| 研究生: |
古孟軒 Ku, Meng-Hsuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
目標公司所有權結構與併購公告市場反應:家族企業之影響
—以美國上市公司為例 Ownership Structure of Target Firms and Market Reactions to M&A Announcements: The Role of Family Firms — Evidence from U.S. Public Companies |
| 指導教授: |
王澤世
Wang, Tse-Shih |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 53 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 家族企業 、併購公告 、累積異常報酬 、現金支付 、公開收購 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Family Firms, M&A Announcements, Cumulative Abnormal Returns, Cash Payment, Tender Offer |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:43 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討目標公司所有權結構對併購公告期間短期市場反應的影響,並以目標公司是否具家族企業身分為核心變數,進一步分析交易支付方式(全現金支付)與收購管道(公開收購)對此關係的調節效果。本研究以2014年至2024年間美國上市公司已完成的418筆併購交易為樣本,採用事件研究法衡量併購公告期間的累積異常報酬(CAR),並透過普通最小平方法(OLS)進行實證分析。
研究結果顯示,併購公告可為目標公司股東創造顯著正向的短期財富效果,且家族企業目標公司於公告期間的累積異常報酬顯著高於非家族企業,顯示市場對家族企業可能存在較高的評價溢價。此結果於不同事件窗口下皆具穩健性,支持目標公司家族企業身分與併購公告期間市場反應呈正向關係的研究假說。
在調節效果方面,家族企業身分與全現金支付之交互作用呈現不顯著負向關係,顯示現金支付雖具正向訊號效果,但可能因市場同時考量控制權移轉後的治理延續性與整合風險,使其對目標公司家族企業正向市場評價產生有限的抵減效果。另一方面,家族企業身分與公開收購的交互作用項呈不顯著的正向關係,顯示公開收購並未顯著改變市場對家族企業的評價,因此未支持公開收購會強化目標公司家族企業身分與併購公告期CAR間的正向關係預期。
整體而言,本研究提供近十年美國併購市場的實證證據,補充家族企業作為併購目標時市場評價的研究成果,並進一步檢視支付方式與收購管道在其中所扮演的調節角色,有助於理解市場在併購公告期間如何解讀所有權結構與交易機制所傳遞的資訊。
This study examines the impact of target firms’ ownership structure on short-term market reactions during M&A announcements, focusing on family firm status, and further analyzes the moderating effects of payment method (all-cash payment) and acquisition channel (tender offer). The sample consists of 418 completed M&A transactions involving U.S. listed firms from 2014 to 2024. The event study methodology is employed to measure cumulative abnormal returns (CAR), and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is used for empirical analysis.
The results show that M&A announcements generate significantly positive short-term wealth effects for target shareholders. Family firms exhibit significantly higher CAR than non-family firms, indicating a valuation premium from the market. This finding is robust across different event windows and supports the positive relationship between family firm status and market reactions during M&A announcements.
Regarding moderating effects, the interaction between family firm status and all-cash payment is negative but statistically insignificant, suggesting that concerns over governance continuity and post-acquisition integration partially offset the positive signal of cash payment. The interaction between family firm status and tender offers is positive but insignificant, indicating that tender offers do not significantly alter market reactions toward family firms and do not strengthen their positive CAR effect.
Overall, this study provides recent evidence from the U.S. M&A market, complements the literature on family firms as acquisition targets, and enhances the understanding of how investors interpret ownership structure and transaction mechanisms during M&A announcements.
Adhikari, H. P., & Sutton, N. K. (2016). All in the family: The effect of family ownership on acquisition performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 88, 65–78.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.
Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120.
Asquith, P. (1983). Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 51–83.
Basu, N., Dimitrova, L., & Paeglis, I. (2009). Family control and dilution in mergers. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(5), 829–841.
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96.
Boston Consulting Group. (2025). The brave new world of dealmaking in the global market.
Boston Consulting Group. (2026). M&A Outlook 2026: Expectations Are High—Again.
Bowman, E. H., & Singh, H. (1993). Corporate restructuring: Reconfiguring the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S1), 5–14.
Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 3–40.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (2003). Succession and non-succession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16(2), 89–107.
Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36.
DePamphilis, D. M. (2019). Mergers, acquisitions, and other restructuring activities: An integrated approach to process, tools, cases, and solutions (9th ed.). Academic Press.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
Feldman, E. R., Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. (2019). Family firms and the stock market performance of acquisitions and divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 40(5), 757–780.
Filipović, Z. M. (2025). Mergers and acquisitions in family firms (Working paper). Université Paris Dauphine-PSL.
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C., Yurtoglu, B. B., & Zulehner, C. (2003). The effects of mergers: An international comparison. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(5), 625–653.
Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1969–1997.
Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1992). Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135–175.
Huang, Y. S., & Walkling, R. A. (1987). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements: Payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329–349.
Jarrell, G. A., Brickley, J. A., & Netter, J. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 49–68.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(4), 5–50.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 3–27.
Lang, L. H. P., Stulz, R. M., & Walkling, R. A. (1989). Managerial performance, Tobin's Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 137–154.
Martynova, M., & Renneboog, L. (2008). A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10), 2148–2177.
Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1851–1889.
Moeller, S. B., & Schlingemann, F. P. (2005). Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(3), 533–564.
Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201–228.
Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2005). Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 757–782.
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.
Rossi, S., & Volpin, P. F. (2004). Cross-country determinants of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), 277–304.
Schwert, G. W. (2000). Hostility in takeovers: In the eyes of the beholder? The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2599–2640.
Seth, A., Song, K. P., & Pettit, R. (2000). Synergy, managerialism or hubris? An empirical examination of motives for foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 387–405.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.
Weston, J. F., Mitchell, M. L., & Mulherin, J. H. (2004). Takeovers, restructuring, and corporate governance (4th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
WifiTalents. (2026). Family business statistics. https://wifitalents.com/family-business-statistics/