研究生: |
黃俊銘 Huang, Chun-Ming |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
剛性鋪面及再生瀝青混凝土鋪面績效評估 Performance Evaluation of Rigid and Recycled Asphalt Concrete Pavements |
指導教授: |
陳建旭
Chen, Jian-Shiuh |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系碩士在職專班 Department of Civil Engineering (on the job class) |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 118 |
中文關鍵詞: | 剛性路面 、瀝青混凝土回收料 、再生瀝青混凝土 、鋪面績效 |
外文關鍵詞: | Rigid pavements, Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement, Reclaimed Asphalt Concrete, Pavement Performance |
相關次數: | 點閱:104 下載:3 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
剛性鋪面需進行長期績效觀測,方可建立合理維修機制。本研究以國道3號蘭潭隧道細紋刨除後之剛性鋪面性能分別進行耐久性及安全性評估試驗,耐久性為量測紋理深度,安全性為抗滑值(BPN和SN)及平坦度(IRI)量測。藉由歷年鋪面績效試驗成果顯示,IRI值大致良好、BPN值及SN值存在持續下降趨勢,BPN值大於45。
再生瀝青混凝土(Recycled Asphalt Concrete, RAC)需進行正確之品質管控,提升服務年限。本研究藉由臺南市試驗路段南74線,評估再生瀝青混凝土(RAC)鋪面績效。配合設計以標稱最大粒徑19mm之再生瀝青混凝土,並添加刨除回收料40%,並依理論公式推估再生劑(RA-5)添加量,再於瀝青拌和廠進行試拌,確認最終配合設計;同時,進行試驗道路鋪築,評估再生瀝青混凝土鋪面之安全性及耐久性,並納入103年7月於嘉義縣縣道170線(8K+826~10K+412) 再生瀝青混凝土試驗道路現地試驗數據,評估再生瀝青混凝土鋪面績效,兩者於評估期間之績效良好。
To construct a standard maintenance process, it is needed to observe the change of a rigid pavement. This study try to remove the eliminating fine lines of “Formosa Highway No.3, Lan-Tan Tunnel” and analyze its durability (Mean Texture Depth) and security (British Pendulum Number, Skid Number, and International Roughness Index). We summarized the analysis results of the rigid pavement recently, and it is showed that the IRI value was almost the same. However, the value of BPN and SN have reduced year by year, but the security was still enough (BPN>45).
The quality of RAC (Recycled Asphalt Concrete) is needed to well control to increase its life time. This study evaluated the security and durability of the rigid pavement of Tainan City No. 74 road, and compared with Chiayi County No. 170 road (8K + 826 ~ 10K + 412). Both road sections show the good quality.
中華鋪面工程學會 (2004)「近代新瀝青混凝土路面材料及產製鋪設技術」,桃園。
交通部臺灣區國道高速公路局 (2003)「交通技術標準規範公路類公路工程部-公路養護手冊」,台北。
交通部國道新建工程局 (1990)「北二高剛性路面建造講習」,台北。
交通部,「105年道路長度及橋梁座數」,http://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=64&parentpath=0,6,105年08月02日瀏覽。
李英豪、李 釗、陳世晃 (2009) 「剛性鋪面維護及補強技術之研究2/2」,交通部,臺北。
李世大 (2007) 「跑道抗滑係數檢測及分析之研究-以臺灣桃園國際機場為例」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,桃園。
李德誠、周廷鏘(2002)「美國道路管理系統之運作考察報告」,台北市政府工務局,台北。
梁順榮 (2007)「鋪面平坦度高程檢測及規範探討之研究」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,桃園。
黃裔炎 (2002)「剛性路面施工與維護」,臺灣營建研究院,臺北。
陳建旭、王慶雄(2001)「Clegg 衝擊試驗評估鋪面結構之成果分析」,台灣公路工程,第37卷第4-5期,第30-44頁。
陳俊雄 (2015)「剛性鋪面績效評估與機場道面管理系統」國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,台南。
劉德賢 (2014) 「多孔隙瀝青混凝土(PAC)應用於鋪面大行養護之評估」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,臺南。
蔡攀鰲(2001)「國內再生瀝青混凝土推動與再生瀝青混凝土拌和廠評鑑」,中華鋪面工程學會會刊,第一卷第一期,第1-13頁。
蔡攀鰲(2002)「再生瀝青混凝土拌合廠審查認可基準」,再生瀝青混凝土實務講習,中華鋪面工程學會,台南,第1-19頁。
蔡攀鰲 (2003)「公路工程學」,國立成功大學土木系,台南。
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2004). Standard Practice for Classifying Hot-Mix Recycling Agents, ASTM D4552-92.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2013). Standard Specification for Superpave Volumetric Mix Design, AASHTO M323.
Asphalt Institute (2014). Asphalt Mix Design Methods, MS-2, Seventh Edition, Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY.
Chen, J. S., Chen, S. F., Liao, M. C., and Huang, S. W. (2015). “Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Blends of Recycling Agents Mixed with Aged Binders,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol.27(2), 04014143.
Elsenaar, P. M. W., J. Reichert, and R. Sauterey, (1976),“Pavement Characteristics and Skid Resistance,” Transportation Research Record 622, pp.1-25.
Federal Aviation Administration (1997), “Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces,” Department of Transportation Advisory Circular, A/C No. 150/5320-12C.
Huang, Y.H.(2004). Pavement Analysis and Design, Pearson Education, Inc, 2nd edition, New Jersey.
Hajj, E. Y., Sebaaly, P. E., and Shresta, R. (2009). “Laboratory evaluation of mixes containing recycled asphalt pavement (RAP).” Int. J. Road Mater. Pavements Des., 10(3), 495–518.
International Civil Aviation Organization, (1994) “Airport Services Manual Part2:Pavement Surface Conditions”, Third Edition.
Jayawickrama , P. W. and Graham, G.L. (1995). “Use of Skid Performance History as Basis for Aggregate Qualification for Seal Coats and Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete Surface Courses,"Transportation Research Record 1501, pp.31-38.
Madrid, R. C., Davison, R. R., and Glover, G. J. (2000). “Compositional Evaluation of Asphalt Binder Recycling Agents.” Pet. Sci. Technol., 18(1), 153–175.
Mallick, R.B. and El-Korchi, T. (2009). Pavement Engineering, Taylor&Francis Group, North Wales.
Mogawer, W.S., Austerman, A., Roque, R., Underwood, S., Mohammad, L., and Zou, J. (2015). “Ageing and Rejuvenators: Evaluating Their Impact on High RAP Mixtures Fatigue Cracking Characteristics Using Advanced Mechanistic Models and Testing Methods,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol.16(2), pp.1-28.
Papagiannakis, A.T. and Masad, E.A. (2007). Pavement Design and Material, John Wiley&Sons, Inc, New Jersey.
Soleymani, H. R., Bahia, H. U., and Bergan, A. T. (1999). “Blending charts based on performance-graded asphalt binder specification.” Transportation Research Record 1661, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 7–14.
Sondag, M. S., Chadbourn, B. A. and Drescher, A. (2002). Investigation of Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Mixtures, Final Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Twin City.
Thom, N. (2014). Principles of Pavement Engineering, Thomas Telford Publishing Ltd, London.