簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳穎兒
Chan, Wing Yee
論文名稱: 服務學習對知識建構影響之探索性研究
An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Service-Learning on Knowledge Construction
指導教授: 董旭英
Tung, Yuk-Ying
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 270
中文關鍵詞: 服務學習知識建構高等教育公民參與協作學習
外文關鍵詞: Service-Learning, knowledge construction, higher education, civic engagement, collaborative learning
相關次數: 點閱:22下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討高等教育中服務學習(Service-Learning, S-L)對知識建構之影響,並深入剖析其運作機制、影響因子,以及多元利害關係人在形塑學習成果中之角色。本研究立基於體驗學習理論、轉化學習理論及社會建構主義觀點,提出三項核心假設:(H1)服務學習能創造超越傳統課室學習的多重知識建構契機;(H2)服務學習之成效受方案設計與情境條件之調節;(H3)服務學習中的知識建構乃透過學生、教師及社區夥伴間之協作互動而生成。

    本研究採混合研究法(mixed-methods research design)。量化研究部分,針對香港某大學修習服務學習課程之334名大學生進行前後測問卷調查,以評量七大核心學習範疇:學科專業知識、溝通技巧、組織能力、社交勝任力、問題解決能力、研究技能及公民導向。質性資料則透過17場焦點團體訪談(共69名學生參與)及學生反思日誌之文本分析所得。

    量化結果顯示,學生在七項學習範疇皆呈現統計上顯著之提升,其中以學科專業知識之增益最為顯著。質性分析歸納出七個相互交織的學習面向,並凸顯「反思」作為將經驗轉化為知識之核心機制。研究結果進一步證實,服務學習中的知識建構本質上具備協作性,涵蓋教師、教學助理、社區夥伴及服務對象之參與。然而,學習成效顯著受到方案設計要素(如課程目標對準度、反思活動結構及社區參與時長)之影響。

    綜合上述研究發現,本研究提出「參與式知識共創動態生態系統」(Dynamic Ecosystem of Engaged Knowledge Co-Creation)理論框架,將服務學習概念化為一迭代、協作且具轉化性之知識建構歷程。該框架確立批判性反思為學習之核心驅動力,並強調利害關係人與情境條件間之相互依存性。本研究不僅增進對高等教育中模式二(Mode 2)及模式三(Mode 3)知識建構之理解,亦提供服務學習連結學術學習與公民參與之實證支持。總結而言,設計周全的服務學習方案能有效提升學術學習、個人發展及民主公民素養,賦能學生應對複雜之社會挑戰。

    This study examines the impact of Service-Learning (S-L) on knowledge construction in higher education, with particular attention to its mechanisms, influencing factors, and the roles of multiple stakeholders in shaping learning outcomes. Grounded in experiential learning theory, transformative learning theory, and social constructivist perspectives, the study addresses three central hypotheses: (H1) Service-Learning creates opportunities for multiple forms of knowledge construction beyond traditional classroom learning; (H2) the effectiveness of Service-Learning varies according to program design and contextual conditions; and (H3) knowledge construction in Service-Learning emerges through collaborative interactions among students, faculty, and community partners.

    A mixed-methods research design was adopted. Quantitative data were collected from 334 undergraduate students enrolled in Service-Learning courses at a university in Hong Kong using pretest–posttest questionnaires measuring seven learning domains: subject-related knowledge, communication skills, organization skills, social competence, problem-solving skills, research skills, and civic orientation. Qualitative data were obtained through 17 focus group interviews involving 69 students and through analysis of students' reflective writings.

    Quantitative findings indicate statistically significant improvements across all seven learning domains, with notable gains in subject-related knowledge. Qualitative analysis reveals seven interconnected areas of learning, highlighting reflection as the central mechanism through which experience is transformed into knowledge. The findings further demonstrate that knowledge construction in Service-Learning is inherently collaborative, involving faculty members, teaching assistants, community partners, and service recipients. However, the effectiveness of learning outcomes is significantly shaped by program design elements such as alignment with course objectives, the structure of reflection activities, and the duration of community engagement.

    Based on the integrated findings, this study proposes a theoretical framework—the Dynamic Ecosystem of Engaged Knowledge Co-Creation—which conceptualizes Service-Learning as an iterative, collaborative, and transformative process of knowledge construction. The framework positions critical reflection as the core driver of learning while emphasizing the interdependence of stakeholders and contextual conditions. The study contributes to the understanding of Mode 2 and Mode 3 knowledge construction in higher education and provides empirical evidence of Service-Learning’s capacity to bridge academic learning with civic engagement. Overall, the findings suggest that well-designed Service-Learning programs can enhance academic learning, personal development, and democratic citizenship, preparing students to address complex societal challenges.

    中文摘要 i ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v TABLE OF CONTENTS vii LIST OF TABLE xiv LIST OF FIGURE xv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The context of research 1 1.2 Research Question and Objectives 4 1.2.1 Research Question (RQ) 4 1.2.2 Research Objectives (RO) 4 1.2.3 Hypothesis (H) 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 Classical and Philosophical Perspectives on Knowledge 6 2.1.1 Plato's Theory of Knowledge: Justified True Belief 6 2.1.2 Aristotle’s Views on Knowledge: Experience as foundational to Knowledge construction 8 2.1.3 John Dewey’s Theory of Knowledge: Pragmatism and Inquiry 12 2.1.4 Piaget’s Genetic Epistemology: A Developmental Approach to Knowledge 15 2.1.5 Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory: Knowledge as a Social Construct 20 2.1.6 Berger and Luckmann’s Social Construction of Knowledge 24 2.1.7 Habermas’s Theory of Knowledge and Human Interests 27 2.1.8 Nonaka and Takeuchi’s (1995) Knowledge Creation Theory 31 2.1.9 Theories of Situated and Distributed Knowledge 32 2.1.10 Knowledge construction models : Mode 1, Mode 2, Mode 3 32 2.1.11 Power Dynamics in Knowledge Construction 40 2.2 The Role of Higher Education in Knowledge construction 40 2.2.1 University-Community Engagement and Knowledge construction 41 2.3 Theoretical Foundations of Service-Learning 42 2.3.1 Experiential Learning Theory 45 2.3.2 Transformative Learning Theory 47 2.3.3 Constructivist Learning Theory 48 2.3.4 Critical Pedagogy 49 2.3.5 Developmental Theories 49 2.3.6 Social and Motivational Theories 50 2.4 Summary 50 2.4.1 Knowledge Construction as a Theoretical Foundation for Service-Learning 51 2.4.2 Mechanisms of Knowledge Construction in Service-Learning 53 2.4.3 Outcomes of Knowledge Construction in Service-Learning 55 2.4.4 Implications for Higher Education and Future Research 74 2.5 The Conceptual Model, Research Questions, And Hypotheses 75 2.5.1 The Conceptual Model 75 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 82 3.1 Participants 82 3.2 Research Tools 82 3.2.1 Quantitative Method 82 3.2.2 Qualitative Methods 83 3.3 Data Analysis 84 3.3.1 Quantitative Method: Paired Samples t-test 84 3.3.2 Qualitative Methods 85 CHAPTER 4 QUANTITATIVE FINDINGS 87 4.1 Participant Profile 87 4.1.1 Gender Distribution 88 4.1.2 Year of Study Distribution 88 4.1.3 Faculty Distribution 88 4.2 Analysis 88 4.2.1 Overview of Learning Outcomes 88 4.2.2 Paired Samples T-Test Results 89 4.2.3 Key Findings 90 4.2.3.1 Subject-Related Knowledge. 90 4.2.3.2 Communication Skills. 90 4.2.3.3 Organization Skills. 91 4.2.3.4 Social Competence. 91 4.2.3.5 Problem-Solving Skills. 91 4.2.3.6 Research Skills. 92 4.2.3.7 Civic orientation. 92 4.2.4 Effect Size Analysis 93 4.3 Summary 93 CHAPTER 5 QUALITATIVE RESULTS 95 5.1 Introduction 95 5.2 Key Areas of Student Learning in Knowledge Construction Through Service-Learning 95 5.2.1 Application of Course Knowledge: Bridging Theory and Practice 96 5.2.1.1 Practical Application of Business Theories. 96 5.2.1.2 Making Abstract Concepts Tangible. 97 5.2.1.3 Instructional Design in Practice. 98 5.2.2 Development of Communication Skills: Enhancing Interpersonal and Intercultural Competencies 100 5.2.2.1 Interpersonal Communication Within Project Groups. 101 5.2.2.2 Communication with Diverse Service Recipients. 102 5.2.3 Enhanced Research Skills: Developing Methodological Competencies Through Community-Based Inquiry 106 5.2.4 Improved Organization and Problem-Solving Skills: Developing Adaptive Management Capabilities 113 5.2.5 Deeper Understanding of Service Recipients and Social Issues: Developing Contextual Knowledge and Social Awareness 119 5.2.6 Increased Civic Engagement and Social Responsibility: Developing Democratic Citizenship Capacities 125 5.2.7 Personal Growth and Satisfaction: Developing Purpose and Meaning Through Service 131 5.3 Implications for Knowledge Construction 136 5.3.1 Experiential Learning as a Foundation for Knowledge Construction 137 5.3.2 Reflection as a Tool for Deepening Knowledge 138 5.3.3 Interdisciplinary Integration of Knowledge 138 5.3.4 Community Engagement as a Source of Knowledge 139 5.3.5 Challenges and Barriers in Knowledge Construction 140 5.3.6 Broader Implications for Higher Education 141 5.3.7 Summary 141 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION 143 6.1 Overview of Research Hypotheses and Objectives 143 6.2 The Impact of Service-Learning on Knowledge Construction (H1, RO1) 144 6.2.1 Bridging Theory and Practice 144 6.2.2 Development of Problem-Solving Skills 144 6.2.3 Civic Orientation and Social Responsibility 145 6.3 Mechanisms and Processes of Knowledge Construction (H1, H3, RO2) 146 6.3.1 Reflection as a Catalyst for Learning 146 6.3.1.1 Structured Reflection in Service-Learning. 146 6.3.1.2 Reflection as a Tool for Personal Growth and Empathy Development. 148 6.3.1.3 Reflection and Collaborative Knowledge Construction. 148 6.3.1.4 Challenges and Opportunities in Reflection. 149 6.3.2 Collaborative Knowledge Construction 151 6.4 Factors Influencing Effectiveness (H2, RO3) 151 6.4.1 Program Design and Implementation 151 6.4.2 Contextual Factors 152 6.5 Implications for Pedagogical Practices 152 6.6 The Role of Stakeholders in Facilitating Knowledge Construction (RQ4, RO3, H3) 153 6.6.1 Course Instructors: Bridging Theory and Practice 153 6.6.1.1 From Knowledge Dispensers to Co-Learners. 153 6.6.1.2 Guidance in Contextual Application. 154 6.6.1.3 Promoting Interdisciplinary Knowledge Co-Creation. 155 6.6.1.4 Effectiveness in Fostering Transformation. 156 6.6.2 Teaching Assistants (TAs): Supporting Logistical and Emotional Needs 157 6.6.2.1 Logistical Support and Active Participation. 157 6.6.2.2 Encouraging Collaborative Knowledge Building. 158 6.6.2.3 Emotional Support. 158 6.6.2.4 Effectiveness in Fostering Transformation. 158 6.6.3 Partner Agencies: Facilitating Real-World Engagement 159 6.6.3.1 Providing Contextual Expertise. 159 6.6.3.2 Fostering Reciprocal Knowledge Exchange. 160 6.6.3.3 Co-Creation of Knowledge. 160 6.6.3.4 Effectiveness in Fostering Transformation. 160 6.6.4 Service Targets: Transforming Stereotypes and Building Empathy 161 6.6.4.1 Challenging Stereotypes Through Direct Interaction. 161 6.6.4.2 Fostering Empathy and Perspective-Taking. 161 6.7 A Modified Model of Knowledge Construction in Service-Learning: The Dynamic Ecosystem of Engaged Knowledge Co-Creation 162 6.7.1 Advancing the Understanding of Knowledge Construction in Service-Learning 162 6.7.2 Core Components of the Modified Model 163 6.7.3 The Higher Education Institution (HEI) Knowledge Ecosystem: Foundational Learning and Preparation 164 6.7.3.1 Formal Curricular Learning. 165 6.7.4 The Critical Reflection and Meaning-Making Engine: The Heart of Knowledge Construction 167 6.7.4.1 Nature of Reflection in the Model 167 6.7.5 The Service-Learning Engagement and Impact Cycle: An Iterative Journey 169 6.7.6 The Ecosystem of Stakeholder Collaboration: Co-Creating Knowledge (H3) 173 6.7.6.1 Course Instructors: Facilitators, Mentors, and Co-Learners. 173 6.7.6.2 Teaching Assistants (TAs): Logistical and Emotional Scaffolding. 174 6.7.6.3 Partner Agencies: Gateways to Authentic Contexts and Expertise. 174 6.7.6.4 Service Targets: Catalysts for Empathy, Perspective Transformation, and Reciprocal Learning. 175 6.7.7 Program Design and Contextual Factors: Shaping the S-L Experience (H2) 176 6.7.7.1 Program Design Elements 176 6.7.7.2 Implementation Factors 176 6.7.7.3 Contextual Factors 177 6.7.8 Multifaceted Learning Outcomes: Products of the Engaged Ecosystem 177 6.7.8.1 Academic Learning and Skill Development 177 6.7.8.2 Personal Growth and Development 178 6.7.8.3 Civic Engagement and Social Responsibility 179 6.7.9 Integration, Iteration, and Transformation within the Model 179 6.7.10 Summary: Embracing the Dynamic Ecosystem for Enhanced Knowledge Construction 180 6.8 Future Research Directions 180 6.8.1 Longitudinal Studies: Examining the Long-Term Impacts of Service-Learning 181 6.8.1.1Professional Trajectories 181 6.8.1.2 Civic Engagement 181 6.8.1.3 Lifelong Learning. 182 6.8.2 Comparative Analyses: Investigating Program Designs and Contextual Factors 183 6.8.2.1 Comparative Studies Across Disciplines 183 6.8.2.2 Influence of Contextual Factors 183 6.8.2.3 Variations in Program Design 184 6.8.3 Stakeholder Contributions: Exploring Roles and Interactions 185 6.8.3.1 Faculty Contributions 185 6.8.3.2 Contributions of Teaching Assistants (TAs) 185 6.8.3.3 Community Partner and Service Recipient Roles 186 6.8.3.4 Dynamics of Collaboration 187 6.9 Conclusion 187 6.9.1 Key Contributions to Service-Learning 188 6.9.2 Factors Influencing Effectiveness 188 6.9.3 Collaborative Knowledge Construction 189 6.9.4 Implications for Pedagogical Practices 189 6.9.5 Future Research Directions 190 Chapter 7 Concluding Remarks 191 7.1 Key Findings 191 7.1.1 Impact of Service-Learning on Knowledge Construction (RQ1, RO1, H1) 191 7.1.2 Mechanisms and Processes Facilitating Knowledge Construction (RQ2, RO2, H1, H3) 192 7.1.3 Factors Influencing Effectiveness (RQ3, RO3, H2) 192 7.1.4 Stakeholder Contributions (RQ4, RO3, H3) 193 7.2 Implications for Pedagogical Practices 193 7.3 Future Research Directions 193 7.4 Conclusion 194 REFERENCES 195 APPENDICES 209 Appendix 1A 209 Appendix 1B 217 Appendix 1C 225 Appendix 1D 236 Appendix 2 244 Appendix 3 245 Appendix 4 252

    Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
    Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 350 BCE)
    Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29(2), 137–154.
    Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
    Astin, A.W., Vogelgesang L. J., Kimberly M., Jodi A., Nida D., Uma J., Victor S. & Yamamura, E. (2006). Understanding the effects of service-learning: A study of students and faculty. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
    Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.
    Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31-47.
    Becker, N. J. (2000). Service learning in the curriculum: Preparing LIS students for the next millennium. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 41(4): 285-293.
    Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books.
    Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Intercultural Press.
    Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. Routledge.
    Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
    Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi A., and Herremans I. (2010). When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics , 95, 297-318.
    Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
    Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service & Outreach, 1(1), 11-20.
    Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139-150.
    Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603-618.
    Bringle, R & Hatcher, J. (1995). A Service Learning Curriculum for Faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 112-122.
    Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons, 77(4), 179–185.
    Britt, M. A. (Ed.). (2012). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57). Academic Press.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
    Bronk, K. C. (2011). The role of purpose in life in healthy identity formation: A new approach. New Directions for Youth Development, 2011(132), 31-44.
    Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. In L. Kahlor & P. Stout (Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in communication (pp. 11-39). Routledge.
    Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
    Brownell, J. (2010). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
    Campbell, D. F., & Carayannis, E. G. (2016). The academic firm: a new design and redesign proposition for entrepreneurship in innovation-driven knowledge economy. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 12.
    Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
    Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12. http://www.innovationentrepreneurship.com/content/pdf/2192-5372-1-2.pdf.
    Chan, A., Ma, X., Fong, M., & Lingnan University . Office of Service-Learning. (2006). Service-Learning and research scheme : The Lingnan model. Hong Kong: Office of Service-Learning (OSL), Lingnan University.
    Chan, C. M. A., LEE, W. K. M. & Ma, H. K. C. (2009). Service-Learning Model at Lingnan University : Development Strategies and Outcome Assessment. Staff Publications.
    Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
    Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. Free Press.
    Compact, M. C. (1999). From Charity to Change: Campus Community Collaborations from Minnesota and the Nation. Minneapolis: MN.
    Crabtree, R. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations for international service learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(1),18-36.
    Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk, K. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119-128.
    Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.
    Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51-76). Solution Tree Press.
    Dewey, J. (1916/2004). Democracy and education. Dover Publications.
    Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath and Company.
    Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and education. Touchstone.
    Dill, D., & Soo, M. (2004). Transparency and quality in higher education markets. In P. N. Teixeira, D. B. Johnstone, M. J. Rosa, & H. Vossensteyn (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? (pp. 61–85). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 276-285.
    Dostilio, L. D., Harrison, B., & ESDATE, K. (2012). Complexities of community-campus partnerships: A case study. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(4), 119-148.
    Dragne, C. (2007). Background document for the University of Victoria Task Force on Civic Engagement. Background document on University-community engagement, 9,11-39.
    Driscoll, A. (2008). Carnegie's Community-Engagement Classification: Intentions and Insights. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 40(1):38-41.
    Ehrlich, T. (1996). Foreword. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Service-Learning in higher education : Concepts and practices . San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.
    Ehrlich, T. (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Oryx Press.
    Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
    Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. Falmer Press.
    Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113-136.
    Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton.
    Eyler, J. (2000). What do we most need to know about the impact of Service-Learning on student learning?. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Special Issue, Fall 2000, 11-17.
    Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass.
    Fine, G. (2003). Introduction. Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays. N.Y.: Oxford University Press: 5–7.
    Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. University of Chicago Press.
    Fong, L. Y. (2003). The development of Service-Learning in Higher Education. The Report for Council of Youth R.O.C.
    Freire, P. (1970/2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
    Furco, A. (1996). Service-Learning: a balanced approach to experiential education. Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning. Corporation for National Service, Washington, DC: 2-6.
    Gallopin, G. C., Silvio, F., O'Connor, M, and Ravetz. J. (2001). Science for the twenty-first century: From social contract to the scientific core. International Journal Social Science, 168, 219–229.
    Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Harvard Business School Press.
    Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. Basic Books.
    Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
    Gibbons, M. (1998). Higher education relevance in the 21st century. In The United Nations Educational, Social, and Cultural Organization World Conference on Higher Education. Paris: World Bank.
    Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications.
    Gibson, J. L. (2003). Organizations: Behavior, structure, processes (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
    Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
    Gortzen, R. & Frederik, V. G, (1970). Jurgen Habermas: The complete oeuvre. A bibliography of primarly literature, translations and reviews. Human Studies, 2, 285-300.
    Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417.
    Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280.
    Habermas, J. (1971). reflections on the linguistic foundations of sociology: The christian gauss lectures (Princeton University, February-March 1971). On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction, B. Fultner (trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. 1–103.
    Hart, A. & Northmore, S. (2010). Auditing and evaluating university – community engagement: Lessons from a uk case study. Higher Education Quarterly, n.p (n.i):1-25.
    Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.
    Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.
    Howard, J. (2013). Academic Service-Learning: Myths, Challenges, and Recommendations, http://data.ohr.umn.edu/protected/service1.pdf
    Hoyt, L. (2010). A new lens for civic learning: Moving from "thin" to "thick" conceptions of civic identity, knowledge, and action. Journal of College and Character, 11(4).
    Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
    Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
    Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-Learning in today’s higher education. In Jacoby, B. (Ed.), Service-Learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Jonassen, C. T. (1960). Toward an operational definition of community welfare. Social Problems, 8(2), 112-118.
    Keeling, R. P. (Ed.). (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators and American College Personnel Association.
    Kegan, R. (1994). In Over our Hheads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press.
    Kempner, K. M., & Tierney, W. G. (Eds.). (1996). The social role of higher education: comparative perspectives (Vol. 7). Taylor & Francis.
    Keyton, J. (2017). Communication in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 413-436.
    Kiely, R. (2004). A chameleon with a complex: Searching for transformation in international service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(2), 5-20.
    Kiely, R. (2005). A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(1), 5–22.
    King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. Jossey-Bass.
    Kirkham, R. L. (1984). Does the Gettier Problem Rest on a Mistake?. Mind. New Series. 93 (372), 501–513.
    Klein, G. (2003). Intuition at work: Why developing your gut instincts will make you better at what you do. Currency.
    Klein, J. T. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. Jossey-Bass.
    Knefelkamp, L. L. (2008). Holistic learning communities: Weaving connections among intellectual, personal, and civic development. In L. L. Knefelkamp, R. D. Brown, & C. Lee Widick (Eds.), Applying new developmental findings. New Directions for Student Services, 1978(4), 1-10.
    Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. ACTACo-publications.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
    Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
    Longo, N. V., & Meyer, R. E. (2006). College student civic engagement: A case for balanced citizenship. Liberal Education, 92(2), 30-35.
    Ma, A. W. W., & Chan, C. K. K. (2013). Knowledge building, application and transfer through Service-Learning [Unpublished manuscript]. Lingnan University.
    Ma, H. K. C. & Chan, C. M. A. (2013). A Hong Kong University First : Establishing Service-Learning as an Academic Credit-bearing Subject. Staff Publications.
    Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750-764.
    Martin, R. L. (2009). The opposable mind: How successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Harvard Business Press.
    Maton, K. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1-2), 4-21.
    McCarthy, T. A. (1979). The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
    McKay, V. C. & Rozee, P. D. (2004). Characteristics of Faculty Who Adopt community Service Learning Pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(2), 21-33.
    McKnight, J., & Block, P. (2010). The abundant community: Awakening the power of families and neighborhoods. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    McMillan, D. W., & David, M. C. (1986). Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
    McNall, M., Sturdevant C. R., Brown, R., & Allen, A. (2009). Brokering Community-University Engagement. Innovative High Education , 33, 317-331.
    Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.
    Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
    Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12.
    Mills, C. W. (1959/2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
    Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Free Press.
    Nowotny, H., Scott. P., and Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: “Mode 2 Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge." Minerva, 41(3), 179-194.
    Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Harvard University Press.
    Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
    Ogbodo, C. M. (2013). Issues and Trends in Nigeria Higher Education: Lagos. VITAMED Educational Books.
    Onyx, J. (2008). University-community engagement: What does it mean?. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 1, 90-106.
    Orange, J. B. (2001). Supported communication for adults with aphasia. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 281–304). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    Palmer, P. J. (2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life (10th anniversary ed.). Jossey-Bass.
    Parks, S. D. (2011). Big questions, worthy dreams: Mentoring young adults in their search for meaning, purpose, and faith (Rev. ed.). Jossey-Bass.
    Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London, UK: Routledge
    Piliavin, J. A. (2003). Doing well by doing good: Benefits for the benefactor. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 227–247). American Psychological Association.
    Polanyi, M. (1966/2009). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.
    Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
    Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
    Rocheleau, J. (2004). Theoretical roots of Service-Learning: Progressive education and the developmental tradition. In B. Speck & S. Hoppe (Eds.), Service-Learning: History, theory, and issues (pp. 3–21). Greenwood Press.
    Roderick, R. (1986). Habermas and the foundations of critical theory. N.Y.: St. Martin's.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.
    Saltmarsh, J., & Hartley, M. (Eds.). (2011). "To serve a larger purpose": Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Temple University Press.
    Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic Books.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
    Schusler, T. M., Krasny, M. E., & Decker, D. J. (2009). Developing environmental action competence through service learning. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 433-454.
    Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
    Sigmon, R. L. (1979). Service-learning: Three principles. Synergist, 8(1), 9-11.
    Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2011). Interpersonal communication competence. Sage.
    Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.
    Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Contribution of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441-1478.
    Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
    Tucker, M.L., McCarthy, A.M.; Hoxmeier, J. A. & Lenk, M. M. (1998). Community service learning increases communication skills across the business curriculum. Higher Education. 68.
    Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). Oxford University Press.
    Van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. State University of New York Press.
    Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2003). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-64.
    Vickers, M., Harris, C., & McCarthy, F. (2004). University‐community engagement: exploring service‐learning options within the practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of teacher education, 32(2), 129-141.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(134), 43-57.
    Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The mann gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.
    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
    Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.
    Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. Macmillan.
    Whitney, M. D., & Clayton, P. H. (2011). Research on and through reflection. In R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, & S. G. Jones (Eds.), International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research (pp. 135-169). Stylus Publishing.
    Willison, J., & O'Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 393-409.
    Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91.
    Young, Robert E. (1990). A critical theory of education : Habermas and our children's future. N.Y.: Teachers' College Press.
    Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1998). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. American Psychological Association.
    Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE