近年來，智慧型手機已成為最大的遊戲平台。隨著智慧型手機的效能不斷地提升，不僅使手機遊戲的開發方向趨往橫向且操作複雜的遊戲，也令玩家更加重視手機遊戲的操控體驗，甚至出現了手機遊戲的專用搖桿。另外，手機遊戲市場競爭激烈，由市場現況與其收益來源可以知道提升玩家的使用意願之重要性。然而，過去的文獻多以其他遊戲平台或遊戲的設計要素作為研究目標，較少探討玩家在進行手機遊戲時的互動體驗與感受，以及驅動玩家進行遊戲的動機。但值得注意的是，藉由整理先前的研究成果可以推論，若能滿足使用者對於使用體驗的預期感受，則可以提升滿意度，進而提高使用意願。
因此，本研究邀請手機遊戲的重度玩家來參與實驗，並對玩家使用四種遊戲操控媒介來進行MOBA類手機遊戲前後的遊戲滿意度及各語彙感受的評分得點進行實驗、分析與探討。本研究目的包含: (1) 探索MOBA類手機遊戲體驗的語意空間，並應用於後續實驗；(2) 探討遊戲體驗中的各語彙感受是否會影響遊戲滿意度；(3) 探討遊戲體驗中各語彙感受之間是否會互相影響；(4) 探索玩家以各種手機遊戲操控媒介進行遊戲時影響滿意度較大的語彙，並配合訪談資料對手機遊戲搖桿提出未來的設計建議。透過觀察與分析遊戲滿意度及各語彙感受的評分得點在實際體驗前後的變化趨勢及關聯，能夠了解玩家在進行手機遊戲時的體驗感受與遊戲滿意度之間的關係。
研究結果顯示遊戲滿意度與遊戲體驗中的各語彙感受有關，透過滿足玩家對遊戲體驗中的預期感受，能夠提升遊戲滿意度；各語彙感受之間也會產生交互影響，進而推論出，若能提升遊戲操控體驗，則可以提高遊戲整體體驗及遊戲滿意度。最後，本研究配合訪談資料和分析結果對三種手機遊戲搖桿提出設計建議，例如:改善按鍵位置與功能之間的配對關係，可以提升手把式搖桿在「靈活」上的感受，並提升遊戲滿意度。此一研究流程可作為開發人機互動媒介時的參考應用。

Nowadays, smartphones have become the largest gaming platform. With the improvement of the performance of smartphones continuously, the manipulation of mobile games has gradually turned to more horizontal and complicated. It also prompted players to pay more attention to the gaming experience; even emerge various types of joystick for mobile phones. In addition, the mobile game market is highly competitive. Therefore, it is important that increase players' willingness to use. However, the previous literature mostly focused on other game platforms or game design elements as research targets and seldom discussed the interactive experience when playing mobile games, and the motivations that drive players to play games. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that by summarizing the previous research results, it can be inferred that if the user's expected experience of the user experience can be satisfied, then the satisfaction can be improved, and then escalate the willingness to use.
This research invites 38 high-involved players of mobile games to participate in the experiment. In the case of using four kinds of game control medium for MOBA mobile games, the scores of the feelings of each Kansei vocabulary and game satisfaction before and after the game are analyzed. The purpose of this research includes: (1) Explore the semantic space of MOBA mobile gaming experience and apply it to the experiments; (2) Explore whether the feelings of Kansei vocabulary will affect game satisfaction; (3) Explore whether the feelings of each Kansei vocabulary will affect each other; (4) Explore the Kansei vocabulary that has a stronger impact on the game satisfaction of players when using various mobile game control medium to play MOBA mobile games, and provide design suggestions for mobile game joysticks with the interview data. By observing and analyzing the correlation of the difference and the changing trend of the scores of each Kansei vocabulary and game satisfaction which before and after the actual experience, it is possible to understand the relationship between the feelings of Kansei vocabulary and game satisfaction.
Finally, the results of this research show that game satisfaction is affected by the feelings of each Kansei vocabulary in the gaming experience, and the three factors about Kansei vocabulary generated by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) also affect each other, and it is inferred that by improving the player's game control experience, the game can be improved overall gaming experience. In addition, through this study, we are able to explore the process of using the Kansei engineering method to understand the users' control feelings and apply to the development of future human-computer interactive products and contribute to the field of human-computer interaction.

王明堂. (2018). 感性工學到感性設計：感性工學研究的基礎與應用: 全華圖書.
林建煌. (2008). 行銷管理, 四版, 台北: 華泰文化事業股份有限公司.
產業情報研究所. (2018). 【遊戲玩家調查系列一】七成五玩家瘋手遊 學生族最熱中. Retrieved from https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=494
黃國樑, & 陳國祥. (2013). 智慧手持式裝置在互動介面中不同感官設計要素與感性意象的初探/A Preliminary Study on Kansei Images and Design Elements Associated with Varied Sensory Channels for the Interactive Interface of SHD. 感性學報 Journal of Kansei, 1(2), 4-27.

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 20(4), 644-656.
Brustein, J. (2013). The profitable future of free mobile apps. Saatavissa: http://www. businessweek.com/articles/2013-09-19/the-profitablefuture-of-free-mobile-apps. Hakupäivä, 3, 2014.
Engl, S., & Nacke, L. E. (2013). Contextual influences on mobile player experience–A game user experience model. Entertainment Computing, 4(1), 83-91.
Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & management, 44(3), 276-286.
Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015). Why do people use gamification services? International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 419-431. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.006
Hsiao, K.-L., & Chen, C.-C. (2016). What drives in-app purchase intention for mobile games? An examination of perceived values and loyalty. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 18-29.
Hsiao, Y.-H., Chen, M.-C., & Liao, W.-C. (2016). Logistics Service Design for Cross-Border E-Commerce Using Kansei Engineering with Text-Mining-Based Online Content Analysis. Telematics and Informatics. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.002
Hu, T., Poston, R. S., & Kettinger, W. J. (2011). Nonadopters of online social network services: Is it easy to have fun yet? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 25.
Khalaf, S. (2016). Media, productivity & emojis give mobile another stunning growth year. Flurry by Yahoo.
Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: analysis. Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9.
Matsubara, Y., & Nagamachi, M. (1997). Hybrid Kansei engineering system and design support. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 81-92.
Merikivi, J., Tuunainen, V., & Nguyen, D. (2017). What makes continued mobile gaming enjoyable? Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 411-421. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.070
Molinillo, S., Munoz-Leiva, F., & Perez-Garcia, F. (2018). The effects of human-game interaction, network externalities, and motivations on players' use of mobile casual games. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(9), 1766-1786.doi:10.1108/imds-11-2017-0544
Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjornsen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 330-346. doi:10.1177/0092070305276149
Park, H. J., & Kim, S.-H. (2013). A Bayesian network approach to examining key success factors of mobile games. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1353-1359.
Purcell, K., Entner, R., & Henderson, N. (2010). The rise of apps culture. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 14.
Schütte *, S. T. W., Eklund, J., Axelsson, J. R. C., & Nagamachi, M. (2004). Concepts, methods and tools in Kansei engineering. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(3), 214-231. doi:10.1080/1463922021000049980
Svanæs, D. (2013). Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty's phenomenology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(1), 8.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
Uludagli, M. C., & Acarturk, C. (2018). User interaction in hands-free gaming: a comparative study of gaze-voice and touchscreen interface control. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 26(4), 1967-1976. doi:10.3906/elk-1710-128
Wang, Q., & Sun, X. (2016). Investigating gameplay intention of the elderly using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 59-68.
Wang, Z., Zhou, M., Shi, Z., & Lian, J. (2020). Research on Design of Shared Bicycle Service System Based on Kansei Engineering. In (pp. 704-713).
Wei, P.-S., & Lu, H.-P. (2014). Why do people play mobile social games? An examination of network externalities and of uses and gratifications. Internet Research, 24(3), 313-331.