簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許柔潔
Salonga, Rhea Lauren
論文名稱: Impact of Renegotiation on Spin-off with Endogenous Liability
Impact of Renegotiation on Spin-off with Endogenous Liability
指導教授: 張巍勳
Chang, Wei-Shiun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所
Institute of International Management
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 102
外文關鍵詞: Procurement Auction, Spin-off, Subsidiary, Renegotiation
相關次數: 點閱:161下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Procurement auctions with the option of post-auction renegotiation have caused some serious doubts about its effectiveness especially when there exists limited and endogenous liability due to wealth constraints. Prior literature examines this exercise assuming those parameters are exogenous. This project relaxes that assumption and studies the choice of the wealth constraint through spinning off when renegotiation is allowed in procurement auctions. The results show that creating a spin-off does not have a significant effect on the probability of winning, but does have positive influence on the earnings. On buyer’s side, strong sellers yields the highest possible profit for the buyer, while weak sellers are more detrimental than spin-offs for the buyer’s profit. In addition, the worst environment for the buyers is when there are asymmetric sellers and at the same time, spinning off is allowed.

    ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1 1.2 Research Gaps. 2 1.3 Research Objectives and Contribution. 3 1.4 Research Structure. 4 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 Common Value Auctions. 10 2.2 Renegotiation. 10 2.3 Spin-off (Subsidiary) Company. 12 2.4 Procurement Model. 14 2.4.1 Baseline (B). 16 2.4.2 B + Spin-off (B+S). 18 2.4.3 Wealth (W). 20 2.4.4 W + Spin-off (W+S). 21 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 23 3.1 Experimental Design. 23 3.2 Sampling Plan. 26 3.3 Testable Hypotheses. 27 3.4 Data Analysis. 28 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 30 4.1 Summary Statistics. 30 4.2 Bidder’s Rationality 36 4.3 Analysis of Spin-off Decision 38 4.4 Analysis of Spin-off Behavior 42 4.5 Buyer’s Profit 48 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 51 5.1 Discussion and Implication. 51 5.2 Future Research. 52 REFERENCES 53 APPENDICES 55 Appendix 1: Experiment Instructions in English 55 1.1 Baseline + Spin-off (B+S). 55 1.2 Baseline (B). 60 1.3 Wealth + Spin-off (W+S). 66 1.4 Wealth (W). 73 Appendix 2: Experiment Instructions in Chinese 80 1.1 Baseline + Spin-off (B+S). 80 1.2 Baseline (B). 85 1.3 Wealth + Spin-off (W+S). 90 1.4 Wealth (W). 97

    Bajari, P., Houghton, S., + Tadelis, S. (2014). Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of adaptation costs. The American economic review, 104(4), 1288-1319.
    Bajari, P., McMillan, R., + Tadelis, S. (2009). Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: an empirical analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25(2), 372-399.
    Ball, J., Rutherford, R., + Shaw, R. (2009). The wealth effects of real estate spin-offs. Journal of Real Estate Research.
    Board, S. (2007). Bidding into the Red: A Model of Post‐Auction Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 62(6), 2695-2723.
    Brisset, K., Cochard, F., + Le Gallo, J. (2015). Secret versus public reserve price in an “outcry” English procurement auction: Experimental results. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 285-298.
    Brux, J. D. (2010). The dark and bright sides of renegotiation: An application to transport concession contracts. utilities Policy, 18(2), 77-85.
    Bulow, J., + Klemperer, P. (1994). Auctions vs. negotiations: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Calveras, A., Ganuza, J.-J., + Hauk, E. (2004). Wild bids. Gambling for resurrection in procurement contracts. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 26(1), 41-68.
    Chang, W. S., Salmon, T. C., + Saral, K. J. (2016). Procurement Auctions with Renegotiation and Wealth Constraints. Economic Inquiry, 54(3), 1684-1704.
    Charness, G., + Levin, D. (2009). The origin of the winner's curse: a laboratory study. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1(1), 207-236.
    Che, Y.-K. (1993). Design competition through multidimensional auctions. The RAND Journal of Economics, 668-680.
    Cramton, P. (1997). The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment. Journal of Economics + Management Strategy, 6(3), 431-495.
    Daley, L., Mehrotra, V., + Sivakumar, R. (1997). Corporate focus and value creation evidence from spin-offs. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(2), 257-281.
    Decarolis, F. (2014). Awarding price, contract performance, and bids screening: evidence from procurement auctions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 108-132.
    Domberger, S., Hall, C., + Li, E. A. L. (1995). The determinants of price and quality in competitively tendered contracts. The Economic Journal, 1454-1470.
    Easley, D., + Kleinberg, J. (2012). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Significance, 9, 43-44.
    Engel, E., Fischer, R., + Galetovic, A. (2006). Renegotiation without holdup: Anticipating spending and infrastructure concessions: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171-178.
    Gil, R., + Oudot, J.-M. (2009). Competitive Bidding, Renegotiation and Relational Contracting: Evidence from French Defense Procurement: University of California Santa Cruz, working paper.
    Goeree, J. K., + Offerman, T. (2002). Efficiency in auctions with private and common values: An experimental study. The American economic review, 92(3), 625-643.
    Goeree, J. K., + Offerman, T. (2003). Competitive bidding in auctions with private and common values. The Economic Journal, 113(489), 598-613.
    Gomez-Ibanez, J., + Meyer, J. (2011). Going private: The international experience with transport privatization: Brookings Institution Press.
    Guasch, J.-L. (2004): Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concessions — Doing it Right, WBI Development Studies, The World Bank, Washington DC.
    Guasch, J. L., Laffont, J.-J., + Straub, S. (2008). Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the water and transport sectors. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(2), 421-442.
    Ito, K., + Rose, E. L. (1994). The genealogical structure of Japanese firms: Parent‐subsidiary relationships. Strategic management journal, 15(S2), 35-51.
    Joskow, P. L. (1988). Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: empirical evidence. Journal of Law, Economics, + Organization, 4(1), 95-117.
    Kagel, J. H., + Levin, D. (1986). The winner's curse and public information in common value auctions. The American economic review, 894-920.
    Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of economic surveys, 13(3), 227-286.
    Krasnokutskaya, E., + Seim, K. (2011). Bid preference programs and participation in highway procurement auctions. The American economic review, 101(6), 2653-2686.
    Lorentziadis, P. L. (2016). Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 347-371.
    McAfee, R. P., + McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of economic literature, 25(2), 699-738.
    Roelofs, M. R. (2002). Common value auctions with default: an experimental approach. Experimental Economics, 5(3), 233-252.
    Spulber, D. F. (1990). Auctions and contract enforcement. Journal of Law, Economics, + Organization, 6(2), 325-344.
    Waehrer, K. (1995). A model of auction contracts with liquidated damages. Journal of Economic Theory, 67(2), 531-555.
    Wang, R. (2000). Bidding and renegotiation in procurement auctions. European Economic Review, 44(8), 1577-1597.
    Wilson, R. B. (1969). Communications to the Editor-Competitive Bidding with Disparate Information. Management Science, 15(7), 446-452.
    Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., + Beckstead, S. M. (1989). Spin-offs: What are the gains? Journal of Business Strategy, 10(2), 29-32.
    Zheng, C. Z. (2001). High bids and broke winners. Journal of Economic Theory, 100(1), 129-171.

    下載圖示 校內:2021-09-11公開
    校外:2021-09-11公開
    QR CODE