瀝青混凝土配合設計中，在計算篩分析與級配曲線時，都有所規範的上限與下限，唯有在填充料的部分僅規範通過 # 200篩達70%以上，然而對於更高的通過比例甚至是100%通過之填充料粒徑並沒有詳加的說明 ; 而由於填充料可改變瀝青膠泥流動性，形成溫感性低、黏度大的瀝青膠漿，故此因素可能會對瀝青膠漿或是瀝青混凝土產生不同程度的影響。
本研究探討不同粒徑之石粉填充料對瀝青混凝土工程性質的影響，並針對瀝青與不同粒徑填充料混合後的膠漿做流變黏彈性質分析比較。
綜合工程試驗結果來看，馬歇爾穩定值流度值、間接張力與回彈模數試驗上，並沒有顯著的差異表現。然而在滯留強度上，可以發現隨著填充料粒徑的增加，滯留強度表現越佳。另外在Cantabro磨耗試驗中，可以得知隨著粒徑的增加，磨耗值也會有越大的表現。
而在流變試驗當中，可以發現抗車轍能力與粒徑大小呈現正相關而與抗疲勞能力呈現負相關。

In marshall mix design, the calculation of gradation curve have a standard upper and lower limits, only in the filler specification have the rule that through the # 200 sieve more than 70%, but for a higher proportion even 100% of the filler particle size is not described in detail; and because the filler material can change the flow of asphalt, the formation of lower temperature sensitivity and lower viscosity, so the factors may influence at varying degrees.
In this study, we will discuss the effects of different fillers particle size on the engineering properties, and the effects on viscoelastic properties of asphalt mixed with different particle size fillers.
According to the results of the comprehensive engineering properties, there is no significant difference in the Marshall stability, the indirect tension and the resilient modulus. However, in the retained strength, it can be found that as the filler particle size increases, the retained strength will have better performance. Also in the Cantabro test, it can be learned that as the particle size increases, the wear value will increase.
In the rheological test, we can find that the anti-rutting ability and the size of the particle size is positively correlated, however the anti-fatigue ability to show a negative correlation.

1.王士菁，「千里達湖瀝青添加於傳統黏結料之質流行為」，國立成功大學研究所碩士論文，台南，2013。
2.王耀寬，轉爐石對多孔隙瀝青混凝土之影響，國立成功大學研究所碩士論文，台南，2008。
3.交通部公路總局，「施工說明書技術規定」，交通部公路總局編印，2012。
4.吳武雄，「半固態瀝青膠泥之黏度試驗特性」，中華技術一月號第56期，2005。
5.何見安，不同級配對石膠泥瀝青混凝土特性影響之研究，國立中興大學研究所碩士論文，台中，2010。
6.周義華，「運輸工程」，華泰文化，台北，2007。
7.林樹豪，「老化作用對瀝青質流性質之影響」，國立成功大學研究所碩士論文，台南，1993。
8.陳松堂，「自充填混凝土之適用性與介紹」，台灣公路工程第三十卷第五期，2003。
9.許聖國，「瀝青及改質瀝青老化速率模式之探討」，國立成功大學研究所碩士論文，台南，1999。
10.覃维祖，「瀝青混 凝土的强 度理論及受 力變形特徵」，結構工程材料，p109。
11.複雜流體分子流變實驗室，中正大學化工所，複雜流體分子流變實驗室，嘉義，2014。
12.蔡攀鰲，「瀝青混凝土」，三民書局，台北，1984。
13.Anderson, D.A, and Goetz, W.H. (1973). “Mechanical Behavior and Reinforcement of Mineral Filler-Asphalt Mixtures” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol.42,pp.37-66.
14.Branthaver,J.F., Petersen, J.C., Robertson, R.E.,Duvall, I.J., Kim, S.S.,Harmaberger,P.M.,Mill T, Ensley, E.K.,Barbour, F.A.,Schabron, J.F., “Binder Characterization and Evaluation,” Report NO.SHRP-A-368 , 1993.
15.Brown, E.Ray Prithvi S. Kandhal, Freddy L.Roberts, Y.Richard Kim, Dah-Yinn Lee, Thomas W.Kennedy, “Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, and Construction” , NAPA Research and Education Fundation, Laham,Maryland, 2009.
16.Ingvild Ødegård. ” Effects of Mastic Ingredients and
Composition on Asphalt Mixture Properties”, Norwegian
University of Science and Technology Department of Civil and Transport Engineering,2015.
17.Ratnasamy Muniandy and Eltaher Aburkaba, “Effect of
Mineral Filler Type and Particle Size on the Engineering Properties of Stone Mastic Asphalt Pavements”, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univerity Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan,Malaysia,2010.
18.Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. and Kennedy, T. W. (1996): Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction. Second Edition. NAPA Education Foundation, ISBN 0914313010.