| 研究生: |
劉淳毅 Liu, Chun-Yi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
環境、社會、治理表現對台灣石化產業財務績效之影響 The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on the Financial Performance of Taiwan's Petrochemical Industry |
| 指導教授: |
蔡欣怡
Tsai, Hsin-Yi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 交通管理科學系 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 115 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | ESG 、TCRI 、石化產業 、財務績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | ESG, TCRI, petrochemical industry, financial performance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:53 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討整體ESG績效及其三大構面(環境ENV、社會SOC、治理GOV)對台灣上市櫃石化產業財務績效之影響,並納入相關財務變數進行實證分析。研究先透過敘述統計檢驗資料分佈情形,經Shapiro-Wilk檢定顯示所有變數均不具常態性,無多重共線性問題。後續以最小平方法(OLS)進行線性迴歸分析,探討ESG對TCRI (台灣企業信用風險指標)、EPS(每股盈餘)、ROE(股東權益報酬率)與ROA(資產報酬率)之影響。
實證結果顯示,在信用評等方面,整體ESG績效及ENV與GOV構面皆與TCRI呈負向顯著關係,顯示ESG實踐有助於降低信用風險。再者,EPS模型中,整體ESG績效呈臨界顯著,而GOV構面則呈正向顯著,反映公司治理能正面影響盈餘表現。接著在ROE方面,整體ESG績效與SOC、GOV構面皆呈正向顯著,顯示ESG揭露有助於提高股東報酬。最後,在ROA模型中,整體ESG績效與GOV構面亦呈正向顯著關聯,顯示ESG實踐能強化產業透明度並吸引長期投資者,進而提升整體資產報酬率。綜上所述,ESG整體表現及其構面對石化產業多項財務指標皆具有顯著影響,顯示推動ESG有助於提升企業財務穩健性與永續競爭力。
This study aims to investigate the impact of overall ESG performance and its three main dimensions—Environmental (ENV), Social (SOC), and Governance (GOV)—on the financial performance of publicly listed petrochemical companies in Taiwan. Relevant financial variables are also included in the empirical analysis. Descriptive statistics were first employed to examine data distribution, and the Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that all variables were non-normally distributed. No multicollinearity issues were detected. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression analysis was then conducted to explore the effects of ESG on TCRI (Taiwan Corporate Credit Risk Index), EPS (Earnings Per Share), ROE (Return on Equity), and ROA (Return on Assets).The empirical results show that, with regard to credit ratings, overall ESG performance as well as the ENV and GOV dimensions are significantly negatively associated with TCRI, suggesting that ESG practices help reduce credit risk. In the EPS model, overall ESG performance is marginally significant, while the GOV dimension exhibits a significantly positive relationship, indicating that corporate governance can positively influence earnings performance. Regarding ROE, both overall ESG performance and the SOC and GOV dimensions show a strong positive correlation, implying that ESG disclosures contribute to enhancing shareholder returns. Finally, in the ROA model, both overall ESG performance and the GOV dimension are also significantly positively associated, suggesting that ESG practices enhance industry transparency, attract long-term investors, and ultimately improve asset returns.In conclusion, overall ESG performance and its individual dimensions significantly affect various financial indicators in the petrochemical industry, demonstrating that the promotion of ESG contributes to improved financial stability and sustainable competitiveness of enterprises.
Amiraslani, H., Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2023). Trust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(2), 421-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09646-0
Aybars, A., Ataünal, L., & Gürbüz, A. (2018). ESG and Financial Performance: Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues on Corporate Performance. In (pp. 520-536). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7180-3.ch029
Bai, X., Han, J., Ma, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022). ESG performance, institutional investors’ preference and financing constraints: Empirical evidence from China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S157-S168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.013
Black, F. (1972). Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing. The Journal of Business, 45(3), 444-455. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351499
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper & Row.
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2014). Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-hill.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. O. U. Press.
Buchanan, B., Cao, C. X., & Chen, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 73-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.07.004
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
Dickie, G. (2024). World recorded hottest day on July 21, monitor says. T. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/world-registers-hottest-day-ever-recorded-july-21-monitor-says-2024-07-23/
Ding, A., Daugaard, D., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2020). The future trajectory for environmental finance: planetary boundaries and environmental, social and governance analysis. Accounting & Finance, 60(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12599
Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter, G., & Nguyen, M. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility – An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450-466. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.31
Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical? Marketing Science, 18(4), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.4.547
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2017). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1607-9
García-Martínez, G., Guijarro, F., & Poyatos, J. (2017). Measuring the social responsibility of European companies: A goal programming approach. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12438
Geltner, D., & Miller, N. (2007). Commercial Real Estate Analysis and Investments.
Global, U. (2004). Who Cares Wins Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. UN Global Compact.
GRI. (1997). Our mission and history. https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/mission-history/
Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600102
Hanson, D. (2013). ESG Investing in Graham & Doddsville. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 25(3), 20-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12024
He, Y. (2023). ESG Ratings and Corporate Value. SHS Web of Conferences, 169. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901058
IKEA. (2023). IKEA Sustainability Report FY23. IKEA.
Khan, M. (2019). Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns around the World. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
Kumar, P. (2017). Impact of earning per share and price earnings ratio on market price of share: a study on auto sector in India. International Journal of Research, 5(2), 113-118.
Lang, L. H. P., Stulz, R., & Walkling, R. A. (1989). Managerial performance, Tobin's Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 137-154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90075-5
Lantos, G. (2001). The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595-630. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281
Lee, K.-H., Cin, B., & Lee, E. (2014). Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1855
Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663.
LI, Y.-Z. (2024). 2024年第二季我國石化產業回顧與展望. 工研院產科國際所.
Lo, K. Y., & Kwan, C. L. (2017). The Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance and Sustainability Initiatives on Stock Value – Examining Market Response to Initiatives Undertaken by Listed Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 606-619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1431
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3
Merkley, K. J. (2014). Narrative disclosure and earnings performance: Evidence from R&D disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 725-757.
Minutolo, M., Kristjanpoller, W., & Stakeley, J. (2019). Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303
Naimy, V., El Khoury, R., & Iskandar, S. (2021). ESG Versus Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from East Asian Firms in the Industrials Sector. Studies of Applied Economics, 39. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i3.4457
Patell, J. M. (1976). Corporate Forecasts of Earnings Per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Test. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 246-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490543
Peters, R., & Mullen, M. R. (2009). Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance.
Pinney, C., Lawrence, S., & Lau, S. (2019). Sustainability and Capital Markets—Are We There Yet? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12350
Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are Socially Responsible Managers Really Ethical? Exploring the Relationship Between Earnings Management and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160-177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00678.x
Saxena, A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Shaik, V. A., Twala, B., Singh, A., Montero, E., & Priyadarshi, N. (2022). Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape. Sustainability, 15, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010309
Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
Shen, H., Lin, H., Han, W., & Wu, H. (2023). ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4), 100325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325
Starbucks. (2024). Starbucks Announces 6,000 Greener Stores Worldwide https://about.starbucks.com/press/2024/starbucks-announces-6000-greener-stores-worldwide/
Verheyden, T., Eccles, R. G., and Feiner, A. . (2016). ESG for all? The impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. . Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 47-55.
WBCSD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility : making good business sense. W. B. C. f. S. Development. https://search.worldcat.org/zh-tw/title/Corporate-social-responsibility-:-making-good-business-sense/oclc/53238304
Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089
工業技術研究院. (2024). 工業技術與資訊月刊. 工業技術研究院.
天下雜誌. (2022). 2022年ESG策略問卷調查:台灣中小企業與ESG商機的距離. https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/42912
王俐覃. (2024). 企業 ESG 表現對信用評級之影響 國立中山大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 高雄市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2kn536
王詮富. (2012). 信用評等與違約率之回顧 -- 以TCRI 為例 國立臺灣大學]. https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2012.03094
王禎輿. (2019). 碳排放與企業績效之關聯性-石化產業CSR實證分析 國立中央大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4n8e88
台灣區石油化學工業同業公會. (1982). 石化工業 (Vol. 4).
吳幸蓁, & 廖蕙儀. (2017). 自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果 [The Determinants and Consequences of Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure]. 中山管理評論, 25(1), 13-62. https://doi.org/10.6160/2017.03.01
李秀英, 劉俊儒, & 楊筱翎. (2011). 企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性 [Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance]. 東海管理評論, 13(1), 77-111. https://doi.org/10.29724/tmr.201108.0003
林欣怡. (2021). 企業環境永續資訊揭露程度與績效關聯性之研究 –以上市水泥石化業為例 東吳大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/72y237
孫維伯. (2024). ESG評級分歧與股價報酬 國立中山大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 高雄市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2n4grm
國立政治大學商學院信義書院. (2024). 2024台灣企業ESG調查報告書. 國立政治大學商學院信義書院.
國立臺灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心. (2022). 從2050淨零排放路徑凝聚臺灣世代新共識. https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/en-trans/1695
張志強. (2024). 原油製造化學品現況與趨勢. https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/industrytech/IndustryTech.aspx?menu_id=13545&it_id=547
張幸惠. (2018). 企業社會責任與企業價值-以台灣就業99指數為例 [Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Evidence from Taiwan Employment 99 Index]. 評價學報(12), 31-56.
曾繁鑫. (2014). 政府推動石化產業高值化政策-個案公司之應對策略 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70988
黃正忠, 林泉興, & 帥文欣. (2020). 責任投資標的篩選面面觀. 會計研究月刊(412), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.6650/ARM.202003_(412).0016
楊詠荏. (2021). 考量碳排放下台灣石化業者的經營效率 國立陽明交通大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新竹市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4kvy26
葉柏均. (2024). ESG評分與信用風險之間的關聯 東吳大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z263z5
蔡偉銑. (1997). 台灣石化工業發展過程的政治經濟分析. 東吳政治學報》,(8), 頁, 157-224.
薛化元, 張., 陳家豪, 許志成. (2017). 台灣石化業發展史. 現代財經基金會.
簡立忠. (2024). 國際ESG評鑑介紹及我國ESG評鑑發展. 會計研究月刊(459), 75-81. Article/Detail?docID=P20160621002-N202402060004-00012
金融監督管理委員會.(2023). 金管會發布「上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案(2023年)」https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202303280001&dtable=News
工業技術研究院. (2024). 工業技術與資訊月刊. 工業技術研究院.
國立政治大學商學院信義書院. (2024). 2024台灣企業ESG調查報告書. 國立政治大學商學院信義書院.
張志強 (2024). 原油製造化學品現況與趨勢. https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/industrytech/IndustryTech.aspx?menu_id=13545&it_id=547