台灣機場目前的道面型式採用剛性道面為主，隨著使用年限及交通量不斷的增加，加上航機的大型化，道面普遍不堪負荷，養護維修不但耗時且成本不斷攀升。本研究由收集桃園國際機場環境、地質、現有結構斷面的相關資料，採用美國民航局(FAA)於2009年所發表AC 150/5320-6E諮詢通告之FAARFIELD程式，對於桃園國際機場現有剛性道面上加鋪熱拌瀝青混凝土(HMA)，採用石膠泥瀝青混凝土(SMA)加以評估。並進一步利用FAARFIELD程式中的非標準斷面模式，評估當加鋪層區分為底層HMA及面層SMA時，面層SMA在各參數變化±20%時其敏感度差異。由研究顯示，桃園國際機場現有剛性道面上加鋪層厚度為28cm時，可以滿足機場未來20年的航運量需求。並由敏感度分析結果中顯示，影響道面加鋪厚度最鉅者為航機的最大起飛重，其次依序為道基的CBR值及PCC層之厚度，相對於上述三者，其他參數之敏感度對於加鋪厚度之敏感度較低。在加鋪層區分為底層與面層之分析模式中顯示，有否分成兩層其總加鋪厚度值相似，由此顯示FAARFIELD程式在厚度設計上並無法考量SMA所擁有的優越性能；FAA建議對服務重量超過45噸的飛機，道面需有至少15cm的穩定處理底層，因此在28cm的加鋪厚度分配中，可採用5~10cm的SMA面層及18~23cm的HMA處理底層。於原有剛性道面上採用具有高耐久性、高抗車轍性且滿足機場道面抗滑性的石膠泥瀝青混凝土(SMA)加鋪將是一項值得採用的整建方案。

Currently, most of pavement in airport of Taiwan was rigid pavement. Because of an increase in life time and traffic, and aircraft maximization led to that pavement widely can’t afford it. Then, maintenance was not only time-consuming but cost-rising. The study collected data related environment, geology and current structural section. Use FAARFIELD program published in AC 150/5320-6E by FAA, 2009 to evaluate that SMA overlaid current rigid pavement in Taoyuan International airport. Overlay classified into double layers: HMA base and SMA surface. Further, apply nonstandard section mode of FAARFIELD program to evaluate the degree of sensitivity difference with every parameter variance ±20%. The result showed that 28 cm overlay adding current rigid pavement satisfied traffic demand in 20 years to come. From sensitivity analysis result, the best significant parameter of overlay thickness was maximum take-off weight. Next, the parameters were sequentially CBR value of subgrade and PCC layer thickness. The other parameters had lower influence to above-mentioned three parameters. No matter what overlay classified into double layers，the total overlay thickness was similar in analysis mode. From the result, it showed that FAARFIELD program didn’t consider excellent performance. FAA recommended that pavement required at least 15 cm stable treated base to service aircraft more than 45 tons. Therefore, adopt 5~10 cm SMA surface and 18~23 cm stable treated base in distribution of 28 cm pavement thickness. SMA had high durability, high rutting resistance and skid resistance to satisfy airport pavement. Use SMA to overlay above current rigid pavement was the renovation proposal to worth adopt.

中華鋪面學會(2001)，石膠泥瀝青混凝土特輯，台南。
王貴月(2011)「石膠泥瀝青混凝土破壞及養護」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
交通部民用航空局(2006)「中正國際機場道面整建工程計畫書」，臺北。
交通部民用航空局(2012)「中華民國民航統計年報」，臺北。
交通部民用航空局(2009)「台灣地區民用機場整體規劃及未來五年發展計劃」，臺北。
交通部民用航空局(2010)「台灣桃園國際機場道面整建及助導航設施提升工程計畫建設計畫書」，臺北。
邱垂德、潘昌林(2001)「石膠泥瀝青混凝土組成材料之品質需求」，石膠泥(SMA)瀝青混凝土講習研討會，中華鋪面學會主辦，台南。
陳建旭、蔡攀鰲、黃隆昇、陳虹潔（2001），「粗粒料型態與組構對石膠泥瀝青混凝土力學行為之影響」，中國土木水利工程學刊，第13 卷，第4 期，頁數827-838。
陳建旭、廖敏志(2011)「石膠泥瀝青混凝土(SMA)鋪面之材料、配比設計與施工」，台灣公路工程，第37卷第3期，第16-43頁。
Brown, E.R. and Cooley, L.A. (1999). "Designing Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures for Rut-Resistant Pavements" National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report425, pp.8-25.
Campbell, C., (1999). “The Use of Stone Mastic Asphalt on Aircraft on Pavement,” Final Report, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Chen, J.S., M.S. Shiah and H.J. Chen (2001). "Quantification of Coarse Aggregate Shape and Its Effect on Engineering Properties of Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures," Journal of Testing and Evaluation,ASTM Vol.29, pp.513-519.
Chen, J.S., K.Y. Lin, and S.Y. Wong (2005). "Quantification of Movements of Flat and Elongated Particles in Hot Mix Asphalt Subject to Wheel Load Test," Materials and Structures, RILEM, Vol.38, pp.395-402.
Federal Aviation Administration (2009). "Advisory Circular : Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation" AC 150/5320-6E, Washington, D.C.
Kandhal, P.S., Lynn, C.Y., and Parker, F. (1998), “Characterization Tests for Mineral Fillers Related to Performance of Asphalt Paving Mixtures,” NCAT Report No. 98-2, January.
Mogawer, W.S., and Stuart, K.D. (1995), “Effect of Coarse Aggregate Content on Stone Matrix Asphalt Rutting and Draindown,” Transportation Research Record, 1492, pp.1-7.
Wade (2010) “ssessment Of FAA HMA Overlay Procedures” Final Report , Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program, Auburn University. Project 06-07 June .
Prowell, B., Watson, D.E., Hurley, G.C. and Brown E.R., (2009). “Evaluation of Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) for Airfield Pavements,” Final Report , Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program, Auburn University. Project 04-04, February .