果關係及交叉相互影響。一般行銷會透過各種構面直接刺激消費者產生認知效用,進而直接影響到購買意願,但本研究發現消費者購買商品行為並非僅有線性式的「因為 A 導致 B,接著 B 導致 C,最後 C 導致 D」的一次性具體過程,而是非線性的多次決策過程,每個構面除了會交互影響外,更會有反饋性或追溯性。
    本研究的結論成果在理論與實務上皆具有參考價值。在學術貢獻層面,其貢獻有三:一、本研究以SOR橂型架構順序性、系統性的豐富消費者行為模式及因果關係。二、本研究將認知心理學結合經濟學的效用理論,產生「O個體」的認知效用與消費者行為作連結。三、本研究經由鏈式中介檢定分析與假設檢定分析相互驗證結果,發現消費者行為面向的『追溯性理論』,此乃發現消費者行為之面向而非發明此理論。四、本研究擴展SOR模型之應用類別。在實務貢獻層面,本研究發現消費者行為面向的『追溯性理論』具有跨領域、多元的創新意涵與推動價值,應用於消費者行為實務上提供企業有價值的創意與決策參考,茲分為1、管理方面2、行銷方面,詳述如第五章結論與建議第三節研究貢獻。

    With advancements in medical technology and the rise of preventative medicine, modern people's pursuit of longer lifespans, increased emphasis on health and wellness, rising chronic diseases, the outbreak of infectious diseases like COVID-19, and a declining birth rate leading to an aging population, the demand for health supplements continues to climb. This has driven this industry to utilize biotechnology in the manufacture of health-oriented supplements, resulting in rapid growth. Therefore, this study establishes a stimulus-response (SOR) framework within the context of purchasing biotechnological health supplements to explore how a sequential and systematic structure can stimulate consumers' cognitive utility through various dimensions, thereby influencing their purchase intentions and leading to a non-linear decision-making process in purchasing behavior. Because consumer purchasing behavior is complex and variable, influenced by the causal interactions of internal and external factors, and possessing feedback or retrospective characteristics, this study aims to fill a research gap.
    This study collected data using an online questionnaire, with a total of 300 questionnaires (n1=300). To ensure the questionnaires were collected from individuals with experience in purchasing and consuming health supplements, thus excluding 15 invalid questionnaires from those who had never purchased health supplements, the total number of valid questionnaires was 285 (n2=285). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and Smart PLS software. The results showed that both hypothesis testing and chain-linked analysis yielded consistent and highly significant results. According to the data analysis in Chapter 4, the dimensions of perceived information, purchase motivation, involvement, value position (S stimulus), cognitive utility (O individual), and purchase intention (R response) not only interacted and showed significant positive correlations but also exhibited causal relationships and cross-influences. Traditional marketing often uses various dimensions to directly stimulate consumers' cognitive utility, which in turn influences their willingness to buy. However, this study found that consumers' purchasing behavior is not a linear, one-time process of "A leads to B, then B leads to C, and finally C leads to D," but rather a non-linear, multi-stage decision-making process. In addition to interacting with each dimension, each dimension also has feedback or traceability.
    The findings of this study have both theoretical and practical value. In terms of academic contributions, there are three main points: First, this study enriches the understanding of consumer behavior patterns and causal relationships through the sequential and systematic structure of the SOR (Sequential, Orthogonal, and Regressive) model. Second, this study combines cognitive psychology with economic utility theory to link individual cognitive utility with consumer behavior. Third, this study discovers the "Traceability theory." Fourth, this study expands the application categories of the SOR model. In terms of practical contributions, the "Traceability theory" discovered in this study has cross-disciplinary and multifaceted innovative implications and driving value, providing valuable creative ideas and decision-making references for enterprises in practice. These are detailed in Chapter 5, Conclusions and Recommendations, Section 3, regarding the research contributions.

    摘要 I 致謝 VII 目錄 IX 表目錄 XII 圖目錄 XIV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究目的 6 第四節 研究缺口與問題9 第五節 研究流程 10 第二章 文獻回顧 12 第一節 生物技術的定義 12 第二節 生技保健食品與一般保健食品的差異13 第三節 SOR模型 15 第四節 知覺信息「S刺激」 16 第五節 購買動機「S刺激」 19 第六節 涉入程度「S刺激」 21 第七節 價值定位「S刺激」 23 第八節 認知效用「O生物個體」26 第九節 購買意願「R反應」 30 第十節 知覺信息與認知效用的關係 31 第十一節 購買動機與認知效用的關係 33 第十二節 涉入程度與認知效用的關係 35 第十三節 價值定位與認知效用的關係 37 第十四節 認知效用與購買意願的關係 38 第十五節 人口統計變項與購買意願的關係 40 第三章 研究方法 42 第一節 研究架構 42 第二節 研究假設 42 第三節 問卷變項定義 45 第四節 研究對象、問卷設計與發放 52 第四章 資料分析 54 第一節  問卷資料分析 54 第二節  單因子變異數分析 70 第三節  樣本信、效度衡量分析 72 第四節  樣本因素負荷量及VIF分析 77 第五節  假設檢定結果 80 第五章 結論與建議 89 第一節  研究結論 89 第二節  研究討論與建議 93 5.2.1 給消費者的建議 96 5.2.2 給企業的建議 96 第三節  研究貢獻 98 5.3.1 學術意涵 98 5.3.2 實務意涵 103 第四節  研究限制及後續研究建議 109 參考文獻 111 附錄: 問卷 118

    Adenan, M. A., Ali, J. K., & Rahman, D. (2018). Country of origin, brand image and high involvement product towards customer purchase intention: empirical evidence of east malaysian consumer. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 20(1), 63–72.
    Afandi, M. T. R., & Marsasi, E. G. (2023). Fast food industry investigation: the role of brand attitude and brand loyalty on purchase intentions in generation z based on theory of reasoned action. BASKARA: Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 206–220.
    Aitken, F., Menelaou, G., Warrington, O., Koolschijn, R. S., Corbin, N., Callaghan, M. F., & Kok, P. (2020). Prior expectations evoke stimulus-specific activity in the deep layers of the primary visual cortex. PLoS biology, 18(12), e3001023.
    Aji, N. S., Djawahir, A. H., & Rofiq, A. (2019). The influence of products and promotions on purchasing decisions mediated in purchase motivation. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 17(1), 152–161.
    Ali, D., & Javed, M. (2023). Impact of electronic word of mouth on purchase intention: Mediating role of brand trust and product involvement. JSOM, 2, 1–13.
    Amos, C., Holmes, G. R., & Keneson, W. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of consumer impulse buying. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 21(2), 86–97.
    Anwar, A., Thongpapanl, N., & Ashraf, A. R. (2021). Strategic imperatives of mobile commerce in developing countries: the influence of consumer innovativeness, ubiquity, perceived value, risk, and cost on usage. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(8), 722–742.
    Arora, N., Prashar, S., Parsad, C., & Vijay, S. (2022). Impact of antecedents of celebrity-product congruence on value transfer and purchase intention: moderating effect of cognitive strength and over-endorsement. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 16(4), 663–683.
    Arora, N., Prashar, S., Parsad, C., & Vijay, T. S. (2019). Mediating role of consumer involvement between celebrity endorsement and consumer evaluation: comparative study of high and low involvement product. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 113–142.
    Arora, N., Prashar, S., Vijay, T. S., & Parsad, C. (2023). Exploring the effect of personality congruencies on brand identification and purchase intentions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 33(2), 186–209.
    Belanche, D., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2017). Understanding interactive online advertising: Congruence and product involvement in highly and lowly arousing, skippable video ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37(1), 75–88.
    Bruner, J. (2009). Actual minds, possible worlds (Vol. 1). Harvard university press.
    Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American psychologist, 19(1), 1.
    Buxbaum, O. (2016). The SOR-model. In Key insights into basic mechanisms of mental activity (pp. 7–9). Springer.
    Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015). Service systems: a broadened framework and research agenda on value propositions, engagement, and service experience. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 6–22.
    Chiang, T.-L. (2017). 公共衛生與預防醫學的區別: 歷史觀點. Taiwan Gong Gong Wei Sheng Za Zhi, 36(5), 423–426.
    Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information systems research, 14(2), 189–217.
    Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the social sciences. In: Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Cooley, D., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2019). The effect of social media on perceived information credibility and decision making. Journal of Internet Commerce, 18(3), 249–269.
    Cowan, K., & Ketron, S. (2019). A dual model of product involvement for effective virtual reality: The roles of imagination, co-creation, telepresence, and interactivity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 483–492.
    Cowan, K., Spielmann, N., Horn, E., & Griffart, C. (2021). Perception is reality… How digital retail environments influence brand perceptions through presence. Journal of Business Research, 123, 86–96.
    Craig, M. J., & Choi, M. (2024). The role of affective and cognitive involvement in the mitigating effects of AI source cues on hostile media bias. Telematics and Informatics, 88, 102097.
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
    DARMAWAN, D. (2021). STRATEGI PEMASARAN CV CRM BERSAUDARA PINRANG DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN TINGKAT KEPUASAN PELANGGAN Universitas Hasanuddin].
    Davlembayeva, D., Pantano, E., Marikyan, D., Serravalle, F., & Scarpi, D. (2024). Retail surveillance: From consumers’ interaction to data extraction when in-store and online. Academy of Marketing Science World Marketing Congress,
    Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational statistics & data analysis, 81, 10–23.
    Filieri, R., Hofacker, C. F., & Alguezaui, S. (2018). What makes information in online consumer reviews diagnostic over time? The role of review relevancy, factuality, currency, source credibility and ranking score. Computers in human behavior, 80, 122–131.
    Filieri, R., McLeay, F., Tsui, B., & Lin, Z. (2018). Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services. Information & management, 55(8), 956–970.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50.
    Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual review of psychology, 39(1), 1–42.
    Gibson, G. R., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M. E., Prescott, S. L., Reimer, R. A., Salminen, S. J., Scott, K., Stanton, C., Swanson, K. S., & Cani, P. D. (2017). Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology, 14(8), 491–502.
    Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology press.
    Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
    Hair, J. F., Sharma, P. N., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Liengaard, B. D. (2024). The shortcomings of equal weights estimation and the composite equivalence index in PLS-SEM. European Journal of Marketing, 58(13), 30–55.
    Han, T.-I., & Chung, J.-E. (2014). Korean consumers’ motivations and perceived risks toward the purchase of organic cotton apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 32(4), 235–250.
    Henry, J. D., Von Hippel, W., Molenberghs, P., Lee, T., & Sachdev, P. S. (2016). Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders. Nature Reviews Neurology, 12(1), 28–39.
    Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational research methods, 17(2), 182–209.
    Herawati, H., Prajanti, S. D. W., & Kardoyo, K. (2019). Predicted purchasing decisions from lifestyle, product quality and price through purchase motivation. Journal of Economic Education, 8(1), 1–11.
    Hewei, T., & Youngsook, L. (2022). Factors affecting continuous purchase intention of fashion products on social E-commerce: SOR model and the mediating effect. Entertainment computing, 41, 100474.
    Hill, K. M., Fombelle, P. W., & Sirianni, N. J. (2016). Shopping under the influence of curiosity: How retailers use mystery to drive purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1028–1034.
    Hsiao, C.-H., & Tang, K.-Y. (2021). Who captures whom–Pokémon or tourists? A perspective of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102312.
    Hu, H.-f., & Krishen, A. S. (2019). When is enough, enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective. Journal of Business Research, 100, 27–37.
    Hussain, A., Hooi Ting, D., Zaib Abbasi, A., & Rehman, U. (2023). Integrating the SOR model to examine purchase intention based on Instagram sponsored advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 29(1), 77–105.
    Hussain, S., Ahmed, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption. Computers in human behavior, 66, 96–102.
    James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R (Vol. 103). Springer.
    Kandemir, G., Pirtini, S., & BAYRAKTAR, A. (2019). A research on the role of consumer involvement and product knowledge levels on purchasing decisions. Turkish Journal of Marketing, 4(2), 162–183.
    Kiely, K. M. (2024). Cognitive function. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1078–1081). Springer.
    Kim, Y. H., Kim, D. J., & Wachter, K. (2013). A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decision support systems, 56, 361–370.
    Klerck, D., & Sweeney, J. C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer‐perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology & marketing, 24(2), 171–193.
    Kurdi, A. (2021). The Effects of Herd Mentality on Behavior Houston Baptist University].
    Lee, J., & Beeler, C. (2009). An investigation of predictors of satisfaction and future intention: Links to motivation, involvement, and service quality in a local festival. Event management, 13(1), 17–29.
    Li, X., Tang, K., Omidvar, M. N., Yang, Z., Qin, K., & China, H. (2013). Benchmark functions for the CEC 2013 special session and competition on large-scale global optimization. gene, 7(33), 8.
    Liao, J., Li, C., & Filieri, R. (2022). The role of humor in management response to positive consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(2), 323–342.
    Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020). Education and cognitive functioning across the life span. Psychological science in the public interest, 21(1), 6–41.
    Luo, X. (2005). How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? Journal of Consumer psychology, 15(4), 288–294.
    Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). The basic emotional impact of environments. Perceptual and motor skills, 38(1), 283–301.
    Miremadi, A., & Haghayegh, M. (2022). The competitive advantage of EWOM in digital marketing. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(2), 258–269.
    Pandey, N., Tripathi, A., Jain, D., & Roy, S. (2020). Does price tolerance depend upon the type of product in e-retailing? Role of customer satisfaction, trust, loyalty, and perceived value. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 28(6), 522–541.
    Perrea, T., Krystallis, A., Engelgreen, C., & Chrysochou, P. (2017). Much too new to eat it? Customer value and its impact on consumer-product relationship in the context of novel food products. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(6), 616–630.
    Pop, R.-A., Săplăcan, Z., & Alt, M.-A. (2020). Social media goes green—The impact of social media on green cosmetics purchase motivation and intention. Information, 11(9), 447.
    Prebensen, N. K., Woo, E., Chen, J. S., & Uysal, M. (2013). Motivation and involvement as antecedents of the perceived value of the destination experience. Journal of travel research, 52(2), 253–264.
    Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial management & data systems, 121(12), 2637–2650.
    Serravalle, F., Vanheems, R., & Viassone, M. (2023). Does product involvement drive consumer flow state in the AR environment? A study on behavioural responses. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 72, 103279.
    Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 15–37.
    Spence, C., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., Velasco, C., & Wang, Q. J. (2019). Extrinsic auditory contributions to food perception & consumer behaviour: An interdisciplinary review. Multisensory research, 32(4-5), 275–318.
    Sridhar, S., & Fang, E. (2019). New vistas for marketing strategy: Digital, data-rich, and developing market (D3) environments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 977–985.
    Sultan, P., Wong, H. Y., & Azam, M. S. (2021). How perceived communication source and food value stimulate purchase intention of organic food: An examination of the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. Journal of cleaner production, 312, 127807.
    Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Elsevier.
    Takemeyang, A., Ketuma, H. J., & Akpor, T. A. (2026). The Role of Customer Value Proposition in Digital Financial Literacy and Ai-Driven Finance Adoption. Frontiers in Management Science, 5(1), 20–40.
    Tsuchiya, H., Fu, Y.-M., & Huang, S. C.-T. (2022). Customer value, purchase intentions and willingness to pay: The moderating effects of cultural/economic distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(2), 268–286.
    Uwaya, D., Onoyivbe, E., & Osemwegie, M. (2024). Estimations of phytochemical composition and non-enzymatic antioxidant, and antitussive, expectorant and analgesic properties of polyherbal-formulated TEA. Open Journal of Bioscience Research (ISSN: 2734-2069), 5(2), 15–32.
    Watanabe, E. A. d. M., Alfinito, S., Curvelo, I. C. G., & Hamza, K. M. (2020). Perceived value, trust and purchase intention of organic food: a study with Brazilian consumers. British Food Journal, 122(4), 1070–1184.
    Weeks, K. O., Kenyon, G. N., Slaydon, J., & Sargsyan, G. (2026). Measuring Business Efficiency Through Entropy. Systems Research and Behavioral Science.
    Wirya, Y. H., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2022). Consumer product involvement, attitude and cognition towards AD, and perceived value concerning purchase intentions. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 13(2), 173–184.
    Yan, L., & Yuet, F. K. C. (2024). Establishing Reliable Measures for Examining the Mediating Role of Teachers' Innovative Leadership in Transformational Leadership and Continuing Professional Development. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 14(12).
    Yang, Z., Jun, M., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Measuring customer perceived online service quality: scale development and managerial implications. International Journal of operations & production Management, 24(11), 1149–1174.
    Zatori, A., Smith, M. K., & Puczko, L. (2018). Experience-involvement, memorability and authenticity: The service provider's effect on tourist experience. Tourism management, 67, 111–126.
    Zhang, G., Yue, X., Ye, Y., & Peng, M. Y.-P. (2021). Understanding the impact of the psychological cognitive process on student learning satisfaction: combination of the social cognitive career theory and SOR model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 712323.
    王玉珍, 李宜玫, & 吳清麟. (2019). 青少年優勢力量表之發展研究. 教育心理學報, 業自我效能及學業緊張因素與國中生初次作弊行為之關聯性分析. 教育研究集刊, 58(4), 51–89.
    吳治勳, 陳慶餘, 許志成, & 吳英璋. (2016). 臺灣老化態度量表之編製與心理計量特性. 中華心理衛生學刊, 29(2), 159–186.
    单峰, 黄璐琦, 郭娟, & 陈敏. (2015). 药食同源的历史和发展概况. 生命科学, 27(8), 1061–1069.
    林頡. (2025). 基於SOR模型研究評論品質與業主回應對購買意願的影響 國立嘉義大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 嘉義市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9vvm58
    徐保誠. (2017). 銀髮族保健食品涉入程度對 知覺價值與購買意願關聯性之研究- 以G眷村為例 國立臺南大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t9gth5
    許淑碧, & 黃炳文. (2021). 消費者對健康食品標章認知、涉入程度及購買意願之研究:SOR模型之應用. 農林學報, 68(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.30089/JAF.202106_68(2).0004
    陳信峰. (2010). 總體經濟變數對消費者行為之影響性-以 Barnesandnoble. com 為例. 國立臺灣大學國際企業學系學位論文, 1–59.
    陳密桃. (2003). 認知負荷理論及其對教學的啟示.
    陳欽雨, & 蔡宜雯. (2016). 服務業員工自我概念, 正向態度與專業契合對升遷機會之影響. 人力資源管理學報, 16(2), 81–114.

    QR CODE