| 研究生: |
劉柏巖 Liu, Po-Yen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
員工對企業未來發展的認知與企業商業信用關聯性之研究 The Relation between Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Outlook and Firms’ Trade Credit |
| 指導教授: |
楊朝旭
Young, Chaur-Shiuh |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 55 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 員工未來展望 、商業信用 、Glassdoor 、資訊不對稱 、供應鏈 、非財務資訊 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Employee Outlook, Trade Credit, Glassdoor, Information Asymmetry, Supply Chain, Non-financial Information |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:25 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以 2021 年至 2023 年間之 S&P 500 美國上市公司為研究對象,結合 Glassdoor 員工評論平台之員工未來展望評分與 Compustat 財務資料,探討員工對企業未來發展之認知,是否會透過影響供應商對企業履約風險之評估,進而影響企業所能取得之商業信用水準。員工作為企業營運之第一線參與者,其對企業未來前景之評估,可能蘊含財務報表所難以完整揭露之前瞻性資訊。在供應商資訊取得相對受限之情境下,此類非財務訊號是否能成為其授信決策之重要參考依據,為本研究之核心問題。惟本研究採用觀察性資料與固定效果迴歸設計,所有實證結果應解讀為變數間之關聯性,而非因果效果。
本研究以Glassdoor 平台之 Business Outlook 評分平均值(Employee_Outlook)衡量員工對企業未來發展之認知,以應付帳款除以銷貨成本(TradeCredit)衡量企業所能取得之商業信用水準。由於 Employee_Outlook 與員工整體滿意度(ES)之間存在高度共線性,本研究採用正交化處理,以確保主要解釋變數之估計係數能完整反映員工前瞻性展望之獨立效果。最終回歸樣本共計 947 筆公司-年度觀測值,涵蓋 338 家上市公司。
主回歸結果顯示,Employee_Outlook 對 Trade Credit 之影響在整體樣本下不顯著,不支持員工正向展望與較高商業信用水準呈正相關之假說。此一結果在替代依變數、不同固定效果設定及落後一期解釋變數等各種穩健性測試下均維持一致。然而,橫斷面分析揭示,Employee_Outlook 之效果具有明確的產業邊界條件:在量測儀器與控制設備業(SIC 38)及運輸設備業(SIC 37)中,員工展望對商業信用具有邊際統計顯著之負向影響,且交乘項分析確認此類製造業之效果顯著有別於其他產業(p = 0.066)。本研究認為,上述製造業之顯著效果,主要來自供應鏈複雜度高與員工技術密集度強等產業特性,使員工展望之非財務訊號在此類情境下具有較高之資訊價值。
本研究之貢獻在於:首次將員工前瞻性展望與商業信用決策相連結,填補既有文獻之空缺;確立員工展望訊號價值之產業邊界條件;並以零結果說明在大型上市公司財務資訊透明度較高之情境下,非財務訊號之邊際資訊價值相對有限,有助於釐清員工觀感影響外部融資決策之適用範圍。
This study examines whether employees' perceptions of corporate outlook, as reflected in Glassdoor's Business Outlook ratings, are associated with the level of trade credit firms receive from suppliers. Using a panel of 947 firm-year observations covering 338 S&P 500 firms from 2021 to 2023, employee-outlook data from Glassdoor are combined with financial data from Compustat. Employee_Outlook is measured as the firm-year average Business Outlook rating (coded +1, 0, or -1); trade credit is measured as accounts payable scaled by cost of goods sold. Because Employee_Outlook is highly collinear with overall employee satisfaction, satisfaction is orthogonalized against Employee_Outlook so that the coefficient of interest captures its independent informational content. Fixed-effects panel regressions, controlling for firm size, profitability, leverage, firm age, sales growth, cash holdings, and interest coverage, show that Employee_Outlook has no statistically significant association with trade credit in the full sample, a result that is robust across alternative dependent variables, fixed-effect specifications, and a lagged explanatory variable. Cross-sectional analysis reveals that this null result masks meaningful industry heterogeneity: in the Measuring and Controlling Instruments (SIC 38) and Transportation Equipment (SIC 37) industries, employee outlook exhibits a marginally significant negative association with trade credit, an effect statistically distinct from other industries. These findings suggest that non-financial employee signals carry limited incremental information for suppliers of large, transparent firms overall, but may matter more in industries with complex supply chains and technically intensive production.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.
Amir, E., & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1–3), 3–30.
Bae, K. H., J. K. Kang, and J. Wang. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 100 (1), 130–153.
Banerjee, S., S. Dasgupta, and Y. Kim. (2004). Buyer–supplier relationships and trade credit. Working Paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Bushee, B. J., & Leuz, C. (2005). Economic consequences of SEC disclosure regulation: Evidence from the OTC bulletin board. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 233–264.
Chi, W., and Y. Chen. (2021). Employee satisfaction and the cost of corporate borrowing. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101666.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101 (3), 621–640.
Fan, Y., Fu, J., Ji, Y., & Thomas, W. B. (2024). The ability of employee disclosures to reveal private information. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 51(7–8), 2093–2121.
Fauver, L., M. B. McDonald, and A. G. Taboada. (2018). Does it pay to treat employees well? International evidence on the value of employee‐friendly culture. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 84–108.
Fisman, R., and I. Love. (2003). Trade credit, financial intermediary development, and industry growth. Journal of Finance, 58 (1), 353–374.
Fu, J., X. Ji, and L. Jing. (2023). Rank and File Employee Satisfaction and the Implied Cost of Equity. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 38 (1), 182-210.
Green, T. C., Huang, R., Wen, Q., & Zhou, D. (2019). Crowdsourced employer reviews and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(1), 236–251.
Hales, J., Moon, J. R., & Swenson, L. A. (2018). A new era of voluntary disclosure? Empirical evidence on how employee postings on social media relate to future corporate disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68–69, 88–108.
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.
Huang, K., Li, M., & Markov, S. (2020). What do employees know? Evidence from a social media platform. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 199–226.
Kothari, S. P., Ramanna, K., & Skinner, D. J. (2010). Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 246–286.
Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353–385.
Li, T. (2023). Employment protection and the provision of trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance, 155, 106991.
Li, Y. (2024). Linking labor with capital: How employee-friendly treatment impacts trade credit availability. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 87, 102476.
Ng, C. K., Smith, J. K., & Smith, R. L. (1999). Evidence on the Determinants of Credit Terms Used in Interfirm Trade. The Journal of Finance, 54(3), 1109–1129.
Petersen, M. A., and R. G. Rajan. (1997). Trade credit: Theories and evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 10 (3), 661–691.
Verwijmeren, P., and J. Derwall. (2010). Employee well‐being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34 (5), 956–964.
Wu, W., M. Firth, and O. M. Rui. (2014). Trust and the provision of trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance, 39, 146–159.
Xu, H., J. Wu, and M. Dao. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and trade credit. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54 (4), 1389–1416.