| 研究生: |
柯丁尹 Ke, Ding-Ring |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
化工廠商技術能力,組織學習,六標準差活動與服務品質關係之研究 A Study of the Relationship Among Technological Capabilities,Organization Learning,Six Sigma Activities and Service Quality in Chemical Companies |
| 指導教授: |
蔡明田
TSAI, MING-TIEN |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程管理碩士在職專班 Engineering Management Graduate Program(on-the-job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 123 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 六標準差活動 、服務品質 、組織學習 、六標準差 、技術能力 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Organization learning, Six Sigma, Technological capabilities, Service quality, Six Sigma activities |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:159 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在現今競爭的環境中,為了面對新時代的挑戰,使得各個企業都不斷的求新、求變,以客戶的滿意與否列為優先考慮,並要求更好的服務品質是時代必然走向,也是企業追求之目標;企業藉由技術能力提升、組織的學習、六標準差活動改善,進而影響到組織的創新行為,提高服務品質與滿足內外部顧客需求,幫助企業獲取顧客信任而獲得利潤。
本論文根據技術能力、組織學習、六標準差活動與服務品質之相關文獻探討,提出觀念性之研究架構與欲驗證之研究假設,並說明研究變數之定義與衡量指標;同時對於問卷調查之實施加以敘述,再依資料之性質,決定資料分析方法,並以SPSS統計軟體進行資料分析。本研究以實施六標準差活動之台灣化工產業為實證研究對象,共發放300份問卷,回收問卷163份,扣除無效問卷8份,有效問卷共155份,有效回收率51.66%。
最後,藉由理論之探討及實證分析,確立技術能力、組織學習、六標準差活動與服務品質存在顯著的相關性,並更進一步瞭解,化工廠商內部技術能力提升、並配合組織學習、再經六標準差活動改善,的確有助於提升其服務品質;因此,對一個永續經營成長的企業來說,提升內部技術能力及推動組織學習是刻不容緩的事,厚植六標準差活動之基礎建設能力及程序建構能力,更是提升企業服務品質與發展的核心競爭優勢。
Nowadays in the competitive environment , each enterprise is continuously looking for innovations and changes in order to face the new challenge of coming era, and is also taking the customer's satisfaction as their first priority, better service quality is undoubtedly the direction of decade and the goal of the enterprise, therefore, they improve their service quality to meet the customer's needs by improve technological capabilities, organization learning, Six Sigma activities improve, and in advance the influences of their interior innovated act, to the end, they could help enterprises to obtain customer’s confidence and gain them profits.
This thesis is according to the relevant document of technological capabilities, organization learning, Six Sigma activities and service quality, drawing out the conceptual structure and hypothesis, clarifying the definition of parameter and measurement index , meanwhile, stating how the later questionnaire is implemented, deciding the analytical method of the materials, and data analysis with SPSS for Windows. The empirical study object in this research is the chemical industries of Taiwan that doing Six Sigma activities. We provide 300 questionnaires, recycle 163, 8 invalid questionnaires and 155 effective questionnaires, the effective returns-ratio is 51.66% .
Finally , by theory and real example discussion, verifying the high correlationamong technological capabilities ,organization learning, Six Sigma activities and service quality, furthermore, the cooperation of improve technological capabilities, organization learning with the Six Sigma activities improve circulations is indeed useful to chemical companies in improving their service quality. So, for an continuously growing up enterprise, it is a very urgent thing to improve technological capabilities and promote organization learning, establishing the ability of infrastructure and procedure planting in Six Sigma activities is definitely the core-tech to improve enterprise service quality and development.
一、中文部分
1. 王丕承,實踐六標準差的技術,中國生產力中心,初版,2003。
2. 王長興,兩岸資訊廠商組織學習、六標準差活動與服務品質關係之研究,私立大業大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,2006。
3. 台灣化學科技產業協進會,產業升級與永續發展研討會,2004,4月電子報,台北:經濟部工業局,2004。
4. 吳明隆,統計應用學習實務SPSS 10.0版第二版,知城數位科技股份有限公司,2005。
5. 吳萬益,企業研究方法二版,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,2005。
6. 李瑞慶,技術創新類型、技術能力對技術創新績效之影響,私立中原大學企研所碩士論文,1999。
7. 李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯,組織行為學,pp.453-470,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司,2001。
8. 李國璧,產品研發、六標準差活動能力與顧客滿意度之研究,私立長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,2003。
9. 杉本辰夫著,事務、營業、服務的品質管制,台北:中華顧問公司,(盧淵源譯),1986。
10. 林文寶,技術知識特性、整合、知識能力與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關係性之研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文,2001。
11. 近滕隆雄,服務管理第一版,台北:書泉出版社,(陳耀茂譯),2000。
12. 邱皓政,量化研究與統計分析第二版,台北:五南圖書出版有限公司,2004。
13. 封德台,技術學習與技術能力關係之研究-國內資訊軟體產業之實證,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,2000。
14. 胡瑋珊譯,六標準差設計,經濟新潮社出版:城邦文化發行,2002。
15. 翁明祥,技術密集產業、技術創新過程及關鍵影響因素關係之研究,輔仁管理評論,第3卷第2期,pp.21-48,1996。
16. 翁崇雄,評量服務品質與服務價值之研究-以銀行業為實證對象,國立政治大學商學研究所博士論文,1996。
17. 曹木針,寬頻社區網路服務品質與顧客滿意度之研究-以中華電信公司大台北地區顧客為例,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,2000。
18. 莊訓樊,六標準差個案討論,提昇競爭優勢6σ研討會,私立中原大學工業工程系,2001。
19. 陳憲章,解析六標準差經營管理之真諦,中華六標準差應用學會,2004。
20. 陳建雄 ,六標準差綠帶訓練教材,華宇企管顧問公司出版,再版,2005。
21. 游常山,微軟-轉動團隊學習,遠見雜誌特刊,11月,pp.52-53,2003。
22. 黃國材 ,六標準差在製造業之應用,私立大葉大學工業工程研究所碩士論文,2002。
23. 黃仁祈,企業文化、組織學習、組織創新與企業核心能力間之關係研究,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,2003。
24. 楊錦洲,顧客服務創新價值,台北:中衛發展中心,2001。
25. 楊錦瑤等人,六標準差專欄:Six Sigma實戰-觀念植入篇,第38卷第7期,pp.47-48,2002。
26. 詹昭雄,從TQM轉換至6σ之要點,品質管制月刊38(2),pp.86~88,2001。
27. 蔣德瑄,技術能力、組織學習特性與新產品發展績效之研究-以台灣織布業為例,商管科技季刊,第4卷第3期,pp.281-307,2003。
28. 蔡敦浩與周德光,技術能力的形成與發展,1994產業科技研究發展管理實務案例暨論文研討會論文集,中國生產力中心,pp.237-264,1994。
29. 蔡兆哲,企業技術能力、海外投資動機/方式、投資環境與技術轉移績效關係之研究,私立輔仁大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,1995。
30. 蔡啟通,組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,1997。
二、英文部分
1. Amit,R. and P.J.H. Schoemaker., ”Strategic Assets and organizational Rent”,Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 33-46,1993.
2. Bearden, William O. & Teel Jesse E.,“Selected Determinants of Customer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.20,pp.21-28,1983.
3. Baker, W. E. and J. M. Sinkula. ,Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: Integrating and extending models of organizational performance. Journal of Market Focused Management, 4(4): pp.295-308,1999.
4. Baker, W. E. and J. M. Sinkula. ,The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4): pp.411-427,1999.
5. Cardozo, R. N. ,“An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expection and Satisfaction”, Journal of MarketingResearch, Vol.2, pp.244-249,1965.
6. Cooper, R. G. ,The new product process: An empirical-based classification scheme. R&D Management, 13(1), pp.1-13,1983.
7. Chee Meng Yap & Wam. E. ,Souder Factors influence new product and failure in small entrepreeurial high-technology electric firms. Journal of Innovation Management, 11, pp.418-432,1994.
8. Calantone, R. J.,S. T.Cavusgil and Y. Zhao.,Learning orientation,firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6): pp.515-524,2002.
9. Chen, J.,Li, Y., Yang, X. and Zhou E. ,“Relating the Molecular Structure and Crystallization Behavior of Polypropylene” ,Polymer Engineering and Science,Vol. 44, pp.1749-1754,2004.
10. Deming, W.E. ,Improve of quality & productivity, through action by management,National Productivity Review, 14(4), pp.12-22,1982.
11. Damanpour, F. , Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3):pp. 555-590,1991.
12. Drejer, A. and J. O. Riis.,“Competence Development and Technology: How Learning and Technology Can be Meaningfully Integrated,” Technovation, Vol. 19, 1999, pp. 631-644,1999.
13. Danneels, E. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. ,〝Product Innovativeness from the Firm’sPerspective: It’s Dimensions & Their Relation With Project Seletion and Performance〞,The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.18, Iss.6, pp. 357-373,2001.
14. Fiol, C. Marlene and Marjorie A. Lyles. ,Organizational learning. Academy of Management The Academy of Management Review, 10(4):pp.803-813,1985.
15. Frankle, E.G., “Management of Technology Change”, Kluwer Academic,1990.
16. Gerald J. Hahn, Necip Doganaksoy & Roger Hoerl .,The Evolution of Six Sigma. Quality Engineering 12 (3), pp. 317-326,2000.
17. Gronroos, C., Service Management and Marketing-A Customer Relationship Management Approach, New York.: Wiley,2000.
18. Gloria Barczak & Fareena Sultan.,〝How marketing research affects cycle time: a caseof the telecommunications indutry〞, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing ,Vol.16 (4), pp. 258-271,2001.
19. Greg Brue. ,Six Sigma for Managers McGraw-Hill,pp. 29-93,2002.
20. Hunt, S. D. and R. M. Morgan ,The resource-advantage theory of competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions.Journal of Marketing, 60(4):pp.107-114,1996.
21. Hult, G. T. M., O. C. Ferrell and R. F. Hurley.,Global organizational learning effects on cycle time performance. Journal of Business Research, 55(5): pp.377-387,2001.
22. Juran, J.M., & Gryna, F.M. ,Quality planning and analysis(2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill,1986.
23. Jerome A. Blakeslee ,Implementing the Six Sigma Solution. Quality Progress, 32 (7), pp.77-85,1999.
24. Jean Cherry & Sridhar Seshadri.,Six Sigma: Using Statistics to Reduce Process Variability and Costs in Radiology. Radiology Management November / December. pp. 42-45,2000.
25. Klimecki, R. and H. Lassleben. ,Modes of organizational learning:Indications from an empirical study, Management Learning,(4):pp.405-430,1998.
26. Kotler, P. ,Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control(7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,1998.
27. Khalil,TarekM., Management of Technology, 1st., p.173, McGraw-HillCompanies, Inc,2000.
28. Lovelock, Christopher H. ,﹐Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights, Journal of Marketing, 47, pp.9-20,1983.
29. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. and Gelatly, I. R. , “Affective and Continuance Commitment to the Organization: Evaluation of Measure and Analysis of Concurrent and Time-Lagged Relations.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, p.p.710-720,1990.
30. Mitra, A. , Fundamentals of quality control and improvement. New York: Macmillan,1993.
31. Mohr, Jakki .,Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations,New Jersey,Prentice-Hall, Inc,2001.
32. Molleman, E. and M. Broekhuis .,Sociotechnical systems: Towards an organizational learning approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(3, 4): pp.271-294,2001.
33. Nystrom, P. C. and W. H. Starbuck,To avoid organizational crises,unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12(4): pp.53-65,1984.
34. Oliver, Richard L. , Measurment and evaluation of satisfaction process in retailing setting. Journal of Retailing, 57, pp.25-48,1981.
35. Ouksel, A. M., K. Mihavics and P. Chalos .,Accounting information systems and organization learning: A simulation. Accounting. Management and Information Technologies, 7(1):pp. 1-19,1997.
36. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, Valarie A., & Berry, Leonard L. , Communication and control processes in delivert of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 52(4), pp.35-48,1988.
37. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, Valarie A., & Berry, Leonard L. , Quality counts in service. Journal of Marketing, 28, pp.44-53,1988.
38. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, Valarie A., & Berry, Leonard L. , Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), pp.420-450,1991.
39. Prahalad C.K. and Hamel Gary.,”The Core Competence of the Corporation , Harvard Business Review, Vol.68 Iss.3, May-June 1990,pp.79-91,1993.
40. Peter S. Pande & Patrick Connolly.,Turning Quality into a Management System. ASQ's 54th Annual Quality Congress Proceedings. pp.161-167,2000.
41. Peter S. Pande, Robert P. Neuman & Roland R. Cavanagh., The Six Sigma Way. Mc Graw-Hill. pp.32-86,2000.
42. Rosenberg, N., & Frischtak, C. , International technology transfer. New York: Praeger,1985.
43. Reeves, C.A., & Bednar, D.A. ,Defining quality: Alternatives and implications.Academy of Management Review, 19,pp.419-445,1994.
44. Roger W. Hoerl., “Six Sigma and the Future of the Quality Progression”, Quality Progress 31 (6) , pp. 35-42,1998.
45. Ronald D. Snee .,Why Should Statisticians Pay Attention to Six Sigma?. Quality Progress, 32 (9), pp.100-103,1999.
46. Ronald D. Snee ., Six Sigma Improves Both Statistical Training and Processes. Quality Progress, 33 (10), pp. 68-72,2000.
47. Sasser, W.E., Jr., & Arbeit, S.F. ,Selling jobs in the service sector. Business Horizons,19(3),pp.61-65,1976.
48. Sharif, M. N. ,Basis for techno-economic policy analysis. Science and Public Policy, 4(15),pp. 217-229,1988.
49. Sinkula, J. M., W. E. Baker and T. Noordewier. ,A framework for makerbased organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 25(4):pp.305-317,1997.
50. Schneider, B., S. S. White, and M. C. Paul., “Linking Service Climate and Customer Perceptions of Service Quality:Test of a Causal Model.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), p.p.150-163,1998.
51. Yamin, S., A. Gunasekaran and F. T. Mavondo.,Innovation index and its implications on organizational performance: A study of Australian manufacturingb companies. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(5): 495-503,1999.