| 研究生: |
林佳葦 Lin, Chia-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
不同站姿準備寬度對初學者與有經驗舞者的芭蕾旋轉動作控制的影響 Influence of Preparatory Distance on Postural Control while Performing Ballet Turns in Novices and Experienced Dancers |
| 指導教授: |
蘇芳慶
Su, Fong-Chin |
| 共同指導教授: |
林呈鳳
Lin, Cheng-Feng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 醫學工程研究所 Institute of Biomedical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 133 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 旋轉軸 、舞蹈 、神經肌肉控制 、向外旋轉 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | rotation axis, dance, neuromuscular control, pirouette, en dehors |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:154 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
背景: 旋轉,為芭蕾舞一個重要的動作。有許多因素會影響旋轉的動作控制,像是舞者的技巧程度、慣用腳或非慣用腳、準備位置寬度(準備時的雙足最短距離)。目前為止,並沒有完整的文獻報導有關於芭蕾舞旋轉與其相關影響的因子。所以完整量化芭蕾舞旋轉的動作控制,以及探討舞者的技巧程度、慣用腳或非慣用腳、準備位置寬度時對芭蕾舞旋轉動作的影響是必要的。
目的:比較單圈芭蕾舞向外旋轉的動作控制。此研究的特定目的如下:(1) 探討有經驗芭蕾舞者與初學者的動作控制差異。 (2) 比較慣用腳支撐與非慣用腳支撐執行芭蕾單圈旋轉的差異。 (3) 評估不同準備位置寬度對於單圈旋轉的影響。
方法: 本實驗受測者包括十三位有經驗的女性舞者與十三位初學女性舞者。所有受測者皆執行慣用腳支撐與非慣用腳支撐之單圈向外旋轉,並執行四種不同準備寬度之旋轉(包含自選寬度、0.5倍足長、1.0倍足長、1.5倍足長)。可將整個單圈芭蕾旋轉分成五個時期:準備期、雙腳支撐旋轉期、單腳支撐旋轉前期、單 腳支撐旋轉中期、結束期。本實驗會紀錄雙腳支撐旋轉期的上推力量(push force),以及單腳支撐旋轉中期與結束期時的著地力量(landing force)。本實驗也會計算單腳支撐旋轉前期的旋轉軸與垂直軸之夾角(inclination angle of instantaneous screw axis),和結束期的身體軀幹軸與垂直軸之夾角(trunk inclination angle)。同時,本實驗也會計算旋轉時的角速度(angular velocity)與支撐腳位移量(foot displacement)。
結果: (1) 有經驗舞者比初學舞者有較小的旋轉軸角度、旋轉角速度、和上推力量與著地力量。 (2) 有經驗舞者在慣用腳支撐比非慣用腳支撐旋轉時,有較小的旋轉軸角度和支撐腳位移量;初學舞者則在慣用腳支撐與非慣用腳支撐旋轉時,在旋轉軸角和支撐腳位移量是沒有差異的。 (3) 有經驗舞者在自選準備寬度旋轉時有最小的旋轉軸角度;初學舞者則是在0.5倍足長為準備位置寬度時有最小的支撐腳位移量。
結論: (1) 有經驗舞者在單圈旋轉表現比初學舞者佳。而初學舞者在準備時期會花較久的時間,卻在旋轉期時表現倉促。 (2) 有經驗舞者在慣用腳支撐單圈旋轉時,表現比非慣用腳支撐時好。初學舞者則在慣用腳支撐或非慣用腳支撐執行單圈旋轉表現,沒有顯著性的差異。 (3) 有經驗舞者在自選準備寬度旋轉時表現比其他準備寬度好;而初學舞者則是在0.5倍足長為準備寬度旋轉時表現最好。
Background: Turning, whole body rotation, is a fundamental movement in ballet. Several factors may be influential on the performance of the ballet turns, such as skill levels, leg-dominance, and preparatory distance (the distance between feet in the sagittal plane). To date, few complete motion analysis of ballet turning as well as factors which may affect the performance of ballet turning is reported in the literature. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the influences from skill levels, leg-dominance, and preparatory distances on ballet performance.
Purpose: To evaluate the postural control while performing single-revolution ballet turn with en dehors. The specific aims of the study were: (1) to investigate the postural control between the experienced dancers and novice dancers; (2) to investigate the difference between dominant leg (D) and non-dominant leg (ND) in both E and N groups; and (3) to evaluate the differences among different preparatory distance of turning in both E and N groups.
Methods: Thirteen female experienced dancers and thirteen female novice dancers participated in this study. Participants randomly performed ballet turning with en dehors in both D and ND leg support and four preparatory distances (self-selected (PDss), 0.5-fold of foot length (PD05), 1.0-fold of foot length (PD10), and 1.5-fold of foot length (PD15)). There were five phases in whole turning task: preparatory (PRE), turning with double-leg support (TDS), turning with single-leg support in pre-swing (TSSp), turning with single-leg support in mid-swing (TSSm), and ending (END) phases. The push force of gesture and supporting leg in TDS phase, and landing force in TSSm and END phases were measured. The inclination angle of instantaneous screw axis during TSSp and trunk inclination angle during END phase were calculated. The angular velocity on retire position and foot displacement of supporting leg during whole task were also detected.
Results: The experienced dancers had less inclination angle of instantaneous screw axis, angular velocity, push force and landing force than novice dancers. The experienced dancers also had less inclination angle of instantaneous screw axis and foot displacement with D leg support than that of ND leg support. On the other hand, the novice dancers had no difference in inclination angle of instantaneous screw axis and foot displacement between D and ND leg supports. The experienced dancers had smallest inclination angle of instantaneous screw axis in PDss compared to other preparatory distances. In addition, the novice dancers had smallest foot displacement in PD05 compared to other preparatory distances.
Conclusions: The experienced dancers had better performance than novice dancers. The novice group had longer duration in preparatory phase but shorter duration in turning phase. The experienced dancers had better ability in turning with D leg support, whereas the novice dancers had no preference of performance in turning for any side of leg. The experienced dancers had best performance with self-selected preparatory distance, whereas the novice dancers had best performance with 0.5-fold of foot length of preparatory distance.
1. Gordon, A., Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on the Passé Movement in Elite Dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 2002. 6(4): p. 111.
2. Vetter, R.E. and M.L. Symonds, Correlations between injury, training intensity, and physical and mental exhaustion among college athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 2010. 24(3): p. 587-96.
3. Kushner, S., et al., Relationship of turnout to hip abduction in professional ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med, 1990. 18(3): p. 286-91.
4. Coplan, J.A., Ballet dancer's turnout and its relationship to self-reported injury. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2002. 32(11): p. 579-84.
5. Negus, V., D. Hopper, and N.K. Briffa, Associations between turnout and lower extremity injuries in classical ballet dancers. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2005. 35(5): p. 307-18.
6. Kirstein, L. and M. Stuart, The Classic Ballet- basic technique and terminology. 2004, New York.
7. Motta-Valencia, K., Dance-Related Injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2006. 17: p. 697–723.
8. Laws, K., An analysis of turns in dance. Dance Research Journal, 1978. 11(1): p. 12-19.
9. Laws, K., Physics and the art of dance : understanding movement. 2002, Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. xix, 236 p.
10. Laws, K., Physics and the Art of Dance. 2002, New York.
11. Mouchnino, L., et al., Coordination between equilibrium and head-trunk orientation during leg movement: a new strategy build up by training. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1992. 67(6): p. 1587.
12. Owen, V. and J. Whiting, The physics of some dance movements. Physics Education, 1989. 24: p. 128-132.
13. Sugano, A. and K. Laws, Physical analysis as a foundation for pirouette training. Science & Medicine, 2002. 17(1): p. 29.
14. Golomer, E., et al., Spontaneous whole body rotations and classical dance expertise: How shoulder–hip coordination influences supporting leg displacements. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2009. 19(2): p. 314-321.
15. Bouillette, A., E. Golomer, and J. Keller, Coordination of pelvic and scapular girdles in performing a pirouette.
16. Lyon, I.N. and B.L. Day, Control of frontal plane body motion in human stepping. Exp Brain Res, 1997. 115(2): p. 345-56.
17. Hiller, C., K. Refshauge, and D. Beard, Sensorimotor control is impaired in dancers with functional ankle instability. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004. 32(1): p. 216.
18. McKeon, P.O. and J. Hertel, Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part I: can deficits be detected with instrumented testing. J Athl Train, 2008. 43(3): p. 293-304.
19. Catena, R.D., P. van Donkelaar, and L.S. Chou, Different gait tasks distinguish immediate vs. long-term effects of concussion on balance control. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2009. 6: p. 25.
20. Winter, D.A., Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2005, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21. Hahn, M.E. and L.S. Chou, Age-related reduction in sagittal plane center of mass motion during obstacle crossing. J Biomech, 2004. 37(6): p. 837-44.
22. Lee, H.J. and L.S. Chou, Balance control during stair negotiation in older adults. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007. 40(11): p. 2530-6.
23. Chen, C.J. and L.S. Chou, Center of mass position relative to the ankle during walking: a clinically feasible detection method for gait imbalance. Gait & posture, 2010. 31(3): p. 391-3.
24. Lee, H.J. and L.S. Chou, Detection of gait instability using the center of mass and center of pressure inclination angles. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2006. 87(4): p. 569-75.
25. Mandeville, D., L.R. Osternig, and L.S. Chou, The effect of total knee replacement surgery on gait stability. Gait Posture, 2008. 27(1): p. 103-9.
26. Amblard, B., et al., Voluntary head stabilization in space during oscillatory trunk movements in the frontal plane performed in weightlessness. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale, 1997. 114(2): p. 214-25.
27. Mesure, S., et al., Strategies of segmental stabilization during gait in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res, 1999. 129(4): p. 573-81.
28. Sveistrup, H., et al., Head, arm and trunk coordination during reaching in children. Exp Brain Res, 2008. 188(2): p. 237-47.
29. Isableu, B., et al., Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control. Exp Brain Res, 2003. 150(2): p. 208-21.
30. Chatfield, S., et al., A descriptive analysis of kinematic and electromyographic relationships of the core during forward stepping in beginning and expert dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 2007. 11(3): p. 76.
31. Golomer, E.M., R.M. Gravenhorst, and Y. Toussaint, Influence of vision and motor imagery styles on equilibrium control during whole-body rotations. Somatosens Mot Res, 2009. 26(4): p. 105-10.
32. Golomer, E., et al., Effects of Mental Imagery Styles on Shoulder and Hip Rotations During Preparation of Pirouettes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2008. 40(4): p. 281-290.
33. Payne, G. and D. Issacs, Human Motor Development: A Lifespan Approach (6th ed). 2005, New York: McGraw Hill.
34. Kimmerle, M., Lateral bias, functional asymmetry, dance training and dance injuries. J Dance Med Sci., 2010. 14(2): p. 58-66.
35. Laws, K., Physics and the Potential for Dance Injury. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 1986. 1(3): p. 73-79.
36. Wright, I.C., et al., The influence of foot positioning on ankle sprains. J Biomech, 2000. 33(5): p. 513-9.
37. Norkin, C.C. and D.J. White, Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 2009: F a Davis Co.
38. Bennell, K., et al., Hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in young female ballet dancersand controls. British Medical Journal, 1999. 33(5): p. 340.
39. Hui, S.S. and P.Y. Yuen, Validity of the modified back-saver sit-and-reach test: a comparison with other protocols. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2000. 32(9): p. 1655-9.
40. Hamilton, D., et al., Dance training intensity at 11-14 years is associated with femoral torsion in classical ballet dancers. Br J Sports Med, 2006. 40(4): p. 299-303; discussion 303.
41. Aguinaldo, A.L. and H. Chambers, Correlation of throwing mechanics with elbow valgus load in adult baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2009. 37(10): p. 2043-8.
42. Sommer, H., Determination of First and Second Order Instant Screw Parameters from Landmark Trajectories. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1992. 114: p. 274-281.
43. Zatsiorsky, V.M., Kinetics of human motion. 2002: Human Kinetics.
44. Weiss, D.S., t.A. Ris, and G. Grossman, When Can I Start Pointe Work? Guidelines for Initiating Pointe Training. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 2009. 13: p. 90-92.
45. Hamilton, D., et al., Dance training intensity at 11-14 years is associated with femoral torsion in classical ballet dancers. British journal of sports medicine, 2006. 40(4): p. 299-303; discussion 303.
46. Bennell, K., et al., Hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in young female ballet dancers and controls. British journal of sports medicine, 1999. 33(5): p. 340-6.
47. Khan, K., et al., Hip and ankle range of motion in elite classical ballet dancers and controls. Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, 1997. 7(3): p. 174-9.
48. Gilbert, C.B., M.T. Gross, and K.B. Klug, Relationship between hip external rotation and turnout angle for the five classical ballet positions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1998. 27(5): p. 339-47.
49. Steinberg, N., et al., Range of joint movement in female dancers and nondancers aged 8 to 16 years: Anatomical and clinical implications. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006. 34(5): p. 814.
50. Bennell, K.L., et al., Changes in hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in 8-11 year old novice female ballet dancers and controls: a 12 month follow up study. British journal of sports medicine, 2001. 35(1): p. 54-9.
51. Kong, P.W. and S.F. Burns, Bilateral difference in hamstrings to quadriceps ratio in healthy males and females. Physical Therapy in Sport 2010. 11: p. 12-17.
52. Dickstein, R. and J.E. Deutsch, Motor Imagery in Physical Therapist Practice. Physical Therapy, 2007. 87(7): p. 942-953.
53. Lin, C.F., et al., Comparison of postural stability between injured and uninjured ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med, 2011. 39(6): p. 1324-31.
54. Bruyneel, A.V., et al., Organization of postural equilibrium in several planes in ballet dancers. Neuroscience letters, 2010. 485(3): p. 228-32.
55. Bronner, S. and S. Ojofeitimi, Gender and limb differences in healthy elite dancers: passe kinematics. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2006. 38(1): p. 71-9.
56. McMillan, M., A cinematographic analysis of characteristic likenesses and differences between skilled, semi-skilled, and non-skilled performances of pirouettes [master's thesis]. in Texas Women's university. 1972: Denton.
57. Kulig, K., A.L. Fietzer, and J.M. Popovich, Jr., Ground reaction forces and knee mechanics in the weight acceptance phase of a dance leap take-off and landing. Journal of sports sciences, 2011. 29(2): p. 125-31.
58. Meglin, J. and M. Woollacoot, The neural choreography underlying a pirouette arabesque. Kinesiol Med Dance, 1992. 14: p. 95-105.
59. Pedotti, A., et al., Postural synergies in axial movements: short and long-term adaptation. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale, 1989. 74(1): p. 3-10.
60. Imura, A. and M.R. Yeadon, Mechanics of the Fouette turn. Human movement science, 2010. 29(6): p. 947-55.
61. Golomer, E., et al., The influence of classical dance training on preferred supporting leg and whole body turning bias. Laterality, 2009. 14(2): p. 165-77.
62. Amblard, B., et al., Voluntary head stabilisation in space during oscillatory trunk movements in the frontal plane performed before, during and after a prolonged period of weightlessness. Exp Brain Res, 2001. 137(2): p. 170-9.
63. Kirstein, L. and M. Stuart, The Classic Baallet- basic technique and teminology. 2004, ALFRED A. KNOPE: New York.
64. Demura, S., et al., Lateral dominance of legs in maximal muscle power, muscular endurance, and grading ability. Perceptual and motor skills, 2001. 93(1): p. 11-23.
65. Capranica, L., et al., Force and power of preferred and non-preferred leg in young soccer players. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 1992. 32(4): p. 358-63.
66. Yiou, E., C. Schneider, and D. Roussel, Coordination of rapid stepping with arm pointing: anticipatory changes and step adaptation. Human movement science, 2007. 26(3): p. 357-75.
67. Clifford, A.M. and H. Holder-Powell, Postural control in healthy individuals. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2010. 25(6): p. 546-51.
68. Lanshammar, K. and E.L. Ribom, Differences in muscle strength in dominant and non-dominant leg in females aged 20-39 years--a population-based study. Phys Ther Sport, 2011. 12(2): p. 76-9.
69. Ricotti, L. and A. Ravaschio, Break dance significantly increases static balance in 9 years-old soccer players. Gait & posture, 2011. 33(3): p. 462-5.
70. Farrar-Baker, A. and V. Wilmerding, Prevalence of Lateral Bias in the Teaching of Beginning and Advanced Ballet Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 2006. 10(4): p. 81-84.
校內:2016-09-02公開