| 研究生: |
徐逸珊 Hsu, Yi-Shan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以全球創新指數與企業社會責任評估公司權益資金成本 The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Innovation Index upon the Cost of Equity Capital |
| 指導教授: |
王明隆
Wang, Ming-Long |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 104 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 54 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業社會責任 、權益資金成本 、全球創新指數 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | CSR, cost of equity capital, GII |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:92 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇研究主要探討在以全球創新指數的評估下,企業社會責任對於權益資金成 本是否產生影響。本研究從 2007 年至 2013 年,並考量全球 130 幾個國家的創新能 力。我們利用由歐洲工商管理學院、康乃爾大學、世界智慧財產權組織所出版的全 球創新指數來評估國家創新能力,並用 Thomson Reuters ASSET4 的企業社會責任分 數代表各公司的企業社會責任能力。更進一步,我們將國家分為已開發國家和開發 中國家,探討企業社會責任和全球創新指數在已開發國家中對權益資金成本是否產 生影響。
研究結果顯示在已開發國家中,企業社會責任表現越好的公司,其權益資金成 本越低。我們認為這是因為在已開發國家的企業社會責任競爭策略發展成熟、完善 的規範制度且資訊揭露較透明。另外,根據結果來看,在國家創新能力越佳的公司, 其權益資金成本越低。就不同的經濟開發程度來說,本研究發現在已開發中國家的 創新能力更顯著於開發中國家。由於對基礎建設的投入、教育的培養、知識的創新 與完善的市場制度等,使國家創新能力好的公司亦享有較低之權益資金成本。本文 實證發現在已開發國家的企業社會責任和國家創新能力皆是影響公司權益資金成 本的重要因素,這些結論大致上合乎我們的預期。
This paper examines the influence of corporate social responsibility and global innovation index on the cost of equity capital. We used the Global Innovation Index which was published by INSEAD, Cornell University and WIPO to evaluate country innovation capacity from 2007 to 2013, covering 130 countries. We collected the corporate social responsibility score from Thomson Reuters ASSET4 and made it the capacity for corporate social responsibility on the part of the companies under consideration. Further, we grouped countries into two types, developed countries and developing countries. We tested whether the impact of CSR and GII in developed countries exists in regard to the cost of equity capital.
The firms with better CSR have lower cost of equity capital in developed countries because as corporate social responsibility become more mature, complete regulations, information disclosure and more transparency occurred in developed countries. Additionally, according to the results, we find the firms in countries with better innovation have decreased cost of equity capital. As to the different stages of economic development, the innovation capacity of developed countries is significantly higher than that of developing countries. A healthy infrastructure, cultivation of education, knowledge innovation and a sound market help firms in more innovative countries obtain lower cost of equity capital. This paper indicated that CSR and the global innovation index in developed countries are the important factors influencing cost of equity capital. General speaking, these conclusions corresponded to our expectations.
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., 2007, The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits, Journal of Accounting and Economics 44, 166-192.
Arli, Denni; Lasmono, Hari K., 2010, Consumers' perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 34(1), pp. 46-51
Beckmann, S., Morsing, M. and Reisch, L., 2006, “Strategic CSR communication: an Emerging field”, Strategic CSR Communication, DJOF, Copenhagen, pp. 11-32. Boatright, J. R., 1997, Ethics and the Conduct of Business (2nd ed.) Prentice Hall, New
Jersey.
Bocquet, R., Bas, C. L., Mothe, C., Poussing, N., 2014, CSR, innovation, and firm
performance in a sluggish growth context: A firm-level empirical analysis,
ESDES-Recherche.
Bowen, H. R., 1953, Social responsibilities of the businessman, Harper & Brothers. Bowen, R. M., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., 2008, Analyst Coverage and the Cost of Raising
Equity Capital: Evidence from Underpricing of Seasoned Equity Offerings,
Contemporary Accounting Research 25, 657-700.
Bowman, E. H., Haire, M., 1975, A strategic posture toward corporate social
responsibility, California Management Review 18 , 49-58.
Busch, 2011, Triptych Inquiry: Rethinking Sustainability, Innovation, and Financial
Performance, CrossSector Leadership for the Green Economy - Integrating Research and Practice on Sustainable Enterprise, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Business for Social Responsibility, 1992, Business for Social Responsibility, http://www.bsr.org.
39
Carbonell, P., Rodriguez, A. I., 2006, The impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance, International Journal of Research in Marketing 23, 1-12.
Carroll, A. B., 1991, The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons 34, 39-48.
Casanova, L., Dayton-Johnson, J., Fonstad, N. O., Pietikäinen, A., 2011, Innovation in Latin America: Recent Insights, 65-75.
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Brussels, 2nd July 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development.
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., Parker, L. D., 1987, The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12, 111-122.
Dahlsrud, A., 2006, How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an analysis of 37 definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15, 1-13.
Durán-Vázquez, R., Lorenzo-Valdés, A., Moreno-Quezada, G. E., 2012, Innovation and CSR impact on financial performance of selected companies in Mexico, Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation 8, 5-20.
Elkington, J., 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business, Capstone: Oxford.
Fama, E. F., French, K. R., 1992, The cross‐section of expected stock returns, The journal
of finance 47, 427-465.
Frank, M., Goyal, V., 2003, Testing the pecking order theory of capital
structure, Journal of Financial Economics 67, 217-48.
Freeman, R., 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective, Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
González-Ramos, M. I., Donate, M. J., Guadamillas, F., 2014, TECHNOLOGICAL
POSTURE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: EFFECTS ON
INNOVATION PERFORMANCE, Environmental Engineering and Management
Ghoul, S. El., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., Mishra, D. R., 2012, Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital? Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 2388-2406.
40
Journal 13, 2497-2505.
IMF, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/02/weodata/groups.htm#ae
Khoury, G., Rostami, J., Turnbull J. P., 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility: Turning Words into Action, Conference Board of Canada: Ottawa.
Kilcullen, M., Kooistra, J. O., 1999, At least do no harm: sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility, Reference Services Review 27, 158–178.
Lea R. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility, Institute of Directors (IoD) member opinion survey. IoD: London. http://www.epolitix.com/data/companies/images/Companies/Institute-of-Directors /CSR_Report.pdf
Luce, R. A., Barber, A. E., Hillman, A. J., 2001, Good Deeds and Misdeeds: A Mediated Model of the Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Organizational Attractiveness , Business and Society 40, 397-415.
Mcwilliams, A., Siegel, D., 2000, Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or mis-specification? Strategic Management Journal 21, 603-609.
Moskowitz, M., 1972, Choosing socially responsible stocks, Business and Society Review 1, 71-75.
OECD, http://www.oecd.org/site/innovationstrategy/defininginnovation.htm Ogneva, M., Subramanyam, K. R., and Raghunandan, K., 2007, Internal control
weakness and cost of equity evidence from SOX section 404 disclosures, The
Accounting Review 82, 1255-1297.
Pinney, C., 2001, Imagine Speaks Out, How to Manage Corporate Social Responsibility
and Reputation in a Global Marketplace: the Challenge for Canadian Business, Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R., 2006, Strategy and society: The link between competitive
Griffin, J. J., Mahon, J. F., 1997, The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research, Business and Society 36, 5-31.
Ingram, R., Frazier, K., 1983, Environmental Performance and Corporate Disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research 18, 614-622.
Moses, L. P., 1996, The talmudic concept of "beyond the letter of the law": Relevance to business social responsibilities, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 941-950.
41
advantage and corporate social responsibility, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW
84, 78-92.
Preston, L. E., O’Bannon, D. P., 1997, The corporate social-financial performance
relationship, Business and Society 36, 419-429.
Primi, A., 2013, The Evolving Geography of Innovation: A Territorial Perspective,
69-78.
Ramaswamy, K., 2001, Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm
performance: an empirical studyof the Indian manufacturing sectors, Strategic
Management Journal 22, 989-998.
Smith, A. D., 2007, Making the case for the competitive advantage of corporate social
responsibility, Business Strategy Series 8, 186-195.
Ullmann, A. A., 1985, Data in search of a theory, a critical examination of the
relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic
performance of US firms, The Academy of Management Review 10, 540-557. Vance, S. C., 1975, Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks?
Management Review 64, 19-24.
Walton, C. C., 1967, Corporate social responsibilities, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Witters, L., Marom, R., Steinert, K., Alcatel-Lucent., 2012, The Role of Public-Private
Partnerships in Driving Innovation.
Verschoor, C. C., 1998, A study of the link between a corporation’s financial performance and its commitment to ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1509-1516.
Waddock, S. A., Graves S. M., 1997, The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link, Strategic Management Journal 18, 303-319.
Wright, P., Ferris, S., 1997, Agency conflict and corporate strategy: the effect of divestment on corporate value, Strategic Management Journal 18, 77-83.
校內:2021-01-14公開