工業設計人員需具備的專業能力非常廣泛，橫跨認知、情意、技能三大領域。本研究藉由文獻探討，整理、歸納出工業設計人員的能力指標，再搜尋、瀏覽各領域中可能的能力測驗，嘗試將工業設計人員能力指標與測驗進行配對。依其貢獻度與可行性，並參考新進工業設計人員的專業能力需求，本研究選擇「情意」領域中的「職業道德」，與「技能」領域中的「圖面溝通」，進行研究設計。分別發展出「設計人員職業道德行為量表」，與「工業設計人員識、製圖能力測驗」。
「設計人員職業道德行為量表」研究結果顯示︰（1）「學歷」與「專業背景」差異，可能影響設計人員對於職業道德的認同度。學歷是「研究所」的受測者，比「大學、專科」者，特別注重「公眾」的職責。專業背景是「工業設計」的受測者，比「視覺傳達設計」、「其他設計」者，更加重視「公眾」、「自然環境」的職責。（2）設計人員職業道德行為量表間「委託人與雇主；設計人員；酬勞；職業；名聲、宣傳；公眾；社會與文化；自然環境」8個構面的相關係數顯著。（3）以「委託人與雇主；設計人員；酬勞；名聲、宣傳；公眾；社會與文化；自然環境」7構面為預測變項；可預測「職業」構面的68.1％。（4）受測者依集群分析，可分為4群︰「衛道人士」、「中庸之道」、「獨善其身」、「同儕至上」。
「工業設計人員識、製圖能力測驗」研究結果顯示，「專業經驗」差異，可能影響工業設計人員的識、製圖能力。以「檯式虎鉗的立體系統分解圖」為例題︰（1）「年級」方面，「四年級」受測者的「立體分解圖描繪」、「標示可動關節」得分，比「一年級」優秀。（2）「設計證照」方面，「有工業設計相關證照」受測者的「立體分解圖描繪」得分，比「無設計相關證照」者優秀。（3）另外發現，「性別」方面，「男性」受測者的「零、組件判別」得分，比「女性」優秀。
工業設計逐漸受到社會重視，影響力越強、責任就越大。期望藉由新進工業設計人員能力指標與測驗的探討，呼籲大眾關心工業設計人員的專業能力發展，健全工業設計人員的專業能力養成與考核制度建立。

Industrial designers need to have a very wide range of professional competence, across the three major areas of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Through reference review, this study discusses, collates and summarizes the industrial designers’ competence indicators. Then it goes on to research and browse the possible competence test in various fields, and try to pair up between the industrial designers’ competence indicators and the test. According to the extent of its feasibility and contribution, and the needs of novice industrial designers’ professional competence, this study chooses the "professional ethics" from the " affective " field, and the " communication of drawing " from the " psychomotor " field, to carry out research and design. It aims to develop "Designers’ professional ethic behaviors scale" and "Industrial designers’ competence test of recognition of drafts and drawing", respectively.
The research results of "Designers’ professional ethic behaviors scale" showed that : (1) The differences of "education degree" and "professional background" may affect designers’ professional ethic recognition . Testers with "graduate" degree tend to emphasis more on "public" responsibility than that with "university" degree. Testers with professional background of "industrial design" tend to emphasis more on "public", "natural environment" responsibility than testers with "visual communication design", and "other design". (2) 8 items (client & employer; designers; remuneration; profession; publicity; public; society & culture; natural environment) in "Designers’ professional ethic behaviors scale" showed significant correlation coefficient. (3) Using the following 7 items as predicting variables: " client & employer; designers; remuneration; publicity; public; society & culture; natural environment ", 68.1% of the "profession" item can be predicated. (4) According to ‘cluster analysis’, testers can be divided into 4 groups: "Moralist", "Moderationist", “The self serving", "The peer-first".
The result of "Industrial designers’ competence test of recognition of drafts and drawing " shows that the differences of "professional experience" may affect the industrial designers’ competence of recognition of drafts and drawing. The Using "exploded illustration of bench vise" as an example : (1) "Grade-wise ", the "fourth grade" outperformed "first grade" in " exploded illustration drawing" and "movable joints marking". (2) In "design certification", testers with "industrial design licenses" outperformed "license-free designers" in " exploded illustration drawing". (3) Another finding is that, "gender-wise", the "male" outperformed "female" in "components identification”.
As the social recognition of industrial design increases, its influence and responsibility also increases greatly. It is expected that through the research of novice industrial designers’ competence indicators and test, the public interest can be called upon in fields such as industrial designers’ professional competence development, and helps to complete the examination system of industrial designers’ professional competence cultivation and the establishment of its corresponding checking system.

英文部分︰
（1）Anne Anastasi，1976，Psychological testing，Macmillan
（2）Esther Kapa，2001，A Metacognitive Support during the Process of Problem Solving in a Computerized Environment， Educational Studies in Mathematics Vol. 47 No. 3
（3）Gilbert Rohde，1941，Aptitudes and Training for Industrial Design，Parnassus Vol. 13 No. 2
（4）Gilbert A. Clark，1989，Screening and Identifying Students Talented in the Visual Arts: Clark's Drawing Abilities Test，Gifted Child Quarterly Vol. 33 No. 3
（5）Gilbert A. Clark，1993，Judging Children's Drawings as Measures of Art Abilities，Studies in Art Education Vol. 34 No. 2
（6）Gilbert Clark ＆ Enid Zimmerman，1997，The Influence of Theoretical Frameworks on Clark and Zimmerman's Research about Art Talent Development，Journal of Aesthetic Education Vol. 31 No. 4
（7）Gerhard Heufler，2004，DESIGN BASICS–From Ideas to Products，Niggli Verlag
（8）I.M. Verstijnen，C. van Leeuwen，G. Goldschmidt ，R. Hamel ＆ J.M. Hennessey，1998，Creative discovery in imagery and perception︰Combining is relatively easy，restructuring takes a sketch，Acta Psychologica Vol. 99 No. 2
（9）IDSA，2004，What is industrial design？，IDSA
（10）J. Gordon Lippincott，1945，Industrial Design as a Profession，College Art Journal Vol. 4 No. 3
（11）John P. Robinson，Phillip R. Shaver ＆ Lawrence S. Wrightsman，1991，Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes，Academic Press
（12）John M. Ritz, Dte，1995，Industrial Design，The Technology Teacher
（13）Jonathon Kemnitzer，2001，Passing through the Gateway of Creativity：Becoming an Industrial Designer，The Technology Teacher Vol. 61 No. 2
（14）Jaana Holvikivi，2007，Logical Reasoning Ability in Engineering Students︰A Case Study，IEEE Transactions on Education Vol. 50 No. 4
（15）Kristina Goodrich，1993，Getting an industrial design job，IDSA
（16）Kevin J. Reeder，2001，An Overview of the Industrial Design Curriculum，The Technology Teacher Vol. 60 No. 8
（17）Lani M. van Dusen, J. David Spach, Brendon Brown ＆ Monte Hansen，1999，Trio︰a New Measure of Visual Processing Ability，Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol. 59 No. 6
（18）Lev-Wiesel, Rachel，1999，The Use of the Machover Draw-a-Person Test in Detecting Adult Survivors of Sexual Abuse︰A Pilot Study，American Journal of Art Therapy Vol. 37 No. 4
（19）Monica E. Cardella，Cynthia J. Atman ＆ Robin S. Adams，2006，Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers，Design Studies Vol. 27 No. 1
（20）Nigel Cross，2000，Engineering Design Methods–Strategies for Product Design，Wiley
（21）Ronald K. Hambleton，1971，Reviewed Work(s)︰Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test by George K. Bennett，Journal of Educational Measurement Vol. 8 No. 1
（22）Ronald Finke，1990，Creative Imagery–discoveries and inventions in visualization，Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
（23）Rachel Cooper ＆ Mike Press，1995，The Design Agenda–A Guide to Successful Design Management，Wiley
（24）Robert M. Kaplan ＆ Dennis P. Saccuzzo，1997，Psychological testing︰principles, applications, and issues，Brooks / Cole Pub. Co.,
（25）Sinan Olkun，2003，Making Connections: Improving Spatial Abilities with Engineering Drawing Activities，International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning
（26）Stavridou, Fotini & Kakana, Domna，2005，When Adolescents Represent the Third Dimension: Three Case Studies，International Journal of Art & Design Education Volume 24.1
（27）Toshiaki Takesue，2000，Expanding Industrial Designers' Abilities for IT era，Design Center, Hitachi, Ltd.
（28）Thomas O. Williams, Jr., Anna-Maria Fall, Ronald C. Eaves and Suzanne Woods-Groves，2006，The Reliability of Scores for the Draw-A-Person Intellectual Ability Test for Children, Adolescents, and Adults，Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Vol. 24 No. 2
（29）Y. Cartonnet，1999，Experimental Research on the Relations between Stereoscopic Vision and Mechanical Designers’ Activities, with a View to C.A.D. Teaching，International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9
中文部分︰
（30）王鴻祥，2001，「工業設計專業能力指標之建立」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
（31）李大偉，1986，技職教育測量與評鑑，三民
（32）吳明隆，2000，SPSS統計應用實務，松崗
（33）技術及職業教育百科全書編輯委員會，2003，技術及職業教育百科全書，教育部
（34）周文智、黃台生，2002，「我國技職校院工業設計系學生專業能力指標之建構」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫摘要式成果報告
（35）陸定邦、林群超，2004，「生活流行用品設計人才供需之調查與研究」計劃執行成果報告，大學院校藝術與設計系所人才培育計劃
（36）張木生，1983，立體圖學–上冊，正工
（37）張世彗，2003，創造力–理論、技術∕技法與培育，自行出版
（38）許言、張文智、楊耿賢，2007，新進設計師招募方式與工作表現對設計教育的意涵，國際藝術教育學刊 Vol. 5 No. 1
（39）葉雯玓，2000，「臺灣工業設計師專業能力及其需求性探討」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
（40）楊旻洲，2002，「工業設計人才之適才適性適所研究」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
（41）劉育東，2001，Protocol Analysis在一般媒材、電腦媒材與網路環境下的比較研究，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
（42）邊守仁，1999，產品創新設計–工業設計專案的解構與重建，全華
網路部分︰
（43）AGDA，1996， Code of Ethics，http://www.agda.com.au/about/code
（44）Alan Chapman，2006，bloom's taxonomy - learning domains，http://www.businessballs.com/bloomstaxonomyoflearningdomains.htm
（45）ASID，2006，ASID Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct，http://www.asid.org/find/ASID+Code+of+Ethics+and+Professional+Conduct.htm
（46）AIGA，2008，Standards of professional practice，http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/standards-professional-practice
（47）Claire R Maley，2008，A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test，http://210.60.0.152/PROMS2007TAIWAN/4_PROMS%20Taiwan%202007%20PP%20slideshow_0717E4-4R2205.pdf
（48）DIA，2008，Code of Ethics，http://www.design.org.au/content.cfm?id=35
（49）ICOGRADA、ICSID、IFI，1983，ICOGRADA / ICSID / IFI，Model Code of Professional Conduct for Designers，http://www.ifiworld.org/index.cfm?GPID=33
（50）ICSID，2008，Professional Ethics ICSID Code of Professional Ethics，http://ingles.duoc.cl/sl/ethics/pdf/Professional.pdf
（51）IDSA，2008，Code of Ethics，http://www.idsa.org/absolutenm/templates/?a=57&z=0
（52）Jennifer Martin，2001，Bloom's learning domains，http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/BloomsLD/index.htm
（53）Nova Southeastern University - Center for Psychological Studies，2007，Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test，http://www.cps.nova.edu/~cpphelp/BMCT.html
（54）勞委會職訓局南區職評資源中心，2008，職評工具簡介–工作氣質測驗，http://www.vercenter.nknu.edu.tw/modules/catalog3/docs/work.doc
（55）勞委會職訓局南區職評資源中心，2008，職評工具簡介–我喜歡做的事，http://www.vercenter.nknu.edu.tw/modules/catalog3/docs/like.doc
（56）勞委會職訓局南區職評資源中心，2008，職評工具簡介–通用性向測驗，http://www.vercenter.nknu.edu.tw/modules/catalog3/docs/a.doc