進入二十一世紀的知識經濟新紀元，企業在面臨競爭與日益增與環境高度不確定的挑戰下，莫不致力於追求強化企業體質之道，知識儼然成為組織賴以存續、建立競爭優勢以求發展的最關鍵因素。
許多學者提出「知識市場」的觀念，知識市場是經由知識擁有者與知識重建者傳遞知識所形成，並且個人可能同時擁有知識擁有者與重建者的雙重身分，但是知識擁有者與知識重建者在知識分享上的動機不同。所以本研究將知識分享視為知識買賣雙方的雙向溝通並分別探究之。
本研究以計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB)來探究組織成員貢獻出本身知識的意願與實際行為，並以科技接受模型(Technology Acceptance Model, TAM)來探究組織成員使用企業知識庫的意願與實際行為，進而探究知識再使用和知識貢獻對組織成員工作滿意度的影響。
本研究的研究結果如下：
1、「知識貢獻」受到「態度」和「認知行為控制」的正向直接影響，其中又以「認知行為控制」的影響效果為大；而「主觀規範」會正向地影響「態度」，再透過「態度」來間接影響「知識貢獻」。
2、當組織成員認為此電子知識庫是有用的，則會增加他們的使用意願及行為，當組織成員認為愈容易操作使用的電子知識庫，他們會提高對電子知識庫的有用性認定，所以越會增加他們的使用意願及行為。
3、在組織成員有意願且實際使用企業電子知識庫，並且有意願並實際貢獻出本身知識的情況下，會使組織員工滿意度增加。

Accompany with the new era of knowledge economy, businesses face the challenge of increasing competition and uncertainty environment, and they have to strengthen essence. Consequently, knowledge exactly becomes the key resource for business to carry over and even to build competitive advantages.
There are many scholars bring up the concept of “knowledge market” which is composed of “knowledge owner” and “knowledge reconstruction”. Everyone may have two roles at the same time. The motives to share knowledge are different for knowledge owner and knowledge reconstruction. Therefore, this research takes knowledge sharing apart and views it as two-way communication of knowledge owner and knowledge reconstruction.
This research uses “Theory of Planned Behavior” to explain the intention and behavior of contributing their own knowledge; moreover, it uses “Technology Acceptance Model” to explain the intention and behavior of reusing knowledge from electronic knowledge-base. Furthermore, this research probes into the effects of knowledge contribution and knowledge reuse on job satisfaction.
The results of this research are as followed.
1.Knowledge contribution is positively and directly affected by “attitude toward behavior” and “perceived behavior control”, and the affection of the later is larger than that of the former. In addition, “attitude toward behavior” is the mediator between “subjective norm” and “knowledge contribution”.
2.When employees perceive the electronic knowledge-base is useful for their job, they will intent to use it. When employees perceive the electronic knowledge-base is easy to use, they may think it is useful and will intent to use it.
3.When employees are willing to use the electronic knowledge-base and contribute their own knowledge, job satisfaction will increase

中文部份
1.方世杰、方世榮，知識管理-觀念架構的建立。商管科技季刊，1（3），355-374，2000。
2.吳靜吉、潘養源、丁興祥，內外控取向與工作滿足及績效之關係。國立政治大學學報，第41期，頁61-74，1970。
3.林東清，知識管理。台北：智勝文化，2003。
4.許士軍，管理學，台北：東華書局，1997。
5.張春興，現代心理學。台北市：東華書局，1998。
6.陳順宇，多變量分析。華泰書局，1998。
7.楊子江、王美音譯，創新求勝：智價企業論。台北：遠流出版，1997。（I. Nonaka & H. Takeuchi, 原著）

英文部分
1.Adams, J. S., “Towards an Understanding of Inequity”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, pp. 422-436., Oct 1963
2.Adams, J. S., Inequity in Social Exchange, In L. Berkowite (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.2, pp.267-299, 1965
3.Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A., “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication”. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp.227-247., 1992
4.Agho, A. O., C. W. Mueller, J. L. Price, “Determinants of Employee Job Satisfaction: an Empirical Test of a Casual Model”, Human Relations, Vol. 46, pp.1007-1027, 1993
5.Arthur Andersen Business Consulting, Zukai Knowledge Management, Tokyo: Toyo Keizai., 1999.
6.Arthur Andersen Business Consulting, “Knowledge Management”, 2000.
7.Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M., “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 84, pp. 888-918., 1977
8.Ajzen, I., ”From Intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior”. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckman(Eds.), Actions-control : From cognition to behavior, Heidelberg,p11-p39., Springer 1985
9.Ajzen, I., “Attitude Structure and Behavior,” in A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald(Eds.). Attitude Structure and Function, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989, 241-274., 1989
10.Alderfer, C. P., “Existence, Relatedness and Growth: Human Needs is Organization Settings”, New York: Free Press, 1972
11.Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi, “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No.4, pp.74-94, 1988
12.Bagozzi, R. P., H. Baumgartner and Y. Yi, “State Versus Action Orientation and the Theory of Reasoned Action,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18, No.4, pp.505-528, March, 1992.
13.Bartol, K.M. & Srivastava, A., “Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems,” Journal of Leadership and Organizations Studies, 9(1), pp.64-76., 2002
14.Blau, P. M., Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley, 1964
15.Bock, G.W. & Kim, Y.G., “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing,” Information Resources Management Journal, pp.14-21., 2002a
16.Bock, G.W. & Kim, Y.G., “Determinants of the Individual’s Knowledge Sharing Behavior: The Theory of Reasoned Action Perspective,” Proceedings of 6th Pacific Asia Conference on Information System (PACIS)., 2002b
17.Brayfield, A. H., & Rohte, H. F.，An Index of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology,35,pp.307-311., 1951
18.Campbell, J. P., M. D. Dunnette, E. E. Lawler, K. E. Weick, “Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness”, New York: Megraw-Hall, 1970
19.Campbell, J. P., “On the natural of organizational effectiveness,” In Goodman, P. S. and Pennings, J. M. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness, pp. 13-55, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA., 1977.
20.Carnevale, D. G.., “Trustworthy Govemment”. San Franci-sco: Jossey-Bass Publishers., 1995
21.Carnevale , D. G.., “Organizational Trust “, in Tay M. Shafritz（ed.）58, The International Encyclopedia of Public and Administration . Westview Press, 1998
22.Chau, P.Y.K., “An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting the Acceptance of CASE by System Developers”, Information and Management, Vol. 30, No. 6 pp.269-280., 1996
23.Chen, L.D., Gillenson, M.L. and Sherrell, D.L., “Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective”, Information and Management, Vol.39, pp.705-719., 2002.
24.Cheney, P.H., “Effects of Individual Characteristics, Organizational Fators and Task Characteristics on Computer Programmer Productivity and Job Satisfaction,” Information & Management, Vol.7, pp. 209-214, 1984.
25.Cheung, C. K., S. A. Scherling, “Job Satisfaction, Work Values, and Sex Differences in Taiwan’s Organizations,” Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 133(5), pp.563-575, 1999
26.Chruden H. J., A. W. Sherman, “Personal Management”, 4TH ed., South-Western Publishing Co., pp.312, 1972
27.Churchill, G. A., Jr., N. M. Ford, S. W. Hartley, and O. C. Walker, Jr., “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance：A Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22, pp.103-118, May 1985.
28.Constant, D. Kiesler, & Sproull, L., “What’s Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing,” Information Systems Research, Vol.5, No.4, pp.400-421., 1994
29.Cranny, L. T., Smith, E. F. Stone, “Job Satisfaction: How People Feel about Their Jobs and How it Affect Their Performance”, MA: Lexington Books, 1993
30.Cribbin, J. J., “Effective Managerial Leadership, American Management Association”, New York, 1972
31.Davenport, T.H., “Some Principles of Knowledge Management,” Working Paper.,1997
32.Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998
33.Davis, K., J. W. Newstrorm, “Human Behavior at Work: Organization Behavior”, 7TH ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp.187, 1985
34.Davis, F. D., “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge., 1986
35.Davis, F. D., “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.319-340., 1989
36.Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. & Warshaw, P.R., “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp.982 – 1003., 1989
37.Dishaw, M.T, Strong, D.M., “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs”, Information and Management , 36, pp.9–21., 1999
38.D. Pollar., “Becoming Knowledge-Power: Planning and Transformation”, Information Resources Management Journal, pp54-63., 2000
39.Dunn, J. D., E. C. Stephens, “Management of Personnel: Manpower Management and Organization Behavior”, New York: MacGraw-Hill, 1972
40.Ebert, R. J. and Griffin, R. W., Business Essentials, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., 1995
41.Elena, Karahanna & Straub Detmar W., “The psychological origins of perceived usefulness andease-of-use”, Information & Management, Vol.35, No.4, pp.237-250., 1999
42.Elliott, S., & O’Dell, C., “Sharing Knowledge and Best Practices: The Hows and Whys of Tapping Your Organization’s Hidden reservoirs of Knowledge,” Health Forum Journal, 42, pp.34-37., 1999
43.Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Beliefs, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addition-Wesley, Boston, MA, 1975.
44.Fishbein, M., Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, NY: Wiley Press, 1967.
45.Fogarty T., “Public Accounting Experience: The Influence of Demographic and Organizational Attributes.”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.9, No.7, pp. 12-20, 1994.
46.Fournet, G. P. & Distefano, M. K. Jr., & Pryer, M.W., “Job Satisfaction Issues And Problem” Personnel Psychology, pp.165-183, 1966.
47.Garrity, E.J., & Siplor, J.C., “Multimedia as a Vehicle for Knowledge Modeling in Expert System,” Expert System with Application, Vol.7, No.3, pp.397-406., 1994
48.Ghiselli, R. F., J. M., La Lopa, Billy Bai, “Job Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction, and Turnover Intent”, Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, Vol.42, pp.28-37, 2001
49.Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M. & Donnelly, J. H., Organizations Behaviors Structure Processes, 10th（Ed.）McGraw-Hill., 2000
50.Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G.R., “Development Of The Job Diagnostic Survey” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60,2, pp.159-170, 1975.
51.Hackman, J. R., G. R. Oldham, “Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.16, pp.250-279, 1976
52.Hagger, M.S. & Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity: Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables,” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, pp.3-32., 2002.
53.Hall B. P., “Values Development and Learning Organizations.”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.5, No.1, pp.19-32, 2001.
54.Harrison, D.A., P.P. Mykytyn Jr. and C.K. Riemenschneider, “Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests,” Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.2, pp. 171-195, June, 1997.
55.Hartwick, J., and Barki, H., “Explaining the role of user participation in information systems use”, Management Science, 40, 4, 440-465, 1994.
56.Haynes, R. M. and Thies, E. A., “Management of Technology in Service Firms”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol.10, No.3, pp. 388-397., August 1991
57.Heberlein, T.A. & Black, J.S., “Attitudinal Specificity and The Prediction of Behavior in a Field Setting,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, pp.474-79., 1976
58.Hendrickson, A. R. and Collins, M. R., “An Assessment of Structure and Causation of IS Usage”, The DATA BASE of Advances in Information Systems, Vol.27,No.2, p61-p67., Spring 1996
59.Hendriks, P., "Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on Motivation for Knowledge Sharing" , Knowledge and Process Management.Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 91-100, 1999
60.Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B. B., The Motivation to Work, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY., 1959
61.Hesketh Beryl, Dianne Gardnerr, “Person-Environment Fit Model: A Reconceptualization and Empirical Test”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.42, Issue 3, pp.333-349, 1993
62.Hidding, G. & Shireen, M. C., ”Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Andersen Consulting”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.5, No. 1, pp.3-13, 1998
63.Hodson R., “Workplace Behaviors”, Work and Occupations, pp.271-290, 1991.
64.Homans, G.C., “Social behavior as exchange”. The American Journal of Sociology, 597-606., 1958
65.Homans, G. C., “Social Behavio r: Its Elementary Forms”. New York: Harcourt, Brace & world., 1961
66.Holtshous, D., “Ten knowledge domains: model of a knowledge-driven company?”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.6, N.1, pp.3-8.,1999.
67.Hoppock, R., Job Satisfaction Happer & Brother, New York, 1995.
68.Howells, J., “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation And Technology Transfer” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 8,2, pp.91-106, 1996.
69.Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Liu, S., and Tam, K. Y., “Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.16, No.2, pp.91-112., 1999
70.Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, & G. B. Davis, “Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage Via A Structural Equation Model.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.11, No.4, pp.87-114., 1995
71.Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., and Maragahh, H., “Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study,” Information and Management, 29, pp.227-238., 1995
72.Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. and Baroudi, J.J., “A motivational model of microcomputer usage”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.13,No.1, pp.127-143., 1996
73.Igbaria, M. & Tan, M., “The consequence of information technology acceptance subsequent individual performance,” Information and Management, 32, pp.113-121, 1997
74.Jarvenpaa, S.L. & Staples, D.S., “Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No.1, pp.151-183., 2001
75.Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H., “Specific and General Knowledge, and Organizational Structure,” in Werin, L., and Wijkander, H. (eds.), Contract Economics, Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K.; pp. 251-274., 1992
76.Kalleberg, L. E., K. A. Loscocco, “Aging Value & Rewards: Explaining Age Differences in Job Satisfaction”, American Sociological Review, Vol.48, pp.78-60, 1977
77.Kelley, H. & Thibaut, J.W., “Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence”, New York: Wiley., 1978
78.Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D., “Citizenship behavior and social exchange.” Academy of Management, Vol.37, pp.656-669., 1994
79.Kolekofski, K.E. & Heminger, A.R., “Beliefs and Attitudes Affecting Intentions to Share Information in An Organizational Setting,” Information and Management, 40, pp.521-532., 2003.
80.Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P.and Zhuang, Y., ”The Role of Ease of Use, Usefulness and Attitude In The Prediction of World Wide Web Usage”, ACM, p195-p204., 1998
81.Lederer, Aldsvert L.; Maupin, Donna j., Sena, Mark P.; Zhuang, Youlong., “The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web.” Decision Support Systems, 29, pp269-282., 2000
82.Liebowitz, J. & Beckman, T., “Knowledge Organizations: What Every Manger Should Know”, Boca Ration, FL: St. Lucie Press., 1998
83.Lin, Judy C.C., and Lu, Hsipeng, “Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site”, International Journal of Information Management, 20, pp.197-208., 2000
84.Lippke, L. A., B. V. Boltes, E. Gregory, “Employee Satisfaction in Extension: A Texas Study”, Journal of Extension, Vol.33, No.5, October 1995
85.Locke, E. A., “Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp.1297-1349, 1969
86.Locke, E. A., “Satisfactors And Dissatisfactors Among White Collar and Blue Collar Employee”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, pp.67-76, 1973.
87.Locke, E. A., “The Nature and Cause of Job Satisfaction in M.D. Punnette ed”, Handbook of Individual and Organizational Psychology, pp.1297-1349, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1976
88.Maslow, A. H., “Motivation and Personality”, New York: Harper & Brothers Pub, pp.146-150, 1954
89.Matson, Eric; Patiath, Pradip; Shavers, Tim., “Stimulating Knowledge Sharing: Strengthening Your Organization's Internal Knowledge Market”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.32, No.3, pp.275-285, Aug 2003.
90.Mathieson, K., “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research, (2:3), pp.173-191., 1991
91.McClelland, D. C., “The Achieving Society, Princeton”, New-Jersey: Van Nestand, 1961
92.McCormaick, L. W., “Industrial Psychology”, New Jersey: Prentice Hill., 1980.
93.Moore, G.C. & Benbasat, I., “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adoption an Information Technology Innovation,” Information System Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, , pp.191-222., 1993
94.Morris M.G. and A. Dillon., “How User Perceptions Influence Software Use”, IEEE Software,Vol. 144,July-Aug. pp.58-65., 1997
95.Morse N. C., “Satisfaction in The White Color Job”, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research Center, 1953.
96.Musen, A. M., “Dimensions of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse”. Computers and Bio-medical Research, 25, 435-467., 1992
97.Nonaka, I., “A Dynamic Theory Of Organizational Knowledge Creation.” Organization Science, 5, 1, pp.14-37, 1994.
98.Nonaka, L., and Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
99.O’Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J.A., & Anderson, J.C., “Message Flow and Decision Making”. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L.Porter), Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, pp.600-623., 1987
100.Organ, D. W., T. Bateman, “Organizational Behavior”, 3TH ed, Plano, Texas: Business Publication Co., pp.320-396, 1986
101.Polanyi, M., “The Tacit Dimension” (London, Routledge & Keegan Paul), 1966
102.Pollock, T. G., R. C. Whitbred, N. Contractor, “Social Information Processing and Job Characteristics: A Simultaneous Test of Two Theories with Implications for Job Satisfaction”, Human Communication Research, pp.292-330, 2000
103.Porter, L. W., E. E. Lawler, “Managerial Attitudes & Performance Illinoiss”, Homewood, New York, 1968
104.Price, J. H., Handbook of Organizational Measurement, D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA., 1972
105.Purser, R. E. & Pasmore, W. A., “Organizing for Learning”. In W. Pasmore & W. Pasmore (Eds), In Organizational change and development. Great Britain: LondonJAI Press Inc., pp. 37-114, 1992
106.Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S., “Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.74, No.2, pp. 71-80, 1996
107.Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G. & Zanna, M. P., “Trust in Close Relationships”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.49, No.1, pp. 95-112, 1985
108.Robbins, J. L. Gibson, “Organizational behavior structure”,7TH ed., p.111, 1991
109.Robbins, S. P., Organization Behavior. (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1993
110.Robbins, S.P., Organization Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, 1996
111.Robbins, S. P. (2001), Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications (9th Ed.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
112.Robbins, S. P. and Coulter, M. K. (1999), Management (6th Ed.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
113.Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. & Camerer, C., “ Not so Different after all : A Cross-Discipline View of Trust ” Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.3, pp.393-404., 1998
114.Ruggles, R., “The state of the Notion: Knowledge management in Practice”. California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, pp. 80-89. 1998
115.Ryu Seewon, Seung Hee Ho and Ingoo Han, “Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals”, Expert Systems with Applications, 25, pp.113–122., 2003.
116.Schaffer, R. H., “Job Satisfaction as Related to Need Satisfaction in Work”, Psychology Monographs, Vol.67, pp.14, 1953
117.Seal, F. E., P. A. Knight, “Industrial/Organization Psychology: Science & Practice, Pacific Grove of California”, Brooks/Cole, 1988
118.Seashore, S.E., & Tabor, T.D., “Job Satisfaction And Their Correlation” American Behavioral Scientist, 18, pp.333-368, 1975.
119.Senge, P. M., “Transforming the practice of management”. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 5-31., 1997
120.Senge, P., ”Sharing Knowledge”, Executive Excellence,Vol.15,No.6 .pp.11-12, 1998
121.Sharon Watson, Kelly Hewitt, “A Multi-Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse”, Journal of Management Studies. Oxford, Vol. 43, No. 2; pp. 141, Mar 2006.
122.Sheppard, B. H., J. Hartwick and P. R. Warshaw, “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15, pp. 325-343, December 1988.
123.Skinners, B. F., “Beyond Freedom and Dignity”, New York: Fred A. Knopf, Inc., 1971
124.Smith, P. C., L. M. Kendall, C. L. Hulin, “Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement”, Bureau of Business Research, No.88, Columbus, Ohio State University, 1969
125.Spector, P. E., “Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, and Consequences”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997
126.Starbuck, W.H., “Learning by Knowledge Intensive Firms,” Journal of Management Studies, 29, pp.713-740., 1992
127.Straub, D., Limayem, M., and Karahanna-Evaristo, E., “Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing”, Management Science, Vol.41, No.8, p1328-p1342., August 1995
128.Sveiby, K., “The New Organizational Wealth”. San Francisco: Berrettn Koehler, 1997
129.Szajna, B., “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.” Management Science, Vol.42, No.1, pp.85-92., 1996
130.Tannenbaum, R. and Schmidt, W. H., “How to choose a leadership pattern,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 95-101., 1958
131.Taylor, S. & Todd, P., “Understanding Information Technology Usage: a Test of Competing Models”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-176., 1995
132.Thibaut, J.W. & Kelly, H., “The Social Psycholoy of Groups”, New York: Wiley., 1959
133.Venkatesh, V. ＆ F. D. Davis, “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and Test”, Decision Sciences, Vol.27, No.3, pp.451-481., 1996
134.Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D., “A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies”, Management Science, Vol.46, No.2, pp.186-204., 2000
135.Vroom, V. H., “Ego-Involvement, Job Satisfaction and Job Performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.15, pp.159-177, 1964
136.Szulanski, G., “Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter special issue), 27-43, 1996
137.Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G.. W., & Lofguist, H., Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (Minnesota Studies on Vocatinal Rehabilitation, vol .22). University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center, Work Adjustment Project., 1967
138.Wernimont P. F., “A System View of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56, pp.173-176, 1972.
139.Wexley, K. N., & Yukl, G. A., “Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology”, Homewood, III: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1977
140.Yining,Chen,Ohio.& Hao, Lou., “Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Groupware Application”, Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 14,No. 4, pp.1-16., 2002
141.Zack, M.H., “Managing Codified Knowledge,” Sloan Management Review, pp.45-58., 1999