簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 游濬宇
You, Jun-Yu
論文名稱: 探討風險愛好CEO的公司透過執行ESG是否在疫情期間有保險效果
Whether the companies with risk-seeking CEO would have insurance effect through the implementation of ESG during the Covid-19 period
指導教授: 梁少懷
Liang, Shao-Huai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵詞: 風險追逐CEOESGCOVID-19保險效果VEGA
外文關鍵詞: Risk-seeking CEO, ESG, COVID-19, insurance effect, VEGA
相關次數: 點閱:79下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討風險愛好CEO的公司透過執行ESG是否在疫情期間會有保險效果,因為CEO的特質對於公司政策有重大影響,而ESG的議題也被全球重視,希望能透過此研究了解在極端事件發生的情況下,CEO的風險傾向對於公司帶來的影響。本研究以2018~2021有Refinitiv ESG分數的台灣上市櫃公司為研究對象,以VEGA值作為CEO風險偏好的衡量基準,並以股價報酬的變動來測量是否有保險效果。實證分析以OLS迴歸模型進行,而為提升研究之準確性,加入公司相關財務數據、會影響報酬的因素作為控制變數,並且考量產業固定效果。實證結果發現:(1) 越是風險追逐的CEO的公司ESG的表現越好。(2) 雖然在結果上無顯著,與大多過去文獻不同,本研究從係數上發現在疫情期間風險追逐CEO的公司可能有墮落天使效果而非保險效果。本研究也額外對ESG的三個構面做分析,分析結果發現並無某個單一構面對於墮落天使效果有顯著的影響。本研究主要提供投資者以及公司不同面向的參考方向,對於投資者在極端事件發生時的投資方向有除了財務數據上的參考方向。而公司則可以在制定CEO薪酬政策時以本文作參考,減少關於ESG連結方面的薪酬獎勵政策。

    The purpose of this study is to investigate whether companies with risk-seeking CEO would have insurance effect through the implementation of ESG during the Covid-19 period. Since the CEO's catachrestic can have a significant impact on corporate policies and ESG issues are globally recognized, this study aims to examine how the CEO's risk preference affects the company during extreme events. The study focuses on Taiwan-listed companies with Refinitiv ESG scores from 2018 to 2021. VEGA is used as a measure of CEO risk preference, and changes in stock price are used to evaluate whether an insurance effect exists. The empirical analysis is conducted using the OLS regression model. To enhance the accuracy of the study, relevant financial data and factors affecting returns are included as control variables, and industry fixed effects are taken into consideration. The empirical results indicate that (1) companies with risk-seeking CEOs have better ESG performance, and (2) While the results are not statistically significant, contrary to most previous literature, this study found from the coefficients that companies with risk-seeking CEOs during the pandemic may exhibit a fallen angel effect rather than an insurance effect. In additional test, we analyzed the three pillars of ESG and found that no single pillar has a significant impact on the fallen angel effect rather than insurance effect. This study provides investors and companies with different perspectives. For investors, this study offers guidance on investment directions during extreme events beyond financial data. For companies, this study can serve as a reference for CEO compensation policies, reducing the focus on ESG-related incentive policies.

    1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT 3 2.1 Firms with risk-seeking CEO 3 2.2 ESG 4 3. METHODOLOGY 5 3.1 Sample Construction 5 3.2 Main Variables 6 3.3 Control Variables 10 3.4 Models 12 4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS 13 4.1 descriptive statistics analysis 13 4.2 multivariate correlation analysis 16 4.3 Additional test 19 5. CONCLUSION 23 6. REFERENCES 25

    Baghdadi, G., Podolski, E. J., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2022). CEO risk-seeking and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from pilot CEOs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 76, 102282.
    Bennedsen, M., PÉRez-GonzÁLez, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2020). Do CEOs Matter? Evidence from Hospitalization Events. The Journal of Finance, 75(4), 1877-1911.
    Bharath, S. T., & Shumway, T. (2008). Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1339-1369.
    Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654.
    Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. (2003). The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90-103.
    Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 431-468.
    Cooper, S. A., Raman, K. K., & Yin, J. (2018). Halo effect or fallen angel effect? Firm value consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and reputation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(3), 226-240.
    Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802-830.
    Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.
    Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445.
    Guay, W. R. (1999). The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: an analysis of the magnitude and determinants. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 43-71.
    Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators? The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457-1498.
    Ikram, A., Li, Z., & MacDonald, T. (2020). CEO Pay Sensitivity (Delta and Vega) and Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 12(19).
    Karpavičius, S., & Yu, F. (2019). Managerial risk incentives and a firm’s financing policy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 100, 167-181.
    Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304-329.
    Li, Z., Feng, L., Pan, Z., & Sohail, H. M. (2022). ESG performance and stock prices: evidence from the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 242.
    Liang, S.-H., Lin, H.-C., Chou, Y.-T., & Hsiao, H.-Y. (2021). The Insurance Value of CSR during the Financial Crisis in Taiwan. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 10(2), 33-51.
    Lin, Y. T., Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, W. P., & Tsai, B. S. (2017). The Effect of Managerial Share Holdings on Firm Default Risk:The Perspective of Risk Sensitivity. Journal of Management & Systems, 24(1), 47-71.
    Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. N. E. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
    Low, A. (2009). Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(3), 470-490.
    Manabe, T., & Nakagawa, K. (2022). The value of reputation capital during the COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from Japan. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102370.
    Merton, R. C. (1974). On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449-470.
    Ongsakul, V., Jiraporn, P., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2021). Does managerial ownership influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? The role of economic policy uncertainty. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 763-779.
    Rajgopal, S., & Shevlin, T. (2002). Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 145-171.
    Starks, L. T. (2009). EFA Keynote Speech: “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: What Do Investors Care about? What Should Investors Care about?”. Financial Review, 44(4), 461-468.
    Tufano, P. (1996). Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk Management Practices in the Gold Mining Industry. The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1097-1137.
    Walker, K., Zhang, Z., & Yu, B. (2016). The angel-halo effect. European Business Review, 28(6), 709-722.
    Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2019). Deciphering the motives behind corporate social responsibility (CSR) using managerial ownership: evidence from heteroskedastic identification. Applied Economics Letters, 26(12), 963-970.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE