| 研究生: |
吳佩宜 Wu, Pei-Yi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
政治獻金、公司治理及內部控制缺失之關聯性探討 The Relation among Campaign Finance, Corporate Governance and Internal Control Weaknesses |
| 指導教授: |
林軒竹
Lin, Hsuan-Chu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2016 |
| 畢業學年度: | 104 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 35 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 政治獻金 、內控缺失 、公司治理 、裁罰機率 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Campaign Finance, Internal Control Weaknesses, Corporate Governance, rate of sanction |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:170 下載:6 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自1996年開放總統直接民選至今,台灣經歷三次政黨輪替。雖然「政治獻金法」於2004年總統大選前正式於立法院三讀通過,針對政治獻金之收受有相當多的管控,但至今仍有眾多有關政治人物私下收受獻金之傳聞或弊案,諸如陳水扁家族的海角七億事件、馬英九為頂新門神的傳聞、林益世收受賄款的弊案……等。近年來台灣食安崩壞,環安議題延燒,舞弊案件的頻傳,消費者及民間團體依靠己力聯合抵制的同時,多數違法企業卻獲得無罪判決或減輕罪行,不免讓人聯想是否與外力介入護航相關。有鑑於此,本研究以2011年至2014年期間監察院之政治獻金資料庫中執政黨(中國國民黨)及最大在野黨(民主進步黨)之政黨及候選人專戶,捐獻者為台灣上市櫃公司為樣本,對比研究期間上市櫃公司經主管機關裁罰之次數,先後以敘述性統計、皮爾森相關係數分析及一般最小平方法探討公司捐獻政治獻金是否會降低內控缺失被裁罰的機率。
實證結果發現內控缺失裁罰次數確實會受到政治獻金捐獻之影響,但此影響屬於正向或負向,則與受贈對象及其政黨選舉後是否為執政黨具有較大的關聯。從結果分析,若受贈的對象淪為在野黨,公司反而有可能讓執政黨找機會懲罰。企業若想藉由政治捐獻而獲得好處,亦要設想結果是否會如預期,若是壓錯寶,不但無法產生保護傘的效果,反而可能會因為捐獻對象是執政黨的政敵,而懲罰性的增加被裁罰次數。
Since direct elections for President in 1996, Taiwan has experienced three times of Party Alternation. Although "Political Donations Act" was passed by Legislature before the Presidential election in 2004, there are still many rumors and scandals about politicians privately accepting political donation. This study focuses on over-the-counter (OTC) companies which are signed up for Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System by investigating the relation between campaign finance, corporate governance and internal control weaknesses based on data collected from the sunshine acts of the Control Yuan and Taiwan Economic Journal Database from 2011 to 2014. The purpose of this study is to discuss how political donations affect the rate of sanction for enterprises internal control. The empirical results show that the frequency of political donations will influence the rate of sanction for the internal control, mostly depending on that the donation goes to the ruling party or the opposite party. For those enterprises which donate money to the political opponent have greater chance to get punished by ruling party and unable to produce the umbrella effect.
壹、網站:
臺灣證券交易所網站:http://www.twse.com.tw
證券暨期貨市場發展基金會之資訊揭露專區:http://www.sfi.org.tw/finance/finance1/finance1_2
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission:www.coso.org
證券暨期貨市場發展基金會之資訊揭露專區:http://www.sfi.org.tw/finance/finance1/finance1_2
貳、中文文獻
王智賢及蔡坤良,2005,政治獻金限額與關稅遊說,經濟研究,41卷2期 (2005 / 07 / 01),P207 - 247。
王鼎銘,2007,台灣政治獻金法及參選人政治獻金資料之實證研究,選舉研究,14卷2期 (2007 / 11 / 01),P121 - 144。
江朝聖,2016,由公司治理觀點論公司政治捐贈之法律規範,管理與法遵叢刊,1卷1期 (2016 / 01 / 01),P61 - 89。
余佳燕,2013,內部控制缺失與審計公費之關聯性研究,台北大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
李建然、許書偉、湯麗芬,2008,「內部稽核品質與財務報表品質之關聯性」,輔仁管理評論,第十五卷第三期,33-62頁。
李啟賢,2014,公司治理與內部控制,內部稽核103年元月刊 P30-35。
林柄滄,1999,管理不當與內控缺失,內部稽核會訊,28期 P48-53。
林惠敏,2006,污染管制與政治獻金,政治大學財政研究所碩士學位論文。
馬嘉應、張先治、張力,2006,「內部控制制度應用與執行之研究 (上)」,會計研究月刊,第兩百四十三期, 110-118頁。
張思國、陳脩文、鄭益成及黃曉惠,2009,「公司治理因素與上市公司內部控制制度關聯性之研究」,五六七期,頁6-25。
張思國、陳脩文、鄭益成及黃曉惠,2009,「公司治理因素與上市公司內部控制制度關聯性之研究( 中) 」,五六八期,頁6-27。
張思國、陳脩文、鄭益成及黃曉惠,2009,「公司治理因素與上市公司內部控制制度關聯性之研究( 下) 」,五六九期,頁20-51。
張義,2015,我國總統選舉政治獻金之實證研究_以第13任總統選舉為例,臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
陳信憲、陳雯香,2011,政治獻金對臺灣公司股票報酬之影響,臺灣銀行季刊第六十二卷第二期P275-287。
陳暖芬,2010,我國政治獻金之探究:以第6屆及第7屆立法委員政治獻金為例,臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系學位論文。
陳禮炫,2004,重大財務弊案內控缺失知防杜作法,內部稽核,49期 (2004 / 12 / 01),P36 - 41。
葉可超,2009,政治獻金法施行狀況與問題研究-以立法委員為例,台北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文。
鄭桂蕙、余俊憲、王蘭芬,2012,內部控制缺失與應計品質-獨立董監之調節效果,東吳經濟商學學報,79期P81-120。
参、英文文獻
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., and Kinney, W. R., “The Discovery and Reporting of Internal Control Deficiencies Prior to SOX-Mandated Audits,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1-2, 2007, pp. 166-192.
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., and LaFond, R., “The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality,” Accounting Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, 2008, pp. 217-250.
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., and LaFond, R., “The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-43.
Beneish, M.D., Billings, M.B., and Hodder, L.D. 2008 Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty. The Accounting Review83(3):665-703.
DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J., 1991 Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors. The Accounting Review Vol. 66, pp. 643-655.
Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., and McVay, S., “Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting,” Accounting Review, Vol. 82, No. 5, 2007a, pp. 1141-1170.
Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., and McVay, S., “Determinants of Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1-2, 2007b, pp. 193-223.
Ge, W. and McVay, S., “The Disclosure of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2005, pp. 137-158.
Li, C., Sun, L., and Ettredge, M. 2010. Financial executive qualifications, financial executive turnover, and adverse SOX 404 opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50:93-110.
Kinney, W., and L. McDanel, 1989, “Characteristics of Firms Correcting Previously Reported Quarterly Earnings”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11( 1),pp.71-93
Krishnan, J. (2005), “Audit committee quality and internal control: an empirical analysis.” The AccountingReview, 80, No.2, pp. 649-675
Zhang, Y., J. Zhou, and N. Zhou (2007), “Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internalcontrol weaknesses.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, No.3, pp. 300-327.