簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖美茱
Paramosa, Larissa Stefanie
論文名稱: 開發商、顧問公司、營造廠及供應商之企業社會責任相關之議題、重大主題及揭露的相關性
The Relevance of CSR Related Issues, Material Topics, and Disclosures of Developers, Consulting Firms, Contractors, and Suppliers
指導教授: 張行道
Chang, Andrew S.
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 130
外文關鍵詞: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) report, environmental issues, material topics, environmental indicator disclosure, construction companies
相關次數: 點閱:82下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • The construction sector is known as the contributor of many environmental issues, such as emissions, waste, and exploitation of resources. However, different roles of construction such as developers, consulting firms, contractors, and suppliers may not consider them as the same importance. A Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) report discloses a company’s environmental performance and the results can be compared. This research aimed to investigate the relevance of issues addressed with the material topics and disclosures in the CSR reports for four types of construction companies.
    This research adopted literature review, content analysis, and case study methods. Sixteen CSR related studies were reviewed to obtain the important issues from the four types of companies, i.e. developers, consulting firms, contractors, and material suppliers. Then, content analysis and case study of CSR reports of 16 companies were adopted to obtain material topics and indicator disclosures. Once the issues, material topics, and disclosures were identified, the relevance between three of them were analyzed.
    The results show that Energy, Emissions, and Effluents and Waste were addressed as important issues and material topics by most construction companies. In the CSR reports, Emissions is the most disclosed aspect with 45%. EN16 (Total direct and indirect GHG emissions) in Emissions also had the highest disclosure with 72%.
    For the relevance between issues, topics, and disclosures, the aspect-level and indicator-level topics-disclosure correlations are the highest with 0.61 and 0.41, respectively. It shows that the material topics are disclosed well in the CSR reports. For the four types of companies, the disclosures between consulting firms and suppliers have the highest correlation of 0.86 in the aspect-level. The disclosures between consulting firms and contractors have strong correlation with 0.74 in the indicator-level. The consulting firm-supplier and supplier-contractor relationships have high similarity in their issues, topics, and disclosures.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENT ........................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Research Motivation ............................................................................................... 2 1.2 Research Objectives ............................................................................................... 2 1.3 Research Method and Process ................................................................................ 3 1.4 Research Scope and Limitation .............................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................ 6 2.1 Corporate Social Responsibility ............................................................................. 6 2.1.1 CSR Related Issues ..................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 CSR reporting in construction industry ...................................................... 8 2.1.3 Indicator disclosure ................................................................................... 10 2.2 Stakeholders in Construction Industry ................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Definitions of stakeholders ....................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Stakeholders interest and influence .......................................................... 13 2.2.3 Stakeholders relationships ........................................................................ 13 2.3 Sustainable Construction ...................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Development of sustainable construction ................................................. 15 2.3.2 Triple Bottom Line in construction industry ............................................ 16 CHAPTER 3 MAJOR ISSUES FROM STUDIES ............................................................. 18 3.1 Issues from Studies ............................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Issues of developers .................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Issues of consulting firms ......................................................................... 23 3.1.3 Issues of contractors ................................................................................. 25 iv 3.1.4 Issues of suppliers ..................................................................................... 28 3.1.5 Summary of issues from studies ............................................................... 31 3.2 Indicator-Level Issues ........................................................................................... 34 3.2.1 Developers ................................................................................................ 35 3.2.2 Consulting firms, contractors, and material suppliers .............................. 37 3.2.3 Summary of indicator-level issues............................................................ 41 CHAPTER 4 MATERIAL TOPICS FROM CSR REPORTS ............................................. 44 4.1 Material Topics at the Aspect Level ..................................................................... 44 4.1.1 Company information ............................................................................... 44 4.1.2 Developers ................................................................................................ 50 4.1.3 Consulting firms ....................................................................................... 53 4.1.4 Contractors................................................................................................ 56 4.1.5 Suppliers ................................................................................................... 59 4.1.6 Summary of material topics ...................................................................... 62 4.2 Indicator-level Material Topics ............................................................................. 64 4.2.1 Developers ................................................................................................ 65 4.2.2 Consulting firms, contractors, and material suppliers .............................. 67 4.2.3 Summary of indicator-level topics............................................................ 71 CHAPTER 5 INDICATOR DISCLOSURE IN CSR REPORTS AND RELEVANCE AMONG ISSUES, TOPICS, AND DISCLOSURES .......................................................... 74 5.1 Indicator Disclosure of Companies ...................................................................... 74 5.1.1 Developers ................................................................................................ 75 5.1.2 Consulting firms ....................................................................................... 79 5.1.3 Contractors................................................................................................ 83 5.1.4 Suppliers ................................................................................................... 86 5.2 Disclosure Comparison......................................................................................... 90 5.2.1 Aspect disclosures .................................................................................... 90 5.2.2 Indicator disclosures ................................................................................. 92 CHAPTER 6 RELEVANCE AMONG ISSUES, TOPICS, AND DISCLOSURES BETWEEN FOUR TYPES OF COMPANIES ................................................................... 96 v 6.1 Relationships between Issues, Topics, and Disclosures ....................................... 96 6.1.1 Six aspects and their indicators ................................................................ 96 6.1.2 Aspect-level relationships......................................................................... 98 6.1.3 Indicator-level relationships ................................................................... 103 6.1.4 Aspect-level and indicator-level relationships of all company types ..... 107 6.2 Relationships for Four Types of Companies ...................................................... 110 6.2.1 Hypotheses formulation ........................................................................... 110 6.2.2 Relationships for the four types of companies ........................................ 112 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS ................................................... 118 7.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 118 7.2 Research Contribution ........................................................................................ 121 7.3 Suggestions ......................................................................................................... 121 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 123

    1. Papers and books
    1) Afzal, F., Lim, B., and Prasad, D. (2017). “An investigation of corporate
    approaches to sustainability in the construction industry.” Procedia Engineering,
    Vol. 180, pp. 202–210.
    2) Annunziata, E., Testa, F., Iraldo, F., and Frey, M. (2016). “Environmental
    responsibility in building design: An Italian regional study.” Journal of Cleaner
    Production, Vol. 112, pp. 639–648.
    3) Babak, N. A. (2017). “Transport construction negative impact on the environment.”
    Procedia Engineering, Vol. 189, pp. 867–873.
    4) Baker, C. R., Cohanier, B., and Pederzoli, D. (2012). “Corporate social and
    environmental reporting in the large retail distribution sector.” Procedia
    Economics and Finance, Vol. 2, pp. 209–218.
    5) Buse, C., Freiling, J., and Weissenfels, S. (2001). “Turning product business into
    service business: Performance contracting as a challenge of SME
    customer/supplier networks,” presented at the IMP 2001 Conference (Oslo),
    Norway. https://www.impgroup.org/uploads/papers/157.pdf, accessed on January
    15, 2019.
    6) Carroll, A. B. (2008). “A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and
    practices.” The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282746355_A_History_of_Corporate_
    Social_Responsibility_Concepts_and_Practices/download, accessed on
    December 15, 2018.
    7) Cavanagh, S. (1997). “Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications.”
    Nurse Researcher, Vol. 4(3), pp. 5–16.
    8) Chang, R. D., Zuo, J., Soebarto, V., Zhao, Z. Y., Zillante, G., and Gan, X. L.
    (2017). Discovering the transition pathways toward sustainability for construction
    enterprises: Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Construction
    Engineering and Management, Vol. 143(6), pp. 1-12.
    124
    9) Chang, R. D., Zuo, J., Zhao, Z. Y., Soebarto, V., Lu, Y., Zillante, G., and Gan, X.
    L. (2018). “Sustainability attitude and performance of construction enterprises: A
    China study.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 172, pp. 1440–1451.
    10) Danatzko, J. M., Sezen, H., and Asce, M. (2011). “Sustainable structural design
    methodologies.” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol.
    16, pp. 186–190.
    11) Doloi, H. (2013). “Cost overruns and failure in project management:
    Understanding the roles of key stakeholders in construction projects.” Journal of
    Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 139(3), pp. 267–279.
    12) Duman, D. U., Giritli, H., and McDermott, P. (2016). “Corporate social
    responsibility in construction industry: a comparative study between UK and
    Turkey.” Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 6(2), pp. 218–
    231.
    13) Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Building theories from case study research.” Academy
    of Management Review, Vol. 14(4), pp. 532–550.
    14) Ekincioglu, O., Gurgun, A. P., Engin, Y., Tarhan, M., and Kumbaracibasi, S.
    (2013). “Approaches for sustainable cement production - A case study from
    Turkey.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 66, pp. 136–142.
    15) European Commission. (2018). Construction and demolition waste (CDW).
    http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste, accessed on December 10, 2018.
    16) European Commission. (2017). Buildings. https://ec.europa.eu/energy, accessed
    on December 10, 2018.
    17) Formentini, M., and Taticchi, P. (2016). “Corporate sustainability approaches and
    governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management.” Journal of
    Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, pp. 1920–1933.
    18) Fraj-Andrés, E., López-Pérez, M. E., Melero-Polo, I., and Vázquez-Carrasco, R.
    (2012). “Company image and corporate social responsibility: reflecting with
    SMEs’ managers.” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 30(2), pp. 266–280.
    19) GRI. (2008). A snapshot of sustainability reporting in the construction and real
    estate sector. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary, accessed on April
    11, 2018.
    125
    20) GRI. (2013). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines - Reporting principles and
    standard disclosures. https://www2.globalreporting.org, accessed on April 20,
    2018.
    21) GRI. (2017). Mapping G4 to the GRI Standards. https://www.globalreporting.org,
    accessed on May 9, 2018.
    22) Göçmen, Z. A. (2014). “Exploring land developer perspectives on conservation
    subdivision design and environmentally sustainable land development.”
    Environmental Management, Vol. 54(5), pp. 1208–1222.
    23) Hendrickson, C., and Au, T. (2008). Project management for construction:
    Fundamental concepts for owners, engineers, architects, and builders.
    https://www.cmu.edu/cee/projects/PMbook/index.html, accessed on January 15,
    2019.
    24) Hernandez, H. A. L. (2015). Sustainable performance and relationships between
    the indicators in CSR reports of construction companies, Master’s thesis. National
    Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
    25) Hu, X., Xia, B., Skitmore, M., Buys, L., and Hu, Y. (2017). “What is a sustainable
    retirement village? Perceptions of Australian developers.” Journal of Cleaner
    Production, Vol. 164, pp. 179–186.
    26) Huang, B., Wang, X., Kua, H., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R., and Ren, J. (2018).
    “Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R
    principle.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 129, pp. 36–44.
    27) Huang, C. F., and Lien, H. C. (2012). “An empirical analysis of the influences of
    corporate social responsibility on organizational performance of Taiwan’s
    construction industry: Using corporate image as a mediator.” Construction
    Management and Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 263–275.
    28) Inestroza, A. M. R. (2018). Environmental performance disclosure in the CSR
    reports of international contractors, Master’s thesis. National Cheng Kung
    University, Tainan, Taiwan.
    29) International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2007). Corporate social
    responsibility: An implementation guide for business. https://www.iisd.org/
    pdf/2007/csr_guide.pdf, accessed on December 15, 2018.
    126
    30) Invidiata, A., Lavagna, M., and Ghisi, E. (2018). “Selecting design strategies
    using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings.”
    Building and Environment, Vol. 139, pp. 58–68.
    31) Jiang, W., and Wong, J. K. W. (2016). “Key activity areas of corporate social
    responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry: A study of China.” Journal of
    Cleaner Production, Vol. 113, pp. 850–860.
    32) Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology.
    Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
    33) Kudłak, R., Szőcs, I., Krumay, B., and Martinuzzi, A. (2018). “The future of CSR
    - Selected findings from a Europe-wide Delphi study.” Journal of Cleaner
    Production, Vol. 183, pp. 282–291.
    34) Li, H., Zhang, X., Ng, S. T., and Skitmore, M. (2018). “Quantifying stakeholder
    influence in decision/evaluations relating to sustainable construction in China – A
    Delphi approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 173, pp. 160–170.
    35) Liao, P. C., Tsenguun, G., and Liang, L. W. (2016). “Development of social
    responsibility evaluation framework of construction projects: A multistakeholders
    perspective.” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 145, pp. 234–241.
    36) Loosemore, M., Lim, B. T. H., Ling, F. Y. Y., and Zeng, H. Y. (2018). A
    comparison of corporate social responsibility practices in the Singapore, Australia
    and New Zealand construction industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.
    190, pp. 149–159.
    37) Luning, S. (2012). “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for exploration:
    Consultants, companies and communities in processes of engagements.”
    Resources Policy, Vol. 37(2), pp. 205–211.
    38) Ma, L., Wang, L., Wu, K. J., and Tseng, M. L. (2018). “Assessing co-benefit
    barriers among stakeholders in Chinese construction industry.” Resources,
    Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 137, pp. 101–112.
    39) Maldonado, C. R. C. (2016). Relationships between environmental initiatives and
    impact reductions in the indicators in CSR reports of construction companies,
    Master’s thesis. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
    127
    40) McDonald, J. H. (2015). Handbook of biological statistics.
    http://www.biostathandbook.com/hypothesistesting.html, accessed on January 12,
    2019.
    41) McManus, J. (2002). “The influence of stakeholder values on project
    management.” Management Services, Vol. 46(6), pp. 8–15.
    42) Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., and Yang, J. (2015). “Stakeholder management studies
    in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.” International
    Journal of Project Management, Vol. 33(2), pp. 446–457.
    43) McCallister, J. (2018). Pearson correlation coefficient: Formula, example &
    significance. https://study.com/academy/lesson/pearson-correlation-coefficientformula-
    example-significance.html#lesson, accessed on December 27, 2018.
    44) Nguyen, Q. A., and Hens, L. (2015). “Environmental performance of the cement
    industry in Vietnam: the influence of ISO 14001 certification.” Journal of Cleaner
    Production, Vol. 96, pp. 362–378.
    45) O’Connor, J. T., Torres, N., and Woo, J. (2016). Sustainability actions during the
    construction phase. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.
    142 (7), pp. 1-9.
    46) Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi, M. J., and Attari, M. (2013). “Advancing environmental
    evaluation in cement industry in Iran.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 41,
    pp. 23–30.
    47) Petrovic-Lazarevic, S. (2008). “The development of corporate social
    responsibility in the Australian construction industry.” Construction Management
    and Economics, Vol. 26(2), pp. 93–101.
    48) Pongiglione, M., and Calderini, C. (2016). “sustainable structural design :
    Comprehensive literature review.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.
    142(12), pp. 1–15.
    49) Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the Project Management Body
    of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - Fifth Edition. http://dinus.ac.id/repository/
    docs/ajar/PMBOKGuide_5th_Ed.pdf, accessed on November 25, 2018.
    50) Ratcliffe, J., Stubbs, M., and Keeping, M. (2009). Urban planning and real estate
    development 3rd edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    128
    51) Raub, S., and Blunschi, S. (2014). “The power of meaningful work: How
    awareness of CSR initiatives fosters task significance and positive work outcomes
    in service employees.” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, Vol. 55(1), pp. 10–18.
    52) Sardinha, I. D., Reijnders, L., and Antunes, P. (2011). “Using corporate social
    responsibility benchmarking framework to identify and assess corporate social
    responsibility trends of real estate companies owning and developing shopping
    centres.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 19(13), pp. 1486–1493.
    53) Shen, L. Y., Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, L., and Ji, Y. B. (2010). “Project feasibility
    study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially
    responsible construction management practice.” Journal of Cleaner Production,
    Vol. 18(3), pp. 254–259.
    54) Smith, J., Love, P. E. D., and Wyatt, R. (2001). “To build or not to build?
    Assessing the strategic needs of construction industry clients and their
    stakeholders.” Structural Survey, Vol. 19(2), pp. 121–132.
    55) Stajanca, M., and Estokova, A. (2012). “Environmental impacts of cement
    production.” Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository, pp.
    296–302.
    56) Teng, Y., Mao, C., Liu, G., and Wang, X. (2017). “Analysis of stakeholder
    relationships in the industry chain of industrialized building in China.” Journal of
    Cleaner Production, Vol. 152, pp. 387–398.
    57) United Nations. (2018). The sustainable development goals report 2018.
    https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018, accessed on December 1, 2018.
    58) Wu, C. L., Fang, D. P., Liao, P. C., Xue, J. W., Li, Y., and Wang, T. (2015).
    “Perception of corporate social responsibility: The case of Chinese international
    contractors.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 107, pp. 185–194.
    59) Xia, N., Zhong, R., Wu, C., Wang, X., and Wang, S. (2017). “Assessment of
    stakeholder-related risks in construction projects: Integrated analyses of risk
    attributes and stakeholder influences.” Journal of Construction Engineering and
    Management, Vol. 143(8), pp. 1-11.
    60) Yin, B. C. L., Laing, R., Leon, M., and Mabon, L. (2018). “An evaluation of
    sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore.” Sustainable
    Cities and Society, Vol. 39, pp. 613–620.
    129
    61) Zhao, Z. Y., Zhao, X. J., Davidson, K., and Zuo, J. (2012). “A corporate social
    responsibility indicator system for construction enterprises.” Journal of Cleaner
    Production, Vol. 29–30, pp. 277–289.
    2. CSR Reports
    1) CapitaLand. (2017). Global sustainability report 2016.
    https://www.capitaland.com/content/dam/capitaland-sites/international, accessed
    on April 16, 2018.
    2) Cemex. (2017). 2016 integrated report. https://www.cemex.com/
    documents/20143/0/IntegratedReport2016+%286%29.pdf/3ed972c6-fd93-4381-
    0ec7-e73afc69ef6b, accessed on April 22, 2018.
    3) CH2M. (2016). 2016 sustainability and corporate citizenship report.
    https://www.ch2m.com/sites/default/files/content/article, accessed on April 17,
    2018.
    4) Citycon. (2017). Sustainability accounts 2016. https://www.citycon.com/
    sites/default/files/citycon_sustainability_accounts_en.pdf, accessed on April 16,
    2018.
    5) First Capital Realty. (2017). First Capital Realty 2016 Corporate Responsibility
    and Sustainability (CRS) report. https://www.fcr.ca/uploads/
    community/CSR/FCR_CSR_2016.pdf, accessed on April 16, 2018.
    6) Fluor. (2017). 2016 sustainability report. https://www.fluor.com/
    SiteCollectionDocuments/2016-fluor-sustainability-report.pdf, accessed on April
    20, 2018.
    7) HDR. (2016). Sustainability + Corporate responsibility report: 2016.
    https://www.hdrinc.com/sites/default/files/2017-05/2016-hdr-sustainability-corpresponsibility.
    pdf, accessed on April 17, 2018.
    8) HeidelbergCement. (2017). Sustainability report 2016.
    https://www.heidelbergcement.com/en/system/files_force/assets/document,
    accessed on April 22, 2018.
    9) Hochtief. (2017). Group report 2016. https://www.hochtief.com/
    hochtief_en/mmdbdownload?id=162388&format=4, accessed on April 20, 2018.
    130
    10) Hyundai Engineering & Construction. (2016). 2016 Hyundai Engineering &
    Construction sustainability report. http://en.hdec.kr/Common/CMM/
    FileDownload.aspx?attidx=4213, accessed on April 20, 2018.
    11) LafargeHolcim. (2017). Sustainability report 2016. from
    https://www.lafargeholcim.com/sites/lafargeholcim.com/files/atoms/files/lfh_sus
    tainabilityreport_online_finalv7.pdf, accessed on April 22, 2018.
    12) Obayashi. (2016). Obayashi corporate report 2016.
    https://www.obayashi.co.jp/en/ir/upload/img/ir2016en.pdf, accessed on April 20,
    2018.
    13) Royal Haskoning DHV. (2017). Annual report 2016.
    https://www.royalhaskoningdhv.com/en-gb/about-us, accessed on April 17, 2018.
    14) Swire Properties. (2017). Sustainable development report 2016.
    http://www.swireproperties.com/~/media/Images/Swireproperties, accessed on
    April 16, 2018.
    15) Taiheiyo. (2016). CSR report 2016. http://www.taiheiyocement.
    co.jp/english/csr/pdf/csrrpt2016.pdf, accessed on April 22, 2018.
    16) WSP. (2017). 2016 Global sustainability report. https://www.wsp.com/-
    /media/Campaign/Global/Document/sustainability-report-2017/sustainabilityreport-
    wsp-2016.pdf, accessed on April 18, 2018.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-01-08公開
    校外:2024-01-08公開
    QR CODE