簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉淳毅
Liu, Chun-Yi
論文名稱: 環境、社會、治理表現對台灣石化產業財務績效之影響
The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on the Financial Performance of Taiwan's Petrochemical Industry
指導教授: 蔡欣怡
Tsai, Hsin-Yi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 交通管理科學系
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: ESGTCRI石化產業財務績效
外文關鍵詞: ESG, TCRI, petrochemical industry, financial performance
相關次數: 點閱:53下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討整體ESG績效及其三大構面(環境ENV、社會SOC、治理GOV)對台灣上市櫃石化產業財務績效之影響,並納入相關財務變數進行實證分析。研究先透過敘述統計檢驗資料分佈情形,經Shapiro-Wilk檢定顯示所有變數均不具常態性,無多重共線性問題。後續以最小平方法(OLS)進行線性迴歸分析,探討ESG對TCRI (台灣企業信用風險指標)、EPS(每股盈餘)、ROE(股東權益報酬率)與ROA(資產報酬率)之影響。
    實證結果顯示,在信用評等方面,整體ESG績效及ENV與GOV構面皆與TCRI呈負向顯著關係,顯示ESG實踐有助於降低信用風險。再者,EPS模型中,整體ESG績效呈臨界顯著,而GOV構面則呈正向顯著,反映公司治理能正面影響盈餘表現。接著在ROE方面,整體ESG績效與SOC、GOV構面皆呈正向顯著,顯示ESG揭露有助於提高股東報酬。最後,在ROA模型中,整體ESG績效與GOV構面亦呈正向顯著關聯,顯示ESG實踐能強化產業透明度並吸引長期投資者,進而提升整體資產報酬率。綜上所述,ESG整體表現及其構面對石化產業多項財務指標皆具有顯著影響,顯示推動ESG有助於提升企業財務穩健性與永續競爭力。

    This study aims to investigate the impact of overall ESG performance and its three main dimensions—Environmental (ENV), Social (SOC), and Governance (GOV)—on the financial performance of publicly listed petrochemical companies in Taiwan. Relevant financial variables are also included in the empirical analysis. Descriptive statistics were first employed to examine data distribution, and the Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that all variables were non-normally distributed. No multicollinearity issues were detected. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression analysis was then conducted to explore the effects of ESG on TCRI (Taiwan Corporate Credit Risk Index), EPS (Earnings Per Share), ROE (Return on Equity), and ROA (Return on Assets).The empirical results show that, with regard to credit ratings, overall ESG performance as well as the ENV and GOV dimensions are significantly negatively associated with TCRI, suggesting that ESG practices help reduce credit risk. In the EPS model, overall ESG performance is marginally significant, while the GOV dimension exhibits a significantly positive relationship, indicating that corporate governance can positively influence earnings performance. Regarding ROE, both overall ESG performance and the SOC and GOV dimensions show a strong positive correlation, implying that ESG disclosures contribute to enhancing shareholder returns. Finally, in the ROA model, both overall ESG performance and the GOV dimension are also significantly positively associated, suggesting that ESG practices enhance industry transparency, attract long-term investors, and ultimately improve asset returns.In conclusion, overall ESG performance and its individual dimensions significantly affect various financial indicators in the petrochemical industry, demonstrating that the promotion of ESG contributes to improved financial stability and sustainable competitiveness of enterprises.

    第一章、緒論1 第一節 研究背景1 第二節 研究動機與目的5 第三節 研究架構8 第二章、文獻探討9 第一節、社會企業責任 (CSR)9 第二節、環境、社會及治理 (ESG) 定義與評量方法11 第三節、ESG對財務績效影響之實證15 一、台灣企業信用風險指標TCRI (Taiwan Corporate Credit Risk Index)18 二、每股盈餘 (Earnings per share,EPS)21 三、營運績效 (Return on Equity, ROE、Return on Assets, ROA)23 第四節、探討石化產業與ESG永續發展實證文獻25 第五節、台灣石化業施行ESG近況28 一、台灣石化業近況概述:實質GDP的貢獻28 二、台灣石化業淨零減碳:碳排狀況暨法規面31 三、台灣石化業減碳挑戰:產業與政策的拉鋸戰36 四、以台灣石化業源頭-台灣中油股份公司及台塑石化股份有限公司談低碳轉型與ESG施行39 五、石化業轉型與調適的關鍵時刻43 第六節、小結50 第三章、研究方法52 第一節、研究假設52 第二節、研究樣本與資料來源54 一、研究樣本54 二、資料收集與分析方法55 第三節、研究模型57 一、台灣企業信用風險指標TCRI58 二、每股盈餘59 三、營運績效60 四、變數衡量62 第四章、實證分析67 第一節、基本資料分析67 一、敘述性統計 Descriptive Statistics67 二、異質變異檢定Breusch-Pagan (BP) Test70 三、Hausman檢定71 第二節、變數相關性分析72 第三節、八大模型迴歸分析74 模型一:TCRI信用評等線性迴歸-總體ESG績效(TESG)74 模型二:TCRI信用評等線性迴歸- ESG三大支柱績效(E、S、G)76 模型三:每股盈餘線性迴歸-總體ESG績效(TESG)78 模型四:每股盈餘線性迴歸- ESG三大支柱績效(E、S、G)80 模型五:股東權益報酬率線性迴歸-總體ESG績效(TESG)82 模型六:股東權益線性迴歸- ESG三大支柱績效(E、S、G)84 模型七:資產報酬率線性迴歸-總體ESG績效(TESG)86 模型八:資產報酬率線性迴歸- ESG三大支柱績效(E、S、G)88 第五章、結論與建議91 第一節、研究結論91 第二節、研究建議93 第三節、研究限制與後續研究建議95 參考文獻96

    Amiraslani, H., Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2023). Trust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(2), 421-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09646-0
    Aybars, A., Ataünal, L., & Gürbüz, A. (2018). ESG and Financial Performance: Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues on Corporate Performance. In (pp. 520-536). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7180-3.ch029
    Bai, X., Han, J., Ma, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022). ESG performance, institutional investors’ preference and financing constraints: Empirical evidence from China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S157-S168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.013
    Black, F. (1972). Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing. The Journal of Business, 45(3), 444-455. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351499
    Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper & Row.
    Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2014). Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-hill.
    Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. O. U. Press.
    Buchanan, B., Cao, C. X., & Chen, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 73-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.07.004
    Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
    Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
    Dickie, G. (2024). World recorded hottest day on July 21, monitor says. T. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/world-registers-hottest-day-ever-recorded-july-21-monitor-says-2024-07-23/
    Ding, A., Daugaard, D., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2020). The future trajectory for environmental finance: planetary boundaries and environmental, social and governance analysis. Accounting & Finance, 60(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12599
    Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter, G., & Nguyen, M. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility – An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450-466. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.31
    Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical? Marketing Science, 18(4), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.4.547
    Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
    Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2017). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
    Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1607-9
    García-Martínez, G., Guijarro, F., & Poyatos, J. (2017). Measuring the social responsibility of European companies: A goal programming approach. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12438
    Geltner, D., & Miller, N. (2007). Commercial Real Estate Analysis and Investments.
    Global, U. (2004). Who Cares Wins Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. UN Global Compact.
    GRI. (1997). Our mission and history. https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/mission-history/
    Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business &amp Society, 36, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600102
    Hanson, D. (2013). ESG Investing in Graham & Doddsville. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 25(3), 20-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12024
    He, Y. (2023). ESG Ratings and Corporate Value. SHS Web of Conferences, 169. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901058
    IKEA. (2023). IKEA Sustainability Report FY23. IKEA.
    Khan, M. (2019). Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns around the World. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
    Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
    Kumar, P. (2017). Impact of earning per share and price earnings ratio on market price of share: a study on auto sector in India. International Journal of Research, 5(2), 113-118.
    Lang, L. H. P., Stulz, R., & Walkling, R. A. (1989). Managerial performance, Tobin's Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 137-154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90075-5
    Lantos, G. (2001). The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595-630. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281
    Lee, K.-H., Cin, B., & Lee, E. (2014). Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1855
    Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663.
    LI, Y.-Z. (2024). 2024年第二季我國石化產業回顧與展望. 工研院產科國際所.
    Lo, K. Y., & Kwan, C. L. (2017). The Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance and Sustainability Initiatives on Stock Value – Examining Market Response to Initiatives Undertaken by Listed Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 606-619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1431
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3
    Merkley, K. J. (2014). Narrative disclosure and earnings performance: Evidence from R&D disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 725-757.
    Minutolo, M., Kristjanpoller, W., & Stakeley, J. (2019). Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303
    Naimy, V., El Khoury, R., & Iskandar, S. (2021). ESG Versus Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from East Asian Firms in the Industrials Sector. Studies of Applied Economics, 39. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i3.4457
    Patell, J. M. (1976). Corporate Forecasts of Earnings Per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Test. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 246-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490543
    Peters, R., & Mullen, M. R. (2009). Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance.
    Pinney, C., Lawrence, S., & Lau, S. (2019). Sustainability and Capital Markets—Are We There Yet? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12350
    Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are Socially Responsible Managers Really Ethical? Exploring the Relationship Between Earnings Management and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160-177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00678.x
    Saxena, A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Shaik, V. A., Twala, B., Singh, A., Montero, E., & Priyadarshi, N. (2022). Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape. Sustainability, 15, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010309
    Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
    Shen, H., Lin, H., Han, W., & Wu, H. (2023). ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4), 100325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325
    Starbucks. (2024). Starbucks Announces 6,000 Greener Stores Worldwide https://about.starbucks.com/press/2024/starbucks-announces-6000-greener-stores-worldwide/
    Verheyden, T., Eccles, R. G., and Feiner, A. . (2016). ESG for all? The impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. . Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 47-55.
    WBCSD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility : making good business sense. W. B. C. f. S. Development. https://search.worldcat.org/zh-tw/title/Corporate-social-responsibility-:-making-good-business-sense/oclc/53238304
    Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089
    工業技術研究院. (2024). 工業技術與資訊月刊. 工業技術研究院.
    天下雜誌. (2022). 2022年ESG策略問卷調查:台灣中小企業與ESG商機的距離. https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/42912
    王俐覃. (2024). 企業 ESG 表現對信用評級之影響 國立中山大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 高雄市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2kn536
    王詮富. (2012). 信用評等與違約率之回顧 -- 以TCRI 為例 國立臺灣大學]. https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2012.03094
    王禎輿. (2019). 碳排放與企業績效之關聯性-石化產業CSR實證分析 國立中央大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4n8e88
    台灣區石油化學工業同業公會. (1982). 石化工業 (Vol. 4).
    吳幸蓁, & 廖蕙儀. (2017). 自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果 [The Determinants and Consequences of Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure]. 中山管理評論, 25(1), 13-62. https://doi.org/10.6160/2017.03.01
    李秀英, 劉俊儒, & 楊筱翎. (2011). 企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性 [Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance]. 東海管理評論, 13(1), 77-111. https://doi.org/10.29724/tmr.201108.0003
    林欣怡. (2021). 企業環境永續資訊揭露程度與績效關聯性之研究 –以上市水泥石化業為例 東吳大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/72y237
    孫維伯. (2024). ESG評級分歧與股價報酬 國立中山大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 高雄市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2n4grm
    國立政治大學商學院信義書院. (2024). 2024台灣企業ESG調查報告書. 國立政治大學商學院信義書院.
    國立臺灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心. (2022). 從2050淨零排放路徑凝聚臺灣世代新共識. https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/en-trans/1695
    張志強. (2024). 原油製造化學品現況與趨勢. https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/industrytech/IndustryTech.aspx?menu_id=13545&it_id=547
    張幸惠. (2018). 企業社會責任與企業價值-以台灣就業99指數為例 [Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Evidence from Taiwan Employment 99 Index]. 評價學報(12), 31-56.
    曾繁鑫. (2014). 政府推動石化產業高值化政策-個案公司之應對策略 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70988
    黃正忠, 林泉興, & 帥文欣. (2020). 責任投資標的篩選面面觀. 會計研究月刊(412), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.6650/ARM.202003_(412).0016
    楊詠荏. (2021). 考量碳排放下台灣石化業者的經營效率 國立陽明交通大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新竹市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4kvy26
    葉柏均. (2024). ESG評分與信用風險之間的關聯 東吳大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z263z5
    蔡偉銑. (1997). 台灣石化工業發展過程的政治經濟分析. 東吳政治學報》,(8), 頁, 157-224.
    薛化元, 張., 陳家豪, 許志成. (2017). 台灣石化業發展史. 現代財經基金會.
    簡立忠. (2024). 國際ESG評鑑介紹及我國ESG評鑑發展. 會計研究月刊(459), 75-81. Article/Detail?docID=P20160621002-N202402060004-00012
    金融監督管理委員會.(2023). 金管會發布「上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案(2023年)」https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202303280001&dtable=News
    工業技術研究院. (2024). 工業技術與資訊月刊. 工業技術研究院.
    國立政治大學商學院信義書院. (2024). 2024台灣企業ESG調查報告書. 國立政治大學商學院信義書院.
    張志強 (2024). 原油製造化學品現況與趨勢. https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/industrytech/IndustryTech.aspx?menu_id=13545&it_id=547

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE