簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林宜萱
Lin, Yi-Syuan
論文名稱: 商業銀行持股並進入企業董監事會對股票報酬率之影響
The Relationship between Commercial Bankers on Boards and Stock Returns of Firms
指導教授: 梁少懷
Liang, Shao-Huai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 31
中文關鍵詞: 銀行持股董監事會金控子銀行股票報酬
外文關鍵詞: Bank Holding, Board of Directors, Financial Holding Bank, Stock Return
相關次數: 點閱:69下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用2010-2018年間台灣上市及上櫃公司作為研究樣本,欲探討商業銀行持股與擔任董監事之行為和被投資企業股票報酬之間的關聯性,並進一步以商業銀行的持股率與投資報酬率之間的線性與非線性關係來判斷是否存在最適持股比率。研究結果顯示,具有商業銀行持股或擔任董監事的企業,其股票會產生較大的報酬率。此外,儘管顯著水準不足,但若該商業銀行是隸屬於台灣地區16家金融控股公司旗下之子企業,其對股票報酬帶來的正面影響可能更大。本文認為此乃因為這類商業銀行可以藉由母公司的資源整合和資訊蒐集等能力來降低與被投資企業之間的資訊不對稱程度,並對社會傳達出該被投資企業體質健全之認證訊號,進而吸引投資者跟隨銀行腳步進行投資,使股價順勢上漲所形成。又進一步觀察商業銀行持股比率與企業股票報酬之關聯,實證結果顯示兩者之間存在單一正向線性關聯,而其先上升、後減少的非線性關係則不顯著。故本文結合台灣現行相關法令後推論,在商業銀行持股比率低於被投資企業實收資本總額或已發行股份總數5%以下之水準時,商業銀行持股以及進入企業擔任董監事之行為能為企業的股票帶來較多報酬,而當銀行持股越多時,報酬上升的幅度亦將隨之增加。

    This paper analyzes a sample of Taiwan listed and over-the-counter companies from 2010 to 2018 to examine the impact of commercial banks who hold firm’s shares and act as directors or supervisors on stock returns. Also, we use the linear and nonlinear relationship between shareholding ratio and stock return to determine whether an optimal shareholding ratio exists. The results show that companies invested by commercial banks will receive higher stock returns. Moreover, the positive impact on stock returns will be more significant if the commercial bank is a subsidiary of Taiwan Financial Holdings because it can reduce the information asymmetry between creditors and shareholders by taking advantage of parent company’s resource integration and information collection capabilities, and convey a good signal about the invested firm to society to attract investors buying stocks. On the other hand, the empirical results show that there is only a single positive linear correlation between shareholding ratio and stock return, and the nonlinear relationship doesn’t exist. Therefore, combining our empirical results with Taiwan’s current laws, we can infer that when a commercial bank’s shareholding ratio is less than 5% of the total issued shares of the invested firm, acting as a shareholder, director, or supervisor of invested firm can bring more stock return. The more shares the commercial banks hold, the greater the increase in stock returns, but we do not know what the most appropriate shareholding ratio should be.

    摘要 I 英文延伸摘要 II 目錄 V 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 5 第一節 銀行持股與進入企業董事會的企業特性與其帶來的利弊 5 第二節 銀行進入企業董監事會對企業財務績效影響 6 第三節 銀行規模與市場影響力 9 第四節 企業董事之最適持股比率 10 第三章 樣本與變數模型 12 第一節 資料來源與樣本選擇 12 第二節 變數定義 12 第三節 研究模型 16 第四章 實證結果與分析 18 第一節 敘述性統計 18 第二節 實證結果與迴歸分析 20 第五章 結論 24 第一節 研究結論 24 第二節 研究限制與建議 24 參考文獻 27

    中文文獻
    王克陸、陳美燁、彭雅惠 (2007)。台灣金控子銀行經營業績之評估-使用DEA方法。科技管理學刊,12(2),1-27。
    朱文儀、李庭閣、莊正民、廖盈琇 (2019)。大股東股權集中度、外部法人持股、外部董事年資對公司績效之影響-台灣上市公司的實證研究。中山管理評論,27(3),551-582。
    周麗娜 (2013)。股利發放率、股利殖利率與股票報酬之探討。國立成功大學財務金融研究所在職專班碩士論文。
    洪榮華、雷雅淇 (2002)。公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票報酬關係之實證研究。管理評論,21(3),25-48。
    洪碧霞、陳瑞璽、蔡侑達 (2015)。公開資訊觀察站訊息如何影響股票報酬? 臺灣股票市場日內及日間資料分析。證券市場發展季刊,27(2),125-184。
    張訓華 (1991)。股數結構、董事會組成輿企業當年財務績效--以77年度會計報酬率為準。東吳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    陳育成、黃雅瑋、賴靜惠 (2006)。盈餘宣告對價量、買賣價差之影響。證券市場發展季刊,18(4),1-31。
    陳昭蓉、廖益興 (2014)。銀行進入公司董事會、代理問題與資訊不對稱之關聯性研究。人文及社會科學集刊,26(4),583-619。
    楊蓁海 (2008)。我國金融機構轉投資相關問題之探討。中央銀行季刊,30(2),45-80。
    葉馨蓮 (2017)。月營收資訊內涵、投資人情緒與股價報酬之探討。國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    鄭秀玲、劉育碩 (2000)。銀行規模、多角化程度與經營效率分析:資料包絡法之應用。人文及社會科學集刊,12(1),103-148。
    英文文獻
    Abe, N., Gaston, N., & Kubo, K. (2005). Executive pay in Japan: the role of bank-appointed monitors and the Main Bank relationship. Japan and the World Economy, 17(3), 371-394.
    Ahn, S., & Choi, W. (2009). The role of bank monitoring in corporate governance: Evidence from borrowers’ earnings management behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 425-434.
    Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2007). Stock Return Predictability: Is it There? Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 651-707.
    Barnhart, S. W., & Rosenstein, S. (1998). Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Finacial Review, 33, 1-16.
    Basco, R., & Voordeckers, W. (2015). The relationship between the board of directors and firm performance in private family firms: A test of the demographic versus behavioral approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(4), 411-435.
    Bikker, J., Finnie, P., & Spierdijk, L. (2006). The Impact of Bank Size on Market Power. DNB Working Paper, (120), 1-37.
    Booth, J. R., & Deli, D. N. (1999). On executives of financial institutions as outside directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 227-250.
    Brennan, M. J. (1970). Taxes, Market Valuation and Corporate Financial Policy. Corporate Financial Policy, 23(4), 417-427.
    Cable, J. (1985). Capital Market Information and Industrial Performance: The Role of West German Banks. The Economic Journal, 95(377), 118-132.
    Chahine, S., & Safieddine, A. (2008). Corporate governance and the external monitoring of banks in Lebanon. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 8(3), 258-270.
    De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
    Dewatripont, M., & Tirole, J. (1994). A Theory of Debt and Equity: Diversity of Securities and Manager-Shareholder Congruence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 1027-1054.
    Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393-414.
    Easley, D., & O'Hara, M. (1992). Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 577-605.
    Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
    Fama, E. F. (1985). What's different about banks. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 29-39.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995). Size and Book‐to‐Market Factors in Earnings and Returns. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 131-155.
    González, F. (2011). Information Content of Bank Equity Stakes. Theory and Evidence.
    Gul, S., Kamran, A., Khan, M. B., Razzaq, N., & Rehman, S. U. (2012). Financial Ratios and Stock Return Predictability (Evidence from Pakistan). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(10), 1-6.
    Haan, J. D., & Poghosyan, T. (2012). Bank size, market concentration, and bank earnings volatility in the US. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(1), 35-54.
    Hawawini, G., & Keim, D. B. (1995). On the Predictability of Common Stock Returns: World-Wide Evidence. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 9, 497-544.
    Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., & Scharfstein, D. (1991). Corporate Structure, Liquidity and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 33-60.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The Market For Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5-50.
    Jiang, W., Li, K., & Shao, P. (2010). When Shareholders Are Creditors: Effects of the Simultaneous Holding of Equity and Debt by Non-commercial Banking Institutions. Review of Financial Studies, 23(10), 3595-3637.

    Kang, J.-K., & Shivdasani, A. (1999). Alternative mechanisms for corporate governance in Japan: An analysis of independent and bank-affiliated firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 7, 1-22.
    Kroszner, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (2001). Bankers on Boards: monitoring, conflicts of interest, and lender liability. Journal of Financial Economics, 62, 415-452.
    Lee, Y. S., Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1999). The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8(4), 421-431.
    Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387.
    Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1993). Board Composition and Corporate Financing: The Impact of Financial Institution Representation on Borrowing. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 603-618.
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
    Morck, R., Nakamura, M., & Shivdasani, A. (2000). Banks, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value in Japan. The Journal of Business, 73(4), 539-567.
    Nofsinger, J. R., & Sias, R. W. (1999). Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutionaland Individual Investors. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2263-2295.
    Perera, S., Skully, M., & Wickramanayake, J. (2007). Cost Efficiency in South Asian Banking: The Impact of Bank Size, State Ownership and Stock Exchange Listings. International Review of Finance, 7(1-2), 35-60.
    Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3-37.
    Reinganum, M. R. (1981). Misspecification of capital asset pricing_Empirical anomalies based on earnings' yields and market values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 19-46.

    Roe, M. J. (1993). Mutual Funds in the Boardroom. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5, 56-61.
    Sharpe, S. A. (1990). Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending, and Implicit Contracts: A Stylized Model of Customer Relationships. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1069-1087.
    Shiller, R. J. (1984). Stock Prices and Social Dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 457-510.
    Trevino, R., & Robertson, F. (2002). P/E ratios and Stock Market Returns. Journal of Financial Planning, 15(2), 76-84.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2025-06-25公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE