簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李昀蒨
Li, Yun-Chien
論文名稱: 高階經理人異動與公司績效之關聯性
The Relationship between CEO Turnover and Firm Performance
指導教授: 吳思蓉
Wu, Szu-Jung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 49
中文關鍵詞: 經理人異動公司治理會計績效代理問題
外文關鍵詞: Manager changes, corporate governance, accounting performance, agency problem
相關次數: 點閱:101下載:21
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探討高階經理人異動與公司內部會計績效之關聯性。由於造成經理人異動之原因甚多,不同異動原因所傳達之資訊內涵也大不相同,因此本文除了探討企業高階經理人異動與公司績效之關聯外,也進一步將高階經理人異動分為自願、非自願及其他三大類,並比較不同類型的異動與公司會計績效之關聯。
    本研究以2011年至2018年台灣上市櫃公司為樣本進行探討,實證結果顯示,公司若發生高階經理人異動,對於當期及後續兩期會計績效呈現負向影響,支持惡性循環理論。區分自願、非自願及其他異動樣本後,發現三種類型的異動對於當期及後續績效皆呈現一致的負向結果;其中,非自願性異動與自願性異動相比,與ROA之負向關係更為強烈。此外,本文亦發現若經理人異動前公司發生虧損,則市場對於三種異動宣告反應均較佳;成長性較高之公司在經歷強迫性異動後,會減輕強迫性異動對ROE所帶來的負向效果。

    This study investigate the relationship between the turnover of senior managers and the company’s accounting performance. Because different reasons for managers' changes might have different information content, this study not only investigates whether the managers’ changes is associated with companies’ performance, but also compares the associations between different types of movements and the company's accounting performance by dividing senior managers' changes into three categories: voluntary changes, involuntary changes and other.
    This study uses the sample composed of Taiwan listed companies from 2011 to 2018 to investigate the relationship between senior managers’ turnover and firm performance. The empirical results show that a senior manager change is negatively associated with the company’s current and the following two periods’ accounting performance, supporting the vicious circle theory. After dividing senior managers’ change into voluntary, involuntary and other types, the results show that the three different types of managerial change have consistent negative results on current and subsequent performance. Additionally, the results also show that the involuntary changes have a more intense negative relationship with ROA, compared with voluntary changes. This paper also finds that if the company loses money before the manager's change, the market responds better to the three kinds of change announcements; companies with higher growth will reduce the negative effect on ROE after experiencing forced changes.

    中文摘要i 英文摘要ii 致謝v 第一章 緒論1 第二章 文獻回顧與假說發展4 第一節 經理人異動與企業績效之關聯4 第二節 自願性與非自願性經理人異動與後續企業績效之關聯7 第三章 研究方法8 第一節 資料來源、樣本期間與樣本選取8 第二節 經理人異動分類定義11 第三節 實證研究模型13 第四節 變數定義與衡量14 第四章 實證結果分析與討論19 第一節 敘述性統計量20 第二節 相關係數22 第三節 實證結果24 第五節 額外測試30 第五章 結論41 參考文獻46

    尤虹惠與王雍智,2009, 企業高階主管人事異動與公司績效關聯性之研究─ 以台灣上市公司為例,財金論文叢刊,第10卷,頁24-53。
    王曉雯與吳明政,2011,替換類型與市場競爭對總經理異動宣告股東財富之影響,人文及社會科學集刊,第23卷,第2期,頁1-35。
    施倫閔與張椿柏,2016,公司治理是否降低權益成本?,績效與策略研究,第13卷,第1期,頁85-112.
    翁浩綿,2011,高階經理人異動之決定因素及其對績效之影響,淡江大學產業經濟學系未出版碩士論文。
    陳美華與洪世炳,2005,公司治理、股權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究,企業管理學報,第65卷,頁129-153。
    黃旭輝,2006,經理人異動與股東財富效果,管理評論,第25卷,第1期,頁 23-45。
    黃劭彥、鍾宇軒、吳東憲與廖上萱,2009,自願性財務預測、公司治理與權益資金成本,台灣金融財務季刊,第10卷,第2期,頁 41-66。
    楊朝旭與蔡柳卿,2003,總經理更換與相對績效評估,人力資源管理學報,第 3卷,第1期,頁63-80。
    葉上葆、曹常鴻與蔡如蕙,2007,高階管理者更迭與繼任型態及人力資本對公司經營績效與盈餘管理間關係之研究,經營管理論叢,頁307-326。
    廖秀梅、李娟菁,江佳欣與陳英傑,2020,總經理異動、財務主管異動與盈餘管理-兼論審計委員會的影響,會計審計論叢,第10卷,第2期,頁101-126。
    Bonazzi, L., & Islam, S. M. (2007). Agency theory and corporate governance: A study of the effectiveness of board in their monitoring of the CEO. Journal of modelling in management.
    Bonnier, K. A., & Bruner, R. F. (1989). An analysis of stock price reaction to management change in distressed firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(1), 95-106.
    Clayton, M. C., Hartzell, J. C., & Rosenberg, J. (2005). The impact of CEO turnover on equity volatility. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1779-1808.
    Clifford, C. P., & Lindsey, L. (2016). Blockholder heterogeneity, CEO compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(5), 1491-1520.
    Denis, D. J., & Denis, D. K. (1995). Performance changes following top management dismissals. The Journal of finance, 50(4), 1029-1057.
    Edmans, A. (2009). Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. The Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2481-2513.
    Engel, E., Hayes, R. M., & Wang, X. (2003). CEO turnover and properties of accounting information. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 197-226.
    Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy, 88(2), 288-307.
    Farrell, K. A., & Whidbee, D. A. (2002). Monitoring by the financial press and forced CEO turnover. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(12), 2249-2276.
    Farrell, K. A., & Whidbee, D. A. (2003). Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions. Journal of accounting and economics, 36(1-3), 165-196.
    Fu, R., & Wedge, L. (2011). Board independence and mutual fund manager turnover. Financial Review, 46(4), 621-641.
    Furtado, E. P., & Karan, V. (1990). Causes, consequences, and shareholder wealth effects of management turnover: A review of the empirical evidence. Financial management, 60-75.
    Furtado, E. P., & Rozeff, M. S. (1987). The wealth effects of company initiated management changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 147-160.
    Gangloff, K. A., Connelly, B. L., & Shook, C. L. (2016). Of scapegoats and signals: Investor reactions to CEO succession in the aftermath of wrongdoing. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1614-1634.
    Gilson, S. C. (1989). Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of financial Economics, 25(2), 241-262.
    Huson, M. R., Malatesta, P. H., & Parrino, R. (2004). Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), 237-275.
    Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
    Jenson, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Jenter, D., & Kanaan, F. (2015). CEO turnover and relative performance evaluation. the Journal of Finance, 70(5), 2155-2184.
    John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of banking & Finance, 22(4), 371-403.
    Kaplan, S. N. (1993). Top executives, turnover and firm performance in Germany.
    Kesner, I. F., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Top management turnover and CEO succession: An investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. Journal of Management Studies, 31(5), 701-713.
    Lee, M. S., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2018). CEO connectedness and the cost of capital.
    Mahajan, A., & Lummer, S. (1993). Shareholder wealth effects of management changes. Journal of business finance & accounting, 20(3), 393-410.
    Murphy, K. J., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1993). Financial performance surrounding CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), 273-315.
    Parrino, R., Sias, R. W., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Voting with their feet: Institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. Journal of financial economics, 68(1), 3-46.
    Pukthuanthong, K., Ullah, S., Walker, T. J., & Zhang, J. (2018). Conflict-induced forced CEO turnover and firm performance. Managerial Finance.
    Suchard, J. A., Singh, M., & Barr, R. (2001). The market effects of CEO turnover in Australian firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1), 1-27.
    Suk, I., Lee, S., & Kross, W. (2021). CEO turnover and accounting earnings: The role of earnings persistence. Management science, 67(5), 3195-3218.
    Ting, H. I. (2013). CEO turnover and shareholder wealth: Evidence from CEO power in Taiwan. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2466-2472.
    Tokuga, Y., & Yamashita, T. (2011). Big bath and management change. 京都大學大學院經濟學研究科 Working Paper, (123).
    Warner, J. B., Watts, R. L., & Wruck, K. H. (1988). Stock prices and top management changes. Journal of financial Economics, 20, 461-492.
    Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of financial Economics, 20, 431-460.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE