| 研究生: |
郭崇毓 Kuo, Chung-Yu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以震動台試驗探討加勁邊坡動態行為-基礎強度效應 Shaking table tests on geosynthetic-reinforced slope- Effects of foundation strength |
| 指導教授: |
黃景川
Huang,, Ching-Chuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 159 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 加勁邊坡模型 、地震力加載 、震動台試驗 、永久變位 、HPGA 、Rms method 、Arias intensity |
| 外文關鍵詞: | geosynthetic-reinforced slope, seismic load, permanent displacement, dynamic response, Rms method, Arias intensity |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:131 下載:7 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究利用層狀剪力砂箱與移動式霣落器在震動台施作底土300mm高,其上為一垂直回包式加勁牆,長、寬、高為900mm×500mm×500mm,使用土壤材料為南投縣眉溪中上游河砂試體單位重γ_d=15 kN⁄m^3 ,藉由改變輸入地震波頻率條件、牆前邊坡角度及加勁材料長度以探討加勁牆體在地震力作用之下之牆體變位狀況、牆體加速度反應情況、加勁材料受力分布情況及地震波之能量,並將試驗結果與過往學者結果相並討論。
由震動台模型試驗結果可知:一、加勁牆體在地震中之變位深受震波頻率的影響,其牆面變位隨著頻率的降低而增加,從地震波之速度與能量差異可以看到影響。二、本研究之正規化牆體變位之曲線落在其他學者之曲線的右側,是因為本研究考慮了牆體臨界狀態之前的永久變位情況。三、加速度反應由增幅往減幅發展的過程與過往研究趨勢相近,並透過三種方法去討論放大因子運用。四、加勁牆體再受到地表作用下,最大變位在牆體中層,當牆前坡腳角度逐漸增大,最大變位位置逐漸從牆體中層往上層移動。五、運用Arias intensity 和 Rms method來表示地震波之能量比HPGA更能清楚表示強弱,當牆前坡腳角度越大,牆體破壞所需能量越小。
In present study,geosynthetic-reinforced walls were used to having a shaking table test.A laminar box was used to reduce boundary effect.About the test medium used in this study is a medium-dense river sand.Through various peak acceleration, frequency, length of reinforcement and angle difference in front of the wall were used in the model test to investigate their on the dynamic behavior of the geosynthetic-reinforced walls.Results of a comparative study between the test results reported in the literature and those in the present study reveal: 1. The seismic displacement are significantly affected by the frequency of base motion, i.e., seismic displacement increase with decreasing frequency of base motions, for identical values of horizontal peak ground acceleration(HPGA). 2. The normalized displacement curves obtained here fall to the right of analytical and empirical curves reported in the literature, suggesting that a permanent displacement of the slope prior to the yielding of the slope occurs. This phenomenon has not been considered in previous studies. 3. Transitions from an amplification state to a de-amplification state occur at certain levels of input ground accelerations, depending on the input wave motion. 4. Through multiple methods to represent the amplification factor, such as Max. of peak acceleration, Rms method and Arias intensity.These methods shows the similar trend about amplification and de-amplification,but each of them have the different transition point. 5. Through change the slope angel in front of the wall, the maximum lateral displacement position change from middle of the wall to top of the wall.
1. Bathrust, R. J.(1998)”Segmental retaining wall-seismic design manual” National Concrete Masonry Assocation,Herndon,VA,USA.
2. Bathrust,R. J. and Cai, Z.(1995)”Pseudo-static seismic analysisof geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining walls” Geosynthetics Internatinoal,Vol.2,NO. 5, pp789-832
3. Cai,Z. and Bathurst,R. J.(1996)”Deterministic sliding block methods for estimation seismic displacements of earth structures”Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.15,NO. 4,pp 255-268.
4. Chopra,A. K. (2001)”Dynamic of Structures” Prentice Hall, 2th ed, Chapter 2,pp.39-64
5. Huang,C.-C.,Chou,L.-H, and Tatsuoka,F. (2003)”Seismic displacements of geosyntheic-reinforced soil modular block walls”Geosynthetic Internatinal, Vol. 10,No. 1,pp2-23.
6. Huang,C.-C,Hand Wu,S.-H. (2006)”Simplified approach for assessing seismic displacements of soil-retainging walls.Part I:geosynthetic-reinforced walls with modular block walls” Geosyntheics Internatinal,Vol. 13,No. 6,pp 219-233.
7. Huang,C.-C.,and Horng,J.-C.,Chang,Chueh,S.-Y.,W.-J.,Chiou,J.-S.,and Chen,C.-H(2010)”Dynamic behavior of reinforced slopes: horizontal acceleration response” Geosynthetics Internatinal,Vol. 17,No. 4,pp 207-219.
8. Huang,C.-C.,and Horng,J.-C.,Chang,W.-J.,Chiou,J.-s.,and Chen,C.-H.,(2011)
“Dynamic behavior of reinforced walls – horizontal displacement response” Geotextiles and Geomembranes,Vol. 29,pp 257-267.
9. Huang,C,-C.(2015)”Settlement of footings at the crest reinforeced slopes subjected to toe unloading” Geosynthetics Internatinal.
10. Huang,C.-C.,Huang,B.-S.,Chen,Y.-W.(2016)”Stability analyses for geosynthetic-reinforced steep-faced slopes subjected to toe scouring” Journal of GeoEngineeing, Vol.11,No. 3,pp. 123-132.
11. Huang,C.-C.(2016)”Model tests on the bearing capacity of reinforced saturated sand ground” Geosynthetics Internatonal.
12. Idriss,I. M.(1990)”Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes” Prcceedings H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium,Vol. 2,No. 4,pp 273-289.
13. Krishna,A. M. and Latha, G. M.(2007)”Seismic response of reinforced soil-retaining wall modles using shaking-table tests” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 14,No. 6,pp. 355-364.
14. Matsuo,O., Tsutsumi, T., Yokoyama,K., and Saito, Y.(1998)”Shaking table tests and analyses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls” Geosynthetics Internatinal,Vol .5, No. 1-2,pp 97-126.
15. Newmark, N. M.(1965)”Effect of earthquake on drams and embankments” Geotechnique, Vol. 15,No 2,pp.139-159.
16. Richardson,G. N.(1978)”Earthquake resistant reinforced earth walls” Proceeding of the Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, ASCE, Pittsburgh, PA.,pp.664-683.
17. Sabremahani,M.,Ghalandarzadeh,A.,and Fakher,A.(2009)”Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 27, pp. 121-136.
18. Segrestin, P. and Bastick, M. J.(1988) ”Seismic design of reinforced earth retaining walls the contribution of finite element analysis” Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on Theroy and Practice of Earth Reinforcement,pp. 577-582.
19. Whitman, R. V. and Liao, S.(1985) “Ssismic design of gravity retaining walls” Miscellaneous Paper GL-85-1,Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.
20. Liyan Wang,Guoxing Chen,Su Chen(2015) ”Experimental study om seismic response of geogrid reinforced rigid retaining walls with saturated backfill sand” Geotextiles and Geomembranes,pp. 35-45.
21. Hoe l.Ling, Yoshiyuki Mohri, Dov Leshchinsky, Christopher Burke, Kenichi Matsushima, Huabei Liu(2005) “Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests on Modular-Block Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls” Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 4
22. A. Komak Panah, M Yazdi, A, Ghalandarzadeh(2015) “Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips” Geotextiles and Geomembranes,pp. 148-161
23. Nova-Roessig and Sitat(2006)”Centrifuge Model Syudies of the Seismic Response of Reinforced Soil Slopes” Journal of geotechnical ang Geoenvironmental Engineering,132(3), pp. 388-400
24. 藍子軒(2014)”Acceleration-Amplified Response of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures with a Wide Range of Input Ground Acceleration” National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
25. 徐浩怡 (2016),「土壤之反覆直接剪力行為與模式化」,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文。
26. 王斈文 (2017),「探討加勁擋土牆地震中變位之震動台試驗」,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文。
27. 廖冠傑 (2018),「地工合成物加勁陡坡之耐震行為研究」,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文。