簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 余汎雅
Yu, Fan-Ya
論文名稱: 以過程虛擬化理論探討點餐流程虛擬化的可行性與挑戰
The Feasibility and Challenges of Order Process Virtualization Based on Process Virtualization Theory
指導教授: 黃瀞瑩
Huang, Ching-Ying
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 81
中文關鍵詞: 自助服務自助點餐系統消費者需求過程虛擬化理論資訊品質
外文關鍵詞: self-service, self-service ordering system, consumer needs, Process Virtualization Theory, information quality
相關次數: 點閱:7下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,餐飲業為因應產業蓬勃發展所帶來的人力短缺問題及疫情後無接觸服務的需求,開始導入自助點餐系統,期望藉此提升營運效率並滿足消費者對便利與衛生的期待,然而放眼全球,台灣地區自助點餐系統的實際使用率仍偏低,顯示在推行自助點餐流程的過程中,仍存在顧客使用障礙與接受落差。此現象突顯出,自助點餐雖能在供給端解決人力與流程效率問題,但若未考量消費者在流程中的實際需求與心理適應性,將可能限制其推廣效益,甚至引發消費體驗上的排斥與落差。因此本研究以過程虛擬化理論(Process Virtualization Theory, PVT)為基礎,探討消費者在點餐流程中之使用需求與流程虛擬化的可行性與挑戰,並以資訊科技特徵:表徵、範圍及資訊品質作為調節因子,驗證其是否會間接影響消費者的使用需求對於流程虛擬化可行性的關係。
    本研究透過問卷調查蒐集資料,最終共回收有效問卷329份,根據分析結果顯示,樣本資料中在感官與關係需求上,高齡者與教育程度較低之族群表現出顯著較高的依賴性,反映出此類群體在進入虛擬化點餐流程時,對人際互動與實體感受具有更強烈需求,業者在導入自助點餐系統時應加強人性化設計及人員引導服務,以降低其進入虛擬化過程中的不適感。進一步的探索性因素分析結果顯示,感官與關係需求在自助點餐情境下具有高度相關性,實務上可合併為單一構面,對於過程虛擬化有顯著負向影響;同步需求在自助點餐情境下對於過程虛擬化有顯著正向影響,與理論假設相反,推測是因為現代自助系統已能提供即時反應與快速回饋,因此消費者反而因自助點餐系統的即時性而提高接受意願;識別與控制需求則顯著負向影響使用者對虛擬流程的接受意願。此外,本研究亦發現資訊科技特性中的表徵能力具備調節效果,能減緩感官與關係需求對虛擬化接受意願的負向影響。綜合而言,本研究認為點餐系統設計者及業者在導入自助點餐系統時應加強系統資訊圖像化、情境模擬、視覺提示等豐富且完整的資訊,強化對實體互動的補償,以減緩使用者對於缺乏人員互動與實體流程的的抗拒,並且在系統設計上針對加入會員或個人資料填答應採取自由選擇機制,以降低使用障礙並提升顧客整體體驗。

    In recent years, the low adoption rate of self-service ordering systems in Taiwan’s restaurant industry has drawn attention, despite their global rise to address labor shortages and demand for contactless service. Based on Process Virtualization Theory (PVT), the research examines consumer usage needs and process virtualization feasibility, with IT characteristics—representation, reach, and information quality—as moderating factors. A total of 329 valid responses were collected via questionnaire. Results indicate that older and less-educated users show stronger sensory and relational needs, negatively impacting their acceptance of virtualized processes. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that these two needs are highly correlated and can be merged into a single factor significantly hindering virtualization. In contrast, synchronism requirements positively influenced acceptance, suggesting that immediate feedback from modern systems boosts user willingness. Identification and control requirements had negative effects, while representation capability moderated the adverse impact of sensory and relational needs. The study concludes that enhancing system visualization, simulating real-world interactions, and offering optional personal data inputs can improve user experience and reduce resistance in self-service ordering adoption.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 VII 目錄 VIII 表目錄 X 圖目錄 XI 第一章、緒論 1 研究目的 5 研究流程 7 第二章、文獻回顧 8 第一節 自助點餐系統 8 第二節 過程虛擬化理論 13 第三節 資訊品質 20 第三章、研究方法 21 第一節 研究架構 21 第二節 研究假設 22 第三節 變項之操作性定義及衡量題項 27 第四節 問卷設計 31 第四章、資料分析 35 第一節 樣本資料分析 35 第二節 因素分析 37 第三節 敘述性統計 40 第四節 信效度分析 42 第五節 變異數分析 43 第六節 迴歸分析 47 第七節 小結 54 第五章、結論與建議 56 第一節 研究結論 56 第二節 理論意涵與管理意涵 57 第三節 研究限制與未來建議 60 參考文獻 62 附錄 65

    Ackom, P. S., Owusu Kwateng, K., Tetteh, F. K., & Wiesche, M. (2022). Understanding e-government services: integration of process virtualization theory and user resistance. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 24(5), 418-434.
    Alarabiat, A., Hujran, O., Soares, D., & Tarhini, A. (2021). Examining students' continuous use of online learning in the post-COVID-19 era: an application of the process virtualization theory. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 21-47.
    Balci, B., Grgecic, D., & Rosenkranz, C. (2013). Why People Reject or Use Virtual Processes: A Test of Process Virtualization Theory. Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, August 15-17.
    Barbeitos, I., & Oliveira, T. (2024). Continuance in Portuguese Peer-To-Peer Accommodation Services Through the Lens of Process Virtualization Theory. Information Systems Management, 42(1), 68-88.
    Barth, M., & Veit, D. (2011). Electronic Service Delivery in the Public Sector: Understanding the Variance of Citizens' Resistance 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,
    Berkowsky, R. W., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. J. (2018). Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults. Innov Aging, 2(1), igy002.
    Blut, M., Wang, C., & Schoefer, K. (2016). Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Self-Service Technologies. Journal of Service Research, 19(4), 396-416.
    Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29-51.
    Delone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
    Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness
    terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Volume 19( Issue 2), Pages 110-132.
    Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424.
    Globerson, S., & Maggard, M. J. (1991). A Conceptual Model of Self‐service. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 11, 33-43.
    Goel, P., Garg, A., Sharma, A., & Rana, N. P. (2023). Impact of Sensory Perceptions on the Urge to Buy Impulsively. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 64(4), 469-485.
    Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The Future of Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 1-6.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
    Lee, J., & Allaway, A. (2002). Effects of personal control on adoption of self‐service technology innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 553-572.
    Lin, J.-S. C., & Hsieh, P.-L. (2007). The influence of technology readiness on satisfaction and behavioral intentions toward self-service technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1597-1615.
    Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. (2006). The Quality of Online and Offline Relationships: The Role of Multiplexity and Duration of Social Relationships. The Information Society, 22(3), 137-148.
    Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction With Technology-Based Service Encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50-64.
    Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Gender and Age Differences in Employee Decisions About New Technology: An Extension to the Theory of Planned Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69-84.
    Negash, S., Ryan, T., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Quality and effectiveness in Web-based customer support systems. Information & Management, 40(8), 757-768.
    Ofoeda, J., Boateng, R., & Asmah, A. (2018). Virtualization of government‐to‐citizen engagement process: Enablers and constraints. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(5).
    Overby, E. (2008). Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organization science, 19(2), 277-291.
    Overby, E., & Konsynski, B. R. (2010). <ssrn-1567097.pdf>. SSRN Electronic Journal, Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 10-96.
    Overby, E. M., & Konsynski, B. (2008). Process Virtualization: A Theme and Theory for the Information Systems Discipline. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    Shin, H., & Perdue, R. R. (2019). Self-Service Technology Research: A bibliometric co-citation visualization analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 101-112.
    Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G. (2010). An empirical investigation of employee portal success. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 184-206.
    Walker, R. H., Craig‐Lees, M., Hecker, R., & Francis, H. (2002). Technology‐enabled service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(1), 91-106.
    Wang, S., Ye, Y., Ning, B., Cheah, J. H., & Lim, X. J. (2021). Why Do Some Consumers Still Prefer In-Store Shopping? An Exploration of Online Shopping Cart Abandonment Behavior. Front Psychol, 12, 829696.
    Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760-767.
    何淑熏, 柯盈吟, & 黃瓊慧. (2007). 從網路銀行自助服務探討創新對顧客價值之影響. 《Electronic Commerce Studies》, 5卷4期, Pp. 463-483.
    林聖偉, & 陳光瞬. (2020). 餐飲業採用自助服務科技決策之研究. 《中原體育學報》, 14期, Pp. 39-46.
    張彧, & 陳春富. (2024). 以科技接受模式探討消費者對於自助結帳系統的使用意願. 《量化分析與研究》, 4期, Pp. 59-77.
    陳怡靜, 胡學誠, & 施東河. (2010). 顧客對便利商店自我服務科技系統滿意度的實證研究. 電子商務研究, 第八卷(第二期), 231-258.
    楊政樺, 曾通潔, & 程健行. (2010). 以專家觀點評析航空公司推行網路報到服務之策略內涵. 《顧客滿意學刊》, 6卷1期, Pp. 89-128.
    蔡良敏, 閻漢琳, & 嚴玉華. (2022). 顧客是否參與自助服務科技行為模式之研究:以科技接受模式理論觀點. 《秀傳醫學雜誌》, 21卷2期, Pp. 49-58.
    蔡孟璇, & 王志宏. (2021). 運用科技接受模式探討澎湖機場旅客使用自助報到服務之行為意向-兼論信任之調節效果. 《休閒產業管理學刊》, 14卷1期, Pp. 25-44.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE