| 研究生: |
林柏勳 Lin, Po-Hsun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
後設組織中協作與社會資產: 結合或橋接? The Collaboration and Social Capital in Meta-Organizations: Bonding or Bridging? |
| 指導教授: |
許經明
Shiu, Jing-Ming |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 31 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 後設組織 、標準制定組織 、隨機導向參與者模型 、社會資產 、電信 、3GPP |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Meta-Organizations, Standard-Setting Organizations, Stochastic Actor-Based Model, Social Capital, Telecommunications, 3GPP |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:83 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
公司如何與其他公司合作以實現其在後設組織中的策略目標?協作有助於企業獲得外部資源以及促進溝通,同時也增加了知識溢出的風險,但這些風險可以通過正式的合約來降低。然而,後設組織,如標準制定組織,缺乏正式的合約,這意味著公司往往依賴社會資本來抵消交易成本和機會主義。本文應用社會資本理論來解釋 3GPP(第三代合作夥伴計劃)(主要的國際行動通訊標準制定組織)的後設組織環境中企業間協作的演變。本文基於隨機導向參與者模型和從 3G 到 4G 時代的綜合協作數據集來檢查 3GPP 中的協作機制。我們發現,公司更有可能根據社會資本的“結合”觀點而不是“橋接”觀點來選擇合作夥伴公司。本文推進了對後設組織內部協作機制的研究,同時也對社會資本理論做出了貢獻,強調了在沒有正式合同的情況下社會資本中結合觀點的重要性。
How do firms collaborate with other firms to achieve their strategic goals in meta-organizations? Collaboration helps firms to obtain external resources while also stimulating communication. It also increases risks of knowledge spillovers, but these risks can be reduced through formal contracting. However, meta-organizations, like standard-setting organizations, lack formal contracts, meaning that firms often rely on social capital to offset transaction costs and opportunism. This paper applies social capital theory to explain the evolution of interfirm collaboration in the meta-organizational environment of 3GPP (Third Generational Partnership Project), the primary international mobile telecommunications standard-setting organization. It applies a stochastic actor-based model and a comprehensive collaboration dataset from the 3G to 4G eras to examine the mechanism of collaboration in 3GPP. We find that firms are more likely to choose partner firms based on the 'bonding' view of social capital, rather than the 'bridging' view. The paper advances research on collaboration mechanism within meta-organization, while also contributing to social capital theory in emphasizing the importance of the bonding view of social capital under conditions when no formal contracts are available.
3GPP. (2017). 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Technical Specification Group working methods (Release 14). Technical Report 21.900 v14.0.0.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 429-449.
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Alaa, A. M., Ahuja, K., & van der Schaar, M. (2017). A micro-foundation of social capital in evolving social networks. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 5(1), 14-31.
Amrit, C., & Van Hillegersberg, J. (2010). Exploring the impact of soclo-technlcal core-periphery structures in open source software development. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 216-229.
Berardo, R. (2014). The evolution of self-organizing communication networks in high-risk social-ecological systems. International Journal of the Commons, 8(1), 236-258.
Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self‐organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 632-649.
Berkowitz, H., Brunsson, N., Grothe-Hammer, M., Sundberg, M., & Valiorgue, B. (2022). Meta-organizations: A clarification and a way forward. Management, 25, 1-9.
Berkowitz, H., Crowder, L. B., & Brooks, C. M. (2020). Organizational perspectives on oceans governance: Meta-organizations and cross-sectoral collective action. Marine Policy, 118, 104026.
Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends o f friends: Networks, manipulators and coalitions. Basil Blackwell.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195-220.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999-1023.
Burt, R. (1992). Structure holes. The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (2007). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
Carmagnac, L., & Carbone, V. (2019). Making supply networks more sustainable ‘together’: The role of meta-organisations. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 20(1), 56–67.
Chen, H. L., Ho, M. H. C., & Hsu, W. T. (2013). Does board social capital influence chief executive officers' investment decisions in research and development? R&D Management, 43(4), 381-393.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business School Press.
Claridge, T. (2018). Functions of social capital–bonding, bridging, linking. Social Capital Research, 20, 1-7.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Conaldi, G., Lomi, A., & Tonellato, M. (2012). Dynamic models of affiliation and the network structure of problem solving in an open source software project. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 385-412.
Dahlander, L., & O'Mahony, S. (2011). Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organization Science, 22(4), 961-979.
Daniel, S., & Stewart, K. (2016). Open source project success: Resource access, flow, and integration. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(3), 159-176.
Davies, A., & Brady, T. (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 931-953.
Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2010). Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organization Science, 21(3), 677-695.
Dong, J. Q., & Götz, S. J. (2021). Project leaders as boundary spanners in open source software development: A resource dependence perspective. Information Systems Journal, 31(5), 672-694.
Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., & Hesterly, W. S. (2018). The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3140-3162.
Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165-180.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
Funk, J. L. (2002). Global competition between and within standards: the case of mobile phones. Springer.
Funk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. (2001). Market-and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication. Research Policy, 30(4), 589-610.
Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation (Vol. 5). Harvard Business School Press.
Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2006). Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science, 52(7), 1043-1056.
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652.
Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571-586.
Hahn, J., Moon, J. Y., & Zhang, C. (2008). Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 369-391.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Henry, A. D., Lubell, M., & McCoy, M. (2011). Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 419-444.
Jones, S. L., Leiponen, A., & Vasudeva, G. (2021). The evolution of cooperation in the face of conflict: Evidence from the innovation ecosystem for mobile telecom standards development. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 710-740.
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217-237.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867-891.
Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 87-108.
Knoke, D. (1999). Organizational networks and corporate social capital. In R. T. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 17-42). Kluwer.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action. (pp. 216-239). Harvard Business School Press.
Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16(1), 183-210.
Lee, Y., Lee, I. W., & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration networks in economic development policy: An exponential random graph model analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 547-573.
Leiponen, A. E. (2008). Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Science, 54(11), 1904-1919.
Macy, M. W., & Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 143-166.
Mockus, A., Fielding, R. T., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2002). Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 11(3), 309-346.
Moon, J. Y., & Sproull, L. (2002). Essence of distributed work: The case of the Linux kernel. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work: New research on working across distance using technology (pp. 381-404). MIT Press.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nicholson, G. J., Alexander, M., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(1), 54-72.
O'Mahony, S., & Karp, R. (2022). From proprietary to collective governance: How do platform participation strategies evolve? Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 530-562.
O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32(7), 1179-1198.
O’Mahony, S. (2007). The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed? Journal of Management & Governance, 11(2), 139-150.
O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079-1106.
Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2016). When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 724-741.
Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13(4).
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z. f., Vo ̈r ̈os, A. a., & Preciado, P. (2022). Manual for RSiena. University of Groningen: Department of Sociology. Retrieved 1/5 from https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/RSiena_Manual.pdf
Robison, L. J., Schmid, A. A., & Siles, M. E. (2002). Is social capital really capital? Review of Social Economy, 60(1), 1-21.
Rosenkopf, L., Metiu, A., & George, V. P. (2001). From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 748-772.
Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2008). Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Science, 54(11), 1920-1934.
Schaarschmidt, M., Walsh, G., & von Kortzfleisch, H. F. (2015). How do firms influence open source software communities? A framework and empirical analysis of different governance modes. Information and Organization, 25(2), 99-114.
Simcoe, T. (2006). Delays and de jure standards: What caused the slowdown in internet standards development. In S. Greenstein & V. Stango (Eds.), Standards and public policy (pp. 260-295). Cambridge University Press.
Simcoe, T. (2012). Standard setting committees: Consensus governance for shared technology platforms. American Economic Review, 102(1), 305-336.
Snijders, T. A., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44-60.
Stewart, D. (2005). Social status in an open-source community. American Sociological Review, 70(5), 823-842.
Stewart, K. J., Ammeter, A. P., & Maruping, L. M. (2006). Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 126-144.
Susarla, A., Holzhacker, M., & Krishnan, R. (2020). Calculative trust and interfirm contracts. Management Science, 66(11), 5465-5484.
Van de Bunt, G. G., & Groenewegen, P. (2007). An actor-oriented dynamic network approach: The case of interorganizational network evolution. Organizational Research Methods, 10(3), 463-482.
Van Staveren, I., & Knorringa, P. (2007). Unpacking social capital in economic development: How social relations matter. Review of Social Economy, 65(1), 107-135.
Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp. Psychometrika, 61(3), 401-425.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1, Part 2), 453-486.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225-249.
Xia, M., Zhao, K., & Mahoney, J. T. (2012). Enhancing value via cooperation: Firms’ process benefits from participation in a standard consortium. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 699-729.
校內:2026-09-30公開